Skip to content
2000
image of Readiness for Southern Africa to Employ Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy

Abstract

Background

Forensic investigative genetic genealogy (FIGG) has garnered significant interest in solving cold criminal casework and has proven to be the solution to numerous unidentified human remains (UHR). Forensic samples can be subjected to a private genomic database where whole-genome sequencing (WGS) technique to retrieve genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotype data is performed. After conducting bioinformatics analysis, the data can be compared with the data of other users on the genomic database to identify distant relatives.

Objective

The article aims to explore FIGG in investigating criminal casework and identifying human remains. Moreover, it aims to create awareness among Southern Africans and advocate for a comprehensive approach involving all key stakeholders and practitioners to ensure the ethical and privacy-conscious establishment of FIGG, with a particular focus on Southern Africa.

Method

The study employed a qualitative technique, including a literature scan on FIGG. Interviews were done with various stakeholders, including SAPS detectives, forensic examiners, and overseas specialists.

Results

FIGG is gaining popularity in many countries as a supplement to existing investigative tools. It is labour-intensive and requires increased participation of Southern Africans in private genetic genealogy databases. Specific resources and dedication are required before FIGG can be successfully implemented in the region as a routine investigative tool to solve cold cases and identify unidentified human remains.

Conclusion

Implementing FIGG in the Southern African region is not imminent but may be considered.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cfs/10.2174/0126664844316210241003070113
2024-11-06
2025-02-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bowman N. How they did it: Ground-breaking technology reveals ID in 37-year-old cold case, Dayton Daily News. 2018 Available from: https://www.daytondailynews.com/news/crime–law/how-they-did-groundbreaking-technology-reveals-year-old-cold-case/wdliYt0agtdpFF4w6U1MiP/
  2. Budowle B. Arnette A. Sajantila A. A cost–benefit analysis for use of large SNP panels and high throughput typing for forensic investigative genetic genealogy. Int. J. Legal Med. 2023 137 5 1595 1614 10.1007/s00414‑023‑03029‑7 37341834
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Nogel M. Some areas where digital forensics can support the addressing of legal challenges linked to forensic genetic genealogy. Forensic Sci. Int. Digit. Investig. 2024 49 301696 10.1016/j.fsidi.2024.301696
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Smith J.H. Forensic DNA investigation. Handbook of DNA Profiling. Dash H.R. Shrivastava P. Lorente J.A. Singapore Springer 2022 10.1007/978‑981‑16‑4318‑7_57
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Smith J.H. Horne J.S. The value of forensic DNA investigative leads in South Africa. J For Sci & Crim Inves 2023 17 4 555969 10.19080/JFSCI.2023.17.555969
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Smith L.A. The missing, the martyred and the disappeared: Global networks, technical intensification and the end of human rights genetics. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2017 47 3 398 416 10.1177/0306312716678489 28032532
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Terry S.F. Caffet M. Free at last? Discussing the future of forensic genealogy. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers 2020 24 4 171 172 10.1089/gtmb.2020.29051.sjt 32216641
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Mehar P.A. Forensic Genetic Genealogy: An Investigative Aid. International Medico-Legal Reporter Journal 2021
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Thomson J. Clayton T. Cleary J. Gleeson M. Kennett D. Leonard M. Rutherford D. An empirical investigation into the effectiveness of genetic genealogy to identify individuals in the UK. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020 46 102263 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102263 32114291
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hu Y. Wein L.M. Analysis of the privacy‐performance tradeoff of reference testing in Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy. J. Forensic Sci. 2024 ••• 1556-4029.15579 10.1111/1556‑4029.15579 38978157
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang M. Chen H. Luo L. Huang Y. Duan S. Yuan H. Tang R. Liu C. He G. Forensic investigative genetic genealogy: expanding pedigree tracing and genetic inquiry in the genomic era. J. Genet. Genomics 2024 ••• S1673-8527(24)00158-9 10.1016/j.jgg.2024.06.016 38969261
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Smith J.H. An exploration of the identification and processing of forensic investigative leads in investigating crime in the South African Police Service. Thesis, University of South Africa: Pretoria 2023
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Wickenheiser R.A. Expanding DNA database effectiveness. Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg. 2022 4 100226 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100226 35402888
