Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Modeling in Engineering
  4. Volume 1, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2666-2949
  • E-ISSN: 2666-2957

Abstract

In this study, the integrated methods Hesitant Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (HF-AHP), Fuzzy COmplex Proportional Assessment (F-COPRAS), and Fuzzy Technique for Order Performance to Ideal Solution (F-TOPSIS) were used for job evaluation studies in a food company.

There has been a decline in employee performance in the company. Unfair wages and unequal workload were identified as the reasons for the failure. Therefore, it has been observed that the staff turnover rate in the company is quite high.

The objective is to determine a fair wage policy that will increase employee satisfaction by stratifying with job evaluation analysis between positions.

The experts of Human Resources Department determined eight competency evaluation criteria for job evaluation studies in the proposed approach. Based on their judgments on these criteria, the competencies were rated using a linguistic scale and the weighting values were calculated using the HF-AHP method. These values are inputs for the next stage. Employees were ranked using F-COPRAS and F-TOPSIS methods.

This study showed that the integrated method can be an effective alternative solution approach for calculating the weighting values and ranking of competencies in job evaluation studies.

It has been shown that the use of the strata created as a result of this study is a great facilitator in determining employee pay policies.

© 2022 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/flme/10.2174/2666294901666220512124732
2022-09-01
2024-11-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/flme/10.2174/2666294901666220512124732
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. SöğütA. Factor Weighting Method in Job Evaluation and Application in Big Scale CompanyMaster Degree Thesis, Konya Technical University, Institute of Graduate Studies, Department of Industrial Engineering: Konya, Turkey, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. SarucanA. Human resources manager competencies and weighting methods.J. Social Humanities Sci. Res.201964538403852
     [Google Scholar]
  3. XuZ. Hesitant Fuzzy Sets Theory.SwitzerlandSpringer International Publishing201410.1007/978‑3‑319‑04711‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ZhouW. XuZ. Asymmetric hesitant fuzzy sigmoid preference relations in the analytic hierarchy process.Inf. Sci.2016358–35919120710.1016/j.ins.2016.04.003
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ZhuB. XuZ. Analytic hierarchy process-hesitant group decision making.Eur. J. Oper. Res.2014239379480110.1016/j.ejor.2014.06.019
     [Google Scholar]
  6. ÖztayşiB. OnarS. BoltürkE. KahramanC. Hesitant fuzzy analytic hierarchy process2015 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systemsİstanbul, Turkey201517
     [Google Scholar]
  7. TüysüzF. ŞimşekB. A hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets-based AHP approach for analyzing the performance evaluation factors: An application to cargo sector.Complex Intell. Syst.2017316717510.1007/s40747‑017‑0044‑x
     [Google Scholar]
  8. FouladgarM. ChamziniA. LashgariA. ZavadskasE. TurskisZ. Maintenance strategy selection using AHP and COPRAS under fuzzy environment.Int. J. Strateg. Prop. Manag.20121618510410.3846/1648715X.2012.666657
     [Google Scholar]
  9. AghdaieM. ZolfaniS. ZavadskasE. Market segment evaluation and selection based on application of fuzzy AHP and COPRAS-G methods.J. Bus. Econ. Manag.201314121323310.3846/16111699.2012.721392
     [Google Scholar]
  10. ZarbakhshniaN. SoleimaniH. GhaderiH. Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria.Appl. Soft Comput.20186530731910.1016/j.asoc.2018.01.023
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ChenS.J. HwangC.L. Fuzzy Multi Attribute Decision Making, (Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical System Series).Berlin, HeidelbergSpringer-Verlag1992375
     [Google Scholar]
  12. TriantaphyllouE. LinC.L. Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multi-attribute decision making methods.Int. J. Approx. Reason.19961428131010.1016/0888‑613X(95)00119‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  13. ChenC.T. Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment.Fuzzy Sets Syst.20001141910.1016/S0165‑0114(97)00377‑1
     [Google Scholar]
  14. JahanshahlooG.R. HosseinzadehL. IzadikhahM. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data.Appl. Math. Comput.20061811544155110.1016/j.amc.2006.02.057
     [Google Scholar]
  15. ChuT.C. LinY.C. An interval arithmetic based fuzzy TOPSIS model.Expert Syst. Appl.200936108701087610.1016/j.eswa.2009.01.083
     [Google Scholar]
  16. LiaoC.N. KaoH.P. An integrated fuzzy TOPSIS and MCGP approach to supplier selection in supply chain management.Expert Syst. Appl.201138108031081110.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.031
     [Google Scholar]
  17. YıldızbaşıA. ÜnlüV. Performance evaluation of SMEs towards Industry 4.0 using fuzzy group decision making methods.SN Appl. Sci.202023355
     [Google Scholar]
  18. KutluA.C. EkmekçioğluM. KahramanC. A fuzzy multi criteria approach to point factor method for job evaluation.J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst.201325365967110.3233/IFS‑120673
