Skip to content
2000
Volume 19, Issue 6
  • ISSN: 1872-2121
  • E-ISSN: 2212-4047

Abstract

Introduction

Identification of important soil nutrients is a very important task for precision farming and developing efficient machine learning models.

Methods

The existing work shows that the patent is filed and published on a method and device for assessment of soil health parameters and recommendation of fertilizers. The existing work is done for one advice at a time not for several advices. Multiple advices that are taken into account for the task are appropriate crops, organic fertilizer, and combination 1 and combination 2 of fertilizers.

Results

This paper presented results of feature selection techniques based on Chi-Square, ANOVA and Mutual Information Gain scoring functions such as Select K Best and Select Percentile for multiple agri-advice datasets of Pune District regions to identify important soil health features.

Conclusion

As per Chi-Square, ANOVA and Mutual Information scoring functions with Select K Best and Select Percentile techniques ‘Mn’ was the most important parameter and Cu’ and ‘B’ were the least important parameters among all 11 parameters common in 4 agriculture advices. Whereas pH, K, Fe, 'Oc', 'N', 'S', 'Mn', and 'P' will be used for future research work on the development of an efficient classification algorithm for multi-advice generators.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121290793240429111623
2024-05-09
2025-06-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. PunlumjeakW. RachbureeN. A comparative study of feature selection techniques for classify student performance2015 7th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE)29-30 October 2015, Chiang Mai, Thailand, pp. 425-429, 201510.1109/ICITEED.2015.7408984
    [Google Scholar]
  2. PalA. KulkarniM.B. GuptaH. PonnalaguR.N. DubeyS.K. GoelS. Portable and autonomous device for real-time colorimetric detection: Validation for phosphorous and nitrite detectionSensors and Actuators A: Physical202133011289610.1016/j.sna.2021.112896
    [Google Scholar]
  3. ZhuX. WangK. YanH. LiuC. ZhuX. ChenB. Microfluidics as an emerging platform for exploring soil environmental processes: A critical review.Environ. Sci. Technol.202256271173110.1021/acs.est.1c0389934985862
    [Google Scholar]
  4. StanleyC.E. GrossmannG. SolvasaX.C. deMelloA.J. Soil-on-a-Chip: microfluidic platforms for environmental organismal studies.Lab Chip201516210.1039/C5LC01285F26645910
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LuB. LunnJ. YeungK. DhandapaniS. CarterL. RooseT. ShawL. NightingaleA. NiuX. Droplet microfluidic-based in situ analyzer for monitoring free nitrate in soil.Environ. Sci. Technol.20245862956296510.1021/acs.est.3c0820738291787
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ZhouJ. WangY. Different feature selection of soil attributes influenced clustering performance on soil datasets.Int. J. Geosci.2019101091992910.4236/ijg.2019.1010052
    [Google Scholar]
  7. UddinM. HassanM.R. A novel feature based algorithm for soil type classification.Complex & Intelligent Systems2022843377339310.1007/s40747‑022‑00682‑0
    [Google Scholar]
  8. AgarwalR. ShekhawatN.S. KumarS. NayyarA. QureshiB. Improved feature selection method for the identification of soil images using oscillating spider monkey optimization.IEEE Access2021916712816713910.1109/ACCESS.2021.3135536
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ChenY. MaL. YuD. ZhangH. FengK. WangX. SongJ. Comparison of feature selection methods for mapping soil organic matter in subtropical restored forestsEcological Indicators202213510854510.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108545
    [Google Scholar]
  10. MateP.G. SinghK.R. KhobragadeA. Feature extraction algorithm for estimation of agriculture acreage from remote sensing images2016 World Conference on Futuristic Trends in Research and Innovation for Social Welfare29 February 2016 - 01 March 2016, Coimbatore, India, pp. 1-5, 2016.10.1109/STARTUP.2016.7583964
    [Google Scholar]
  11. JanraoS. ShahD. Performance evaluation for identifying best feature selector and machine learning algorithm for optimizing crop recommendation system2020 IEEE Congreso Bienal de Argentina (ARGENCON)01-04 December 2020, Resistencia, Argentina, pp. 1-8, 2020.10.1109/ARGENCON49523.2020.9505474
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ElnemrH.A. Feature selection for texture-based plant leaves classification2017 Intl Conf on Advanced Control Circuits Systems (ACCS) Systems & 2017 Intl Conf on New Paradigms in Electronics & Information Technology (PEIT)05-08 November 2017, Alexandria, Egypt, pp. 91-97, 2017.10.1109/ACCS‑PEIT.2017.8303025
    [Google Scholar]
  13. AouediO. PiamratK. ParreinB. Performance evaluation of feature selection and tree-based algorithms for traffic classification2021 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops)14-23 June 2021, Montreal, QC, Canada, pp. 1-6, 2021.10.1109/ICCWorkshops50388.2021.9473580
