Skip to content
2000
Volume 19, Issue 12
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background: Traditional radiography angles do not adequately reveal the shape and position of the right ventricular pacing electrode. Objective: This study aimed to explore better radiography angles with the help of cardiac computed tomography (CT). Methods: We analyzed the cardiac CT images of consecutive outpatients from 2018 to 2019. The right anterior oblique (RAO) 30° and the left anterior oblique (LAO) 40° were found to sufficiently display the shape and position of the right ventricular pacing electrode. Results: A total of 214 consecutive outpatients were enrolled, whose average age was 55.0 ± 13.0 years, and 151 were male (70.6%). Through analyzing the cardiac CT images, the α angle (33.7° ± 6.1) and the γ angle (38.8° ± 8.0) were determined. Furthermore, we verified these angles in 48 patients after pacemaker implantation. The results showed that the ratio of the length of right ventricular electrode using the RAO α angle (≈30°) to the posterior-anterior position (PA position) was 1.099 ± 0.157 vs. 1.053 ± 0.182 (the ratio using the traditional RAO 45°) (P < 0.001). We observed that the relationship between the right ventricular active electrode and the ventricular septum was better identified using the LAO γ angle (≈40°) than the traditional 60° angle. Conclusion: With the help of cardiac CT, we found that RAO 30° could better show the shape and length of the right ventricular pacing electrode, and LAO 40° could better show the positional relationship between the pacing electrode and the ventricular septum.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405619666230216092351
2023-10-01
2025-07-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405619666230216092351
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test