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wickenheiser R.A. Naugle J. Hoey B. Nowlin R. Kumar S.A. Kubinski M.A. Glynn C. Valerio R. Allen L. Stoiloff S. Kochanski J. Guerrini C. Schubert A.M. National Technology Validation and Implementation Collaborative (NTVIC): Guidelines for establishing Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy (FIGG) programs. Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg. 2023 7 100446 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100446 38075455
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Wickenheiser R.A. Forensic genealogy, bioethics and the Golden State Killer case. Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg. 2019 1 114 125 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2019.07.003 32411963
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Smith J.H. Singh M. DNA forensic and forensic investigative leads. J. Forensic Med. 2024 9 347 https://www.hilarispublisher.com/open-access/dna-forensic-and-forensic-investigative-leads-105209.html
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Glynn C.L. Bridging disciplines to form a new one: the emergence of forensic genetic genealogy. Genes (Basel) 2022 13 8 1381 10.3390/genes13081381 36011291
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Greytak E.M. Kaye D.H. Budowle B. Moore C. Armentrout S.L. Privacy and genetic genealogy data. Science 2018 361 6405 857 10.1126/science.aav0330 30166479
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Greytak E.M. Moore C. Armentrout S.L. Genetic genealogy for cold case and active investigations. Forensic Sci. Int. 2019 299 103 113 10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.039 30991209
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Samuel G. Kennett D. The impact of investigative genetic genealogy: perceptions of UK professional and public stakeholders. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020 48 102366 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102366 32781429
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Greytak E. Wyatt S. Cady J. Moore C. Armentrout S. Investigative genetic genealogy for human remains identification. J. Forensic Sci. 2024 ••• 1556-4029.15469 10.1111/1556‑4029.15469 38317620
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Tuazon O.M. Wickenheiser R.A. Ansell R. Guerrini C.J. Zwenne G.J. Custers B. Law enforcement use of genetic genealogy databases in criminal investigations: Nomenclature, definition and scope. Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg. 2024 8 100460 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2024.100460 38380276
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Vittali-Smith C. To catch a killer cousin: investigative genetic genealogy as a critical extension of familial searching in serious crime convictions in Australia. Univ. N. S. W. Law J. 2023 46 2 464 10.53637/CGGN8586
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ward J. Best practice recommendations for the establishment of a national DNA identification program for missing persons: A global perspective. Forensic Sci. International. Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2017 6 e43 e45 10.1016/j.fsigss.2017.09.009
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ward J. A multifaceted, multijurisdictional, multiagency, and multidisciplinary approach to investigating unidentified and missing persons cases in Australia. Forensic Science International: Genetics Supplement Series 2022 8 53 55 10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.09.020
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ward J. Coakley L. Grisedale K. Seddon S. Spiden M. Watson J.L. McNevin D. Operationalization of the National DNA Program for Unidentified and Missing Persons’ Forensic Investigative Genetic Genealogy Capability for Human Remains Identification in Australia. Forensic Genom. 2024 4 1 32 40 10.1089/forensic.2023.0019
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Watson J. McNevin D. Grisedale K. Spiden M. Seddon S. Ward J. Operationalisation of the ForenSeq® Kintelligence Kit for Australian unidentified and missing persons casework. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2024 68 102972 10.1016/j.fsigen.2023.102972 37918284
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hennessey M. Best practices in the development and effective use of a forensic DNA database for identification of missing persons and unidentified human remains. Forensic Genetic Approaches for Identification of Human Skeletal Remains. Dash H.R. Shrivastava P. Lorente J.A. Cambridge Academic Press 2023 10.1016/B978‑0‑12‑815766‑4.00018‑2
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Rogalla-Ładniak U. The overview of forensic genetic genealogy. Archives of Forensic Medicine and Criminology 2023 72 4 211 222 10.4467/16891716AMSIK.22.023.17623 37405841
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Watson J.L. McNevin D. Ward J. Genetic Kinship Testing Techniques for Human Remains Identification and Missing Persons Investigations. Forensic Genom. 2024 4 1 4 23 10.1089/forensic.2023.0018
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Erlich Y. Shor T. Pe’er I. Carmi S. Identity inference of genomic data using long-range familial searches. Science 2018 362 6415 690 694 10.1126/science.aau4832 30309907
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kennett D. Using genetic genealogy databases in missing person’s. [Department of Justice (U.S.), National Best Practices for Implementing and Sustaining a Cold Case Investigation Unit, National Institute of Justice. 2019 Available from: https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/national-best-practices-implementing-and-sustaining-cold-case-investigation
