Skip to content
2000
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2666-1845
  • E-ISSN: 2666-1853

Abstract

Bistable composite laminates are emerging as smart structures in automotive and aerospace applications. However, the behavior of the wave propagation within such laminates has not been investigated, which hinders their implementation in Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) and Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE).

As a result, this manuscript examines the propagation behavior of guided waves in bistable composite structures. By understanding the effect of pre-stressing in bistable composite laminates on the characteristics of propagating waves, such as velocity and amplitude, a more knowledgeable decision about their applications in flaw detection and assessment can be made.

The fundamental symmetric (S) and anti-symmetric (A) Lamb wave modes were investigated during propagation in two bistable composite laminates, [0/90] and [0/90], and were assessed experimentally and numerically using ABAQUS. For the tested frequencies, which ranged from 60 kHz to 250 kHz, the behavior of the propagating wave was evaluated for both stable configurations and across two different actuators that were lined up with the fiber directions. Signal processing techniques were thus extensively used to enhance the measured signals and identify both the group velocities and the amplitudes’ trend of the S and A wave modes.

Our results showed that there is a minimal variation (typically below 1%) in the amplitude and velocity of the A and S modes when the composite plates switch between the first stable configuration and the second stable configuration in both composite plates. These results were numerically validated by replicating the bi-stability of the composites. The numerical data were in relatively close agreement (10% average error) with the experimental values and trends. Furthermore, the bistable effect was examined in detail relative to a reference numerical flat (monostable) plate. Although the bistable effect induced a notable amount of internal residual stress, this did not significantly impact the propagating wave modes, with a maximum difference of about 2% when comparing wave velocities.

