Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 15
  • ISSN: 1570-1808
  • E-ISSN: 1875-628X

Abstract

Aims

In this research, 3D-QSAR evaluation on a set of fresh purinoid compounds that we produced was conducted. This analysis aims to illustrate the correlation between the structure of purine and its ability to prevent platelet aggregation. Our findings could pave the way to discovering novel antithrombotic medications.

Background

The incidence of cardiovascular disease triggered by the clumping of platelets poses a significant danger to human health. Purine derivatives are important molecules with antiplatelet aggregation activity.

Objective

The objectives of this research are to establish the correlation between the structure of purine and its ability to prevent platelet aggregation. Such a correlation could aid in the development of innovative antithrombotic medications.

Methods

In this study, 3D-QSAR investigation on a collection of 75 new purine derivatives, which we synthesized, was conducted, utilizing Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) and comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA).

Results

Significant correlation coefficients (CoMFA, q2= 0.843, r2= 0.930, F value= 266.755, SEE= 0.165; CoMSIA, q2= 0.869, r2= 0.918, F value= 222.571, SEE= 0.179) were obtained, and assessed the model's predictive capabilities by validating it with the test set.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that the introduction of an appropriately sized structure at position 2 of the compound yields significant benefits. Conversely, the attachment of an excessively large group is detrimental. Direct attachment of a bulky substituent at C-6 of the compound is not feasible, and its activity increases when the structure with low electron cloud density is added. Moreover, the presence of a voluminous functional group at the 5' position of the compound is advantageous, and its activity will be further increased by the presence of hydrogen bond receptors in this region. These discoveries furnish significant comprehension for the formation of innovative structures with heightened efficacy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/lddd/10.2174/0115701808247583231124062525
2024-01-04
2024-12-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. MichelsonA.D. Antiplatelet therapies for the treatment of cardiovascular disease.Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.20109215416910.1038/nrd2957 20118963
    [Google Scholar]
  2. GhaffarA. ReddyK.S. SinghiM. Burden of non-communicable diseases in South Asia: Authors’ reply.BMJ200432874541499.310.1136/bmj.328.7454.1499‑b
    [Google Scholar]
  3. KarthikeyanG. XavierD. PrabhakaranD. PaisP. Perspectives on the management of coronary artery disease in India.Heart2007931113341338
    [Google Scholar]
  4. LipG.Y.H. FelmedenD.C. Antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants for hypertension.Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.20043CD003186 15266473
    [Google Scholar]
  5. SongJ.C. WangG. ZhangW. ZhangY. LiW.Q. ZhouZ. Chinese expert consensus on diagnosis and treatment of coagulation dysfunction in COVID-19.Mil. Med. Res.20207119
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ScholsA.M.R. SchreuderF.H.B.M. van RaakE.P.M. SchreuderT.H.C.M.L. RooyerF.A. van OostenbruggeR.J. StaalsJ. Incidence of oral anticoagulant-associated intracerebral hemorrhage in the Netherlands.Stroke201445126827010.1161/STROKEAHA.113.003003 24203841
    [Google Scholar]
  7. YaghiS. WilleyJ.Z. CucchiaraB. GoldsteinJ.N. GonzalesN.R. KhatriP. KimL.J. MayerS.A. ShethK.N. SchwammL.H. Treatment and outcome of hemorrhagic transformation after intravenous alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: A scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.Stroke20174812e343e36110.1161/STR.0000000000000152 29097489
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chinese Society of Neurology, Chinese Stroke Society. Consensus on diagnosis and treatment of hemorrhagic transformation after acute ischemic stroke in China 2019.J. Chin J Neurol2019524252265
    [Google Scholar]
  9. HerbertJ.M. SaviP. P2Y12, a new platelet ADP receptor, target of clopidogrel.Semin. Vasc. Med.20033211312210.1055/s‑2003‑40669 15199474
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CattaneoM. LecchiA. LombardiR. GachetC. ZighettiM.L. Platelets from a patient heterozygous for the defect of P2CYC receptors for ADP have a secretion defect despite normal thromboxane A2 production and normal granule stores: further evidence that some cases of platelet ‘primary secretion defect’ are heterozygous for a defect of P2CYC receptors.Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol.20002011E101E10610.1161/01.ATV.20.11.e101 11073862
    [Google Scholar]
  11. NakkamN. TiamkaoS. KanjanawartS. PhunikhomK. TiamkaoS. VannaprasahtS. TassaneeyakulW. TassaneeyakulW. Comparative pharmacodynamic effects of two clopidogrel formulations under steady-state conditions in healthy Thai volunteers.Int. J. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther.201755217718510.5414/CP202723 27936524
    [Google Scholar]
  12. JakubowskiJ.A. WintersK.J. NaganumaH. WallentinL. Prasugrel: a novel thienopyridine antiplatelet agent. A review of preclinical and clinical studies and the mechanistic basis for its distinct antiplatelet profile.Cardiovasc. Drug Rev.200725435737410.1111/j.1527‑3466.2007.00027.x 18078435
