An Alternative Concept in Making Hybrid Flow Batteries into Dendrite-Free Full-Flow Batteries

References

1. ZhangL. FengR. WangW. YuG. Emerging chemistries and molecular designs for flow batteries.Nat. Rev. Chem.20226852454310.1038/s41570‑022‑00394‑6 37118006
   [Google Scholar]
2. XiaY. OuyangM. YufitV. TanR. RegoutzA. WangA. MaoW. ChakrabartiB. KaveiA. SongQ. KucernakA.R. BrandonN.P. A cost-effective alkaline polysulfide-air redox flow battery enabled by a dual-membrane cell architecture.Nat. Commun.2022131238810.1038/s41467‑022‑30044‑w 35501344
   [Google Scholar]
3. GurieffN. KeoghD.F. BaldryM. TimchenkoV. GreenD. KoskinenI. MenictasC. Mass transport optimization for redox flow battery design.Appl. Sci. 2020108280110.3390/app10082801
   [Google Scholar]
4. MohandassG. ChenW. KrishnanS. KimT. Asymmetric and symmetric redox flow batteries for energy-efficient, high-recovery water desalination.Environ. Sci. Technol.20225674477448810.1021/acs.est.1c08609 35297617
   [Google Scholar]
5. WartanaI.M. AgustiniN.P. Application of voltage and lines stability index for optimal placement of wind energy with a system load increase scenario.Curr. Altern. Energy201931444910.2174/2405463103666190724105814
   [Google Scholar]
6. HallD.M. BachmanR.M. RadovicL.R. Carbon materials in redox flow batteries: Challenges and opportunities.Carbon Reports2022139411210.7209/carbon.010306
   [Google Scholar]
7. ZhaoZ. ZhangC. LiX. Opportunities and challenges of organic flow battery for electrochemical energy storage technology.J. Ener. Chem.20226762163910.1016/j.jechem.2021.10.037
   [Google Scholar]
8. MacleanS.A. RazaS. WangH. IgbomezieC. LiuJ. MakowskiN. MaY. ShenY. RӧhrJ.A. WengG-M. TaylorA.D. Investigation of flow rate in symmetric four-channel redox flow desalination system.Cell Rep. Phy. Sci.20245110176110.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101761
   [Google Scholar]
9. LehmannM.L. TylerL. SelfE.C. YangG. NandaJ. SaitoT. Membrane design for non-aqueous redox flow batteries: Current status and path forward.Chem2022861611163610.1016/j.chempr.2022.04.005
   [Google Scholar]
10. ZengL. ZhaoT.S. WeiL. JiangH.R. WuM.C. Anion exchange membranes for aqueous acid-based redox flow batteries: Current status and challenges.Appl. Energy2019233-23462264310.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.063
    [Google Scholar]
11. BockR. KleinsteinbergB. Selnes-VolsethB. Stokke BurheimO. A novel iron chloride red-ox concentration flow cell battery (ICFB) concept; power and electrode optimization.Energies2021144110910.3390/en14041109
    [Google Scholar]
12. ZengY.K. ZhaoT.S. AnL. ZhouX.L. WeiL. A comparative study of all-vanadium and iron-chromium redox flow batteries for large-scale energy storage.J. Power Sources201530043844310.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.100
    [Google Scholar]
13. MaQ. MaoC. FuW. LiH. SuH. XuQ. Numerical study of deep eutectic solvent electrolyte‐based vanadium‐iron redox flow battery with three‐dimensional multi‐layer porous electrode.Int. J. Energy Res.2022469128201283610.1002/er.8055
    [Google Scholar]
14. FaggianoL. LacarbonaraG. BadenhorstW.D. MurtomäkiL. SanzL. ArbizzaniC. Short thermal treatment of carbon felts for copper-based redox flow batteries.J. Power Sources202252023084610.1016/j.jpowsour.2021.230846
    [Google Scholar]
15. BadenhorstW.D. Kuldeep Sanz L. C. Arbizzani Murtomäki L. Performance improvements for the all-copper redox flow battery: Membranes, electrodes, and electrolytes”.Energy Rep.202288690870010.1016/j.egyr.2022.06.075
    [Google Scholar]
16. LloydD. VainikkaT. KontturiK. The development of an all copper hybrid redox flow battery using deep eutectic solvents.Electrochim. Acta2013100182310.1016/j.electacta.2013.03.130
    [Google Scholar]
17. EvankoB. YooS.J. LiptonJ. ChunS-E. MoskovitsM. JiX. BoettcherS.W. StuckyG.D. Stackable bipolar pouch cells with corrosion-resistant current collectors enable high-power aqueous electrochemical energy storage.Energy Environ. Sci.201811102865287510.1039/C8EE00546J
