Recent Advancements in Biochar and its Composite for the Remediation of Hazardous Pollutants

References

1. IslamM.S. AhmedM.K. RaknuzzamanM. MamunH.A.M. IslamM.K. Heavy metal pollution in surface water and sediment: A preliminary assessment of an urban river in a developing country.Ecol. Indic.20154828229110.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.016
   [Google Scholar]
2. BenderJ. LeeR.F. PhillipsP. Uptake and transformation of metals and metalloids by microbial mats and their use in bioremediation.J. Ind. Microbiol.199514211311810.1007/BF01569892
   [Google Scholar]
3. HoudeM. MuirD.C.G. KiddK.A. GuildfordS. DrouillardK. EvansM.S. WangX. WhittleD.M. HaffnerD. KlingH. Influence of lake characteristics on the biomagnification of persistent organic pollutants in lake trout food webs.Environ. Toxicol. Chem.200827102169217810.1897/08‑071.118444699
   [Google Scholar]
4. NaeemK. SyedT.H. AbdusS. NargisJ. KyongS.K. Physicochemical investigation of the drinking water sources from Mardan, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.Int. J. Phys. Sci.201383316611671
   [Google Scholar]
5. PawariM. GawandeS. Ground water pollution & its consequence. Int. J. Eng. Res. gen.Sci.201534773776
   [Google Scholar]
6. KhanM.A. GhouriA.M. Environmental pollution: Its effects on life and its remedies.Res. World J. Arts Sci. Commer.201122276285
   [Google Scholar]
7. TarunaJ. AlankritaC. Assessment of water quality and its effects on the health of residents of Jhunjhunu district, Rajasthan: A cross sectional study.J. Public Health Epidemiol.201354186191
   [Google Scholar]
8. KambleS.M. Water pollution and public health issues in Kolhapur city in Maharashtra.Int. J. Scientif. Res. Pub.20144116
   [Google Scholar]
9. AhmadS. YusafzaiF. BariT. Assessment of heavy metals in surface water of River Panjkora Dir Lower, KPK Pakistan.J. Biol. Environ. Sci.20145144152
   [Google Scholar]
10. UllahS. JavedM.W. ShafiqueM. KhanS.F. An integrated approach for quality assessment of drinking water using GIS: A case study of Lower Dir.J. Himal. Earth Sci.2014472
    [Google Scholar]
11. JabeenS. MahmoodQ. TariqS. NawabB. ElahiN. Health impact caused by poor water and sanitation in district Abbottabad.J. Ayub Med. Coll. Abbottabad2011231475022830145
    [Google Scholar]
12. CurrieJ. Graff ZivinJ. MeckelK. NeidellM. SchlenkerW. Something in the water: Contaminated drinking water and infant health.Can. J. Econ.201346379181010.1111/caje.1203927134285
    [Google Scholar]
13. AhmedT. ScholzM. Al-FarajF. NiazW. Water-related impacts of climate change on agriculture and subsequently on public health: A review for generalists with particular reference to Pakistan.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health20161311105110.3390/ijerph1311105127801802
    [Google Scholar]
14. Minerals reconnaissance at saint catherine area, Southern Central Sinai, Egypt and their environmental impacts on human health. Salem, H.M.; Fouly, E.A., Eds.;Proceedings of the International Conference for Environmen-tal Hazard Mitigation (ICEHM 2000)200058866559988
    [Google Scholar]
15. ChowdhuryS. PilatusK.A. ZimmermannK.F. Arsenic contamination of drinking water and mental health. DEF-Discussion Papers on Development Policy2016222
    [Google Scholar]
16. HugginsT.M. HaegerA. BiffingerJ.C. RenZ.J. Granular biochar compared with activated carbon for wastewater treatment and resource recovery.Water Res.20169422523210.1016/j.watres.2016.02.05926954576
    [Google Scholar]
17. HuB. AiY. JinJ. HayatT. AlsaediA. ZhuangL. WangX. Efficient elimination of organic and inorganic pollutants by biochar and biochar-based materials.Biochar202021476410.1007/s42773‑020‑00044‑4
    [Google Scholar]
18. LehmannJ. JosephS. Biochar for environmental management: An introduction. Biochar for Environmental Management–Science and TechnologyLondon, Sterling, VAEarthscan2009
    [Google Scholar]
19. LiJ. Exploration of Hemudu pottery culture.Jingdezhen’s Ceram.199633640
    [Google Scholar]
20. ChenX. ChenG. ChenL. ChenY. LehmannJ. McBrideM.B. HayA.G. Adsorption of copper and zinc by biochars produced from pyrolysis of hardwood and corn straw in aqueous solution.Bioresour. Technol.2011102198877888410.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.07821764299
    [Google Scholar]
21. InyangM. GaoB. DingW. PullammanappallilP. ZimmermanA.R. CaoX. Enhanced lead sorption by biochar derived from anaerobically digested sugarcane bagasse.Sep. Sci. Technol.201146121950195610.1080/01496395.2011.584604
    [Google Scholar]
22. AltenorS. CareneB. EmmanuelE. LambertJ. EhrhardtJ.J. GaspardS. Adsorption studies of methylene blue and phenol onto vetiver roots activated carbon prepared by chemical activation.J. Hazard. Mater.20091651-31029103910.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.13319118948
    [Google Scholar]
23. SulimanM.A. SajidM. NazalM.K. IslamM.A. Carbon-based materials as promising sorbents for analytical sample preparation: Recent advances and trends in extraction of toxic metal pollutants from various media.Trends Analyt. Chem.202316711726510.1016/j.trac.2023.117265
    [Google Scholar]
24. AlshakhsF. GijjapuD.R. Aminul IslamM. AkinpeluA.A. NazalM.K. A promising palm leaves waste-derived biochar for efficient removal of tetracycline from wastewater.J. Mol. Struct.2024129613684610.1016/j.molstruc.2023.136846
    [Google Scholar]
25. OzturkM. SabaN. AltayV. IqbalR. HakeemK.R. JawaidM. IbrahimF.H. Biomass and bioenergy: An overview of the development potential in Turkey and Malaysia.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.2017791285130210.1016/j.rser.2017.05.111
    [Google Scholar]
26. KongS.H. LohS.K. BachmannR.T. RahimS.A. SalimonJ. Biochar from oil palm biomass: A review of its potential and challenges.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.20143972973910.1016/j.rser.2014.07.107
    [Google Scholar]
27. NorliI. FazilahA. PazliM.I. Agricultural biomass utilisation as a key driver for Malaysian bioeconomy. Knowledge-Driven Developments in the Bioeconomy.Springer2017141159
    [Google Scholar]
28. OsayiJ.I. IyukeS. OgbeideS.E. Biocrude production through pyrolysis of used tyres.J. Catal.201420141910.1155/2014/386371
    [Google Scholar]
29. WeiJ. TuC. YuanG. LiuY. BiD. XiaoL. LuJ. ThengB.K.G. WangH. ZhangL. ZhangX. Assessing the effect of pyrolysis temperature on the molecular properties and copper sorption capacity of a halophyte biochar.Environ. Pollut.2019251566510.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.12831071633
    [Google Scholar]
30. ZhaoB. O’ConnorD. ZhangJ. PengT. ShenZ. TsangD.C.W. HouD. Effect of pyrolysis temperature, heating rate, and residence time on rapeseed stem derived biochar.J. Clean. Prod.201817497798710.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.013
    [Google Scholar]
31. LengL. HuangH. An overview of the effect of pyrolysis process parameters on biochar stability.Bioresour. Technol.201827062764210.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.03030220436
    [Google Scholar]
32. CrossA. SohiS.P. A method for screening the relative long‐term stability of biochar.Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy20135221522010.1111/gcbb.12035
    [Google Scholar]
33. WangZ. LiuK. XieL. ZhuH. JiS. ShuX. Effects of residence time on characteristics of biochars prepared via co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and cotton stalks.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis201914210465910.1016/j.jaap.2019.104659
    [Google Scholar]
34. PeiT. ShiF. HouD. YangF. LuY. LiuC. LinX. LuY. ZhengZ. ZhengY. Enhanced adsorption of phenol from aqueous solution by KOH combined Fe-Zn bimetallic oxide co-pyrolysis biochar: Fabrication, performance, and mechanism.Bioresour. Technol.202338812974610.1016/j.biortech.2023.12974637689119
    [Google Scholar]
35. YinQ. LiuM. RenH. Biochar produced from the co-pyrolysis of sewage sludge and walnut shell for ammonium and phosphate adsorption from water.J. Environ. Manage.201924910941010.1016/j.jenvman.2019.10941031446122
    [Google Scholar]
36. ArbeláezM.J.I. JannaC.F. PérezG.M. Fast pyrolysis of biomass: A review of relevant aspects. Part I: Parametric study.Dyna20158219223924810.15446/dyna.v82n192.44701
    [Google Scholar]
37. MohanD. PittmanC.U.Jr SteeleP.H. Pyrolysis of wood/biomass for bio-oil: A critical review.Energy Fuels200620384888910.1021/ef0502397
    [Google Scholar]
38. BridgwaterA. PeacockeG. Fast pyrolysis processes for biomass.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.20004117310.1016/S1364‑0321(99)00007‑6
    [Google Scholar]
39. LiuS. XieQ. ZhangB. ChengY. LiuY. ChenP. RuanR. Fast microwave-assisted catalytic co-pyrolysis of corn stover and scum for bio-oil production with CaO and HZSM-5 as the catalyst.Bioresour. Technol.201620416417010.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.08526773959
    [Google Scholar]
40. KarunanayakeA.G. ToddO.A. CrowleyM.L. RicchettiL.B. PittmanC.U.Jr AndersonR. MlsnaT.E. Rapid removal of salicylic acid, 4-nitroaniline, benzoic acid and phthalic acid from wastewater using magnetized fast pyrolysis biochar from waste Douglas fir.Chem. Eng. J.2017319758810.1016/j.cej.2017.02.116
    [Google Scholar]
41. LaiW.Y. LaiC.M. KeG.R. ChungR.S. ChenC.T. ChengC.H. PaiC.W. ChenS.Y. ChenC.C. The effects of woodchip biochar application on crop yield, carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions from soils planted with rice or leaf beet.J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.20134461039104410.1016/j.jtice.2013.06.028
    [Google Scholar]
42. DemirbasA. ArinG. An overview of biomass pyrolysis.Energ. Sourc.200224547148210.1080/00908310252889979
    [Google Scholar]
43. HigashikawaF.S. ConzR.F. ColzatoM. CerriC.E.P. AlleoniL.R.F. Effects of feedstock type and slow pyrolysis temperature in the production of biochars on the removal of cadmium and nickel from water.J. Clean. Prod.201613796597210.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.205
    [Google Scholar]
44. LiL. RowbothamJ.S. GreenwellC.H. DyerP.W. An introduction to pyrolysis and catalytic pyrolysis: Versatile techniques for biomass conversion. New and future developments in catalysis: Catalytic biomass conversion. SuibS.L. Elsevier2013173208
    [Google Scholar]
45. TripathiM. SahuJ.N. GanesanP. MonashP. DeyT.K. Effect of microwave frequency on dielectric properties of oil palm shell (OPS) and OPS char synthesized by microwave pyrolysis of OPS.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis201511230631210.1016/j.jaap.2015.01.007
    [Google Scholar]
46. HirstE.A. TaylorA. MokayaR. A simple flash carbonization route for conversion of biomass to porous carbons with high CO 2 storage capacity.J. Mater. Chem. A Mater. Energy Sustain.2018626123931240310.1039/C8TA04409K
    [Google Scholar]
47. CarrierM. HugoT. GorgensJ. KnoetzeH. Comparison of slow and vacuum pyrolysis of sugar cane bagasse.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis2011901182610.1016/j.jaap.2010.10.001
    [Google Scholar]
48. RoyC. ChaalaA. Vacuum pyrolysis of automobile shredder residues.Resour. Conserv. Recycling200132112710.1016/S0921‑3449(00)00088‑4
    [Google Scholar]
49. Uras-PostmaÜ. CarrierM. KnoetzeJ.H. Vacuum pyrolysis of agricultural wastes and adsorptive criteria description of biochars governed by the presence of oxides.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis201410712313210.1016/j.jaap.2014.02.012
    [Google Scholar]
50. GabhaneJ.W. BhangeV.P. PatilP.D. BankarS.T. KumarS. Recent trends in biochar production methods and its application as a soil health conditioner: A review.SN Appl. Sci.202027130710.1007/s42452‑020‑3121‑5
    [Google Scholar]
51. dos SantosK.J.L. dos SantosG.E.S. de SáÍ.M.G.L. IdeA.H. DuarteJ.L.S. de CarvalhoS.H.V. SolettiJ.I. MeiliL. Wodyetia bifurcata biochar for methylene blue removal from aqueous matrix.Bioresour. Technol.201929312209310.1016/j.biortech.2019.12209331518818
    [Google Scholar]
52. GabhaneJ. Prince WilliamS.P.M. VaidyaA.N. MahapatraK. ChakrabartiT. Influence of heating source on the efficacy of lignocellulosic pretreatment – A cellulosic ethanol perspective.Biomass Bioenergy20113519610210.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.026
    [Google Scholar]
53. HuangY.F. ChiuehP.T. KuanW.H. LoS.L. Microwave pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass: Heating performance and reaction kinetics.Energy201610013714410.1016/j.energy.2016.01.088
    [Google Scholar]
54. Arafat HossainM. GanesanP. JewaratnamJ. ChinnaK. Optimization of process parameters for microwave pyrolysis of oil palm fiber (OPF) for hydrogen and biochar production.Energy Convers. Manage.201713334936210.1016/j.enconman.2016.10.046
    [Google Scholar]
55. HuangY.F. ChiuehP.T. LoS.L. CO2 adsorption on biochar from co-torrefaction of sewage sludge and leucaena wood using microwave heating.Energy Procedia20191584435444010.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.772
    [Google Scholar]