  33. de Heer B. Snapshot A. Serial Rape. J. Interpers. Violence 2016 31 4 598 619 10.1177/0886260514556110 25466982
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Wright K.A. Pratt T.C. DeLisi M. Examining offending specialization in a sample of male multiple homicide offenders. Homicide Stud. 2008 12 4 381 398 10.1177/1088767908323930
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Przybylski R. Adult Sex Offender Recidivism. In: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Sex Offender Sentencing, Monitoring, Apprehending, Registering, and Tracking (SMART), editors. Sex Offender Management Assessment and Planning Initiative. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Justice. 2017 Available from: https://smart.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh231/files/media/document/recidivismofadultsexualoffenders.pdf
  36. Scudder N. Daniel R. Raymond J. Sears A. Operationalising forensic genetic genealogy in an Australian context. Forensic Sci. Int. 2020 316 110543 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110543 33152660
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Davawala A. Stock A. Spiden M. Daniel R. McBain J. Hartman D. Forensic genetic genealogy using microarrays for the identification of human remains: The need for good quality samples – A pilot study. Forensic Sci. Int. 2022 334 111242 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111242 35272198
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Edge M.D. Coop G. Attacks on genetic privacy via uploads to genealogical databases. eLife 2020 9 e51810 10.7554/eLife.51810 31908268
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kling D. Phillips C. Kennett D. Tillmar A. Investigative genetic genealogy: Current methods, knowledge and practice. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021 52 102474 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102474 33592389
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Machado H. Silva S. Investigative genetic genealogy: an ethical and privacy assessment framework tool is needed. For. Sci. Rev. (Singap.) 2022 34 17 19 link.gale.com/apps/doc/A694031230/AONE?u=anon~df9fddef&sid=googleScholar&xid=20985e55
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Tillmar A. Sjölund P. Lundqvist B. Klippmark, Älgenäs C, Green H. Whole-genome sequencing of human remains to enable genealogy DNA database searches - a case report. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2020 46 102233 10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.102233 31981902
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Ward J. The operationalization of a multifaceted, multijurisdictional, multiagency and multidisciplinary capability for unidentified and missing persons investigations in Australia. Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2024 56 S1 65 70 10.1080/00450618.2024.2324737
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Yadav P.K. Sharma S. Challenges in using genetic genealogy in forensics. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) Technology in DNA Analysis. Academic Press 2024 511 530 10.1016/B978‑0‑323‑99144‑5.00007‑X
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Castillo A. Alene T. Serna J. Bermudez E. For Victims of Golden State Killer, the Horror Never Ended. Available from: https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-goldenstate-victims-20180430-story.html
  45. Phillips C. The Golden State Killer investigation and the nascent field of forensic genealogy. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2018 36 1 186 188 10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.07.010 30041097
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sel A. The Ingenious and ‘Dystopian’ DNA Technique Police Used to Hunt the ‘Golden State Killer’. Available from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/news/true-crime/wp/2018/04/27/golden-state-killer-dna-websitegedmatch-was-used-to-identify-joseph-deangelo-as-suspect-police-say/
  47. Aldhous P. The Golden State Killer Case has spawned a New Forensic Science Industry. Available from: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/peteral
  48. Zhang S. The Messy Consequences of the Golden State Killer Case. Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2019/10/genetic-genealogy-dnadatabase-criminal-investigations/599005/
  49. Katsanis S.H. Pedigrees and perpetrators: uses of DNA and genealogy in forensic investigations. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 2020 21 1 535 564 10.1146/annurev‑genom‑111819‑084213 32289230
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Williams R. Wienroth M. Social and ethical aspects of forensic genetics: A critical review. Forensic Sci. Rev. 2017 29 2 145 169 28691916
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Henn B.M. Hon L. Macpherson J.M. Eriksson N. Saxonov S. Pe’er I. Mountain J.L. Cryptic distant relatives are common in both isolated and cosmopolitan genetic samples. PLoS One 2012 7 4 e34267 10.1371/journal.pone.0034267 22509285
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Dowdeswell T.L. Forensic genetic genealogy: A profile of cases solved. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2022 58 102679 10.1016/j.fsigen.2022.102679 35176668
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Turner A. Would You Like Your Data Raw or Cooked? Advanced Genetic Genealogy: Techniques and Case Studies. Wayne D.P. Cushing, TX Wayne Research 2019 189 214
