Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Chinese Computer Science
  4. Volume 1, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 1, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2665-9972
  • E-ISSN: 2665-9964

Abstract

A Fuzzy Cubic Set (FCS) is composed of a Fuzzy Set (FS) (certain fuzzy numbers) and an Interval-Valued Fuzzy Set (IVFS) (uncertain fuzzy numbers) to describe the hybrid information of both. To enhance the credibility of both, they should be closely related to the measures/degrees of credibility owing to the vagueness and uncertainty of humans’ cognitions regarding the real world.

This paper presents the notions of a Fuzzy Cubic Credibility Set (FCCS) and a Fuzzy Cubic Credibility Number (FCCN) as the new generalization of the FCS notion to enhance the credibility level of FCS by means of the credibility degrees of both FS and IVFS. Next, we define operations of FCCNs, an expected value of FCCN, and the FCCN Weighted Arithmetic Averaging (FCCNWAA) and FCCN Weighted Geometric Averaging (FCCNWGA) operators for Decision Making (DM) strategy.

A DM strategy using the FCCNWAA or FCCNWGA operator is proposed to solve multicriteria DM problems in the environment of FCCNs. Then, the proposed DM strategy is applied to a DM example of slope design schemes for an open-pit mine in the environment of FCCNs to reflect the feasibility of the proposed DM strategy.

By comparison with the fuzzy cubic DM strategy, the DM results with and without the degrees of credibility, can impact on the ranking of alternatives in the DM example to reflect the effectiveness of the proposed DM strategy.

However, the highlighting advantage of this study is that the proposed DM strategy not only indicates the degrees of credibility regarding the assessed values of FCNs in the DM process but also enhances the DM reliability in the environment of FCCNs. Hence, the proposed DM strategy is superior to the fuzzy cubic DM strategy in the environment of FCCNs.

© 2021 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cccs/10.2174/2665997201999200717165743
2021-04-01
2024-11-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cccs/10.2174/2665997201999200717165743
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ZadehL.A. Fuzzy sets.Inf. Control1965833835310.1016/S0019‑9958(65)90241‑X
     [Google Scholar]
  2. KahramanC. OnarS.C. OztaysiB. Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: A literature review.Int. J. Comp. Intelligence Syst.20158463766610.1080/18756891.2015.1046325
     [Google Scholar]
  3. PandeyM.M. ShuklaD. GrahamA. Evaluating the human performance factors of air traffic control in Thailand using fuzzy multi criteria decision making method.J. Air Transp. Manage.20198110170810.1016/j.jairtraman.2019.101708
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BostancıB. ErdemN. Investigating the satisfaction of citizens in municipality services using fuzzy modeling.Socioecon. Plann. Sci.202069100754
     [Google Scholar]
  5. KacewiczM. Fuzzy slope stability methodMathematics in Geology198719no. 875776710.1007/BF00893013
     [Google Scholar]
  6. MalkawiA.I.H. HassanW.F. AbdullaF.A. Uncertainty and reliability analysis applied to slope stability.Struct. Saf.200022216118710.1016/S0167‑4730(00)00006‑0
     [Google Scholar]
  7. GorzałczanyM.B. A method of inference in approximate reasoning based on interval valued fuzzy sets.Fuzzy Sets Syst.198721111710.1016/0165‑0114(87)90148‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  8. JunY.B. KimC.S. YangK.O. Cubic sets.Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics2012418398
     [Google Scholar]
  9. JunY.B. JungS.T. KimM.S. Cubic subgroups.Annals of Fuzzy Mathematics and Informatics201121915
     [Google Scholar]
  10. JunY.B. KhanA. Cubic ideals in semigroups.Honam Mathematical Journal201335460762310.5831/HMJ.2013.35.4.607
     [Google Scholar]
  11. VijayabalajiS. SivaramakrishnanS. “A cubic set theoretical approach to linear space”, Abstract and Applied Analysis, vol.Article ID20155231291810.1155/2015/523129
     [Google Scholar]
  12. WangJ.M. CuiW.H. YeJ. Slope stability evaluation using tangent similarity measure of fuzzy cube sets.Soft Computing in Civil Engineering2019312735
     [Google Scholar]
  13. TorraV. Hesitant fuzzy sets.Int. J. Intell. Syst.2010256529539
     [Google Scholar]
  14. KhanQ. MahmoodT. MehmoodF. Cubic hesitant fuzzy sets and their applications to multi criteria decision making.International Journal of Algebra and Statistics20165195110.20454/ijas.2016.1055
     [Google Scholar]
  15. FahmiA. AminF. Precursor selection for Sol–Gel synthesis of titanium carbide nanopowders by a new hesitant cubic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making model.New Maths. Natural Comput.2019150114516710.1142/S1793005719500091
     [Google Scholar]
  16. FuJ. YeJ. CuiW. An evaluation method of risk grades for prostate cancer using similarity measure of cubic hesitant fuzzy sets.J. Biomed. Inform.20188713113710.1016/j.jbi.2018.10.003 30339927
     [Google Scholar]
  17. FuJ. YeJ. CuiW. The Dice measure of cubic hesitant fuzzy sets and its initial evaluation method of benign prostatic hyperplasia symptoms.Sci. Rep.2019916010.1038/s41598‑018‑37228‑9 30635593
     [Google Scholar]
  18. YongR. ZhuA. YeJ. Multiple attribute decision method using similarity measure of cubic hesitant fuzzy sets.J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.20193711075108310.3233/JIFS‑182555
     [Google Scholar]
  19. FuJ. YeJ. Similarity measure with indeterminate parameters regarding cubic hesitant neutrosophic numbers and its risk grade assessment approach for prostate cancer patients.Appl. Intell.2020502120213110.1007/s10489‑020‑01653‑z
     [Google Scholar]
  20. ReadJ. StaceyP. Guidelines for open pit slope design.CollingwoodCSIRO Publishing200910.1071/9780643101104
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cccs/10.2174/2665997201999200717165743
Loading
Weighted Aggregation Operators of Fuzzy Credibility Cubic Numbers and their Decision Making Strategy for Slope Design Schemes
Current Chinese Computer Science 1, 28 (2021); https://doi.org/10.2174/2665997201999200717165743
/content/journals/cccs/10.2174/2665997201999200717165743
/content/journals/cccs/10.2174/2665997201999200717165743
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Decision-making strategy; Expected value; Fuzzy credibility cubic number; Fuzzy credibility cubic number weighted arithmetic averaging (FCCNWAA) operator; Fuzzy credibility cubic number weighted geometric averaging (FCCNWGA) operator; Fuzzy credibility cubic set; Slope design scheme

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test