56. LinQ. ZhangJ. YinL. LiuH. ZuoW. TianY. Relationship between heavy metal consolidation and H2S removal by biochar from microwave pyrolysis of municipal sludge: Effect and mechanism.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20212822276942770210.1007/s11356‑021‑12631‑433515143
    [Google Scholar]
57. HuB. WangK. WuL. YuS.H. AntoniettiM. TitiriciM.M. Engineering carbon materials from the hydrothermal carbonization process of biomass.Adv. Mater.201022781382810.1002/adma.20090281220217791
    [Google Scholar]
58. KruseA. FunkeA. TitiriciM.M. Hydrothermal conversion of biomass to fuels and energetic materials.Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol.201317351552110.1016/j.cbpa.2013.05.00423707262
    [Google Scholar]
59. TitiriciM.M. WhiteR.J. FalcoC. SevillaM. Black perspectives for a green future: Hydrothermal carbons for environment protection and energy storage.Energy Environ. Sci.2012556796682210.1039/c2ee21166a
    [Google Scholar]
60. RongX. XieM. KongL. NatarajanV. MaL. ZhanJ. The magnetic biochar derived from banana peels as a persulfate activator for organic contaminants degradation.Chem. Eng. J.201937229430310.1016/j.cej.2019.04.135
    [Google Scholar]
61. MaH. LiJ.B. LiuW.W. MiaoM. ChengB.J. ZhuS.W. Novel synthesis of a versatile magnetic adsorbent derived from corncob for dye removal.Bioresour. Technol.2015190132010.1016/j.biortech.2015.04.04825919932
    [Google Scholar]
62. HuffM.D. KumarS. LeeJ.W. Comparative analysis of pinewood, peanut shell, and bamboo biomass derived biochars produced via hydrothermal conversion and pyrolysis.J. Environ. Manage.201414630330810.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.01625190598
    [Google Scholar]
63. WuJ. YangJ. HuangG. XuC. LinB. Hydrothermal carbonization synthesis of cassava slag biochar with excellent adsorption performance for Rhodamine B.J. Clean. Prod.202025111971710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119717
    [Google Scholar]
64. QianK. KumarA. ZhangH. BellmerD. HuhnkeR. Recent advances in utilization of biochar.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.2015421055106410.1016/j.rser.2014.10.074
    [Google Scholar]
65. Al-RahbiA.S. WilliamsP.T. Hydrogen-rich syngas production and tar removal from biomass gasification using sacrificial tyre pyrolysis char.Appl. Energy201719050150910.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.099
    [Google Scholar]
66. SattarA. LeekeG.A. HornungA. WoodJ. Steam gasification of rapeseed, wood, sewage sludge and miscanthus biochars for the production of a hydrogen-rich syngas.Biomass Bioenergy20146927628610.1016/j.biombioe.2014.07.025
    [Google Scholar]
67. MeyerS. GlaserB. QuickerP. Technical, economical, and climate-related aspects of biochar production technologies: A literature review.Environ. Sci. Technol.201145229473948310.1021/es201792c21961528
    [Google Scholar]
68. QianK. KumarA. PatilK. BellmerD. WangD. YuanW. HuhnkeR. Effects of biomass feedstocks and gasification conditions on the physiochemical properties of char.Energies2013683972398610.3390/en6083972
    [Google Scholar]
69. KumarA. JonesD. HannaM. Thermochemical biomass gasification: A review of the current status of the technology.Energies20092355658110.3390/en20300556
    [Google Scholar]
70. ClementeR.A. GutiérrezJ. HenaoH. MeloA. PérezJ. ChicaE. Adsorption capacity of the biochar obtained from Pinus patula wood micro-gasification for the treatment of polluted water containing malachite green dye.J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci.2021357431441
    [Google Scholar]
71. AtinafuD.G. YunB.Y. YangS. KimS. Encapsulation of dodecane in gasification biochar for its prolonged thermal/shape stability, reliability, and ambient enthalpy storage.Chem. Eng. J.202243713540710.1016/j.cej.2022.135407
    [Google Scholar]
72. YuK.L. LauB.F. ShowP.L. OngH.C. LingT.C. ChenW.H. NgE.P. ChangJ.S. Recent developments on algal biochar production and characterization.Bioresour. Technol.201724621110.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.00928844690
    [Google Scholar]
73. PrinsM.J. PtasinskiK.J. JanssenF.J.J.G. Torrefaction of wood.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis2006771354010.1016/j.jaap.2006.01.001
    [Google Scholar]
74. YaashikaaP.R. KumarP.S. VarjaniS. SaravananA. A critical review on the biochar production techniques, characterization, stability and applications for circular bioeconomy.Biotechnol. Rep.2020281e0057010.1016/j.btre.2020.e0057033304842
    [Google Scholar]
75. WannapeeraJ. WorasuwannarakN. Upgrading of woody biomass by torrefaction under pressure.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis20129617318010.1016/j.jaap.2012.04.002
    [Google Scholar]
76. RoyM. KunduK. Production of biochar briquettes from torrefaction of pine needles and its quality analysis.Bioresour. Technol. Rep.20232210146710.1016/j.biteb.2023.101467
    [Google Scholar]
77. ZhengN.Y. LeeM. LinY.L. SamannanB. Microwave-assisted wet co-torrefaction of food sludge and lignocellulose biowaste for biochar production and nutrient recovery.Process Saf. Environ. Prot.202014427328310.1016/j.psep.2020.07.032
    [Google Scholar]
78. ZhangC. LiF. HoS.H. ChenW.H. GunarathneD.S. ShowP.L. Oxidative torrefaction of microalga Nannochloropsis Oceanica activated by potassium carbonate for solid biofuel production.Environ. Res.2022212Pt C11338910.1016/j.envres.2022.11338935561822
    [Google Scholar]
79. TripathiM. SahuJ.N. GanesanP. Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: A review.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.20165546748110.1016/j.rser.2015.10.122
    [Google Scholar]
80. JoJ.H. KimS.S. ShimJ.W. LeeY.E. YooY.S. Pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of food wastes.Energies2017108119110.3390/en10081191
    [Google Scholar]
81. ElkhalifaS. Al-AnsariT. MackeyH.R. McKayG. Food waste to biochars through pyrolysis: A review.Resour. Conserv. Recycling201914431032010.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.024
    [Google Scholar]
82. AmalinaF. RazakA.S.A. KrishnanS. SulaimanH. ZularisamA.W. NasrullahM. Biochar production techniques utilizing biomass waste-derived materials and environmental applications – A review.J. Hazard. Mater. Adv.2022710013410.1016/j.hazadv.2022.100134
    [Google Scholar]
83. RuizJ.A. JuárezM.C. MoralesM.P. MuñozP. MendívilM.A. Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.20131817418310.1016/j.rser.2012.10.021
    [Google Scholar]
84. NidheeshP.V. GopinathA. RanjithN. AkreP.A. SreedharanV. Suresh KumarM. Potential role of biochar in advanced oxidation processes: A sustainable approach.Chem. Eng. J.202140512658210.1016/j.cej.2020.126582
    [Google Scholar]
85. ZhangZ. ZhuZ. ShenB. LiuL. Insights into biochar and hydrochar production and applications: A review.Energy201917158159810.1016/j.energy.2019.01.035
    [Google Scholar]
86. PatilP.D. YadavG.D. Application of microwave assisted three phase partitioning method for purification of laccase from Trametes hirsuta.Process Biochem.20186522022710.1016/j.procbio.2017.10.006
    [Google Scholar]
87. TurnerJ. SverdrupG. MannM.K. ManessP.C. KroposkiB. GhirardiM. EvansR.J. BlakeD. Renewable hydrogen production.Int. J. Energy Res.200832537940710.1002/er.1372
    [Google Scholar]
88. ShaheenS.M. NiaziN.K. HassanN.E.E. BibiI. WangH. TsangD.C.W. OkY.S. BolanN. RinklebeJ. Wood-based biochar for the removal of potentially toxic elements in water and wastewater: A critical review.Int. Mater. Rev.201964421624710.1080/09506608.2018.1473096
    [Google Scholar]
89. ManyàJ.J. Pyrolysis for biochar purposes: A review to establish current knowledge gaps and research needs.Environ. Sci. Technol.201246157939795410.1021/es301029g22775244
    [Google Scholar]
90. ZhaoL. CaoX. MašekO. ZimmermanA. Heterogeneity of biochar properties as a function of feedstock sources and production temperatures.J. Hazard. Mater.2013256-2571910.1016/j.jhazmat.2013.04.01523669784
    [Google Scholar]
91. LiangC. GascóG. FuS. MéndezA. FerreiroP.J. Biochar from pruning residues as a soil amendment: Effects of pyrolysis temperature and particle size.Soil Tillage Res.201616431010.1016/j.still.2015.10.002
    [Google Scholar]
92. QambraniN.A. RahmanM.M. WonS. ShimS. RaC. Biochar properties and eco-friendly applications for climate change mitigation, waste management, and wastewater treatment: A review.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.20177925527310.1016/j.rser.2017.05.057
    [Google Scholar]
93. NovakJ.M. LimaI. XingB. GaskinJ.W. SteinerC. DasK. Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand.Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour.200933
    [Google Scholar]
94. GlaserB. LehmannJ. ZechW. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal - A review.Biol. Fertil. Soils200235421923010.1007/s00374‑002‑0466‑4
    [Google Scholar]
95. AkhtarJ. AminS.N. A review on operating parameters for optimum liquid oil yield in biomass pyrolysis.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.20121675101510910.1016/j.rser.2012.05.033
    [Google Scholar]
96. AysuT. KüçükM.M. Biomass pyrolysis in a fixed-bed reactor: Effects of pyrolysis parameters on product yields and characterization of products.Energy2014641002102510.1016/j.energy.2013.11.053
    [Google Scholar]
97. YorgunS. Fixed-bed pyrolysis of Miscanthus x giganteus: Product yields and bio-oil characterization.Energy Sources200325877979010.1080/00908310390207828
    [Google Scholar]
98. SeptienS. ValinS. DupontC. PeyrotM. SalvadorS. Effect of particle size and temperature on woody biomass fast pyrolysis at high temperature (1000–1400°C).Fuel20129720221010.1016/j.fuel.2012.01.049
    [Google Scholar]
99. JafriN. WongW.Y. DoshiV. YoonL.W. CheahK.H. A review on production and characterization of biochars for application in direct carbon fuel cells.Process Saf. Environ. Prot.201811815216610.1016/j.psep.2018.06.036
    [Google Scholar]
100. JiangA. ChengZ. ShenZ. GuoW. QSAR study on the removal efficiency of organic pollutants in supercritical water based on degradation temperature.Chem. Cent. J.20181211610.1186/s13065‑018‑0380‑y29442196
     [Google Scholar]
101. MitraS. ChakrabortyA.J. TareqA.M. EmranT.B. NainuF. KhusroA. IdrisA.M. KhandakerM.U. OsmanH. AlhumaydhiF.A. GandaraS.J. Impact of heavy metals on the environment and human health: Novel therapeutic insights to counter the toxicity.J. King Saud Univ. Sci.202234310186510.1016/j.jksus.2022.101865
     [Google Scholar]
102. HerathH.M.S.K. ArbestainC.M. HedleyM.J. KirschbaumM.U.F. WangT. van HaleR. Experimental evidence for sequestering C with biochar by avoidance of CO2 emissions from original feedstock and protection of native soil organic matter.Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy20157351252610.1111/gcbb.12183
     [Google Scholar]
103. AliI. AsimM. KhanT.A. Low cost adsorbents for the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater.J. Environ. Manage.201211317018310.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.02823023039
     [Google Scholar]
104. DaiY. ZhangN. XingC. CuiQ. SunQ. The adsorption, regeneration and engineering applications of biochar for removal organic pollutants: A review.Chemosphere2019223122710.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.16130763912
     [Google Scholar]
105. KołodyńskaD. BąkJ. MajdańskaM. FilaD. Sorption of lanthanide ions on biochar composites.J. Rare Earths201836111212122010.1016/j.jre.2018.03.027
     [Google Scholar]
106. AbbasZ. AliS. RizwanM. ZaheerI.E. MalikA. RiazM.A. ShahidM.R. RehmanM.Z. Al-WabelM.I. A critical review of mechanisms involved in the adsorption of organic and inorganic contaminants through biochar.Arab. J. Geosci.2018111644810.1007/s12517‑018‑3790‑1
     [Google Scholar]
107. YinY. HeX. GaoR. MaH. YangY. Effects of rice straw and its biochar addition on soil labile carbon and soil organic carbon.J. Integr. Agric.201413349149810.1016/S2095‑3119(13)60704‑2
     [Google Scholar]
108. OniB.A. OziegbeO. OlawoleO.O. Significance of biochar application to the environment and economy.Ann. Agric. Sci.201964222223610.1016/j.aoas.2019.12.006
     [Google Scholar]
109. VermaT. AggarwalA. SinghS. SharmaS. SarmaS.J. Current challenges and advancements towards discovery and resistance of antibiotics.J. Mol. Struct.2022124813138010.1016/j.molstruc.2021.131380
     [Google Scholar]
110. BenY. FuC. HuM. LiuL. WongM.H. ZhengC. Human health risk assessment of antibiotic resistance associated with antibiotic residues in the environment: A review.Environ. Res.201916948349310.1016/j.envres.2018.11.04030530088
     [Google Scholar]
111. CarvalhoI.T. SantosL. Antibiotics in the aquatic environments: A review of the European scenario.Environ. Int.20169473675710.1016/j.envint.2016.06.02527425630
     [Google Scholar]
112. LiuS. XuW. LiuY. TanX. ZengG. LiX. LiangJ. ZhouZ. YanZ. CaiX. Facile synthesis of Cu(II) impregnated biochar with enhanced adsorption activity for the removal of doxycycline hydrochloride from water.Sci. Total Environ.201759254655310.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.08728318694
     [Google Scholar]
