Skip to content
2000
image of Hofstede’s Cultural Dimension Driven Artificial Narrow Intelligence iDFIS for Industry 5.0 Empowered Digital Society

Abstract

Background

The fields which are considered to be most primary adopters of AI are financial services, banking and insurance sectors. The implementations of AI technology patent are mostly in the fields of investments, securities, consumer relationships, risk management, market analysis and compliance. AI of today is a collection of lots of algorithms and techniques that are good for variety of applications. Another variant of AI patent that is Artificial Narrow Intelligence (ANI) can perform task which is specific or can perform narrow range of task.

Objective

ANI models are intelligent enough to perform well define task within a limited domain.

ANI model operates within the well-defined parameters. The current study aims to discuss the customers view on adoption of an ANI enabled autonomous intelligent digital financial inclusion system (iDFIS) patent.

Methodology

Total 681 responses were collected from different state of India. The result shows that the factor like convenience, performance efficiency, security, personalization, effort efficiency and social influence factor had a significant positive relationship with the attitude to adopt an autonomous iDFIS system. The three cultural dimension of Hofstede’s theory power distance index, collectivism and uncertainty acceptance also taken as a moderator. The effect of moderators also seen in the different relationships.

Results

The finding of the study will be worthy to develop a strategic decision making in finance sector. The goal of finance sector is also focus on new AI innovative technologies to improve overall growth related to all aspect of finance sector specially in the field of customer service.

Conclusion

The study proposed the direct hypotheses to analyze the adoption of an autonomous iDFIS system among customers.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publishers. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121334543241001050846
2024-12-19
2025-01-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/eng/10.2174/0118722121334543241001050846/BMS-ENG-2024-95.html?itemId=/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121334543241001050846&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Sadgali I. Sael N. Benabbou F. Performance of machine learning techniques in the detection of financial frauds. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019 148 45 54 10.1016/j.procs.2019.01.007
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Demir E. Yavuz F. Machine learning applications in finance: A review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2019 158 448 455
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Chen Y. Wang J. Wang Y. Zhang J. Financial risk prediction based on machine learning. IEEE Access 2020 8 110777 110788
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang L. Wu H. Wu X. Zhao Y. An overview of artificial intelligence and its applications in finance. J. Electron. Commerce Res. 2019 20 4 291 310
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Sarojini D. Rakesh A. Reddy M.V. Machine learning in finance: A review of current research trends. J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput. 2020 11 9 3839 3850
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen J. Chen X. Zhang W. Liu J. Forecasting financial time series using machine learning algorithms: A review. IEEE Access 2021 9 1677 1698
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cao L. Wei Y. Wang Y. Machine learning applications in credit risk assessment: A survey. IEEE Access 2020 8 74584 74598
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu J. Guo R. Chen X. Wang S. Machine learning applications in financial decision-making: A survey. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2020 38 4 4297 4310
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Milana C. Ashta A. Artificial intelligence techniques in finance and financial markets: A survey of the literature. Strateg. Change 2021 30 3 189 209 10.1002/jsc.2403
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodell J.W. Kumar S. Lim W.M. Pattnaik D. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in finance: Identifying foundations, themes, and research clusters from bibliometric analysis. J. Behav. Exp. Finance 2021 32 100577 10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100577
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Altman E.I. Caouette J.B. Narayanan P. Credit-risk measurement and management. Financ. Anal. J. 1998 54 1 7 11 10.2469/faj.v54.n1.2140
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ala’raj M. Abbod M.F. A new hybrid ensemble credit scoring model based on classifiers consensus system approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2016 64 36 55 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.07.017
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Danenas P. Garsva G. Selection of support vector machines based classifiers for credit risk domain. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015 42 6 3194 3204 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.12.001
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dastile X. Celik T. Potsane M. Statistical and machine learning models in credit scoring: A systematic literature survey. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020 91 106263 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106263
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dick S. Artificial intelligence. Harv. Data Sci. Rev. 2019 1 1 1 8
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Cao L. Yang Q. Yu P.S. Data science and AI in FinTech: An overview. Int. J. Data Sci. Anal. 2021 12 2 81 99 10.1007/s41060‑021‑00278‑w
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Adams J. Hagras H. A type-2 fuzzy logic approach to explainable AI for regulatory compliance, fair customer outcomes and market stability in the global financial sector. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ- IEEE), Glasgow, UK, 19-24 July 2020, pp. 1-8. 10.1109/FUZZ48607.2020.9177542
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Agarwal P. Redefining banking and financial industry through the application of computational intelligence. Proceedings of the 2019 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 26 March 2019 - 10 April 2019, pp. 1-5. 10.1109/ICASET.2019.8714305
    [Google Scholar]
  19. LeCun Y. Bengio Y. Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature 2015 521 7553 436 444 10.1038/nature14539 26017442
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Gou X. Xu X. Xu Z. Skare M. Circular economy and fuzzy set theory: A bibliometric and systematic review based on Industry 4.0 technologies perspective. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2024 30 2 489 526 10.3846/tede.2024.20286
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Chen S. Ngai E.W.T. Ku Y. Xu Z. Gou X. Zhang C. Prediction of hotel booking cancellations: Integration of machine learning and probability model based on interpretable feature interaction. Decis. Support Syst. 2023 170 113959 10.1016/j.dss.2023.113959
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hofstede G. Culture and organizations. Int. Stud. Manage. Organ. 1980 10 4 15 41 10.1080/00208825.1980.11656300
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Srite M. Culture as an explanation of technology acceptance differences: An empirical investigation of Chinese and US users. AJIS Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 2006 14 1 10.3127/ajis.v14i1.4
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Huang F. Teo T. Sánchez-Prieto J.C. García-Peñalvo F.J. Olmos-Migueláñez S. Cultural values and technology adoption: A model comparison with university teachers from China and Spain. Comput. Educ. 2019 133 69 81 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.012
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Ameen N. Tarhini A. Reppel A. Anand A. Customer experiences in the age of artificial intelligence. Comput. Human Behav. 2021 114 106548 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548 32905175
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Sharma R. Singh G. Sharma S. Modelling internet banking adoption in Fiji: A developing country perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 2020 53 102116 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102116
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121334543241001050846
Loading
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121334543241001050846
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test