Skip to content
2000
Volume 17, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2405-5204
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Introduction

The most important task in the development of modern chemical engineering is to improve the quality of metal products and parts made from them, increase their efficiency, reliability, and fatigue life, bring these indicators to the level of world standards, and ensure the competitiveness of domestic products in the foreign market. The structural safety of chemical engineering equipment is largely determined by the operational reliability of its component elements. The most common and progressive way of their manufacture is cold pressing methods, the quality and reliability of which are largely defined by the condition of the gauged bars' surface. At the same time, the performance characteristics of machinery parts and mechanisms are determined mainly by the properties of the surface layers of metal, since all destruction processes, especially during cyclic loading, usually start from the surface and depend on its structure and physical and chemical status. The role of the type of metal surface imperfection increases greatly with corrosion fatigue, which is determined by the formation of protective barrier films. In the absence of stress, these films reduce the rate of corrosion, and during cyclic loading, they are continuously destroyed. In addition, a stress concentration appears that is caused by surface damage, leading to the formation of corrosive cavities on it. In this paper, based on theoretical research, a physical parameter is proposed that controls the corrosion fatigue life of strain-hardened structural materials of chemical engineering, serving as an indicator of the degree of strain hardening under static tension. An analysis of experimental data has confirmed that the technological plastic processing of structural materials, leading to a decrease in the value of this indicator, causes an increase in their resistance to corrosion-fatigue failure.

Purpose

The purpose of this work was to identify a physical parameter that controls the corrosion fatigue life of technologically processed structural materials of chemical engineering.

Methods

The experimental test procedure included mechanical tests under static and cyclic loading. Structural materials widely used in chemical engineering, prestrained at different degrees, were selected for the study. Static tension tests of standard samples were carried out on ZD 10/90 and UME-10TM machines with a strain rate of 2 × 10-3 sec–1. The samples were loaded at a frequency of 50 Hz using the MIP-8 machine. A widely spread 3% aqueous solution of sea salt was used for testing in a corrosive environment.

Results

It has been established that a physical parameter that controls the corrosion fatigue life of materials is the exponent in the equation of the strain hardening curve under static tension. It has been shown that the process of plastic treatment of material, leading to a decrease in its size, causes an increase in its resistance to corrosion-fatigue failure.