113. ZhouY. LiuX. XiangY. WangP. ZhangJ. ZhangF. WeiJ. LuoL. LeiM. TangL. Modification of biochar derived from sawdust and its application in removal of tetracycline and copper from aqueous solution: Adsorption mechanism and modelling. Bioresour.Technol.2017245Pt A26627310.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.17828892700
     [Google Scholar]
114. ZhongJ. LiL. ZhongZ. YangQ. ZhangJ. WangL. Advances on the research of the effect of biochar on the environmental behavior of antibiotics.J. Saf. Environ.2018182657663
     [Google Scholar]
115. SiloriR. ZangJ. RavalN.P. GiriB.S. MahlknechtJ. MoraA. MorenoD.J. TauseefS.M. KumarM. Adsorptive removal of ciprofloxacin and sulfamethoxazole from aqueous matrices using sawdust and plastic waste-derived biochar: A sustainable fight against antibiotic resistance.Bioresour. Technol.202338712953710.1016/j.biortech.2023.12953737488012
     [Google Scholar]
116. AhmedM.B. ZhouJ.L. NgoH.H. GuoW. JohirM.A.H. SornalingamK. Single and competitive sorption properties and mechanism of functionalized biochar for removing sulfonamide antibiotics from water.Chem. Eng. J.201731134835810.1016/j.cej.2016.11.106
     [Google Scholar]
117. ChenT. LuoL. DengS. ShiG. ZhangS. ZhangY. DengO. WangL. ZhangJ. WeiL. Sorption of tetracycline on H3PO4 modified biochar derived from rice straw and swine manure.Bioresour. Technol.201826743143710.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.07430032057
     [Google Scholar]
118. AfzalM.Z. SunX.F. LiuJ. SongC. WangS.G. JavedA. Enhancement of ciprofloxacin sorption on chitosan/biochar hydrogel beads.Sci. Total Environ.201863956056910.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.12929800849
     [Google Scholar]
119. AshiqA. AdassooriyaN.M. SarkarB. RajapakshaA.U. OkY.S. VithanageM. Municipal solid waste biochar-bentonite composite for the removal of antibiotic ciprofloxacin from aqueous media.J. Environ. Manage.201923642843510.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.00630769252
     [Google Scholar]
120. ZhangX. ZhangY. NgoH.H. GuoW. WenH. ZhangD. LiC. QiL. Characterization and sulfonamide antibiotics adsorption capacity of spent coffee grounds based biochar and hydrochar.Sci. Total Environ.202071613701510.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13701532036134
     [Google Scholar]
121. ZhouY. CaoS. XiC. LiX. ZhangL. WangG. ChenZ. A novel Fe3O4/graphene oxide/citrus peel-derived bio-char based nanocomposite with enhanced adsorption affinity and sensitivity of ciprofloxacin and sparfloxacin.Bioresour. Technol.201929212195110.1016/j.biortech.2019.12195131400654
     [Google Scholar]
122. EldinM.S.M. SolimanE.A. ElzatahryA.A.F. ElaassarM.R. EweidaB.Y. ElkadyM.F. Abdel RahmanA.M. YossefM.E. Carboxylated alginate hydrogel beads for methylene blue removal: Formulation, kinetic and isothermal studies.Desalination Water Treat.201916830832310.5004/dwt.2019.24628
     [Google Scholar]
123. TangJ. LiY. WangX. DarochM. Effective adsorption of aqueous Pb2+ by dried biomass of Landoltia punctata and Spirodela polyrhiza.J. Clean. Prod.2017145253410.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.038
     [Google Scholar]
124. ChaukuraN. MurimbaE.C. GwenziW. Synthesis, characterisation and methyl orange adsorption capacity of ferric oxide–biochar nano-composites derived from pulp and paper sludge.Appl. Water Sci.2017752175218610.1007/s13201‑016‑0392‑5
     [Google Scholar]
125. LonappanL. RouissiT. DasR.K. BrarS.K. RamirezA.A. VermaM. SurampalliR.Y. ValeroJ.R. Adsorption of methylene blue on biochar microparticles derived from different waste materials.Waste Manag.20164953754410.1016/j.wasman.2016.01.01526818183
     [Google Scholar]
126. XiangpingL. ChuanbinW. JianguangZ. BinL. JupingL. GuanyiC. Application of biochar in removal of organics and heavy metals from water.Acta Petrol. Sin.20183451047
     [Google Scholar]
127. dos ReisG.S. ThivetJ. LaisnéE. SrivastavaV. GrimmA. LimaE.C. BergnaD. HuT. NaushadM. LassiU. Synthesis of novel mesoporous selenium-doped biochar with high-performance sodium diclofenac and reactive orange 16 dye removals.Chem. Eng. Sci.202328111912910.1016/j.ces.2023.119129
     [Google Scholar]
128. ZazyckiM.A. GodinhoM. PerondiD. FolettoE.L. CollazzoG.C. DottoG.L. New biochar from pecan nutshells as an alternative adsorbent for removing reactive red 141 from aqueous solutions.J. Clean. Prod.2018171576510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.007
     [Google Scholar]
129. JiX. LüL. ChenF. YangC. Sorption properties and mechanisms of organic dyes by straw biochar.Acta Sci Circumst.20163651648165410.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.11726845186
     [Google Scholar]
130. WuJ. YangJ. FengP. HuangG. XuC. LinB. High-efficiency removal of dyes from wastewater by fully recycling litchi peel biochar.Chemosphere202024612573410.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12573431918084
     [Google Scholar]
131. YuY. WanY. ShangH. WangB. ZhangP. FengY. Corncob‐to‐xylose residue (CCXR) derived porous biochar as an excellent adsorbent to remove organic dyes from wastewater.Surf. Interface Anal.201951223424510.1002/sia.6575
     [Google Scholar]
132. KarlapudiA.P. VenkateswaruluT.C. TammineediJ. KanumuriL. RavuruB.K. DirisalaV. KodaliV.P. Role of biosurfactants in bioremediation of oil pollution-A review.Petroleum20184324124910.1016/j.petlm.2018.03.007
     [Google Scholar]
133. AbedR.M.M. Al-KindiS. Effect of disturbance by oil pollution on the diversity and activity of bacterial communities in biological soil crusts from the Sultanate of Oman.Appl. Soil Ecol.2017110889610.1016/j.apsoil.2016.10.009
     [Google Scholar]
134. JiangY.F. SunH. YvesU.J. LiH. HuX.F. Impact of biochar produced from post-harvest residue on the adsorption behavior of diesel oil on loess soil.Environ. Geochem. Health201638124325310.1007/s10653‑015‑9712‑125980560
     [Google Scholar]
135. YangE. YaoC. LiuY. ZhangC. JiaL. LiD. FuZ. SunD. KirkR.S. YinD. Bamboo-derived porous biochar for efficient adsorption removal of dibenzothiophene from model fuel.Fuel201821112112910.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.099
     [Google Scholar]
136. KandanelliR. MeesalaL. KumarJ. RajuC.S.K. PeddyV.C.R. GandhamS. KumarP. Cost effective and practically viable oil spillage mitigation: Comprehensive study with biochar.Mar. Pollut. Bull.2018128324010.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.01029571379
     [Google Scholar]
137. NguyenH.N. PignatelloJ.J. Laboratory tests of biochars as absorbents for use in recovery or containment of marine crude oil spills.Environ. Eng. Sci.201330737438010.1089/ees.2012.0411
     [Google Scholar]
138. BanatF.A. Al-BashirB. Al-AshehS. HayajnehO. Adsorption of phenol by bentonite.Environ. Pollut.2000107339139810.1016/S0269‑7491(99)00173‑615092985
     [Google Scholar]
139. GanQ. HouH. LiangS. QiuJ. TaoS. YangL. YuW. XiaoK. LiuB. HuJ. WangY. YangJ. Sludge-derived biochar with multivalent iron as an efficient Fenton catalyst for degradation of 4-Chlorophenol.Sci. Total Environ.202072513829910.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13829932278183
     [Google Scholar]
140. MohammedN.A.S. Abu-ZuraykR.A. HamadnehI. Al-DujailiA.H. Phenol adsorption on biochar prepared from the pine fruit shells: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamics studies.J. Environ. Manage.201822637738510.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.03330138837
     [Google Scholar]
141. ThangP.Q. JitaeK. GiangB.L. VietN.M. HuongP.T. Potential application of chicken manure biochar towards toxic phenol and 2,4-dinitrophenol in wastewaters.J. Environ. Manage.201925110955610.1016/j.jenvman.2019.10955631541848
     [Google Scholar]
142. ZhengW. GuoM. ChowT. BennettD.N. RajagopalanN. Sorption properties of greenwaste biochar for two triazine pesticides.J. Hazard. Mater.20101811-312112610.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.10320510513
     [Google Scholar]
143. SunY. QiS. ZhengF. HuangL. PanJ. JiangY. HouW. XiaoL. Organics removal, nitrogen removal and N2O emission in subsurface wastewater infiltration systems amended with/without biochar and sludge.Bioresour. Technol.2018249576110.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.00429040860
     [Google Scholar]
144. ZhangP. SunH. MinL. RenC. Biochars change the sorption and degradation of thiacloprid in soil: Insights into chemical and biological mechanisms.Environ. Pollut.201823615816710.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.03029414336
     [Google Scholar]
145. ZhangM. GaoB. VarnoosfaderaniS. HebardA. YaoY. InyangM. Preparation and characterization of a novel magnetic biochar for arsenic removal.Bioresour. Technol.201313045746210.1016/j.biortech.2012.11.13223313693
     [Google Scholar]
146. InyangM. DickensonE. The potential role of biochar in the removal of organic and microbial contaminants from potable and reuse water: A review.Chemosphere201513423224010.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.03.07225958252
     [Google Scholar]
147. UchimiyaM. ChangS. KlassonK.T. Screening biochars for heavy metal retention in soil: Role of oxygen functional groups.J. Hazard. Mater.20111901-343244110.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.03.06321489689
     [Google Scholar]
148. UchimiyaM. KlassonK.T. WartelleL.H. LimaI.M. Influence of soil properties on heavy metal sequestration by biochar amendment: 1. Copper sorption isotherms and the release of cations.Chemosphere201182101431143710.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.11.05021147495
     [Google Scholar]
149. KaramiN. ClementeR. JiménezM.E. LeppN.W. BeesleyL. Efficiency of green waste compost and biochar soil amendments for reducing lead and copper mobility and uptake to ryegrass.J. Hazard. Mater.20111911-3414810.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.02521565444
     [Google Scholar]
150. GaoR. HuH. FuQ. LiZ. XingZ. AliU. ZhuJ. LiuY. Remediation of Pb, Cd, and Cu contaminated soil by co-pyrolysis biochar derived from rape straw and orthophosphate: Speciation transformation, risk evaluation and mechanism inquiry.Sci. Total Environ.202073013911910.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13911932402973
     [Google Scholar]
151. LiR. WenY. LiuM. SuL. WangY. LiS. ZhongM. ZhouZ. ZhouN. Simultaneous removal of organic inorganic composite contaminants by in situ double modified biochar: Performance and mechanisms.J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.202213910452310.1016/j.jtice.2022.104523
     [Google Scholar]
152. DinhV.C. HouC.H. DaoT.N. O, N-doped porous biochar by air oxidation for enhancing heavy metal removal: The role of O, N functional groups.Chemosphere202229313362210.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.13362235033519
     [Google Scholar]
153. GertenD. HeckV. JägermeyrJ. BodirskyB.L. FetzerI. JalavaM. KummuM. LuchtW. RockströmJ. SchaphoffS. SchellnhuberH.J. Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries.Nat. Sustain.20203320020810.1038/s41893‑019‑0465‑1
     [Google Scholar]
154. GodfrayHCJ BeddingtonJR CruteIR HaddadL LawrenceD Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people.science20103275967812818
     [Google Scholar]
155. HouD. BolanN.S. TsangD.C.W. KirkhamM.B. O’ConnorD. Sustainable soil use and management: An interdisciplinary and systematic approach.Sci. Total Environ.202072913896110.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13896132353725
     [Google Scholar]
156. WangL. LiZ. WangY. BrookesP.C. WangF. ZhangQ. XuJ. LiuX. Performance and mechanisms for remediation of Cd(II) and As(III) co-contamination by magnetic biochar-microbe biochemical composite: Competition and synergy effects.Sci. Total Environ.202175014167210.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14167232862003
     [Google Scholar]
157. AtinafuD.G. WiS. YunB.Y. KimS. Engineering biochar with multiwalled carbon nanotube for efficient phase change material encapsulation and thermal energy storage.Energy202121611929410.1016/j.energy.2020.119294
     [Google Scholar]
158. GuptaS. KuaH.W. PangS.D. Biochar-mortar composite: Manufacturing, evaluation of physical properties and economic viability.Constr. Build. Mater.201816787488910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.104
     [Google Scholar]
159. LiR. WangJ.J. GastonL.A. ZhouB. LiM. XiaoR. WangQ. ZhangZ. HuangH. LiangW. HuangH. ZhangX. An overview of carbothermal synthesis of metal–biochar composites for the removal of oxyanion contaminants from aqueous solution.Carbon201812967468710.1016/j.carbon.2017.12.070
     [Google Scholar]
160. LiuC. ChenL. DingD. CaiT. From rice straw to magnetically recoverable nitrogen doped biochar: Efficient activation of peroxymonosulfate for the degradation of metolachlor.Appl. Catal. B201925431232010.1016/j.apcatb.2019.05.014
     [Google Scholar]
161. LiJ. LiB. HuangH. ZhaoN. ZhangM. CaoL. Investigation into lanthanum-coated biochar obtained from urban dewatered sewage sludge for enhanced phosphate adsorption.Sci. Total Environ.202071413683910.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13683932018980
