Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications
  4. Volume 18, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 18, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2666-2558
  • E-ISSN: 2666-2566

Abstract

Most of the networks employ TCP protocol for transmission control in transport mechanism. Although it offers numerous services such as reliability, end-to-end delivery, secure transmission of data, and so on to applications functioning across the World Wide Web, TCP needs to have effective congestion management techniques in order to handle traffic with a lot of data. Still, TCP have poor performance during data transmission in the network. The network community continues conducting research to develop a method that should provide a fair and effective transmission bandwidth distribution. Numerous congestion control strategies have been developed based on previous research in this area. This work discusses, identifies, compares, and analyses the behaviour of a few network congestion control strategies to determine their benefits and limitations. The widely known network simulator ns2 is employed for the simulation. The performance metrics for QTCP, TCP new Reno, TCP- Hybla, L-TCP and RL-TCP are throughput, average delay, PDR, packet loss, average jitter, latency and fairness are considered. The RL-TCP exhibits superior performance in multiple measures when it is compared to alternative TCP protocols, as indicated by simulation results. These metrics encompass throughput, average delay, packet delivery ratio (PDR), packet loss, jitter, latency, and fairness. Furthermore, several TCP protocols, such as L-TCP, TCP-Hybla, QTCP, and TCP-New Reno, have undergone evaluation, uncovering disparities in their individual performance attributes. Nevertheless, the RL-TCP regularly demonstrates superior performance in all aspects.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558301809240923075109
2024-10-09
2025-04-24