    [Google Scholar]
18. XuZ. FanQ. LiY. WangJ. LundP.D. Review of zinc dendrite formation in zinc bromine redox flow battery.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.202012710983810.1016/j.rser.2020.109838
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lao-atimanW. BumroongsriP. ArpornwichanopA. OlaruS. KheawhomS. Prediction of charge-discharge behavior and state of charge estimation for tri-electrode rechargeable zinc-air flow batteries.J. Energy Storage20225510578610.1016/j.est.2022.105786
    [Google Scholar]
20. WinsbergJ. JanoschkaT. MorgensternS. HagemannT. MuenchS. HauffmanG. GohyJ.F. HagerM.D. SchubertU.S. Poly(TEMPO)/zinc hybrid‐flow battery: A novel, “green,” high voltage, and safe energy storage system.Adv. Mater.201628112238224310.1002/adma.201505000 26810789
    [Google Scholar]
21. LiB. NieZ. VijayakumarM. LiG. LiuJ. SprenkleV. WangW. Ambipolar zinc-polyiodide electrolyte for a high-energy density aqueous redox flow battery.Nat. Commun.201561630310.1038/ncomms7303 25709083
    [Google Scholar]
22. DudutaM. HoB. WoodV.C. LimthongkulP. BruniniV.E. CarterW.C. ChiangY-M. Semi‐solid lithium rechargeable flow battery.Adv. Energy Mater.20111451151610.1002/aenm.201100152
    [Google Scholar]
23. HatzellK.B. BootaM. GogotsiY. Materials for suspension (semi-solid) electrodes for energy and water technologies.Chem. Soc. Rev.201544238664868710.1039/C5CS00279F 26412441
    [Google Scholar]
24. ChuF. GuoL. WangS. ChengY. Semi-solid zinc slurry with abundant electron-ion transfer interfaces for aqueous zinc-based flow batteries.J. Power Sources202253523144210.1016/j.jpowsour.2022.231442
    [Google Scholar]
25. LiuJ. WangY. Preliminary study of high energy density Zn/Ni flow batteries.J. Power Sources201529457457910.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.110
    [Google Scholar]
26. GhoshM. VijayakumarV. KurungotS. Dendrite growth suppression by Zn2+ ‐integrated nafion ionomer membranes: Beyond porous separators toward aqueous Zn/V 2 O 5 batteries with extended cycle life.Energy Technol. 201979190044210.1002/ente.201900442
    [Google Scholar]
27. ZhaoX. ZhuM. TangC. QuanK. TongQ. CaoH. JiangJ. YangH. ZhangJ. ZIF-8@MXene-reinforced flame-retardant and highly conductive polymer composite electrolyte for dendrite-free lithium metal batteries.J. Colloid Interface Sci.202262047848510.1016/j.jcis.2022.04.018 35452945
    [Google Scholar]
28. ZhouB. LongJ. HeM. ZhengR. DuD. YanY. RenL. ZengT. ShuC. A multifunctional protective layer with biomimetic ionic channel suppressing dendrite and side reactions on zinc metal anodes.J. Colloid Interface Sci.202261313614510.1016/j.jcis.2022.01.027 35033760
    [Google Scholar]
29. HigashiS. LeeS.W. LeeJ.S. TakechiK. CuiY. Avoiding short circuits from zinc metal dendrites in anode by backside-plating configuration.Nat. Commun.2016711180110.1038/ncomms11801 27263471
    [Google Scholar]
30. DingF. XuW. GraffG.L. ZhangJ. SushkoM.L. ChenX. ShaoY. EngelhardM.H. NieZ. XiaoJ. LiuX. SushkoP.V. LiuJ. ZhangJ.G. Dendrite-free lithium deposition via self-healing electrostatic shield mechanism.J. Am. Chem. Soc.2013135114450445610.1021/ja312241y 23448508
    [Google Scholar]
31. ChengX.B. HouT.Z. ZhangR. PengH.J. ZhaoC.Z. HuangJ.Q. ZhangQ. Dendrite‐free lithium deposition induced by uniformly distributed lithium ions for efficient lithium metal batteries.Adv. Mater.201628152888289510.1002/adma.201506124 26900679
    [Google Scholar]
32. SalvatierraR.V. López-SilvaG.A. JalilovA.S. YoonJ. WuG. TsaiA.L. TourJ.M. Suppressing li metal dendrites through a solid li‐ion backup layer.Adv. Mater.20183050180386910.1002/adma.201803869 30368916
    [Google Scholar]
33. NaguibM. BarsoumM.W. GogotsiY. Ten years of progress in the synthesis and development of mxenes.Adv. Mater.20213339210339310.1002/adma.202103393 34396592
    [Google Scholar]