     [Google Scholar]
162. LyuH. TangJ. CuiM. GaoB. ShenB. Biochar/iron (BC/Fe) composites for soil and groundwater remediation: Synthesis, applications, and mechanisms.Chemosphere202024612560910.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.12560931911329
     [Google Scholar]
163. YiY. HuangZ. LuB. XianJ. TsangE.P. ChengW. FangJ. FangZ. Magnetic biochar for environmental remediation: A review.Bioresour. Technol.202029812246810.1016/j.biortech.2019.12246831839494
     [Google Scholar]
164. AlamM.S. BishopB. ChenN. SafariS. WarterV. ByrneJ.M. WarcholaT. KapplerA. KonhauserK.O. AlessiD.S. Reusable magnetite nanoparticles–biochar composites for the efficient removal of chromate from water.Sci. Rep.20201011900710.1038/s41598‑020‑75924‑733149170
     [Google Scholar]
165. HeR. PengZ. LyuH. HuangH. NanQ. TangJ. Synthesis and characterization of an iron-impregnated biochar for aqueous arsenic removal.Sci. Total Environ.20186121177118610.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.01628892862
     [Google Scholar]
166. ZhangP. O’ConnorD. WangY. JiangL. XiaT. WangL. TsangD.C.W. OkY.S. HouD. A green biochar/iron oxide composite for methylene blue removal.J. Hazard. Mater.202038412128610.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12128631586920
     [Google Scholar]
167. ChenX. DaiY. FanJ. XuX. CaoX. Application of iron-biochar composite in topsoil for simultaneous remediation of chromium-contaminated soil and groundwater: Immobilization mechanism and long-term stability.J. Hazard. Mater.202140512422610.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12422633087289
     [Google Scholar]
168. LiuX. YangL. ZhaoH. WangW. Pyrolytic production of zerovalent iron nanoparticles supported on rice husk-derived biochar: simple, in situ synthesis and use for remediation of Cr(VI)-polluted soils.Sci. Total Environ.202070813447910.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13447931796288
     [Google Scholar]
169. LyuH. ZhaoH. TangJ. GongY. HuangY. WuQ. GaoB. Immobilization of hexavalent chromium in contaminated soils using biochar supported nanoscale iron sulfide composite.Chemosphere201819436036910.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.11.18229223115
     [Google Scholar]
170. DiaoZ.H. ZhangW.X. LiangJ.Y. HuangS.T. DongF.X. YanL. QianW. ChuW. Removal of herbicide atrazine by a novel biochar based iron composite coupling with peroxymonosulfate process from soil: Synergistic effect and mechanism.Chem. Eng. J.202140912768410.1016/j.cej.2020.127684
     [Google Scholar]
171. ShenZ. ZhangJ. HouD. TsangD.C.W. OkY.S. AlessiD.S. Synthesis of MgO-coated corncob biochar and its application in lead stabilization in a soil washing residue.Environ. Int.201912235736210.1016/j.envint.2018.11.04530501914
     [Google Scholar]
172. BrigattiM.F. GalanE. ThengB.K.G. Structures and mineralogy of clay minerals. Develop.Developm. Clay Sci.20061198610.1016/S1572‑4352(05)01002‑0
     [Google Scholar]
173. LideD.R. CRC handbook of chemistry and physics.CRC press2005
     [Google Scholar]
174. ArabyarmohammadiH. DarbanA.K. AbdollahyM. YongR. AyatiB. ZirakjouA. van der ZeeS.E.A.T.M. Utilization of a novel chitosan/clay/biochar nanobiocomposite for immobilization of heavy metals in acid soil environment.J. Polym. Environ.20182652107211910.1007/s10924‑017‑1102‑6
     [Google Scholar]
175. ChenL. ChenX.L. ZhouC.H. YangH.M. JiS.F. TongD.S. ZhongZ.K. YuW.H. ChuM.Q. Environmental-friendly montmorillonite-biochar composites: Facile production and tunable adsorption-release of ammonium and phosphate.J. Clean. Prod.201715664865910.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.050
     [Google Scholar]
176. HerathI. ZhaoF.J. BundschuhJ. WangP. WangJ. OkY.S. PalansooriyaK.N. VithanageM. Microbe mediated immobilization of arsenic in the rice rhizosphere after incorporation of silica impregnated biochar composites.J. Hazard. Mater.202039812309610.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12309632768840
     [Google Scholar]
177. HuP. ZhangY. LiuL. WangX. LuanX. MaX. ChuP.K. ZhouJ. ZhaoP. Biochar/struvite composite as a novel potential material for slow release of N and P.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20192617171521716210.1007/s11356‑019‑04458‑x31001775
     [Google Scholar]
178. LiY. WangX. WangY. WangF. XiaS. ZhaoJ. Struvite-supported biochar composite effectively lowers Cu bio-availability and the abundance of antibiotic-resistance genes in soil.Sci. Total Environ.202072413829410.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13829432247985
     [Google Scholar]
179. MummeJ. GetzJ. PrasadM. LüderU. KernJ. MašekO. BussW. Toxicity screening of biochar-mineral composites using germination tests.Chemosphere20182079110010.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.04229778049
     [Google Scholar]
180. MaL. WangQ. IslamS.M. LiuY. MaS. KanatzidisM.G. Highly selective and efficient removal of heavy metals by layered double hydroxide intercalated with the MoS42–ion.J. Am. Chem. Soc.201613882858286610.1021/jacs.6b0011026829617
     [Google Scholar]
181. BolbolH. FekriM. Hejazi-MehriziM. Layered double hydroxide–loaded biochar as a sorbent for the removal of aquatic phosphorus: Behavior and mechanism insights.Arab. J. Geosci.2019121650310.1007/s12517‑019‑4694‑4
     [Google Scholar]
182. ZhangL. TangS. JiangC. JiangX. GuanY. Simultaneous and efficient capture of inorganic nitrogen and heavy metals by polyporous layered double hydroxide and biochar composite for agricultural nonpoint pollution control.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces20181049430134303010.1021/acsami.8b1504930431258
     [Google Scholar]
183. WanS. WangS. LiY. GaoB. Functionalizing biochar with Mg–Al and Mg–Fe layered double hydroxides for removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions.J. Ind. Eng. Chem.20174724625310.1016/j.jiec.2016.11.039
     [Google Scholar]
184. YangF. ZhangS. SunY. TsangD.C.W. ChengK. OkY.S. Assembling biochar with various layered double hydroxides for enhancement of phosphorus recovery.J. Hazard. Mater.201936566567310.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.04730472452
     [Google Scholar]
185. XueL. GaoB. WanY. FangJ. WangS. LiY. CarpenaM.R. YangL. High efficiency and selectivity of MgFe-LDH modified wheat-straw biochar in the removal of nitrate from aqueous solutions.J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.20166331231710.1016/j.jtice.2016.03.021
     [Google Scholar]
186. WangS. GaoB. LiY. ZimmermanA.R. CaoX. Sorption of arsenic onto Ni/Fe layered double hydroxide (LDH)-biochar composites.RSC Adv.2016622177921779910.1039/C5RA17490B
     [Google Scholar]
187. MeiliL. LinsP.V. ZantaC.L.P.S. SolettiJ.I. RibeiroL.M.O. DornelasC.B. SilvaT.L. VieiraM.G.A. MgAl-LDH/Biochar composites for methylene blue removal by adsorption.Appl. Clay Sci.2019168112010.1016/j.clay.2018.10.012
     [Google Scholar]
188. ZubairM. ManzarM.S. Mu’azuN.D. AnilI. BlaisiN.I. Al-HarthiM.A. Functionalized MgAl-layered hydroxide intercalated date-palm biochar for Enhanced Uptake of Cationic dye: Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic studies.Appl. Clay Sci.202019010558710.1016/j.clay.2020.105587
     [Google Scholar]
189. AbdulG. ZhuX. ChenB. Structural characteristics of biochar-graphene nanosheet composites and their adsorption performance for phthalic acid esters.Chem. Eng. J.201731992010.1016/j.cej.2017.02.074
     [Google Scholar]
190. ZhangM. GaoB. YaoY. XueY. InyangM. Synthesis, characterization, and environmental implications of graphene-coated biochar.Sci. Total Environ.2012435-43656757210.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.07.03822906501
     [Google Scholar]
191. HuangD. WangX. ZhangC. ZengG. PengZ. ZhouJ. ChengM. WangR. HuZ. QinX. Sorptive removal of ionizable antibiotic sulfamethazine from aqueous solution by graphene oxide-coated biochar nanocomposites: Influencing factors and mechanism.Chemosphere201718641442110.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.15428802133
     [Google Scholar]
192. InyangM. GaoB. ZimmermanA. ZhangM. ChenH. Synthesis, characterization, and dye sorption ability of carbon nanotube–biochar nanocomposites.Chem. Eng. J.2014236394610.1016/j.cej.2013.09.074
     [Google Scholar]
193. InyangM. GaoB. ZimmermanA. ZhouY. CaoX. Sorption and cosorption of lead and sulfapyridine on carbon nanotube-modified biochars.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20152231868187610.1007/s11356‑014‑2740‑z25212810
     [Google Scholar]
194. FengF. ChenX. WangQ. XuW. LongL. MasryN.E.G. WanQ. YanH. ChengJ. YuX. Use of Bacillus-siamensis-inoculated biochar to decrease uptake of dibutyl phthalate in leafy vegetables.J. Environ. Manage.202025310963610.1016/j.jenvman.2019.10963631678688
     [Google Scholar]
195. XiongB. ZhangY. HouY. ArpH.P.H. ReidB.J. CaiC. Enhanced biodegradation of PAHs in historically contaminated soil by M. gilvum inoculated biochar.Chemosphere201718231632410.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.05.02028501571
     [Google Scholar]
196. MaH. WeiM. WangZ. HouS. LiX. XuH. Bioremediation of cadmium polluted soil using a novel cadmium immobilizing plant growth promotion strain Bacillus sp. TZ5 loaded on biochar.J. Hazard. Mater.202038812206510.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12206531954306
     [Google Scholar]
197. TuC. WeiJ. GuanF. LiuY. SunY. LuoY. Biochar and bacteria inoculated biochar enhanced Cd and Cu immobilization and enzymatic activity in a polluted soil.Environ. Int.202013710557610.1016/j.envint.2020.10557632070805
     [Google Scholar]
198. WeiM. LiuX. HeY. XuX. WuZ. YuK. ZhengX. Biochar inoculated with Pseudomonas putida improves grape (Vitis vinifera L.) fruit quality and alters bacterial diversity.Rhizosphere20201610026110.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100261
     [Google Scholar]
199. LiuX. LiaoJ. SongH. YangY. GuanC. ZhangZ. A biochar-based route for environmentally friendly controlled release of nitrogen: Urea-loaded biochar and bentonite composite.Sci. Rep.201991954810.1038/s41598‑019‑46065‑331266988
     [Google Scholar]
200. WangB. GaoB. ZimmermanA.R. ZhengY. LyuH. Novel biochar-impregnated calcium alginate beads with improved water holding and nutrient retention properties.J. Environ. Manage.201820910511110.1016/j.jenvman.2017.12.04129287175
     [Google Scholar]
201. ZhaoL. CaoX. ZhengW. ScottJ.W. SharmaB.K. ChenX. Copyrolysis of biomass with phosphate fertilizers to improve biochar carbon retention, slow nutrient release, and stabilize heavy metals in soil.ACS Sustain. Chem.& Eng.2016431630163610.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01570
     [Google Scholar]
202. MahmoudE. El BaroudyA. AliN. SleemM. Soil amendment with nanoresidues from water treatment increases P adsorption in saline soils.Environ. Chem. Lett.202018117117910.1007/s10311‑019‑00917‑6
     [Google Scholar]
203. GopinathK.P. VoD.V.N. PrakashG.D. JosephA.A. ViswanathanS. ArunJ. Environmental applications of carbon-based materials: A review.Environ. Chem. Lett.202119155758210.1007/s10311‑020‑01084‑9
     [Google Scholar]
204. PurakayasthaT.J. BeraT. BhaduriD. SarkarB. MandalS. WadeP. KumariS. BiswasS. MenonM. PathakH. TsangD.C.W. A review on biochar modulated soil condition improvements and nutrient dynamics concerning crop yields: Pathways to climate change mitigation and global food security.Chemosphere201922734536510.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.03.17030999175
     [Google Scholar]
205. El-NaggarA. LeeS.S. RinklebeJ. FarooqM. SongH. SarmahA.K. ZimmermanA.R. AhmadM. ShaheenS.M. OkY.S. Biochar application to low fertility soils: A review of current status, and future prospects.Geoderma201933753655410.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.034
     [Google Scholar]
206. NarvaezR.O.M. HernandezP.J.M. GoonetillekeA. BandalaE.R. Biochar-supported nanomaterials for environmental applications.J. Ind. Eng. Chem.201978213310.1016/j.jiec.2019.06.008
     [Google Scholar]
207. FischerB.M.C. ManzoniS. MorillasL. GarciaM. JohnsonM.S. LyonS.W. Improving agricultural water use efficiency with biochar – A synthesis of biochar effects on water storage and fluxes across scales.Sci. Total Environ.201965785386210.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.31230677950
     [Google Scholar]
208. GhoshD. MastoR.E. MaitiS.K. Ameliorative effect of Lantana camara biochar on coal mine spoil and growth of maize (Zea mays).Soil Use Manage.202036472673910.1111/sum.12626
     [Google Scholar]
209. QuJ. ZhangL. ZhangX. GaoL. TianY. Biochar combined with gypsum reduces both nitrogen and carbon losses during agricultural waste composting and enhances overall compost quality by regulating microbial activities and functions.Bioresour. Technol.202031412378110.1016/j.biortech.2020.12378132652451
     [Google Scholar]
210. WangJ. WangS. Preparation, modification and environmental application of biochar: A review.J. Clean. Prod.20192271002102210.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.282