Conclusion

It has been shown that in order to assess the feasibility of a particular process treatment in order to increase the resistance to corrosion fatigue of structural materials, it is necessary to trace its impact on the value of the strain hardening index under static tension.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204313184240819054844
2024-12-01
2024-11-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. TerentyevV PetukhovA Fatigue of high strength metallic materials.2013https://library.bmstu.ru/Catalog/Details/515909
    [Google Scholar]
  2. EstrinY. VinogradovA. Extreme grain refinement by severe plastic deformation: A wealth of challenging science.Acta Mater.201361378281710.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.038
    [Google Scholar]
  3. MoiseychikEA The operation of stretched high-strength bolts in elements of steel structures and their tendency to slow destruction.2014http://vestnikmgsu.ru/ru/component/sjarchive/issue/article.display/2014/11/58-67
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Calderon-Uriszar-AldacaI. BrizE. BiezmaM.V. PuenteI. A plain linear rule for fatigue analysis under natural loading considering the coupled fatigue and corrosion effect.Int. J. Fatigue201912214115110.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.01.008
    [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhuS. ZhangY. ZhuB. ZhangJ. HeY. XuW. High cycle fatigue life prediction of titanium alloys based on a novel deep learning approach.Int. J. Fatigue202418210820610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108206
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LeushinIO SubbotinAYu GeikoIV Removing_of_zinc_coating_from_steel_base_and_application_of_by-products_in_foundry_technologies. Ferrous metals 2017; 10: 48-53
  7. ParmaG WuttkeT NordenM The concept of pre-oxidation of alloy steel strips in continuous galvanizing lines equipped with flameless burners. Ferrous metals 2018; 45-8
    [Google Scholar]
  8. LanC. FengA. ZhangY. MaJ. WangJ. LiH. Evaluation of corrosion fatigue life for high-strength steel wires.J. Construct. Steel Res.202421710866610.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108666
    [Google Scholar]
  9. TsuchiyaH. YamadaN. MiyabeS. DoiK. FujimotoS. Improved corrosion fatigue performance of 316L stainless steel by surface porosification.Materials. Letters.202335313526510.1016/j.matlet.2023.135265
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LuoY. YuanP. LiG. Eng Fract Mech.Elsevier202410.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109835
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ShamirM. BraithwaiteJ. MehmanparastA. Fatigue life assessment of offshore wind support structures in the presence of corrosion pits.Elsevier202310.1016/j.marstruc.2023.103505
    [Google Scholar]
  12. YanC. LiuC. YuS. Fatigue life prediction of stay cables under vehicle load considering corrosion variability.Int. J. Fatigue202311410.1016/j.istruc.2023.104879
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ZengY. ZhouJ. ZhangX. YingH. SSRNhttps://ssrn.com/abstract=4290307] [http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4290307
    [Google Scholar]
  14. AnL-S. ParkY.C. KimH-K. An analytical approach to predict fatigue strength of corroded steel plates using random field-based corrosion surface modeling.Structures20246310639110.1016/j.istruc.2024.106391
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ChenZ. DaiY. LiuY. Life prediction of corrosion-fatigue based on a new crack growth rate model with damage and the extended finite element method.Eng. Fract. Mech.202328910944510.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109445
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Farheen KulsumA. Review on corrosion behavior, fatigue behavior and fracture toughness of Al alloy MMCS.Materials. Today202410.1016/j.matpr.2024.01.058
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BehvarA. HaghshenasM. A critical review on very high cycle corrosion fatigue: Mechanisms, methods, materials, and models.J. Space Safety. Eng.202310328432310.1016/j.jsse.2023.05.002
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Siddharth ChauhanS. Fatigue life estimation of TMT reinforcing steel bar considering pitting corrosion and high temperature impacted surface topography.Int. J. Fatigue202317510781010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107810
    [Google Scholar]
  19. XueS. SuT. ShenR. ZongZ. ZhaoX. Engineering Fracture Mechanics.Elsevier202410.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.109958
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KhajeianA. MahmoudiA.H. SeifiR. An approach to predicting corrosion fatigue for marine applications.Int. J. Fatigue202417910803010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.108030
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ShaoW. WangY. ShiD. Corrosion-fatigue life prediction of reinforced concrete square piles in marine environments.Eng. Fail. Anal.202213810632410.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106324
    [Google Scholar]
  22. RousseauC. El MayM. SaintierN. Corrosion Science.Elsevier202410.1016/j.corsci.2023.111769
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ZhaoY.G. LuY.H. ZhangX.F. LiZ.H. LiuT.G. ShojiT. Corrosion Science.Elsevier202410.1016/j.corsci.2024.112041