     [Google Scholar]
  19. TorraV. Hesitant fuzzy sets.Int. J. Intell. Syst.2010256529539
     [Google Scholar]
  20. RodriguezR.M. MartinezL. HerreraF. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making.IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.201220110911910.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
     [Google Scholar]
  21. AyhanM. An integrated hesitant fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS approach for selecting summer sport school.SAUJS201822226928410.16984/saufenbilder.306664
     [Google Scholar]
  22. YıldızN. TüysüzF. A hybrid multi-criteria decision making approach for strategic retail location investment: Application to Turkish food retailing.Socioecon. Plann. Sci.20196812510.1016/j.seps.2018.02.006
     [Google Scholar]
  23. ÇakırE. ÖzdemirM. Six sigma projects evaluation using fuzzy COPRAS method: A case of manufacturing company.J. Productivity20181739
     [Google Scholar]
  24. ChenC.T. A fuzzy approach to select the location of the distribution center.Fuzzy Sets Syst.20011181657310.1016/S0165‑0114(98)00459‑X
     [Google Scholar]
  25. SarucanA. SöğütA. An integrated hesitant fuzzy approach to a job evaluation and application in a food company, intelligent and fuzzy techniques in big data analytics and decision makingProceedings of the INFUS 2019 ConferenceIstanbul: Turkey, vol. 1029, pp. 1050-1058, 2019.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. AkyıldızH. Güngörİ. The problems of the point method and a model proposal in the job evaluation.SDU J. Fac. Econ. Adm. Sci.2004923152
     [Google Scholar]
  27. GuptaJ.N.D. AhmedN.U. A goal programing approach to job evaluation.Comput. Ind. Eng.198814214715210.1016/0360‑8352(88)90023‑X
     [Google Scholar]
  28. DavisK.R. SauserW.I. A comparison of factor weighting methods in job evaluation: Implications for compensation systems.Public Pers. Manage.19932219110610.1177/009102609302200107
     [Google Scholar]
  29. GuptaS. ChakrabortyM. Job evaluation in fuzzy environment.Fuzzy Sets Syst.19981001-3717610.1016/S0165‑0114(97)00047‑X
     [Google Scholar]
  30. SpyridakosA. SiskosY. YannacopoulosD. SkourisA. Multicriteria job evaluation for large organizations.Eur. J. Oper. Res.2001130237538710.1016/S0377‑2217(00)00039‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  31. DağdevirenM. AkayD. ÇetinyokuşT. KurtM. A job evaluation application with fuzzy mathematical programming technique.Technology20021-29196
     [Google Scholar]
  32. DağdevirenM. AkayD. KurtM. Analytical hierarchy process for job evaluation and application.J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ.2004192131138
     [Google Scholar]
  33. EraslanE. ArıkanA. Determination of wages using the point method, seniority and success: An application in internal production department of a manufacturing facility.J. Fac. Eng. Arch. Gazi Univ.2004192139150
     [Google Scholar]
  34. ÇolakoğluS. Designing, Applying of Job Evaluation and Preparing Payment Systematic with Linear Programming in a FactoryMaster Degree Thesis, University of Çukurova, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Industrial Engineering: Adana, Turkey, 2006.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. KahyaE. Development of a business valuation system for an enterprise in the metal business, Makina Mühendisleri Odası.Endüstri Mühendisliği Dergisi2006174221
     [Google Scholar]
  36. KurgunO. YemişçiD. Scoring method in job evaluation and application in a large scale hotel business.Çimento İşveren Dergisipp. 4-15, 2007
     [Google Scholar]
  37. CorominasA. CovesA.M. LusaA. MartinezC. ISOS: A job evaluation system to implement comparable worth.Intangible Capital200841830
     [Google Scholar]
  38. AdıgüzelO. İpçioğluH. DalgarT. Job evaluation process and an application on education sector.ZKU J. Social Sci.2011713117130
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Özdabanİ. ÖzkanC. A case study on evaluating personnel and jobs jointly with fuzzy distance sets.Int. J. Ind. Eng.2011184169179
     [Google Scholar]
  40. KareemB. OkeP.K. AtetedayeA.F. LawalA.S. Development of a point rating model for job-manpower evaluation in an organization.J. Appl. Math. Bioinformat.201111195206
     [Google Scholar]
  41. EraslanE. AtalayK.D. A new approach for wage management system using fuzzy brackets in industry.Math. Probl. Eng.2013201311110.1155/2013/207032
     [Google Scholar]
  42. SöğütA. SarucanA. Factor weighting in job evaluation with CRITIC methodInternational Science and Academic Congress2019216223Konya, Turkey
     [Google Scholar]
  43. BüyüközkanG. FeyzioğluO. NebolE. Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain.Int. J. Prod. Econ.2008113114815810.1016/j.ijpe.2007.01.016
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/flme/10.2174/2666294901666220512124732
Loading
A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodology for Job Evaluation
Journal of Fuzzy Logic and Modeling in Engineering 1, e120522204664 (2022); https://doi.org/10.2174/2666294901666220512124732
/content/journals/flme/10.2174/2666294901666220512124732
/content/journals/flme/10.2174/2666294901666220512124732
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): competency; fuzzy COPRAS; fuzzy TOPSIS; hesitant fuzzy AHP; Job evaluation; rankings

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test