     [Google Scholar]
211. ZhouY. QinS. VermaS. SarT. SarsaiyaS. RavindranB. LiuT. SindhuR. PatelA.K. BinodP. VarjaniS. SinghniaR.R. ZhangZ. AwasthiM.K. Production and beneficial impact of biochar for environmental application: A comprehensive review.Bioresour. Technol.202133712545110.1016/j.biortech.2021.12545134186328
     [Google Scholar]
212. WangD. JiangP. ZhangH. YuanW. Biochar production and applications in agro and forestry systems: A review.Sci. Total Environ.202072313777510.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13777532213399
     [Google Scholar]
213. CreamerA.E. GaoB. WangS. Carbon dioxide capture using various metal oxyhydroxide–biochar composites.Chem. Eng. J.201628382683210.1016/j.cej.2015.08.037
     [Google Scholar]
214. CreamerA.E. GaoB. ZimmermanA. HarrisW. Biomass-facilitated production of activated magnesium oxide nanoparticles with extraordinary CO2 capture capacity.Chem. Eng. J.2018334818810.1016/j.cej.2017.10.035
     [Google Scholar]
215. WardleD.A. NilssonM.C. ZackrissonO. Fire-derived charcoal causes loss of forest humus.Science2008320587662910.1126/science.115496018451294
     [Google Scholar]
216. YousafB. LiuG. WangR. AbbasQ. ImtiazM. LiuR. Investigating the biochar effects on C‐mineralization and sequestration of carbon in soil compared with conventional amendments using the stable isotope (δ13 C) approach.Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy2017961085109910.1111/gcbb.12401
     [Google Scholar]
217. ChengH. HillP.W. BastamiM.S. JonesD.L. Biochar stimulates the decomposition of simple organic matter and suppresses the decomposition of complex organic matter in a sandy loam soil.Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy2017961110112110.1111/gcbb.12402
     [Google Scholar]
218. ZhangQ. DuanP. GuninaA. ZhangX. YanX. KuzyakovY. XiongZ. Mitigation of carbon dioxide by accelerated sequestration from long-term biochar amended paddy soil.Soil Tillage Res.202120910495510.1016/j.still.2021.104955
     [Google Scholar]
219. XuL. FangH. DengX. YingJ. LvW. ShiY. ZhouG. ZhouY. Biochar application increased ecosystem carbon sequestration capacity in a Moso bamboo forest.For. Ecol. Manage.202047511844710.1016/j.foreco.2020.118447
     [Google Scholar]
220. LiuY. LonappanL. BrarS.K. YangS. Impact of biochar amendment in agricultural soils on the sorption, desorption, and degradation of pesticides: A review.Sci. Total Environ.2018645607010.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.09930015119
     [Google Scholar]
221. RosalesE. MeijideJ. PazosM. SanrománM.A. Challenges and recent advances in biochar as low-cost biosorbent: From batch assays to continuous-flow systems.Bioresour. Technol.201724617619210.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.08428688738
     [Google Scholar]
222. ZhangW. MaoS. ChenH. HuangL. QiuR. Pb(II) and Cr(VI) sorption by biochars pyrolyzed from the municipal wastewater sludge under different heating conditions.Bioresour. Technol.201314754555210.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.08224013292
     [Google Scholar]
223. SunK. KeiluweitM. KleberM. PanZ. XingB. Sorption of fluorinated herbicides to plant biomass-derived biochars as a function of molecular structure.Bioresour. Technol.2011102219897990310.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.03621907572
     [Google Scholar]
224. JiangB. LinY. MbogJ.C. Biochar derived from swine manure digestate and applied on the removals of heavy metals and antibiotics.Bioresour. Technol.201827060361110.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.02230292167
     [Google Scholar]
225. AmbayeT.G. VaccariM. van HullebuschE.D. AmraneA. RtimiS. Mechanisms and adsorption capacities of biochar for the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from industrial wastewater.Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.202118103273329410.1007/s13762‑020‑03060‑w
     [Google Scholar]
226. KasoziG.N. ZimmermanA.R. KizzaN.P. GaoB. Catechol and humic acid sorption onto a range of laboratory-produced black carbons (biochars).Environ. Sci. Technol.201044166189619510.1021/es101442320669904
     [Google Scholar]
227. PremarathnaK.S.D. RajapakshaA.U. SarkarB. KwonE.E. BhatnagarA. OkY.S. VithanageM. Biochar-based engineered composites for sorptive decontamination of water: A review.Chem. Eng. J.201937253655010.1016/j.cej.2019.04.097
     [Google Scholar]
228. LiuB.L. FuM.M. XiangL. FengN.X. ZhaoH.M. LiY.W. CaiQ.Y. LiH. MoC.H. WongM.H. Adsorption of microcystin contaminants by biochars derived from contrasting pyrolytic conditions: Characteristics, affecting factors, and mechanisms.Sci. Total Environ.202176314302810.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14302833129529
     [Google Scholar]
229. ChengL. JiY. LiuX. MuL. ZhuJ. Sorption mechanism of organic dyes on a novel self-nitrogen-doped porous graphite biochar: Coupling DFT calculations with experiments.Chem. Eng. Sci.202124211673910.1016/j.ces.2021.116739
     [Google Scholar]
230. HassanM. LiuY. NaiduR. ParikhS.J. DuJ. QiF. WillettI.R. Influences of feedstock sources and pyrolysis temperature on the properties of biochar and functionality as adsorbents: A meta-analysis.Sci. Total Environ.202074414071410.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14071432717463
     [Google Scholar]
231. RegkouzasP. DiamadopoulosE. Adsorption of selected organic micro-pollutants on sewage sludge biochar.Chemosphere201922484085110.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.02.16530852464
     [Google Scholar]
232. MukherjeeA. ZimmermanA.R. HarrisW. Surface chemistry variations among a series of laboratory-produced biochars.Geoderma20111633-424725510.1016/j.geoderma.2011.04.021
     [Google Scholar]
233. FangQ. YeS. YangH. YangK. ZhouJ. GaoY. LinQ. TanX. YangZ. Application of layered double hydroxide-biochar composites in wastewater treatment: Recent trends, modification strategies, and outlook.J. Hazard. Mater.202142012656910.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12656934280719
     [Google Scholar]
234. ChenJ. ZhangD. ZhangH. GhoshS. PanB. Fast and slow adsorption of carbamazepine on biochar as affected by carbon structure and mineral composition.Sci. Total Environ.201757959860510.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.05227863870
     [Google Scholar]
235. ZhengH. WangZ. ZhaoJ. HerbertS. XingB. Sorption of antibiotic sulfamethoxazole varies with biochars produced at different temperatures.Environ. Pollut.2013181606710.1016/j.envpol.2013.05.05623811180
     [Google Scholar]
236. SunY. GaoB. YaoY. FangJ. ZhangM. ZhouY. ChenH. YangL. Effects of feedstock type, production method, and pyrolysis temperature on biochar and hydrochar properties.Chem. Eng. J.201424057457810.1016/j.cej.2013.10.081
     [Google Scholar]
237. ZhengY. WangJ. LiD. LiuC. LuY. LinX. ZhengZ. Insight into the KOH/KMnO4 activation mechanism of oxygen-enriched hierarchical porous biochar derived from biomass waste by in-situ pyrolysis for methylene blue enhanced adsorption.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis202115810526910.1016/j.jaap.2021.105269
     [Google Scholar]
238. GuptaS. SireeshaS. SreedharI. PatelC.M. AnithaK.L. Latest trends in heavy metal removal from wastewater by biochar based sorbents.J. Water Process Eng.20203810156110.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101561
     [Google Scholar]
239. TanX. LiuY. ZengG. WangX. HuX. GuY. YangZ. Application of biochar for the removal of pollutants from aqueous solutions.Chemosphere2015125708510.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.05825618190
     [Google Scholar]
240. ShanR. ShiY. GuJ. WangY. YuanH. Single and competitive adsorption affinity of heavy metals toward peanut shell-derived biochar and its mechanisms in aqueous systems.Chin. J. Chem. Eng.20202851375138310.1016/j.cjche.2020.02.012
     [Google Scholar]
241. ParkS.H. ChoH.J. RyuC. ParkY.K. Removal of copper(II) in aqueous solution using pyrolytic biochars derived from red macroalga Porphyra tenera.J. Ind. Eng. Chem.20163631431910.1016/j.jiec.2016.02.021
     [Google Scholar]
242. LiuZ. ZhangF.S. WuJ. Characterization and application of chars produced from pinewood pyrolysis and hydrothermal treatment.Fuel201089251051410.1016/j.fuel.2009.08.042
     [Google Scholar]
243. HarveyO.R. HerbertB.E. RhueR.D. KuoL.J. Metal interactions at the biochar-water interface: energetics and structure-sorption relationships elucidated by flow adsorption microcalorimetry.Environ. Sci. Technol.201145135550555610.1021/es104401h21630654
     [Google Scholar]
244. DongX. MaL.Q. LiY. Characteristics and mechanisms of hexavalent chromium removal by biochar from sugar beet tailing.J. Hazard. Mater.20111901-390991510.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.00821550718
     [Google Scholar]
245. SunL. WangJ. WuJ. WangT. DuY. LiY. LiH. Constructing nanostructured silicates on diatomite for Pb(II) and Cd(II) removal.J. Mater. Sci.20195496882689410.1007/s10853‑019‑03388‑w
     [Google Scholar]
246. XuY. ChenB. Investigation of thermodynamic parameters in the pyrolysis conversion of biomass and manure to biochars using thermogravimetric analysis.Bioresour. Technol.201314648549310.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.08623958681
     [Google Scholar]
247. LuH. ZhangW. YangY. HuangX. WangS. QiuR. Relative distribution of Pb2+ sorption mechanisms by sludge-derived biochar.Water Res.201246385486210.1016/j.watres.2011.11.05822189294
     [Google Scholar]
248. Sakin OmerO. HusseinM.A. HusseinB.H.M. MgaidiA. Adsorption thermodynamics of cationic dyes (methylene blue and crystal violet) to a natural clay mineral from aqueous solution between 293.15 and 323.15 K.Arab. J. Chem.201811561562310.1016/j.arabjc.2017.10.007
     [Google Scholar]
249. PatraB.R. MukherjeeA. NandaS. DalaiA.K. Biochar production, activation and adsorptive applications: A review.Environ. Chem. Lett.20211932237225910.1007/s10311‑020‑01165‑9
     [Google Scholar]
250. PatraB.R. NandaS. DalaiA.K. MedaV. Slow pyrolysis of agro-food wastes and physicochemical characterization of biofuel products.Chemosphere202128513143110.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13143134329143
     [Google Scholar]
251. KatheresanV. KansedoJ. LauS.Y. Efficiency of various recent wastewater dye removal methods: A review.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.2018644676469710.1016/j.jece.2018.06.060
     [Google Scholar]
252. CriniG. LichtfouseE. Advantages and disadvantages of techniques used for wastewater treatment.Environ. Chem. Lett.201917114515510.1007/s10311‑018‑0785‑9
     [Google Scholar]
253. WangX. JiangC. HouB. WangY. HaoC. WuJ. Carbon composite lignin-based adsorbents for the adsorption of dyes.Chemosphere201820658759610.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.18329778084
     [Google Scholar]
254. BaysalM. BilgeK. YılmazB. PapilaM. YürümY. Preparation of high surface area activated carbon from waste-biomass of sunflower piths: Kinetics and equilibrium studies on the dye removal.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.2018621702171310.1016/j.jece.2018.02.020
     [Google Scholar]
255. SinghA. NandaS. SosaG.J.F. BerrutiF. Pyrolysis of-MISCANTHUS and characterization of value‐added bio‐oil and biochar products.Can. J. Chem. Eng.202199S1S55S6810.1002/cjce.23978
     [Google Scholar]
256. HaoD. ChenY. ZhangY. YouN. Nanocomposites of zero-valent iron@biochar derived from agricultural wastes for adsorptive removal of tetracyclines.Chemosphere202128413134210.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13134234225129
     [Google Scholar]
257. YuK.L. LeeX.J. OngH.C. ChenW.H. ChangJ.S. LinC.S. ShowP.L. LingT.C. Adsorptive removal of cationic methylene blue and anionic Congo red dyes using wet-torrefied microalgal biochar: Equilibrium, kinetic and mechanism modeling.Environ. Pollut.202127211598610.1016/j.envpol.2020.11598633187841
     [Google Scholar]
258. SinghR. DuttaR.K. NaikD.V. RayA. KanaujiaP.K. High surface area Eucalyptus wood biochar for the removal of phenol from petroleum refinery wastewater.Environmental Challenges2021510035310.1016/j.envc.2021.100353
     [Google Scholar]
259. VigneshwaranS. SirajudheenP. NikithaM. RamkumarK. MeenakshiS. Facile synthesis of sulfur-doped chitosan/biochar derived from tapioca peel for the removal of organic dyes: Isotherm, kinetics and mechanisms.J. Mol. Liq.202132611530310.1016/j.molliq.2021.115303
     [Google Scholar]
260. JacobM.M. PonnuchamyM. KapoorA. SivaramanP. Bagasse based biochar for the adsorptive removal of chlorpyrifos from contaminated water.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.20208410390410.1016/j.jece.2020.103904
     [Google Scholar]
261. DuC. SongY. ShiS. JiangB. YangJ. XiaoS. Preparation and characterization of a novel Fe3O4-graphene-biochar composite for crystal violet adsorption.Sci. Total Environ.202071113466210.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.13466231831251