34. ZhangD. WangS. LiB. GongY. YangS. Horizontal growth of lithium on parallelly aligned mxene layers towards dendrite‐free metallic lithium anodes.Adv. Mater.20193133190182010.1002/adma.201901820
    [Google Scholar]
35. ZhangH. ZhouZ. YinY. XuH. WangY. YangK. ZhangZ. WangJ. HeX. Efficient capture and separation of CO 2 ‐Boosted carbon neutralization enabled by tailorable metal‐organic frameworks: A review.EcoEnergy20231221724710.1002/ece2.15
    [Google Scholar]
36. WangY. LiuY. WangH. DouS. GanW. CiL. HuangY. YuanQ. MOF-based ionic sieve interphase for regulated Zn2+ flux toward dendrite-free aqueous zinc-ion batteries.J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain.20221084366437510.1039/D1TA10245A
    [Google Scholar]
37. ZhangX. WangA. LiuX. LuoJ. Dendrites in lithium metal anodes: Suppression, regulation, and elimination.Acc. Chem. Res.201952113223323210.1021/acs.accounts.9b00437 31657541
    [Google Scholar]
38. AslamM.K. NiuY. HussainT. TabassumH. TangW. XuM. AhujaR. How to avoid dendrite formation in metal batteries: Innovative strategies for dendrite suppression.Nano Energy20218610614210.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106142
    [Google Scholar]
39. CaoD. SunX. LiQ. NatanA. XiangP. ZhuH. Lithium dendrite in all-solid-state batteries: Growth mechanisms, suppression strategies, and characterizations.Matter202031579410.1016/j.matt.2020.03.015
    [Google Scholar]
40. GongK. MaX. ConfortiK.M. KuttlerK.J. GrunewaldJ.B. YeagerK.L. BazantM.Z. GuS. YanY. A zinc–iron redox-flow battery under $100 per kW h of system capital cost.Energy Environ. Sci.20158102941294510.1039/C5EE02315G
    [Google Scholar]
41. WengG.M. LiC.Y.V. ChanK.Y. High voltage vanadium-metal hydride rechargeable semi-flow battery.J. Electrochem. Soc.20131609A1384A138910.1149/2.035309jes
    [Google Scholar]
42. WengG.M. LiC.Y.V. ChanK.Y. LeeC.W. ZhongJ. Investigations of high voltage vanadium-metal hydride flow battery toward kwh scale storage with 100 cm2 electrodes.J. Electrochem. Soc.20161631A5180A518710.1149/2.0271601jes
    [Google Scholar]
43. WeberA.Z. MenchM.M. MeyersJ.P. RossP.N. GostickJ.T. LiuQ. Redox flow batteries: A review.J. Appl. Electrochem.201141101137116410.1007/s10800‑011‑0348‑2
    [Google Scholar]
44. DempseyJ.L. JacksonM.N. PeroffA.G. Meeting the need: Formal electrochemistry training through workshops.J. Chem. Educ.2024101248348910.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00875
    [Google Scholar]
45. dos SantosW.R. Spalenza CaserE. SoaresE.J. SiqueiraR.N. Drag reduction in turbulent flows by diutan gum: A very stable natural drag reducer.J. Non-Newt. Fluid Mech.202027610422310.1016/j.jnnfm.2019.104223
    [Google Scholar]
46. GuY. YuS. MouJ. Research progress on the collaborative drag reduction effect of polymers and surfactants.Ind. Organ. Psychol.202013444 31963432
    [Google Scholar]
47. LiX. HuiB. JinQ. ShiH. LuX. JingL. JingD. Control of both ionic properties and micellar structure for enhanced turbulent drag reduction performance of surfactant solutions.Ind. Eng. Chem. Res.20236240164811649410.1021/acs.iecr.3c02708
    [Google Scholar]
48. RivasB.L. PereiraE.D. Viscosity properties of aqueous solution of poly(allylamine)-metal complexes.Polym. Bull.2000451697610.1007/s002890070058
    [Google Scholar]
49. MaburyS.A. MathersD. EllisD.A. LeeP. MarsellaA.M. DouglasM. An undergraduate experiment for the measurement of trace metals in core sediments by ICP-AES and GFAAS.J. Chem. Educ.20007712161110.1021/ed077p1611
    [Google Scholar]
50. YuanJ. HuangH. ChenY. YangW. TianH. ZhangD. ZhangH. Automatic bulk composition analysis of lunar basalts: Novel big-data algorithm for energy-dispersive x-ray spectroscopy.ACS Earth Space Chem.20237237037810.1021/acsearthspacechem.2c00260
    [Google Scholar]
51. MolauG.E. Heterogeneous ion-exchange membranes.J. Membr. Sci.19818330933010.1016/S0376‑7388(00)82318‑2
    [Google Scholar]