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LukášP. KunzL. NavrátilováL. BokůvkaO. Fatigue damage of ultrafine-grain copper in very-high cycle fatigue region.Mater. Sci. Eng. A201152822-237036704010.1016/j.msea.2011.06.001
    [Google Scholar]
  25. FuzeZhang. Principles and methods for determining calendar life and corrosion tolerance of mechanical parts.Chin. J. Aeronauti.2021341211610.1016/j.cja.2021.10.002
    [Google Scholar]
  26. AgrawalA.P. SrivastavaS.K. Investigations of fatigue crack growth rate behaviour and life prediction of Si3N4/TiB2 reinforced hybrid metal matrix composites.Int. J. Fatigue202418610837310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108373
    [Google Scholar]
  27. GuennecB. KabuchiR. KuwaharaH. UenoA. Analysis of Zr55Al10Cu30Ni5 bulk metallic glass pitting behavior in distilled water environment leading to fatigue-corrosion rupture.Int. J. Fatigue202114310602610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.106026
    [Google Scholar]
  28. PachurinG.V. KuzminN.A. FilippovA.A. NuzhdinaT.V. Fatigue damage process of sheet automotive steels.Met. Technol.20198162210.31044/1684‑2499‑2019‑8‑0‑16‑22
    [Google Scholar]
  29. PachurinG.V. FilippovA.A. GoncharovaD.A. Effect produced by corrosive environment on fatigue resistance of automotive structural steel.IOP Conf Series: Materials Science and Engineering10.1088/1757‑899X/632/1/012037
    [Google Scholar]
  30. PachurinG.V. KuzminN.A. MochalinaM.V. FilippovA.A. Effect produced by the treatment type on the performance of the artificial heart valve welded frame.Recent Innov. Chem. Eng.202316322022510.2174/2405520416666230809124226
    [Google Scholar]
  31. FuruyaY. Visualization of internal small fatigue crack growth.Mater. Lett.201311213914110.1016/j.matlet.2013.09.015
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PachurinG GoncharovaD FilippovA Development of fatigue test technology of sheet automobile materials2018https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/search/article?articleId=205973710.15587/1729‑4061.2018.144524
    [Google Scholar]
  33. PachurinG.V. ShevchenkoS.M. FilippovA.A. MukhinaM.V. KuzminN.A. Defining rolled metal performance for cold bolt upsetting (bolt head).IOP Conf. Series Mater. Sci. Eng.2018327303204010.1088/1757‑899X/327/3/032040
    [Google Scholar]
  34. PiaoJ. YanW. DingY. QuM. WangZ. Effects of corrosion on the fatigue fracture behavior of 4140 steel for offshore wind turbine bolts.Mat. Lett.202435713569410.1016/j.matlet.2023.135694
    [Google Scholar]
  35. TerentyevV.F. KorablevSA. Institute of Metallurgy and Materials Science named after A.A. Baykov RAS. ; Nauka: Moscow 2015.https://search.rsl.ru/ru/record/01008061010
    [Google Scholar]
  36. TerentyevV.F. The mechanism of fatigue crack nucleation in high-strength steels under gigacycle fatigue.MoscowNauka2003
    [Google Scholar]
  37. PachurinG.V. MukhinaM.V. KuzminA.N. Fatigue Resistance of Welded Titanium Joints.6th International Conference on Industrial Engineering 202189990410.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.316.899.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. LiZ.H. HanY.M. ZhaoY.G. YangS.L. ZhongZ.M. LuY.H. Engineering Failure Analysis.Elsevier202410.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108224
    [Google Scholar]
  39. KolT. BretschneiderM. KlinkbergT. LutherF. MaasB. Academic Research and Reviews in Engineering Sciences.PLATANUS Publishing2017675685
    [Google Scholar]
  40. HortigónB. GallardoJ.M. Nieto-GarcíaE.J. LópezJ.A. Construction and Building Materials In.Elsevier201910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.082
    [Google Scholar]
  41. LuoJ. LiM.Q. Strain rate sensitivity and strain hardening exponent during the isothermal compression of Ti60 alloy.Mat. Sci. Eng.201215616310.1016/j.msea.2012.01.021
    [Google Scholar]
  42. ZhuY. FanJ. LiZ. LuoY. NiuY. Study of strain rate sensitivity exponent and strain hardening exponent of typical titanium alloys.Mat. Today Comm.202230110306010.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103060
    [Google Scholar]
  43. SartorM WundeM LemkeA Rod. The use of coatings to reduce metal losses as a result of scale formation during reheating 2016https://www.rudmet.ru/journal/1574/article/27045/
  44. GonoringT.B. A constitutive model for the uniaxial tensile plastic behavior of metals based on the instantaneous strain-hardening exponent.J. Mat. Resea. Technol.2022202421244310.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.189
    [Google Scholar]
  45. ŠebekF. KubíkP. HůlkaJ. PetruškaJ. Strain hardening exponent role in phenomenological ductile fracture criteria.Euro J Mech20165714916410.1016/j.euromechsol.2015.12.006
    [Google Scholar]
  46. XuT. FengY. JinZ. SongS. WangD. Determination of the maximum strain–hardening exponent.Mater. Sci. Eng.2012550808610.1016/j.msea.2012.04.027
    [Google Scholar]
  47. YamadaT. YamashitaY. KannaS. A study on evaluation of ductile crack initiation using strain hardening exponent for steels.Procedia Structural. Integrity.201622206221310.1016/j.prostr.2016.06.276
    [Google Scholar]
  48. EbrahimiR. PardisN. Determination of strain-hardening exponent using double compression test.Mat. Sci. Eng.20091-2566010.1016/j.msea.2009.04.050
    [Google Scholar]
  49. AttaM. MegahedM. SaberD. Using ANN and OA techniques to determine the specific wear rate effectors of A356 Al-Si/Al2O3 MMC.Neural Comput. Appl.20223417143731438610.1007/s00521‑022‑07215‑3