     [Google Scholar]
262. EltaweilA.S. Ali MohamedH. MonaemE.M. SubruitiE.G.M. Mesoporous magnetic biochar composite for enhanced adsorption of malachite green dye: Characterization, adsorption kinetics, thermodynamics and isotherms.Adv. Powder Technol.20203131253126310.1016/j.apt.2020.01.005
     [Google Scholar]
263. ShenY. GuoJ.Z. BaiL.Q. ChenX.Q. LiB. High effective adsorption of Pb(II) from solution by biochar derived from torrefaction of ammonium persulphate pretreated bamboo.Bioresour. Technol.202132312461610.1016/j.biortech.2020.12461633387711
     [Google Scholar]
264. ShenT. WangP. HuL. HuQ. WangX. ZhangG. Adsorption of 4-chlorophenol by wheat straw biochar and its regeneration with persulfate under microwave irradiation.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.20219410535310.1016/j.jece.2021.105353
     [Google Scholar]
265. ChenY. XuF. LiH. LiY. LiuY. ChenY. LiM. LiL. JiangH. ChenL. Simple hydrothermal synthesis of magnetic MnFe2O4-sludge biochar composites for removal of aqueous Pb2+.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis202115610517310.1016/j.jaap.2021.105173
     [Google Scholar]
266. PalansooriyaK.N. KimS. IgalavithanaA.D. HashimotoY. ChoiY.E. MukhopadhyayR. SarkarB. OkY.S. Fe(III) loaded chitosan-biochar composite fibers for the removal of phosphate from water.J. Hazard. Mater.202141512546410.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.12546433730647
     [Google Scholar]
267. SalimiM. SalehiZ. HeidariH. VahabzadehF. Production of activated biochar from Luffa cylindrica and its application for adsorption of 4-Nitrophenol.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.20219410540310.1016/j.jece.2021.105403
     [Google Scholar]
268. WangH. LouX. HuQ. SunT. Adsorption of antibiotics from water by using Chinese herbal medicine residues derived biochar: Preparation and properties studies.J. Mol. Liq.202132511496710.1016/j.molliq.2020.114967
     [Google Scholar]
269. LiuJ. RenS. CaoJ. TsangD.C.W. BeiyuanJ. PengY. FangF. SheJ. YinM. ShenN. WangJ. Highly efficient removal of thallium in wastewater by MnFe2O4-biochar composite.J. Hazard. Mater.202140112331110.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12331132652417
     [Google Scholar]
270. Abd-ElhamidA.I. EmranM. SadekE.M.H. ShanshoryE.A.A. SolimanH.M.A. AklM.A. RashadM. Enhanced removal of cationic dye by eco-friendly activated biochar derived from rice straw.Appl. Water Sci.20201014510.1007/s13201‑019‑1128‑0
     [Google Scholar]
271. SaravananP. ThillainayagamB.P. RavindiranG. JosephrajJ. Evaluation of the adsorption capacity of Cocos Nucifera shell derived biochar for basic dyes sequestration from aqueous solution.Energ. Sourc. A: Recovery Util. Environ. Eff.202011710.1080/15567036.2020.1800142
     [Google Scholar]
272. SumalinogD.A.G. CaparedaS.C. de LunaM.D.G. Evaluation of the effectiveness and mechanisms of acetaminophen and methylene blue dye adsorption on activated biochar derived from municipal solid wastes.J. Environ. Manage.201821025526210.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.01029367138
     [Google Scholar]
273. XieJ. LinR. LiangZ. ZhaoZ. YangC. CuiF. Effect of cations on the enhanced adsorption of cationic dye in Fe3O4-loaded biochar and mechanism.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.20219410574410.1016/j.jece.2021.105744
     [Google Scholar]
274. LengL. YuanX. ZengG. ShaoJ. ChenX. WuZ. WangH. PengX. Surface characterization of rice husk bio-char produced by liquefaction and application for cationic dye (Malachite green) adsorption.Fuel2015155778510.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.019
     [Google Scholar]
275. Morais da SilvaP.M. CamparottoN.G. Grego LiraK.T. PiconeF.C.S. PredigerP. Adsorptive removal of basic dye onto sustainable chitosan beads: Equilibrium, kinetics, stability, continuous-mode adsorption and mechanism.Sustain. Chem. Pharm.20201810031810.1016/j.scp.2020.100318
     [Google Scholar]
276. PalP. PalA. Dye removal using waste beads: Efficient utilization of surface-modified chitosan beads generated after lead adsorption process.J. Water Process Eng.20193110088210.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100882
     [Google Scholar]
277. DaiL. ZhuW. HeL. TanF. ZhuN. ZhouQ. HeM. HuG. Calcium-rich biochar from crab shell: An unexpected super adsorbent for dye removal.Bioresour. Technol.201826751051610.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.09030048926
     [Google Scholar]
278. AygünA. KarakaşY.S. DumanI. Production of granular activated carbon from fruit stones and nutshells and evaluation of their physical, chemical and adsorption properties.Microporous Mesoporous Mater.2003662-318919510.1016/j.micromeso.2003.08.028
     [Google Scholar]
279. HanX. ChuL. LiuS. ChenT. DingC. YanJ. CuiL. QuanG. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution using porous biochar obtained by KOH activation of peanut shell biochar.BioResources20151022836284910.15376/biores.10.2.2836‑2849
     [Google Scholar]
280. ZouW. LiK. BaiH. ShiX. HanR. Enhanced cationic dyes removal from aqueous solution by oxalic acid modified rice husk.J. Chem. Eng. Data20115651882189110.1021/je100893h
     [Google Scholar]
281. SunL. ChenD. WanS. YuZ. Performance, kinetics, and equilibrium of methylene blue adsorption on biochar derived from eucalyptus saw dust modified with citric, tartaric, and acetic acids.Bioresour. Technol.201519830030810.1016/j.biortech.2015.09.02626402873
     [Google Scholar]
282. NunesA.A. FrancaA.S. OliveiraL.S. Activated carbons from waste biomass: An alternative use for biodiesel production solid residues.Bioresour. Technol.200910051786179210.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.03218996006
     [Google Scholar]
283. FrancaA.S. OliveiraL.S. NunesA.A. AlvesC.C.O. Microwave assisted thermal treatment of defective coffee beans press cake for the production of adsorbents.Bioresour. Technol.201010131068107410.1016/j.biortech.2009.08.10219767204
     [Google Scholar]
284. KaragözS. TayT. UcarS. ErdemM. Activated carbons from waste biomass by sulfuric acid activation and their use on methylene blue adsorption.Bioresour. Technol.200899146214622210.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.01918207735
     [Google Scholar]
285. ZhongZ.Y. YangQ. LiX.M. LuoK. LiuY. ZengG.M. Preparation of peanut hull-based activated carbon by microwave-induced phosphoric acid activation and its application in Remazol Brilliant Blue R adsorption.Ind. Crops Prod.201237117818510.1016/j.indcrop.2011.12.015
     [Google Scholar]
286. YangG. WuL. XianQ. ShenF. WuJ. ZhangY. Removal of congo red and methylene blue from aqueous solutions by vermicompost-derived biochars.PLoS One2016115e015456210.1371/journal.pone.015456227144922
     [Google Scholar]
287. ChengZ. ZhangL. GuoX. JiangX. LiT. Adsorption behavior of direct red 80 and congo red onto activated carbon/surfactant: Process optimization, kinetics and equilibrium.Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.20151371126114310.1016/j.saa.2014.08.13825305604
     [Google Scholar]
288. TianP. HanX. NingG. FangH. YeJ. GongW. LinY. Synthesis of porous hierarchical MgO and its superb adsorption properties.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2013523124111241810.1021/am403352y24224803
     [Google Scholar]
289. ChatterjeeS. LeeM.W. WooS.H. Adsorption of congo red by chitosan hydrogel beads impregnated with carbon nanotubes.Bioresour. Technol.201010161800180610.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.05119962883
     [Google Scholar]
290. PandaG.C. DasS.K. GuhaA.K. Jute stick powder as a potential biomass for the removal of congo red and rhodamine B from their aqueous solution.J. Hazard. Mater.2009164137437910.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.01518804326
     [Google Scholar]
291. MondalN.K. KarS. Potentiality of banana peel for removal of Congo red dye from aqueous solution: Isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamics studies.Appl. Water Sci.20188615710.1007/s13201‑018‑0811‑x
     [Google Scholar]
292. SartapeA.S. MandhareA.M. JadhavV.V. RautP.D. AnuseM.A. KolekarS.S. Removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solution with adsorption technique using Limonia acidissima (wood apple) shell as low cost adsorbent.Arab. J. Chem.201710S3229S323810.1016/j.arabjc.2013.12.019
     [Google Scholar]
293. LiuY. ZhaoX. LiJ. MaD. HanR. Characterization of bio-char from pyrolysis of wheat straw and its evaluation on methylene blue adsorption.Desalination Water Treat.2012461-311512310.1080/19443994.2012.677408
     [Google Scholar]
294. MubarakN.M. FoY.T. Al-SalimH.S. SahuJ.N. AbdullahE.C. NizamuddinS. JayakumarN.S. GanesanP. Removal of methylene blue and orange-G from waste water using magnetic biochar.Int. J. Nanosci.2015144155000910.1142/S0219581X1550009X
     [Google Scholar]
295. NautiyalP. SubramanianK.A. DastidarM.G. Adsorptive removal of dye using biochar derived from residual algae after in-situ transesterification: Alternate use of waste of biodiesel industry.J. Environ. Manage.201618218719710.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.06327474901
     [Google Scholar]
296. ThinesK.R. AbdullahE.C. MubarakN.M. Effect of process parameters for production of microporous magnetic biochar derived from agriculture waste biomass.Microporous Mesoporous Mater.2017253293910.1016/j.micromeso.2017.06.031
     [Google Scholar]
297. KongS.H. LamS.S. YekP.N.Y. LiewR.K. MaN.L. OsmanM.S. WongC.C. Self‐purging microwave pyrolysis: An innovative approach to convert oil palm shell into carbon‐rich biochar for methylene blue adsorption.J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.20199451397140510.1002/jctb.5884
     [Google Scholar]
298. YekP.N.Y. PengW. WongC.C. LiewR.K. HoY.L. Wan MahariW.A. AzwarE. YuanT.Q. TabatabaeiM. AghbashloM. SonneC. LamS.S. Engineered biochar via microwave CO2 and steam pyrolysis to treat carcinogenic Congo red dye.J. Hazard. Mater.202039512263610.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12263632298946
     [Google Scholar]
299. LiewR.K. NamW.L. ChongM.Y. PhangX.Y. SuM.H. YekP.N.Y. MaN.L. ChengC.K. ChongC.T. LamS.S. Oil palm waste: An abundant and promising feedstock for microwave pyrolysis conversion into good quality biochar with potential multi-applications.Process Saf. Environ. Prot.2018115576910.1016/j.psep.2017.10.005
     [Google Scholar]
300. AusavasukhiA. KampoosaenC. KengnokO. Adsorption characteristics of Congo red on carbonized leonardite.J. Clean. Prod.201613450651410.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.034
     [Google Scholar]
301. HuangW. ChenJ. ZhangJ. Adsorption characteristics of methylene blue by biochar prepared using sheep, rabbit and pig manure.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20182529292562926610.1007/s11356‑018‑2906‑130120728
     [Google Scholar]
302. SewuD.D. BoakyeP. WooS.H. Highly efficient adsorption of cationic dye by biochar produced with Korean cabbage waste.Bioresour. Technol.201722420621310.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.00927839858
     [Google Scholar]
303. SewuD.D. BoakyeP. JungH. WooS.H. Synergistic dye adsorption by biochar from co-pyrolysis of spent mushroom substrate and Saccharina japonica.Bioresour. Technol.2017244Pt 11142114910.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.10328869124
     [Google Scholar]
304. HameedB.H. El-KhaiaryM.I. Kinetics and equilibrium studies of malachite green adsorption on rice straw-derived char.J. Hazard. Mater.20081531-270170810.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.01917942219
     [Google Scholar]
305. RawatA.P. SinghD.P. Decolourization of malachite green dye by mentha plant biochar (MPB): A combined action of adsorption and electrochemical reduction processes.Water Sci. Technol.20187761734174310.2166/wst.2018.05929595176
     [Google Scholar]
306. BeakouB.H. El HassaniK. HoussainiM.A. BelbahloulM. OukaniE. AnouarA. A novel biochar from Manihot esculenta Crantz waste: Application for the removal of Malachite Green from wastewater and optimization of the adsorption process.Water Sci. Technol.20177661447145610.2166/wst.2017.33228953471
     [Google Scholar]
307. ZhangX. LinQ. LuoS. RuanK. PengK. Preparation of novel oxidized mesoporous carbon with excellent adsorption performance for removal of malachite green and lead ion.Appl. Surf. Sci.201844232233110.1016/j.apsusc.2018.02.148
     [Google Scholar]
308. ChowdhuryS. DasP. Mechanistic, kinetic, and thermodynamic evaluation of adsorption of hazardous malachite green onto conch shell powder.Sep. Sci. Technol.201146121966197610.1080/01496395.2011.584930
     [Google Scholar]
309. HameedB.H. El-KhaiaryM.I. Batch removal of malachite green from aqueous solutions by adsorption on oil palm trunk fibre: Equilibrium isotherms and kinetic studies.J. Hazard. Mater.20081541-323724410.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.01718022316
     [Google Scholar]