The effect on the wave propagation behavior along different directions of both stable configurations was shown to be minimal. These results, which were validated numerically, clear the ambiguity on the usage of these laminates in experimental health monitoring.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cmam/10.2174/2666184501666210906115257
2022-10-01
2025-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. HyerM.W. Some observations on the cured shape of thin unsymmetric laminates.J. Compos. Mater.198115217519410.1177/002199838101500207
    [Google Scholar]
  2. DaynesS. DiaconuC.G. PotterK.D. WeaverP.M. Bistable prestressed symmetric laminates.J. Compos. Mater.20104491119113710.1177/0021998309351603
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Firouzian-NejadA. MustaphaS. Ziaei-RadS. GhayourM. Characterization of bi-stable pure and hybrid composite laminates - an experimental investigation of the static and dynamic responses.J. Compos. Mater.201853565366710.1177/0021998318789241
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GraczykowskiC. OrłowskaA. Sridaran VenkatR. The concept of smart prestressed composites. Numerical modelling and experimental evaluation.SMART 2013. Rome2013
    [Google Scholar]
  5. NicassioF. ScarselliG. PintoF. CiampaF. IervolinoO. MeoM. Low energy actuation technique of bistable composites for aircraft morphing.Aerosp. Sci. Technol.201875354610.1016/j.ast.2017.12.040
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BowenC.R. KimH.A. SaloA.I.T. Active composites based on bistable laminates.Procedia Eng.20147514014410.1016/j.proeng.2013.11.030
    [Google Scholar]
  7. MustaphaS. YeL. DongX. AlamdariM.M. Evaluation of barely visible indentation damage (BVID) in CF/EP sandwich composites using guided wave signals.Mech. Syst. Signal Process.201676-7749751710.1016/j.ymssp.2016.01.023
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MustaphaS. YeL. Propagation behaviour of guided waves in tapered sandwich structures and debonding identification using time reversal.Wave Motion20155715417010.1016/j.wavemoti.2015.03.010
    [Google Scholar]
  9. MustaphaS. YeL. WangD. LuY. Debonding detection in composite sandwich structures based on guided waves.AIAA J.20125081697170610.2514/1.J051274
    [Google Scholar]
  10. BagheriA. LiK. RizzoP. Reference-free damage detection by means of wavelet transform and empirical mode decomposition applied to Lamb waves.J. Intell. Mater. Syst. Struct.201324219420810.1177/1045389X12460433
    [Google Scholar]
  11. MustaphaS. YeL. Leaky and non-leaky behaviours of guided waves in CF/EP sandwich structures.Wave Motion201451690591810.1016/j.wavemoti.2014.03.004
    [Google Scholar]
  12. GeL. WangX. JinC. Numerical modeling of PZT-induced Lamb wave-based crack detection in plate-like structures.Wave Motion201451686788510.1016/j.wavemoti.2014.03.002
    [Google Scholar]
  13. RoseJ.L. A Baseline and Vision of Ultrasonic Guided Wave Inspection Potential.J. Press. Vessel Technol.2002124327328210.1115/1.1491272
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ChimentiD.E. Guided Waves in plates and their use in materials characterization.Appl. Mech. Rev.199750524728410.1115/1.3101707
    [Google Scholar]
  15. SuZ. YeL. LuY. Guided lamb waves for identification of damage in composite structures: a review.J. Sound Vibrat.2006295375378010.1016/j.jsv.2006.01.020
    [Google Scholar]
  16. NayfehA.H. Wave propagation in layered anisotropic media: With application to composites.Elsevier199539
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ThomsonW.T. Transmission of elastic waves through a stratified solid medium.J. Appl. Phys.1950212899310.1063/1.1699629
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KnopoffL. A matrix method for elastic wave problems.Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am.1964541431438
    [Google Scholar]
  19. WangL. RokhlinS.I. Stable reformulation of transfer matrix method for wave propagation in layered anisotropic media.Ultrasonics2001396413424
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ChakiS. BourseG. Stress level measurement in prestressed steel strands using acoustoelastic effect.Exp. Mech.200849567310.1007/s11340‑008‑9174‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  21. LiG-Y. HeQ. ManganR. XuG. MoC. LuoJ. DestradeM. CaoY. Guided waves in pre-stressed hyperelastic plates and tubes: application to the ultrasound elastography of thin-walled soft materials.J. Mech. Phys. Solids2017102677910.1016/j.jmps.2017.02.008
    [Google Scholar]
  22. ToupinR.A. BernsteinB. Sound waves in deformed perfectly elastic materials. Acoustoelastic effect.J. Acoust. Soc. Am.196133221622510.1121/1.1908623
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LiuJ. ZhouJ.X. Propagation of lamb waves in a pre-stressed plate.Appl. Mech. Mater.201166-6841341810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.66‑68.413