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558301809240923075109
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. LorinczJ. KlarinZ. OžegovićJ. A comprehensive overview of TCP congestion control in 5G networks: Research challenges and future perspectives.Sensors 20212113451010.3390/s21134510 34209431
     [Google Scholar]
  2. MishraA. SunX. JainA. PandeS. JoshiR. LeongB. The great internet TCP congestion control census Proc. ACM Meas. Anal. Comput. Syst., vol. 3, 2019no. 3, pp. 1-24201910.1145/3366693
     [Google Scholar]
  3. KanagarathinamM.R. SinghS. SandeepI. KimH. MaheshwariM.K. HwangJ. RoyA. SaxenaN. NexGen D-TCP: Next generation dynamic TCP congestion control algorithm.IEEE Access2020816448216449610.1109/ACCESS.2020.3022284
     [Google Scholar]
  4. WeiW. XueK. HanJ. WeiD.S.L. HongP. Shared bottleneck-based congestion control and packet scheduling for multipath TCP.IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.202028265366610.1109/TNET.2020.2970032
     [Google Scholar]
  5. LubnaT. MahmudI. ChoY.Z. D-LIA: Dynamic congestion control algorithm for MPTCP.ICT Express20206426326810.1016/j.icte.2020.03.005
     [Google Scholar]
  6. PrakashM. AbdrabouA. ZhuangW. An experimental study on multipath TCP congestion control with heterogeneous radio access technologies.IEEE Access20197255632557410.1109/ACCESS.2019.2900290
     [Google Scholar]
  7. LinJ. CuiL. ZhangY. TsoF.P. GuanQ. Extensive evaluation on the performance and behaviour of TCP congestion control protocols under varied network scenarios.Comput. Netw.201916310687210.1016/j.comnet.2019.106872
     [Google Scholar]
  8. PanW. TanH. LiX. LiX. Improved RTT fairness of BBR congestion control algorithm based on adaptive congestion window.Electronics 202110561510.3390/electronics10050615
     [Google Scholar]
  9. WangY. WangL. DongX. An intelligent TCP congestion control method based on deep Q network.Future Internet2021131026110.3390/fi13100261
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HuangH. SunZ. WangX. End-to-end TCP congestion control for mobile applications.IEEE Access2020817162817164210.1109/ACCESS.2020.3024707
     [Google Scholar]
  11. SaediT. El-OclaH. TCP CERL+: Revisiting TCP congestion control in wireless networks with random loss.Wirel. Netw.202127142344010.1007/s11276‑020‑02459‑0
     [Google Scholar]
  12. HaileH. GrinnemoK.J. FerlinS. HurtigP. BrunstromA. End-to-end congestion control approaches for high throughput and low delay in 4G/5G cellular networks.Comput. Netw.202118610769210.1016/j.comnet.2020.107692
     [Google Scholar]
  13. S. T. A. ALBASRAWI Improve the performance of transport layer of tcp protocol in wireless sensor network.J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol.2021996
     [Google Scholar]
  14. TuliE.A. GolamM. KimD.S. LeeJ.M. Performance enhancement of optimized link state routing protocol by parameter configuration for UANET.Drones 2022612210.3390/drones6010022
     [Google Scholar]
  15. GhalebS.A.M. VasanthiV. Energy efficient multipath routing using multi-objective grey wolf optimizer based dynamic source routing algorithm for manet.Int. J. Adv. Sci. Technol.202029360966117
     [Google Scholar]
  16. MishraA. Performance analysis of TCP Tahoe, Reno and New Reno for scalable IoT network clusters in QualNet® network simulator.Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng.20186834735510.26438/ijcse/v6i8.347355
     [Google Scholar]
  17. GambhavaB. BhensdadiaC.K. Mathematical modelling of packet transmission during reclamation period in NewReno TCP and CTCP.Int. J. Internet Protoc. Technol.202316211011810.1504/IJIPT.2023.131296
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ChowdhuryT. AlamM.J. Performance evaluation of TCP Vegas over TCP Reno and TCP NewReno over TCP Reno.JOIV: Int. J. Inf. Visual.20193327528210.30630/joiv.3.3.270
     [Google Scholar]
  19. SaccoA. FloccoM. EspositoF. MarchettoG. Owl: Congestion control with partially invisible networks via reinforcement learning.IEEE INFOCOM 2021 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications, 2021 , Vancouver, BC, Canada, 10 May 202111010.1109/INFOCOM42981.2021.9488736
     [Google Scholar]
  20. LiW. ZhouF. ChowdhuryK.R. MeleisW. QTCP: Adaptive congestion control with reinforcement learning.IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng.20196344545810.1109/TNSE.2018.2835758
     [Google Scholar]
  21. LiW. ZhangH. GaoS. XueC. WangX. LuS. SmartCC: A reinforcement learning approach for multipath TCP congestion control in heterogeneous networks.IEEE J. Sel. Areas Comm.201937112621263310.1109/JSAC.2019.2933761
     [Google Scholar]
  22. ZongL. BaiY. ZhaoC. LuoG. ZhangZ. MaH. On enhancing TCP to deal with high latency and transmission errors in geostationary satellite network for 5G-IoT.Secur. Commun. Netw.202020201710.1155/2020/6693094
     [Google Scholar]
  23. DomańskiA. DomańskaJ. CzachórskiT. KlamkaJ. SzygułaJ. MarekD. Diffusion approximation model of TCP newreno congestion control mechanism.SN Comput. Sci.2020114310.1007/s42979‑019‑0032‑x
     [Google Scholar]
  24. LeH.D. TrinhP.V. PhamT.V. KolevD.R. Carrasco-CasadoA. Kubo-OkaT. ToyoshimaM. PhamA.T. Throughput analysis for TCP over the FSO-based satellite-assisted internet of vehicles.IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol.20227121875189010.1109/TVT.2021.3131746
     [Google Scholar]
  25. YamazakiM. YamamotoM. Fairness improvement of congestion control with reinforcement learning.J. Inf. Process.202129059259510.2197/ipsjjip.29.592
     [Google Scholar]
  26. GórskiT. The 1+5 architectural views model in designing blockchain and IT system integration solutions.Symmetry 20211311200010.3390/sym13112000
     [Google Scholar]
  27. GórskiT. UML profile for messaging patterns in service-oriented architecture, microservices, and internet of things.Appl. Sci. 202212241279010.3390/app122412790
     [Google Scholar]
  28. PundirM. SandhuJ.K. KumarA. Quality-of-service prediction techniques for wireless sensor networks.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.20211950101208210.1088/1742‑6596/1950/1/012082
     [Google Scholar]
  29. SinghalA. PhogatM. KumarD. KumarA. DahiyaM. ShrivastavaV.K. Study of deep learning techniques for medical image analysis: A review.Mater. Today Proc.20225620921410.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.071
     [Google Scholar]
  30. RaniS. KumarA. BagchiA. YadavS. KumarS. RPL based routing protocols for load balancing in iot network.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.20211950101207310.1088/1742‑6596/1950/1/012073
     [Google Scholar]
  31. ShrivastavaV.K. KumarA. ShrivastavaA. TiwariA. ThiruK. BatraR. Study and trend prediction of COVID-19 cases in india using deep learning techniques.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.20211950101208410.1088/1742‑6596/1950/1/012084
     [Google Scholar]
  32. RaniS. TripathiK. KumarA. Machine learning aided malware detection for secure and smart manufacturing: A comprehensive analysis of the state of the art.Int J Interact Des Manuf202310.1007/s12008‑023‑01578‑0
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Murali KrishnaV.B. DuvvuriS.S.S.R.S. YadlapatiK. PidikitiT. SudheerP. Deployment and performance measurement of renewable energy based permanent magnet synchronous generator system.Meas. Sensors202224100478 p. 10047810.1016/j.measen.2022.100478
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558301809240923075109
Loading
Comparative Analysis of Different Transport Layer Protocol Techniques Incognitive Network
Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications 18, E26662558301809 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0126662558301809240923075109
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558301809240923075109
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558301809240923075109
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): L-TCP; PDR; PL; QTCP; RL-TCP; RTT; TCP new reno; TCP- hybla; throughput

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test