310. FanS. TangJ. WangY. LiH. ZhangH. TangJ. WangZ. LiX. Biochar prepared from co-pyrolysis of municipal sewage sludge and tea waste for the adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solutions: Kinetics, isotherm, thermodynamic and mechanism.J. Mol. Liq.201622043244110.1016/j.molliq.2016.04.107
     [Google Scholar]
311. MahmoudD.K. SallehM.A.M. KarimW.A.W.A. IdrisA. AbidinZ.Z. Batch adsorption of basic dye using acid treated kenaf fibre char: Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies.Chem. Eng. J.2012181-18244945710.1016/j.cej.2011.11.116
     [Google Scholar]
312. VieiraS.S. MagriotisZ.M. SantosN.A.V. CardosoM.G. SaczkA.A. Macauba palm (Acrocomia aculeata) cake from biodiesel processing: An efficient and low cost substrate for the adsorption of dyes.Chem. Eng. J.201218315216110.1016/j.cej.2011.12.047
     [Google Scholar]
313. HanX. NiuX. MaX. Adsorption characteristics of methylene blue on poplar leaf in batch mode: Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics.Korean J. Chem. Eng.201229449450210.1007/s11814‑011‑0211‑5
     [Google Scholar]
314. ChenS. QinC. WangT. ChenF. LiX. HouH. ZhouM. Study on the adsorption of dyestuffs with different properties by sludge-rice husk biochar: Adsorption capacity, isotherm, kinetic, thermodynamics and mechanism.J. Mol. Liq.2019285627410.1016/j.molliq.2019.04.035
     [Google Scholar]
315. AbbasM. Factors influencing the adsorption and photocatalysis of direct red 80 in the presence of a TiO 2 : Equilibrium and kinetics modeling.J. Chem. Res.2021457-869470110.1177/1747519821989969
     [Google Scholar]
316. SilvaP.J. SousaS. RodriguesJ. AntunesH. PorterJ.J. GonçalvesI. DiasF.S. Adsorption of acid orange 7 dye in aqueous solutions by spent brewery grains.Separ. Purif. Tech.200440330931510.1016/j.seppur.2004.03.010
     [Google Scholar]
317. DalvandA. NabizadehR. GanjaliR.M. KhoobiM. NazmaraS. MahviH.A. Modeling of reactive blue 19 azo dye removal from colored textile wastewater using L-arginine-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles: Optimization, reusability, kinetic and equilibrium studies.J. Magn. Magn. Mater.201640417918910.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.040
     [Google Scholar]
318. DingG. WangB. ChenL. ZhaoS. Simultaneous adsorption of methyl red and methylene blue onto biochar and an equilibrium modeling at high concentration.Chemosphere201616328328910.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.03727543677
     [Google Scholar]
319. FanS. WangY. WangZ. TangJ. TangJ. LiX. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by sewage sludge-derived biochar: Adsorption kinetics, equilibrium, thermodynamics and mechanism.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.20175160161110.1016/j.jece.2016.12.019
     [Google Scholar]
320. DawoodS. SenT.K. PhanC. Synthesis and characterization of slow pyrolysis pine cone bio-char in the removal of organic and inorganic pollutants from aqueous solution by adsorption: Kinetic, equilibrium, mechanism and thermodynamic.Bioresour. Technol.2017246768110.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.01928711298
     [Google Scholar]
321. SewuD.D. JungH. KimS.S. LeeD.S. WooS.H. Decolorization of cationic and anionic dye-laden wastewater by steam-activated biochar produced at an industrial-scale from spent mushroom substrate.Bioresour. Technol.2019277778610.1016/j.biortech.2019.01.03430660064
     [Google Scholar]
322. Ben ArfiR. KarouiS. MouginK. GhorbalA. Adsorptive removal of cationic and anionic dyes from aqueous solution by utilizing almond shell as bioadsorbent.EMJE2017212010.1007/s41207‑017‑0032‑y
     [Google Scholar]
323. KelmM.A.P. da JúniorS.M.J. de HolandaB.S.H. de AraujoC.M.B. de FilhoA.R.B. FreitasE.J. dos SantosD.R. da SobrinhoM.M.A. Removal of azo dye from water via adsorption on biochar produced by the gasification of wood wastes.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20192628285582857310.1007/s11356‑018‑3833‑x30607856
     [Google Scholar]
324. ManeerungT. LiewJ. DaiY. KawiS. ChongC. WangC.H. Activated carbon derived from carbon residue from biomass gasification and its application for dye adsorption: Kinetics, isotherms and thermodynamic studies.Bioresour. Technol.201620035035910.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.04726512858
     [Google Scholar]
325. SongY. XuH. RenJ. Adsorption study for removal of sunset yellow by ethylenediamine-modified peanut husk.Desalination Water Treat.20165737175851759210.1080/19443994.2015.1086897
     [Google Scholar]
326. HeibatiB. CoutoR.S. GhoutiA.M.A. AsifM. TyagiI. AgarwalS. GuptaV.K. Kinetics and thermodynamics of enhanced adsorption of the dye AR 18 using activated carbons prepared from walnut and poplar woods.J. Mol. Liq.20152089910510.1016/j.molliq.2015.03.057
     [Google Scholar]
327. PavanF.A. LimaE.C. DiasS.L.P. MazzocatoA.C. Methylene blue biosorption from aqueous solutions by yellow passion fruit waste.J. Hazard. Mater.2008150370371210.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.05.02317597293
     [Google Scholar]
328. VadivelanV. KumarK.V. Equilibrium, kinetics, mechanism, and process design for the sorption of methylene blue onto rice husk.J. Colloid Interface Sci.200528619010010.1016/j.jcis.2005.01.00715848406
     [Google Scholar]
329. AnnaduraiG. JuangR. LeeD. Use of cellulose-based wastes for adsorption of dyes from aqueous solutions.J. Hazard. Mater.200292326327410.1016/S0304‑3894(02)00017‑112031611
     [Google Scholar]
330. HanR. WangY. HanP. ShiJ. YangJ. LuY. Removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution by chaff in batch mode.J. Hazard. Mater.2006137155055710.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.02.02916600482
     [Google Scholar]
331. BulutY. AydınH. A kinetics and thermodynamics study of methylene blue adsorption on wheat shells.Desalination20061941-325926710.1016/j.desal.2005.10.032
     [Google Scholar]
332. NcibiM.C. MahjoubB. SeffenM. Kinetic and equilibrium studies of methylene blue biosorption by Posidonia oceanica (L.) fibres.J. Hazard. Mater.2007139228028510.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.06.02916860936
     [Google Scholar]
333. PorkodiK. Vasanth KumarK. Equilibrium, kinetics and mechanism modeling and simulation of basic and acid dyes sorption onto jute fiber carbon: Eosin yellow, malachite green and crystal violet single component systems.J. Hazard. Mater.20071431-231132710.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.09.02917069970
     [Google Scholar]
334. AhmadR. Studies on adsorption of crystal violet dye from aqueous solution onto coniferous pinus bark powder (CPBP).J. Hazard. Mater.20091711-376777310.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.06019604639
     [Google Scholar]
335. MiyahY. LahrichiA. IdrissiM. AnisK. KachkoulR. IdrissiN. Removal of cationic dye “crystal violet” in aqueous solution by the local clay.JMES201781035703582
     [Google Scholar]
336. MushtaqM. BhattiH.N. IqbalM. NoreenS. Eriobotrya japonica seed biocomposite efficiency for copper adsorption: Isotherms, kinetics, thermodynamic and desorption studies.J. Environ. Manage.2016176213310.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.01327039361
     [Google Scholar]
337. ParabH. SudersananM. ShenoyN. PathareT. VazeB. Use of agro‐industrial wastes for removal of basic dyes from aqueous solutions.Clean2009371296396910.1002/clen.200900158
     [Google Scholar]
338. LianF. CuiG. LiuZ. DuoL. ZhangG. XingB. One-step synthesis of a novel N-doped microporous biochar derived from crop straws with high dye adsorption capacity.J. Environ. Manage.2016176616810.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.04327039365
     [Google Scholar]
339. MashkoorF. NasarA. Magnetized Tectona grandis sawdust as a novel adsorbent: Preparation, characterization, and utilization for the removal of methylene blue from aqueous solution.Cellulose20202752613263510.1007/s10570‑019‑02918‑8
     [Google Scholar]
340. SpagnoliA.A. GiannakoudakisD.A. BashkovaS. Adsorption of methylene blue on cashew nut shell based carbons activated with zinc chloride: The role of surface and structural parameters.J. Mol. Liq.201722946547110.1016/j.molliq.2016.12.106
     [Google Scholar]
341. ShiL. ZhangG. WeiD. YanT. XueX. ShiS. WeiQ. Preparation and utilization of anaerobic granular sludge-based biochar for the adsorption of methylene blue from aqueous solutions.J. Mol. Liq.201419833434010.1016/j.molliq.2014.07.023
     [Google Scholar]
342. MiyahY. LahrichiA. IdrissiM. KhalilA. ZerrouqF. Adsorption of methylene blue dye from aqueous solutions onto walnut shells powder: Equilibrium and kinetic studies.Surf. Interfaces201811748110.1016/j.surfin.2018.03.006
     [Google Scholar]
343. GüzelF. SayğılıH. SayğılıA.G. KoyuncuF. YılmazC. Optimal oxidation with nitric acid of biochar derived from pyrolysis of weeds and its application in removal of hazardous dye methylene blue from aqueous solution.J. Clean. Prod.201714426026510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.029
     [Google Scholar]
344. VeereshG.S. KumarP. MehrotraI. Treatment of phenol and cresols in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) process: A review.Water Res.200539115417010.1016/j.watres.2004.07.02815607175
     [Google Scholar]
345. TianX. SongY. ShenZ. ZhouY. WangK. JinX. HanZ. LiuT. A comprehensive review on toxic petrochemical wastewater pretreatment and advanced treatment.J. Clean. Prod.202024511869210.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118692
     [Google Scholar]
346. SchobertH.H. SongC. Chemicals and materials from coal in the 21st century.Fuel2002811153210.1016/S0016‑2361(00)00203‑9
     [Google Scholar]
347. LochabB. ShuklaS. VarmaI.K. Naturally occurring phenolic sources: Monomers and polymers.RSC Advances2014442217122175210.1039/C4RA00181H
     [Google Scholar]
348. ChenA.C. PakdelH. RoyC. Production of monomeric phenols by thermochemical conversion of biomass: A review.Bioresour. Technol.200179327729910.1016/S0960‑8524(00)00180‑211499582
     [Google Scholar]
349. KimJ.S. Production, separation and applications of phenolic-rich bio-oil – A review.Bioresour. Technol.2015178909810.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.12125239785
     [Google Scholar]
350. NaronD.R. CollardF.X. TyhodaL. GörgensJ.F. Production of phenols from pyrolysis of sugarcane bagasse lignin: Catalyst screening using thermogravimetric analysis – Thermal desorption – Gas chromatography – Mass spectroscopy.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis201913812013110.1016/j.jaap.2018.12.015
     [Google Scholar]
351. PodkościelnyP. LászlóK. Heterogeneity of activated carbons in adsorption of aniline from aqueous solutions.Appl. Surf. Sci.2007253218762877110.1016/j.apsusc.2007.04.057
     [Google Scholar]
352. VillegasL.G.C. MashhadiN. ChenM. MukherjeeD. TaylorK.E. BiswasN. A short review of techniques for phenol removal from wastewater.Curr. Pollut. Rep.20162315716710.1007/s40726‑016‑0035‑3
     [Google Scholar]
353. AlkaramU.F. MukhlisA.A. DujailiA.A.H. The removal of phenol from aqueous solutions by adsorption using surfactant-modified bentonite and kaolinite.J. Hazard. Mater.20091691-332433210.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.03.15319464105
     [Google Scholar]
354. HanY. BoatengA.A. QiP.X. LimaI.M. ChangJ. Heavy metal and phenol adsorptive properties of biochars from pyrolyzed switchgrass and woody biomass in correlation with surface properties.J. Environ. Manage.201311819620410.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.00123454371
     [Google Scholar]
355. ChenW. FangY. LiK. ChenZ. XiaM. GongM. ChenY. YangH. TuX. ChenH. Bamboo wastes catalytic pyrolysis with N-doped biochar catalyst for phenols products.Appl. Energy202026011424210.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114242
     [Google Scholar]
356. LuQ. ZhangZ. YangX. DongC. ZhuX. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of biomass impregnated with K3PO4 to produce phenolic compounds: Analytical Py-GC/MS study.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis201310413914510.1016/j.jaap.2013.08.011
     [Google Scholar]
357. WangW. LiX. YeD. CaiL. ShiS.Q. Catalytic pyrolysis of larch sawdust for phenol-rich bio-oil using different catalysts.Renew. Energy201812114615210.1016/j.renene.2018.01.018
     [Google Scholar]
358. OmoriyekomwanJ.E. TahmasebiA. YuJ. Production of phenol-rich bio-oil during catalytic fixed-bed and microwave pyrolysis of palm kernel shell.Bioresour. Technol.201620718819610.1016/j.biortech.2016.02.00226890793
     [Google Scholar]
359. ChangG. MiaoP. YanX. WangG. GuoQ. Phenol preparation from catalytic pyrolysis of palm kernel shell at low temperatures.Bioresour. Technol.201825321421910.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.08429351874
     [Google Scholar]
360. HairuddinM.N. MubarakN.M. KhalidM. AbdullahE.C. WalvekarR. KarriR.R. Magnetic palm kernel biochar potential route for phenol removal from wastewater.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.20192634351833519710.1007/s11356‑019‑06524‑w31691169
     [Google Scholar]