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PeddetiK. SanthanamS. Dispersion curves for lamb wave propagation in prestressed plates using a semi-analytical finite element analysis.J. Acoust. Soc. Am.2018143282984010.1121/1.502333529495706
    [Google Scholar]
  25. MohabuthM. KotousovA. NgC-T. Large acoustoelastic effect for Lamb waves propagating in an incompressible elastic plate.J. Acoust. Soc. Am.201914531221122910.1121/1.509260431067922
    [Google Scholar]
  26. DubucB. EbrahimkhanlouA. SalamoneS. The effect of applied stress on the phase and group velocity of guided waves in anisotropic plates.J. Acoust. Soc. Am.20171426355310.1121/1.501696929289065
    [Google Scholar]
  27. HughesD.S. KellyJ.L. Second-order elastic deformation of solids.Phys. Rev.19539251145114910.1103/PhysRev.92.1145
    [Google Scholar]
  28. HearmonR.F.S. ‘Third-order’ elastic coefficients.Acta Crystallogr.19536433134010.1107/S0365110X53000909
    [Google Scholar]
  29. TakahashiS. MotegiR. Measurement of third-order elastic constants and applications to loaded structural materials.Springerplus20154132510.1186/s40064‑015‑1019‑226180745
    [Google Scholar]
  30. MasonW.P. ThurstonR.N. Physical acoustics principles and methods.New YorkAcademic Press198417
    [Google Scholar]
  31. PonschabM. KieferD.A. RupitschS.J. Towards an inverse characterization of third order elastic constants using guided waves2019 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS)pp. 12641268201910.1109/ULTSYM.2019.8926294
    [Google Scholar]
  32. ScholtesB. 6 - assessment of residual stresses.Structural and residual stress analysis by nondestructive methods.AmsterdamElsevier Science B.V.199759063610.1016/B978‑044482476‑9/50020‑7
    [Google Scholar]
  33. MohrbacherH. SalamaK. "The temperature dependence of third-order elastic constants in metal-matrix composites". Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation: Volumes 12A and 12B.Boston, MASpringer US19932091209710.1007/978‑1‑4615‑2848‑7_268
    [Google Scholar]
  34. RizzoP. ScaleaF. Effect of frequency on the acoustoelastic response of steel bars.Exp. Tech.200627404310.1111/j.1747‑1567.2003.tb00136.x
    [Google Scholar]
  35. MazzottiM. MarzaniA. BartoliI. ViolaE. Guided waves dispersion analysis for prestressed viscoelastic waveguides by means of the SAFE method.Int. J. Solids Struct.201249182359237210.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.04.041
    [Google Scholar]
  36. ThiyagarajanJ.S. Non-destructive testing mechanism for pre-stressed steel wire using acoustic emission monitoring.Materials (Basel)20201321E502910.3390/ma1321502933171838
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Firouzian-NejadA. BowenC. MustaphaS. GhayourM. Ziaei-RadS. Bi-stable hybrid composite laminates containing metallic strips - an experimental and numerical investigation.Smart Mater. Struct.201928505503010.1088/1361‑665X/ab1183
    [Google Scholar]
  38. FakihM.A. MustaphaS. TarrafJ. AyoubG. HamadeR. Detection and assessment of flaws in friction stir welded joints using ultrasonic guided waves: experimental and finite element analysis.Mech. Syst. Signal Process.201810151653410.1016/j.ymssp.2017.09.003
    [Google Scholar]
  39. GiurgiutiuV. Chapter 12 - wave propagation SHM with PWAS transducers.Structural health monitoring with piezoelectric wafer active sensors2nd Academic PressOxford201463970610.1016/B978‑0‑12‑418691‑0.00012‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Giron-SierraJ.M. Digital filters. Digital Signal Processing with Matlab Examples.SingaporeSignals and Data, Filtering, Non-stationary Signals, Modulation. Springer Singapore2017123931010.1007/978‑981‑10‑2534‑1_5
    [Google Scholar]
  41. WangZ.Y. JiangL. XuM.H. ZhengW.G. Application of wavelet transform in transient signal.Appl. Mech. Mater2014556562, 4711-4717
    [Google Scholar]
  42. TiwariK.A. RaisutisR. SamaitisV. Hybrid signal processing technique to improve the defect estimation in ultrasonic non-destructive testing of composite structures.Sensors (Basel)20171712285810.3390/s1712285829232845
    [Google Scholar]
  43. RoseJ.L. Ultrasonic guided waves in solid media.Cambridge University PressWest Nyack201410.1017/CBO9781107273610
    [Google Scholar]
  44. SuZ. YeL. Identification of damage using Lamb waves: from fundamentals to applications.BerlinSpringer20094810.1007/978‑1‑84882‑784‑4
    [Google Scholar]
  45. AntoA.D. MiaS. HasibM.A. The influence of number and orientation of ply on tensile properties of hybrid composites.J. Phys. Mater.20192202500210.1088/2515‑7639/aaff7a
    [Google Scholar]
  46. DoradoA.M.M. G.D. Composite material characterization using acoustic wave speed measurementsASNT Annual Conference 20152015
    [Google Scholar]
  47. PantS. LaliberteJ. MartinezM. RochaB. AncrumD. Effects of composite lamina properties on fundamental Lamb wave mode dispersion characteristics.Compos. Struct.201512423625210.1016/j.compstruct.2015.01.017
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cmam/10.2174/2666184501666210906115257
Loading
/content/journals/cmam/10.2174/2666184501666210906115257
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test