52. Ramírez-MontoyaL.A. Hernández-MontoyaV. Montes-MoránM.A. Jáuregui-RincónJ. CervantesF.J. Decolorization of dyes with different molecular properties using free and immobilized laccases from Trametes versicolor.J. Mol. Liq.2015212303710.1016/j.molliq.2015.08.040
    [Google Scholar]
53. KumarS. VandreE. CarvalhoM. Characteristics of air entrainment during dynamic wetting failure along a planar substrate67th Annual Meeting of the APS Division of Fluid Dynamics. vol. 747 Cambridge University Press2014119140
    [Google Scholar]
54. RosencranzR. BogenS.A. Clinical laboratory measurement of serum, plasma, and blood viscosity.Am. J. Clin. Pathol.2006125S78S86 16830959
    [Google Scholar]
55. NegishiM. SetoH. HaseM. YoshikawaK. How does the mobility of phospholipid molecules at a water/oil interface reflect the viscosity of the surrounding oil?Langmuir200824168431843410.1021/la8015172 18646878
    [Google Scholar]
56. ChaoT.C. TrybalaA. StarovV. DasD.B. Influence of haematocrit level on the kinetics of blood spreading on thin porous medium during dried blood spot sampling.Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.2014451384710.1016/j.colsurfa.2014.03.033
    [Google Scholar]
57. SongY. TurtonR. Study of the effect of liquid bridges on the dynamic behavior of two colliding tablets using DEM.Powder Technol.200717829910810.1016/j.powtec.2007.04.010
    [Google Scholar]
58. Skyllas-KazacosM. Novel vanadium chloride/polyhalide redox flow battery.J. Power Sources2003124129930210.1016/S0378‑7753(03)00621‑9
    [Google Scholar]
59. WuM. LiuM. LongG. WanK. LiangZ. ZhaoT.S. A novel high-energy-density positive electrolyte with multiple redox couples for redox flow batteries.Appl. Energy201413657658110.1016/j.apenergy.2014.09.076
    [Google Scholar]
60. Mensah-DarkwaK. TabiR.N. OwusuM. IngselT. KaholP.K. GuptaR.K. Recent advancement in MoS2 for hydrogen evolution reactions.Curr. Graphene Sci.202031112510.2174/2452273204666200303124226
    [Google Scholar]
61. ShaoY. XiaoX. ZhuY.P. MaT.Y. Single‐crystal cobalt phosphate nanosheets for biomimetic oxygen evolution in neutral electrolytes.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.20195841145991460410.1002/anie.201909326 31456313
    [Google Scholar]
62. SunD. SunZ. YangD. JiangX. TangJ. WangX. Advances in boron nitride‐based materials for electrochemical energy storage and conversion.EcoEnergy20231237540410.1002/ece2.22
    [Google Scholar]
63. NarayananT.M. ZhuY.G. GençerE. McKinleyG. Shao-HornY. Low-cost manganese dioxide semi-solid electrode for flow batteries.Joule20215112934295410.1016/j.joule.2021.07.010
    [Google Scholar]
64. ZhuY.G. NarayananT.M. TulodzieckiM. Sanchez-CasalongueH. HornQ.C. MedaL. YuY. SunJ. RegierT. McKinleyG.H. Shao-HornY. High-energy and high-power Zn–Ni flow batteries with semi-solid electrodes.Sustain. Energy Fuels2020484076408510.1039/D0SE00675K
    [Google Scholar]
65. HanifM. ZuoL. YanQ. HuX. ShiM. ChenH. A novel electrochemically and thermally stable polythiophene for photovoltaic application.J. Appl. Polym. Sci.2013127116116810.1002/app.37852
    [Google Scholar]
66. ZhangS. LuoJ. DuM. HuiH. SunZ. Safety and cycling stability enhancement of cellulose paper-based lithium-ion battery separator by aramid nanofibers.Eur. Polym. J.202217111122210.1016/j.eurpolymj.2022.111222
    [Google Scholar]
67. MirF.A. MirO.I. ZargarR.A. Structural, morphological, vibrational, thermal and optical properties of zns quantum dots in the polymer matrix.Curr. Altern. Energy201931505810.2174/2405463103666190704160914
    [Google Scholar]
68. ChenX. HopkinsB.J. HelalA. FanF.Y. SmithK.C. LiZ. SlocumA.H. McKinleyG.H. CarterW.C. ChiangY-M. A low-dissipation, pumpless, gravity-induced flow battery.Energy Environ. Sci.2016951760177010.1039/C6EE00874G
    [Google Scholar]
69. ChoiN. del OlmoD. FischerP. PinkwartK. TübkeJ. Development of flow fields for zinc slurry air flow batteries.Batteries2020611510.3390/batteries6010015
    [Google Scholar]