Skip to content
2000
Volume 15, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1573-4056
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6603

Abstract

Background: Patients diagnosed with cancer do not have sufficient clinical data for the management of incidental parotid lesions. We aimed to reveal the importance of randomized parotid lesions encountered during oncologic F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET/CT) imaging in our clinical practice and the diagnostic algorithm of such lesions. Methods: We performed a database search of PET/CT records generated from 2009 to 2015 for “parotid” in reports of patients who underwent PET/CT examination for a known malignancy elsewhere, or cancer screening. Results: Incidental parotid FDG uptake on PET/CT had a prevalence of 1.1%. The incidence of parotid metastasis in our series was 36.4%, and 75% of them had malign melanoma metastasis. Of the 11 cases, 5 were of Warthin tumours, and Warthin tumours showed stronger GLUT1 expression than metastatic parotid lesions. Conclusion: In patients with malignancy elsewhere, focal involvement of FDG by the parotid gland, especially if malignant melanoma or SCC is absent, should not be considered a metastatic disease without histopathologic confirmation. If parotid disease would change the patient’s treatment plan and disease stage, the parotid lesion should be evaluated by additional methods, such as fine needle aspiration biopsy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405614666171213160244
2019-03-01
2025-06-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cmir/10.2174/1573405614666171213160244
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): cancer screening; FDG PET/CT; Incidentaloma; metastatic; parotis; warthin
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test