    [Google Scholar]
  13. WallentinL. BeckerR.C. BudajA. CannonC.P. EmanuelssonH. HeldC. HorrowJ. HustedS. JamesS. KatusH. MahaffeyK.W. SciricaB.M. SkeneA. StegP.G. StoreyR.F. HarringtonR.A. FreijA. ThorsénM. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.N. Engl. J. Med.2009361111045105710.1056/NEJMoa0904327 19717846
    [Google Scholar]
  14. FengK.Y. MahaffeyK.W. Cangrelor in clinical use.Future Cardiol.20201628910210.2217/fca‑2019‑0095 32067479
    [Google Scholar]
  15. ZhangS. HuL. DuH. GuoY. ZhangY. NiuH. JinJ. ZhangJ. LiuJ. ZhangX. KunapuliS. DingZ. BF0801, a novel adenine derivative, inhibits platelet activation via phosphodiesterase inhibition and P2Y12 antagonism.Thromb. Haemost.20101041084585710.1160/TH10‑05‑0285 20806121
    [Google Scholar]
  16. HagiharaK. KazuiM. IkenagaH. NanbaT. FusegawaK. TakahashiM. KuriharaA. OkazakiO. FaridN.A. IkedaT. Comparison of formation of thiolactones and active metabolites of prasugrel and clopidogrel in rats and dogs.Xenobiotica200939321822610.1080/00498250802650077 19280520
    [Google Scholar]
  17. MangiacapraF. TranaC. SarnoG. DavidaviciusG. ProtasiewiczM. MullerO. NtalianisA. MisonisN. Van VlemB. HeyndrickxG.R. De BruyneB. Translesional pressure gradients to predict blood pressure response after renal artery stenting in patients with renovascular hypertension.Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv.20103653754210.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.110.957704 21078879
    [Google Scholar]
  18. WiviottS.D. BraunwaldE. McCabeC.H. MontalescotG. RuzylloW. GottliebS. NeumannF.J. ArdissinoD. De ServiS. MurphyS.A. RiesmeyerJ. WeerakkodyG. GibsonC.M. AntmanE.M. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes.N. Engl. J. Med.2007357202001201510.1056/NEJMoa0706482 17982182
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LiS. RenY. HeQ. WeiY. DuH. Synthesis of novel purine derivatives: Antiplatelet aggregation activity evaluation and 3D-QSAR analysis.J. Heterocycl. Chem.202259112016202410.1002/jhet.4539
    [Google Scholar]
  20. QuR. LiuH. FengM. YangX. WangZ. Investigation on intramolecular hydrogen bond and some thermodynamic properties of polyhydroxylated anthraquinones.J. Chem. Eng. Data20125792442245510.1021/je300407g
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ZengX. QuR. FengM. ChenJ. WangL. WangZ. Photodegradation of Polyfluorinated Dibenzo- p -Dioxins in Organic Solvents: Experimental and Theoretical Studies.Environ. Sci. Technol.201650158128813410.1021/acs.est.6b02682 27380414
    [Google Scholar]
  22. TongJ. YangW. ShanL. QingS. 3D-QSAR and docking studies of 1,3.4-thiazolidlinone derivativesusing R-group search and surflex-dock.J. Chin J Struct Chem2019383464475
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HuiF. XihuaD. YanC. ChangjunF. 3D-QSAR models of anti-tumor activity for histone deacetylaseinhibitors containing dihydropyridin-2-one.J. Chin J Struct Chem2020395855862
    [Google Scholar]
  24. XuY. HeZ. LiuH. ChenY. GaoY. ZhangS. WangM. LuX. WangC. ZhaoZ. LiuY. ZhaoJ. YuY. YangM. 3D-QSAR, molecular docking, and molecular dynamics simulation study of thieno[3,2- b]pyrrole-5-carboxamide derivatives as LSD1 inhibitors.RSC Advances202010126927694310.1039/C9RA10085G 35493862
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LiX. ZhouH. MoX. ZhangL. LiJ. In silico study of febuxostat analogs as inhibitors of xanthine oxidoreductase: A combined 3D-QSAR and molecular docking study.J. Mol. Struct.2019118142843510.1016/j.molstruc.2019.01.017
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ArakawaM. HasegawaK. FunatsuK. The recent trend in QSAR modeling - variable selection and 3D-QSAR methods.Curr. Computeraided Drug Des.20073425426210.2174/157340907782799417
    [Google Scholar]
  27. CramerR.D. PattersonD.E. BunceJ.D. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins.J. Am. Chem. Soc.1988110185959596710.1021/ja00226a005 22148765
    [Google Scholar]
  28. (a KlebeG. AbrahamU. MietznerT.K. AbrahaGG. MietznerU. MolecularT. Similarity indices in a comparative analysis(CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological potency.J. Med. Chem.199437244130414610.1021/jm00050a0107990113
    [Google Scholar]
  29. (b) St. LouisM. SYBYL-X 1.3, Molecular Modeling Software.Tripos Associates2011
    [Google Scholar]
  30. LiS. BaoX. LuC. RenC. LiuG. DuH. Essential structural profile of novel adenosine derivatives as antiplatelet aggregation inhibitors based on 3D-QSAr analysis using CoMFA, CoMSIA, and SOMFA.Russ. J. Bioorganic Chem.202046344845710.1134/S1068162020030103
    [Google Scholar]
  31. LiS. ZhouC. YuM. HeQ. DuH. Synthesis, anti-platelet aggregation activity evaluation and structure–activity relationships of a series of novel purine derivatives.J. Heterocycl. Chem.20205772889290310.1002/jhet.3997
    [Google Scholar]
  32. MaJ. ZhangH. ZhangX. LeiM. 3D-QSAR studies of D3R antagonists and 5-HT1AR agonists.J. Mol. Graph. Model.20198613214110.1016/j.jmgm.2018.10.013 30359859
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/lddd/10.2174/0115701808247583231124062525
Loading
/content/journals/lddd/10.2174/0115701808247583231124062525
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test