Skip to content
2000
Volume 1, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6581

Abstract

Accurate estimates of the effectiveness of hormonal emergency contraception (EC) are important for public policy and clinical application. Because there are no randomized trials of emergency contraception, observational studies with historical controls are employed to estimate effectiveness. There are many methodologic issues that can influence estimates of effectiveness, with multiple opportunities for bias. These include issues around use of EC and follow-up, selection of women for study, the historical reference population used for estimates of expected pregnancies, and the statistical approaches used to derive estimates of expected pregnancies. We discuss how the different sources of bias, including previously unrecognized sources, may affect existing estimates and make suggestions for future methodologic improvements to estimate effectiveness.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/1573404054064511
2005-06-01
2025-05-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/1573404054064511
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test