361. LiZ. XingB. DingY. LiY. WangS. A high-performance biochar produced from bamboo pyrolysis with in-situ nitrogen doping and activation for adsorption of phenol and methylene blue.Chin. J. Chem. Eng.202028112872288010.1016/j.cjche.2020.03.031
     [Google Scholar]
362. HaoZ. WangC. YanZ. JiangH. XuH. Magnetic particles modification of coconut shell-derived activated carbon and biochar for effective removal of phenol from water.Chemosphere201821196296910.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.03830119027
     [Google Scholar]
363. VázquezG. ÁlvarezG.J. GarcíaA.I. FreireM.S. AntorrenaG. Adsorption of phenol on formaldehyde-pretreated pinus pinaster bark: Equilibrium and kinetics.Bioresour. Technol.20079881535154010.1016/j.biortech.2006.06.02416935496
     [Google Scholar]
364. AbdelwahabO. AminN.K. Adsorption of phenol from aqueous solutions by Luffa cylindrica fibers: Kinetics, isotherm and thermodynamic studies.Egypt. J. Aquat. Res.201339421522310.1016/j.ejar.2013.12.011
     [Google Scholar]
365. XuB. ChenL. XingB. LiZ. ZhangL. YiG. HuangG. MohantyM.K. Physicochemical properties of Hebi semi-coke from underground coal gasification and its adsorption for phenol.Process Saf. Environ. Prot.201710714715210.1016/j.psep.2017.02.007
     [Google Scholar]
366. YakoutS.M. Physicochemical characteristics of biochar produced from rice straw at different pyrolysis temperature for soil amendment and removal of organics.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India, Sect. A Phys. Sci.201787220721410.1007/s40010‑017‑0343‑z
     [Google Scholar]
367. ChengW.P. GaoW. CuiX. MaJ.H. LiR.F. Phenol adsorption equilibrium and kinetics on zeolite X/activated carbon composite.J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng.20166219219810.1016/j.jtice.2016.02.004
     [Google Scholar]
368. MallekM. ChtourouM. PortilloM. MonclúsH. WalhaK. SalahA. SalvadóV. Granulated cork as biosorbent for the removal of phenol derivatives and emerging contaminants.J. Environ. Manage.201822357658510.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.06929975884
     [Google Scholar]
369. TranV.S. NgoH.H. GuoW. ZhangJ. LiangS. Ton-ThatC. ZhangX. Typical low cost biosorbents for adsorptive removal of specific organic pollutants from water.Bioresour. Technol.201518235336310.1016/j.biortech.2015.02.00325690682
     [Google Scholar]
370. MishraS. YadavS.S. RawatS. SinghJ. KoduruJ.R. Corn husk derived magnetized activated carbon for the removal of phenol and para-nitrophenol from aqueous solution: Interaction mechanism, insights on adsorbent characteristics, and isothermal, kinetic and thermodynamic properties.J. Environ. Manage.2019246236237310.1016/j.jenvman.2019.06.01331195256
     [Google Scholar]
371. SunJ. LiuX. ZhangF. ZhouJ. WuJ. AlsaediA. HayatT. LiJ. Insight into the mechanism of adsorption of phenol and resorcinol on activated carbons with different oxidation degrees.Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp.2019563223010.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.11.042
     [Google Scholar]
372. JinD.F. XuY.Y. ZhangM. JungY.S. OkY.S. Comparative evaluation for the sorption capacity of four carbonaceous sorbents to phenol.Chem. Spec. Bioavail.2016281-4182510.1080/09542299.2015.1136570
     [Google Scholar]
373. Mu’azuN.D. ZubairM. JarrahN. AlaghaO. HarthiA.M.A. EssaM.H. Sewage sludge ZnCl2-activated carbon intercalated MgFe–LDH nanocomposites: Insight of the sorption mechanism of improved removal of phenol from water.Int. J. Mol. Sci.2020215156310.3390/ijms2105156332106562
     [Google Scholar]
374. Rincón-SilvaN.G. Moreno-PirajánJ.C. GiraldoL. Equilibrium, kinetics and thermodynamics study of phenols adsorption onto activated carbon obtained from lignocellulosic material (Eucalyptus Globulus labill seed).Adsorption2016221334810.1007/s10450‑015‑9724‑2
     [Google Scholar]
375. GümüşD. AkbalF. Photocatalytic degradation of textile dye and wastewater.Water Air Soil Pollut.20112161-411712410.1007/s11270‑010‑0520‑z
     [Google Scholar]
376. IzumiY. Recent advances in the photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels with water and/or hydrogen using solar energy and beyond.Coord. Chem. Rev.2013257117118610.1016/j.ccr.2012.04.018
     [Google Scholar]
377. ColmenaresJ.C. VarmaR.S. LisowskiP. Sustainable hybrid photocatalysts: Titania immobilized on carbon materials derived from renewable and biodegradable resources.Green Chem.201618215736575010.1039/C6GC02477G32665764
     [Google Scholar]
378. UddinM.T. BabotO. ThomasL. OlivierC. RedaelliM. D’ArienzoM. MorazzoniF. JaegermannW. RockstrohN. JungeH. ToupanceT. New insights into the photocatalytic properties of RuO2/TiO2 mesoporous heterostructures for hydrogen production and organic pollutant photodecomposition.J. Phys. Chem. C2015119137006701510.1021/jp512769u
     [Google Scholar]
379. MohanD. SarswatA. OkY.S. PittmanC.U.Jr Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent – A critical review.Bioresour. Technol.2014160219120210.1016/j.biortech.2014.01.12024636918
     [Google Scholar]
380. LuY. CaiY. ZhangS. ZhuangL. HuB. WangS. ChenJ. WangX. Application of biochar-based photocatalysts for adsorption-(photo)degradation/reduction of environmental contaminants: Mechanism, challenges and perspective.Biochar2022414510.1007/s42773‑022‑00173‑y
     [Google Scholar]
381. ZhuQ. WuJ. WangL. YangG. ZhangX. Adsorption characteristics of Pb 2+ onto wine lees-derived biochar.Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.201697229429910.1007/s00128‑016‑1760‑426920696
     [Google Scholar]
382. AhmaruzzamanM. Biochar based nanocomposites for photocatalytic degradation of emerging organic pollutants from water and wastewater.Mater. Res. Bull.202114011126210.1016/j.materresbull.2021.111262
     [Google Scholar]
383. ZhangH. XueG. ChenH. LiX. Magnetic biochar catalyst derived from biological sludge and ferric sludge using hydrothermal carbonization: Preparation, characterization and its circulation in Fenton process for dyeing wastewater treatment.Chemosphere2018191647110.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.10.02629031054
     [Google Scholar]
384. ChenM. BaoC. HuD. JinX. HuangQ. Facile and low-cost fabrication of ZnO/biochar nanocomposites from jute fibers for efficient and stable photodegradation of methylene blue dye.J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis201913931933210.1016/j.jaap.2019.03.009
     [Google Scholar]
385. LuL. ShanR. ShiY. WangS. YuanH. A novel TiO2/biochar composite catalysts for photocatalytic degradation of methyl orange.Chemosphere201922239139810.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.13230711728
     [Google Scholar]
386. SharmaG. BhogalS. GuptaV.K. AgarwalS. KumarA. PathaniaD. MolaG.T. StadlerF.J. Algal biochar reinforced trimetallic nanocomposite as adsorptional/photocatalyst for remediation of malachite green from aqueous medium.J. Mol. Liq.2019275249950910.1016/j.molliq.2018.11.070
     [Google Scholar]
387. SilvestriS. GonçalvesM.G. da Silva VeigaP.A. MatosT.T.S. ZamoraP.P. MangrichA.S. TiO2 supported on Salvinia molesta biochar for heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of Acid Orange 7 dye.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.20197110287910.1016/j.jece.2019.102879
     [Google Scholar]
388. WangZ. CaiX. XieX. LiS. ZhangX. WangZ. Visible-LED-light-driven photocatalytic degradation of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin by magnetic biochar modified flower-like Bi2WO6: The synergistic effects, mechanism insights and degradation pathways.Sci. Total Environ.202176414287910.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14287933129540
     [Google Scholar]
389. GonçalvesM.G. da VeigaS.P.A. FornariM.R. ZamoraP.P. MangrichA.S. SilvestriS. Relationship of the physicochemical properties of novel ZnO/biochar composites to their efficiencies in the degradation of sulfamethoxazole and methyl orange.Sci. Total Environ.2020748114138110.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14138132798874
     [Google Scholar]
390. KimJ.R. KanE. Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of sulfamethoxazole in water using a biochar-supported TiO2 photocatalyst.J. Environ. Manage.20161809410110.1016/j.jenvman.2016.05.01627213862
     [Google Scholar]
391. AsgharzadehF. GholamiM. JafariJ.A. KermaniM. AsgharniaH. KalantaryR.R. Heterogeneous photocatalytic degradation of metronidazole from aqueous solutions using Fe3O4/TiO2 supported on biochar.Desalination Water Treat.202017530431510.5004/dwt.2020.24789
     [Google Scholar]
392. ThiruppathiM. LeeladeviK. RamalinganC. ChenK.C. NagarajanE.R. Construction of novel biochar supported copper tungstate nanocomposites: A fruitful divergent catalyst for photocatalysis and electrocatalysis.Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process.2020106210476610.1016/j.mssp.2019.104766
     [Google Scholar]
393. ZhuN. LiC. BuL. TangC. WangS. DuanP. YaoL. TangJ. DionysiouD.D. WuY. Bismuth impregnated biochar for efficient estrone degradation: The synergistic effect between biochar and Bi/Bi2O3 for a high photocatalytic performance.J. Hazard. Mater.202038412125810.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.12125832028547
     [Google Scholar]
394. ZhaiY. DaiY. GuoJ. ZhouL. ChenM. YangH. PengL. Novel biochar@CoFe2O4/Ag3PO4 photocatalysts for highly efficient degradation of bisphenol a under visible-light irradiation.J. Colloid Interface Sci.202056011112110.1016/j.jcis.2019.08.06531655401
     [Google Scholar]
395. TalukdarK. JunB.M. YoonY. KimY. FayyazA. ParkC.M. Novel Z-scheme Ag3PO4/Fe3O4-activated biochar photocatalyst with enhanced visible-light catalytic performance toward degradation of bisphenol A.J. Hazard. Mater.2020398112302510.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12302532768835
     [Google Scholar]
396. KumarA. SainiK. BhaskarT. Hydochar and biochar: Production, physicochemical properties and techno-economic analysis.Bioresour. Technol.202031012344210.1016/j.biortech.2020.12344232362429
     [Google Scholar]
397. KhanN. ChowdharyP. GnansounouE. ChaturvediP. Biochar and environmental sustainability: Emerging trends and techno-economic perspectives.Bioresour. Technol.202133212510210.1016/j.biortech.2021.12510233853722
     [Google Scholar]
398. ClearyJ. WolfD.P. CaspersenJ.P. Comparing the life cycle costs of using harvest residue as feedstock for small- and large-scale bioenergy systems (part II).Energy20158653954710.1016/j.energy.2015.04.057
     [Google Scholar]
399. KuppusamyS. ThavamaniP. MegharajM. VenkateswarluK. NaiduR. Agronomic and remedial benefits and risks of applying biochar to soil: Current knowledge and future research directions.Environ. Int.20168711210.1016/j.envint.2015.10.01826638014
     [Google Scholar]
400. MohammadiA. KhoshnevisanB. VenkateshG. EskandariS. A critical review on advancement and challenges of biochar application in paddy fields: Environmental and life cycle cost analysis.Processes2020810127510.3390/pr8101275
     [Google Scholar]
401. SahooK. BilekE. BergmanR. ManiS. Techno-economic analysis of producing solid biofuels and biochar from forest residues using portable systems.Appl. Energy201923557859010.1016/j.apenergy.2018.10.076
     [Google Scholar]
402. CampbellR.M. AndersonN.M. DaugaardD.E. NaughtonH.T. Financial viability of biofuel and biochar production from forest biomass in the face of market price volatility and uncertainty.Appl. Energy201823033034310.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.085
     [Google Scholar]
403. HarsonoS.S. GrundmanP. LauL.H. HansenA. SallehM.A.M. Meyer-AurichA. IdrisA. GhaziT.I.M. Energy balances, greenhouse gas emissions and economics of biochar production from palm oil empty fruit bunches.Resour. Conserv. Recycling20137710811510.1016/j.resconrec.2013.04.005
     [Google Scholar]
404. BiY. CaiS. WangY. XiaY. ZhaoX. WangS. XingG. Assessing the viability of soil successive straw biochar amendment based on a five-year column trial with six different soils: Views from crop production, carbon sequestration and net ecosystem economic benefits.J. Environ. Manage.201924517318610.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.05131152961
     [Google Scholar]
405. FytiliD. ZabaniotouA. Circular economy synergistic opportunities of decentralized thermochemical systems for bioenergy and biochar production fueled with agro-industrial wastes with environmental sustainability and social acceptance: A review. Curr. Sustain./Renew. Energy Rep.20185150155
     [Google Scholar]
406. PanditN.R. SchmidtH.P. MulderJ. HaleS.E. HussonO. CornelissenG. Nutrient effect of various composting methods with and without biochar on soil fertility and maize growth.Arch. Agron. Soil Sci.2019662250265
     [Google Scholar]
407. IjazM. TahirM. ShahidM. Ul-AllahS. SattarA. SherA. MahmoodK. HussainM. Combined application of biochar and PGPR consortia for sustainable production of wheat under semiarid conditions with a reduced dose of synthetic fertilizer.Braz. J. Microbiol.201950244945810.1007/s42770‑019‑00043‑z30671922
     [Google Scholar]