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Abd El-AzizK. SaberD. MegahedA.A. Investigation and prediction of abrasive wear rate of heat-treated HCCIs with different Cr/C ratios using artificial neural networks.Int. J. Met. Cast.20211541149116310.1007/s40962‑020‑00547‑7
    [Google Scholar]
  51. SaberD. TahaI.B.M. El-AzizK.A. Wear behavior prediction for Cu/TiO2 nanocomposite based on optimal regression methods.Mater. Res.202326e2022026310.1590/1980‑5373‑mr‑2022‑0263
    [Google Scholar]
  52. AntunesR.A. Lopes de OliveiraM.C. Materials selection for hot stamped automotive body parts: An application of the Ashby approach based on the strain hardening exponent and stacking fault energy of materials.Mat. Design .20146324725610.1016/j.matdes.2014.06.011
    [Google Scholar]
  53. NewJ and COD estimates for thin-walled pipes with axial through-wall cracks and high strain hardening exponents. Theor. Appl. Fract. Mech.201790758410.1016/j.tafmec.2017.03.001
    [Google Scholar]
  54. SaberD. IbrahimB.M. Taha and Kh Abd El-Aziz Prediction of the Corrosion Rate of Al-Si Alloys Using Optimal Regression Methods.Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing202110.32604/iasc.2021.018516
    [Google Scholar]
  55. MegahedM. SaberD. AgwaM.A. Modeling of wear behavior of Al-Si/Al2O3 metal matrix composites physics of metals and metallography.Phys. Met. Metallogr.20191201098198810.1134/S0031918X19100089
    [Google Scholar]
  56. SrivastavaV. MankariK. Notch corrosion fatigue behaviour and simplified strain energy density-based notch fatigue life assessment of Grade-A shipbuilding steel.Theo. Appl. Frac. Mech.202413210445310.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104453
    [Google Scholar]
  57. TangS. XuH. AoN. Experimental investigation on corrosion fatigue crack initiation and growth of heat-treated U75V rail steel.Int. J. Fatigue202417810797310.1016/j.ijfatigue.2023.107973
    [Google Scholar]
  58. LuoY. LiG. AoN. Effect of ultrasonic rolled material layer on the corrosion fatigue resistance of railway axle EA4T alloy steel.Eng. Failure . Anal.202417510789510.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107895
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Vijaya PrakashB. MuraliB. Muthu KumaranA. PandiyarajanV. Bohidar Shailendra KumarP. Corrosion-fatigue properties of 13%Cr4%Ni steel ForHydroturbine components.Materials. Today Proceedings.202410.1016/j.matpr.2024.05.005
    [Google Scholar]
  60. LiW. HuS. ZhuS. The pre-corrosion fatigue behavior of 321 steel coated by laser additively manufactured FeCoNiCrMn high-entropy alloy.Ocean Engineering.202429611700810.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117008
    [Google Scholar]
  61. ElahiS.A. Mehri SofianiF. ChaudhuriS. BalbínJ.A. LarrosaN.O. De WaeleW. Investigation of the effect of pitting corrosion on the fatigue strength degradation of structural steel using a short crack model.Procedia Struc. Integ.202351303610.1016/j.prostr.2023.10.063
    [Google Scholar]
  62. ChenY ZhangY CuiZ WangF DongT MengX Effect of impact-corrosion coupling damage on fatigue properties of 2198-T8 aluminum-lithium alloy Eng Failure Analy 2024; 163: 108471.10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108471
    [Google Scholar]
  63. ZvirkoO. VenhryniukO. NykyforchynH. The effect of long-term operation on fatigue and corrosion fatigue crack growth in structural steels.Eng. Failure. Anal.202316310847110.1016/j.prostr.2023.10.062
    [Google Scholar]
  64. AoN. ZhangH. XuH. Corrosion fatigue crack growth behavior of a structurally gradient steel for high-speed railway axles.Eng. Fracture. Mech.202328110916610.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109166
    [Google Scholar]
  65. ChongH. WangB. WangD. Tribo-corrosion-fatigue behaviors of the parallel wires of main cable in the suspension bridge.Wear2024548–54920536310.1016/j.wear.2024.205363
    [Google Scholar]
  66. GuoZ. WangL. MaY. Probabilistic fatigue life prediction of corroded PC beams considering spatial variability of pitting corrosion.Eng. Struct.20243611772110.1016/j.engstruct.2024.117721
    [Google Scholar]
  67. TangZ. ZhangC. Effects of corrosion and pre-fatigue damage on the mechanical properties of HRB400E rebars.J. Construct. Steel Resea.202421710864110.1016/j.jcsr.2024.108641
    [Google Scholar]
  68. ZhaoY.G. LuY.H. ZhangX.F. LiZ.H. LiuT.G. ShojiT. Effects of dissolved hydrogen on corrosion fatigue crack growth behavior of 316LN stainless steel in high temperature pressurized water environment.Corros. Sci.202423211204110.1016/j.corsci.2024.112041
    [Google Scholar]
  69. XueS. SuT. ShenR. ZongZ. ZhaoX. Analysis of corrosion fatigue coupling effect of high-strength steel wire based on multi-stage competition assisting theory.Eng. Fract. Mech.202429810995810.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.109958
    [Google Scholar]
  70. YangY.Q. WenZ.X. ZhaoY.C. PeiH.Q. YangY.Z. YueZ.F. Influence of hot corrosion on thermal fatigue behavior of Ni-based single crystal superalloy: Invisible and accelerated crack.Int. J. Fatigue202418210816210.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108162
    [Google Scholar]
  71. WuD. DingY. SuJ. LiZ-X. ZhaoB. Experimental investigation into corrosion effect on buckling and low-cycle fatigue performance of high-strength steel bars.Eng. Struct.202431211823010.1016/j.engstruct.2024.118230
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204313184240819054844
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test