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Al-TamimiA-K. SalemM. Al-AlamiA. On the use of feature selection for music genre classification2020 Seventh International Conference on Information Technology Trends (ITT)25-26 November 2020, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, pp. 1-6, 2020.10.1109/ITT51279.2020.9320778
    [Google Scholar]
  15. BhuyanH.K. ReddyC.V.M. Sub-feature selection for novel classification2018 Second International Conference on Inventive Communication and Computational Technologies (ICICCT)20-21 April 2018, Coimbatore, India, pp. 477-482, 2018.10.1109/ICICCT.2018.8473206
    [Google Scholar]
  16. DharaneshC.M. PrasadR. PatilC.M. Feature extraction classification for personal identification using iris2017 International Conference on Current Trends in Computer, Electrical, Electronics and Communication (CTCEEC)08-09 September 2017, Mysore, India, pp. 431-435, 2017.10.1109/CTCEEC.2017.8455060
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BhuyanH.K. HuqueM.S. Sub-feature selection based classification2018 2nd International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI)11-12 May 2018, Tirunelveli, India, pp. 210-216, 2018.10.1109/ICOEI.2018.8553763
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KaushikA. GuptaH. LatwalD.S. Impact of feature selection and engineering in the classification of handwritten text2016 3rd International Conference on Computing for Sustainable Global Development (INDIACom)16-18 March 2016, New Delhi, India, pp. 2598-2601, 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. CliffordT. BruceJ. Obafemi-AjayiT. MattaJ. Comparative analysis of feature selection methods to identify biomarkers in a stroke-related dataset2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB)09-11 July 2019, Siena, Italy, pp. 1-8, 2019.10.1109/CIBCB.2019.8791457
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ShroffK.P. MahetaH.H. A comparative study of various feature selection techniques in high-dimensional data set to improve classification accuracy2015 International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI)08-10 January 2015, Coimbatore, India, pp. 1-6, 2015.10.1109/ICCCI.2015.7218098
    [Google Scholar]
  21. BrankovicA. FalsoneA. PrandiniM. PiroddiL. A feature selection and classification algorithm based on randomized extraction of model populations.IEEE Trans. Cybern.20184841151116210.1109/TCYB.2017.268241828371789
    [Google Scholar]
  22. VisputeS. SainiM.L. Automation in Agriculture: A Systematic Survey of Research Activities in Agriculture Decision Support Systems Using Machine Learning.Futuristic Trends in Networks and Computing Technologies. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering. SinghP.K. WierzchońS.T. ChhabraJ.K. Tanwarand S. SingaporeSpringer2022Vol. 93610.1007/978‑981‑19‑5037‑7_56
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Rahul VisputeSushma Lal SainiMadan 2022Performance analysis of soil health classifiers using data analytics tools and techniques for best model and tool selectionInt. J. Onl. Eng.1810169189
    [Google Scholar]
  24. RaoI. ShirgireP. SanganwarS. VyawhareK. VisputeS.R. An overview of agriculture data analysis using machine learning techniques and deep learning.Second International Conference on Image Processing and Capsule Networks (ICIPCN 2021)202230034335510.1007/978‑3‑030‑84760‑9_30
    [Google Scholar]
  25. DeshmukhS. DhannawatD. DalviM. GawaliP. VisputeS.R. KekaneS. Application of data analytics in agriculture sector for soil health analysis: Literature review2019 5th International Conference On Computing, Communication, Control And Automation (ICCUBEA)201919-21 September 2019, Pune, India, pp. 1-4, 2019.10.1109/ICCUBEA47591.2019.9129104
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Chi-square test for feature selection – mathematical explanationAvailable from: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/chi-square-test-for-feature-selection-mathematical-explanation/
  27. Application filed by indian council of agricultural research.WO2017029592A1
    [Google Scholar]
  28. WuQ. XiaS. FanQ. LiZ. Performance analysis of IEEE 802.11p for continuous backoff freezing in IoV.Electronics2019812140410.3390/electronics8121404
    [Google Scholar]
  29. WuQ. WangX. FanQ. FanP. ZhangC. LiZ. High stable and accurate vehicle selection scheme based on federated edge learning in vehicular networks.China Commun.202320311710.23919/JCC.2023.03.001
    [Google Scholar]
  30. JinB. XuX. Forecasting wholesale prices of yellow corn through the Gaussian process regression.Neural Comput & Applic202410.1007/s00521‑024‑09531‑2
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121290793240429111623
Loading
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121290793240429111623
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test