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Angrist M. Genetic privacy needs a more nuanced approach. Nature 2013 494 7435 7 10.1038/494007a 23389508
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Berkman B.E. Miller W.K. Grady C. Is it ethical to use genealogy data to solve crimes? Ann. Intern. Med. 2018 169 5 333 334 10.7326/M18‑1348 29809242
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Brown T. Why we fear genetic informants: Using genetic genealogy to catch serial killers. Columbia Sci Technol Law Rev. 2019 21 1 114 181
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Chauhan N. Kumar R. Forensic Genetics Genealogy-The Genetic Blueprint: Dissecting the Interplay of Relationship Inference, Database Accessibility, and Ethical Concerns in Forensic Genealogy. MIT Art, Design and Technology School of Computing International Conference (MITADTSoCiCon) 2024 10.1109/MITADTSoCiCon60330.2024.10575817
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Debus-Sherrill S. Field M.B. Familial DNA searching- an emerging forensic investigative tool. Sci. Justice 2019 59 1 20 28 10.1016/j.scijus.2018.07.006 30654965
    [Google Scholar]
  59. de Groot N.F. van Beers B.C. Meynen G. Commercial DNA tests and police investigations: a broad bioethical perspective. J. Med. Ethics 2021 47 12 788 795 10.1136/medethics‑2021‑107568 34509983
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Formici G. From "familial searching" to "forensic genetic genealogy": New frontiers and challenges of DNA analysis in criminal investigations. BioLaw Journal-Rivista di BioDiritto 2021 1 305 328
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Fullerton S.M. Rohlfs R. Should police detectives have unrestricted access to public genetic databases? Available from: https://leapsmag.com/should-police-detectives-have-total-access-to-public-genetic-databases
  62. Granja R. Machado H. Ethical controversies of familial searching: the views of stakeholders in the United Kingdom and in Poland. Sci. Technol. Human Values 2019 44 6 1068 1092 10.1177/0162243919828219
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Guerrini C.J. Robinson J.O. Petersen D. McGuire A.L. Should police have access to genetic genealogy databases? Capturing the Golden State Killer and other criminals using a controversial new forensic technique. PLoS Biol. 2018 16 10 e2006906 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006906 30278047
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Guerrini C.J. Wickenheiser R.A. Bettinger B. McGuire A.L. Fullerton S.M. Four misconceptions about investigative genetic genealogy. J. Law Biosci. 2021 8 1 lsab001 10.1093/jlb/lsab001 33880184
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Machado H. Granja R. Emerging DNA technologies and stigmatization. Forensic Genetics Governance and Crime. Machado H. Granja R. Singapore Palgrave Pivot 2020 10.1007/978‑981‑15‑2429‑5_7
    [Google Scholar]
  66. McEwen J. Pino N. Raphael A. Renna K. Boyer J. Brody L.C. Investigative genetic genealogy: ethical, legal, and social issues and directions for future research. Forensic Genom. 2021 1 3 91 98 10.1089/forensic.2021.0008
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Moran K.S. Damned by DNA — Balancing personal privacy with public safety. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018 292 e3 e4 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.09.011 30287163
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Murphy E. Law and policy oversight of familial searches in recreational genealogy databases. Forensic Sci. Int. 2018 292 e5 e9 10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.027 30287164
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Ram N. Guerrini C.J. McGuire A.L. Genealogy databases and the future of criminal investigation. Science 2018 360 6393 1078 1079 10.1126/science.aau1083 29880677
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ramjee D. Ringrose K.N. The challenges of forensic genealogy: dirty data, electronic evidence, and privacy concerns. Denver Law Rev 2020 98 1 9
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Samuel G. Kennett D. Problematizing consent: searching genetic genealogy databases for law enforcement purposes. New Genet. Soc. 2021 40 3 284 304 10.1080/14636778.2020.1843149
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Tillmar A. Sturk-Andreaggi K. Daniels-Higginbotham J. Thomas J.T. Marshall C. The FORCE panel: an all-in-one SNP marker set for confirming investigative genetic genealogy leads and for general forensic applications. Genes (Basel) 2021 12 12 1968 10.3390/genes12121968 34946917
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Scudder N. Robertson J. Kelty S.F. Walsh S.J. McNevin D. Crowdsourced and crowdfunded: the future of forensic DNA? Aust. J. Forensic Sci. 2020 52 2 235 241 10.1080/00450618.2018.1486456
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Scudder N. McNevin D. Kelty S.F. Funk C. Walsh S.J. Robertson J. Policy and regulatory implications of the new frontier of forensic genomics: direct-to-consumer genetic data and genealogy records. Curr. Issues Crim. Justice 2019 31 2 194 216 10.1080/10345329.2018.1560588
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Skeva S. Larmuseau M.H.D. Shabani M. Review of policies of companies and databases regarding access to customers’ genealogy data for law enforcement purposes. Per. Med. 2020 17 2 141 153 10.2217/pme‑2019‑0100 32125932
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Wallace H.M. Jackson A.R. Gruber J. Thibedeau A.D. Forensic DNA databases–Ethical and legal standards: A global review. Egypt. J. Forensic Sci. 2014 4 3 57 63 10.1016/j.ejfs.2014.04.002
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Zabel J. The killer inside us: law, ethics, and the forensic use of family genetics. Berkeley J Crim Law 2019 24 47 100
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Wright L.E. Vander Ven T. Fesmire C. American serial rape, 1940-2010. Crim. Justice Rev. 2016 41 4 446 468 10.1177/0734016816670458
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) Amendment Act, Act 37 of 2013. Pretoria Government Printers 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Meintjes-van der Walt L. Olaborede A. DNA phenotyping: A possible aid in criminal investigation. South African J Crim Justice 2023 36 1 1 23 10.47348/SACJ/v36/i1a1
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Smith J.H. Horne J.S. Letter to the Editor: DNA phenotyping: Exploring its potential in criminal investigations. South African J Crim Justice 2023 36 2 361 362
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Guanglin H. Lan-Hai W. Mengge W. Editorial: Forensic investigative genetic genealogy and fine-scale structure of human populations. Front. Genet. 2023 13 1067865 10.3389/fgene.2022.1067865 36685813
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Fatumo S. Chikowore T. Choudhury A. Ayub M. Martin A.R. Kuchenbäcker K. Diversity in genomic studies: a roadmap to address the imbalance. Nat. Med. 2022 28 2 243 10.1038/s41591‑021‑01672‑4 35145307
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Department of Justice (U.S.). Interim Policy: Forensic Genetic Genealogical DNA Analysis and Searching. United States Department of Justice. 2019 https://www.justice.gov/olp/forensic-science
  85. Born P. Genetic Testing in Underwriting: Implications for Life Insurance Markets. Journal of Insurance Regulation 2019 38 5 1 18 10.52227/26103.2019
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Butler J.M. Recent advances in forensic biology and forensic DNA typing: INTERPOL review 2019–2022. Forensic Sci. Int. Synerg. 2023 6 100311 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100311 36618991
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Chapman M.B. The establishment of an efficient pipeline, incorporating file type conversion and tree-building software for forensic genetic genealogy in Australia. Master's Thesis, Murdoch University 2024
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Charpentier A. Gallic E. Using collaborative genealogy data to study migration: a research note. Hist. Fam. 2020 25 1 1 21 10.1080/1081602X.2019.1641130
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Contreras J.L. Schultz K. Teerlink C.C. Maness T. Meyer L.J. Cannon-Albright L.A. Legal terms of use and public genealogy websites. J. Law Biosci. 2020 7 1 lsaa063 10.1093/jlb/lsaa063 34221427
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Ertürk M.S. Fitzpatrick C. Press M. Wein L.M. Analysis of the genealogy process in forensic genetic genealogy. J. Forensic Sci. 2022 67 6 2218 2229 10.1111/1556‑4029.15127 36059116
    [Google Scholar]
  91. García Ó. Forensic genealogy. Social, ethical, legal and scientific implications. Spanish Journal of Legal Medicine 2021 47 3 112 119 10.1016/j.remle.2020.06.002
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Gurney D. Press M. Moore C. Rolnick C.I. Hochreiter A. Bossert B.L. The need for standards and certification for investigative genetic genealogy, and a notice of action. Forensic Sci. Int. 2022 341 111495 10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111495 36257095
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Majumder M.A. Guerrini C.J. McGuire A.L. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk. Annu. Rev. Med. 2021 72 1 151 166 10.1146/annurev‑med‑070119‑114727 32735764
    [Google Scholar]
  94. O’Leary D.E. DNA Mining and genealogical information systems: Not just for finding family ethnicity. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manage. 2018 25 4 190 196 10.1002/isaf.1439
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Oefelein R.H. Seven years of SNPs: An assessment of methods utilized for generating profiles for forensic genetic genealogy. Forensic Sci. International. Genet. Suppl. Ser. 2022 8 347 348 10.1016/j.fsigss.2022.11.002
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Mateen R.M. Sabar M.F. Hussain S. Parveen R. Hussain M. Familial DNA analysis and criminal investigation: Usage, downsides and privacy concerns. Forensic Sci. Int. 2021 318 110576 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110576 33234348
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Novroski N. The Pioneer of Investigative Genetic Genealogy in CanadaAn Interview with Steve Smith, Head of Cold Case Unit, Toronto Police Service. Forensic Genom. 2024 4 1 1 3 10.1089/forensic.2024.29027.int
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Tillmar A. Fagerholm S.A. Staaf J. Sjölund P. Ansell R. Getting the conclusive lead with investigative genetic genealogy – A successful case study of a 16 year old double murder in Sweden. Forensic Sci. Int. Genet. 2021 53 102525 10.1016/j.fsigen.2021.102525 33991867
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cfs/10.2174/0126664844316210241003070113
Loading
/content/journals/cfs/10.2174/0126664844316210241003070113
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test