Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6581

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy with high-risk factors can lead to adverse emotional experiences for the expectant mother.

Objective

This study aimed to explore perceived stress and contributing factors among expectant mothers with high-risk pregnancies.

Methods

In 2022, a descriptive-analytical study was conducted on 150 high-risk pregnant mothers in comprehensive health centers in Hamadan, Iran. Convenience sampling was used to select participants. The study involved pregnant women between 24-36 weeks of gestation. The participants completed the demographic questionnaire and Cohen's perceived stress scale in a self-reported and written form. The cut point of 21.8 indicated a high stress level. Univariate and multivariate regression were used to determine the relationship between demographic-obstetric variables and perceived stress levels. Statistical analysis was carried out using Stata-13 software. A significance level of 0.05 was utilized in the analysis.

Results

The mean stress score was 33.32 (9.51). Maternal perceived stress was higher with longer gestational age, history of COVID-19 infection, or renting a house, increasing the stress score by 0.85, 7.68, and 6.54, respectively.

Conclusion

The study findings indicated that mothers with high-risk pregnancies experience high levels of perceived stress, which intensifies as their gestational age progresses or if they contract COVID-19 or have unstable housing. The results of this study can help policymakers, planners, and healthcare providers, such as midwives and nurses, in creating and implementing programs to decrease stress and its adverse effects in women with high-risk pregnancies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048302870240523053503
2024-05-30
2025-01-11
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BadakhshM. Hastings-TolsmaM. FirouzkohiM. AmirshahiM. HashemiZ.S. The lived experience of women with a high-risk pregnancy: A phenomenology investigation.Midwifery20208210262510.1016/j.midw.2019.102625 31923707
    [Google Scholar]
  2. HolnessN. High-risk pregnancy.Nurs. Clin. North Am.201853224125110.1016/j.cnur.2018.01.010 29779516
    [Google Scholar]
  3. DeldarK. TaraS.M. JangiM. PourhoseiniA. TaraM. Systematic extraction of diagnostic data items for common high-risk pregnancies using Delphi technique.Medical Technologies Journal20171411910.26415/2572‑004X‑vol1iss4p119‑119
    [Google Scholar]
  4. GomindesA.R. BhakthavalsalanR. SharmaU. Prevalence of high-risk pregnancy among pregnant women attending antenatal care camps in primary health centres in kinaye and vantamuri and their sub-centres.Cureus20221410.7759/cureus.27355 36046327
    [Google Scholar]
  5. MajellaM.G. SarveswaranG. KrishnamoorthyY. SivaranjiniK. ArikrishnanK. KumarS. A longitudinal study on high risk pregnancy and its outcome among antenatal women attending rural primary health centre in Puducherry, South India.J. Educ. Health Promot.2019812
    [Google Scholar]
  6. SinghN.P. PrajapatiA.K. KumarV. SoniK. JainP. Ruchi, Prevalence of high-risk pregnancy among pregnant women enrolled under pradhan mantri surakshit matritva abhiyan in government health facilities of district etawah, Uttar Pradesh: A cross-sectional study.J. Family Med. Prim. Care20221151876188210.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1636_21 35800511
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FiroziS. The rate of the prevalence of high-risk pregnancies and the results on pregnant mothers and the effect on parameters after the birth.Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Res.201233735
    [Google Scholar]
  8. BajalanZ. SabzevariZ. QolizadehA. AbdollahiF. Prevalence of high-risk pregnancies and the correlation between the method of delivery and the maternal and neonatal outcomes.JPENIR201955258
    [Google Scholar]
  9. IsaacsN.Z. AndipatinM.G. A systematic review regarding women’s emotional and psychological experiences of high-risk pregnancies.BMC Psychol.2020814510.1186/s40359‑020‑00410‑8 32362285
    [Google Scholar]
  10. EngidawN.A. MekonnenA.G. AmogneF.K. Perceived stress and its associated factors among pregnant women in Bale zone Hospitals, Southeast Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study.BMC Res. Notes201912135610.1186/s13104‑019‑4383‑0 31234892
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KoendjbiharieA.P. Hindori-MohangooA.D. ZijlmansW.C.W.R. ShankarA. Abdoel WahidF.Z.A. CovertH.H. LichtveldM.Y. DruryS.S. Sociodemographic influences on perceived stress during pregnancy: Results from the CCREOH environmental epidemiologic study, suriname.Women20222212113410.3390/women2020014 36081649
    [Google Scholar]
  12. American Psychological Association. StressAvailable from: https://www.apa.org/topics/stress
  13. TraylorC.S. JohnsonJ.D. KimmelM.C. ManuckT.A. Effects of psychological stress on adverse pregnancy outcomes and nonpharmacologic approaches for reduction: An expert review.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM20202410022910.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100229 32995736
    [Google Scholar]
  14. HerbellK. ZauszniewskiJ.A. Stress experiences and mental health of pregnant women: The mediating role of social support.Issues Ment. Health Nurs.201940761362010.1080/01612840.2019.1565873 31021665
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LönnbergG. JonasW. UnternaehrerE. BränströmR. NissenE. NiemiM. Effects of a mindfulness based childbirth and parenting program on pregnant women’s perceived stress and risk of perinatal depression–Results from a randomized controlled trial.J. Affect. Disord.202026213314210.1016/j.jad.2019.10.048 31733457
    [Google Scholar]
  16. TanpraditK. KaewkiattikunK. The effect of perceived stress during pregnancy on preterm birth.Int. J. Womens Health20201228729310.2147/IJWH.S239138 32346315
    [Google Scholar]
  17. BushN.R. SavitzJ. CocciaM. Jones-MasonK. AdlerN. BoyceW.Th. Maternal stress during pregnancy predicts infant infectious and noninfectious illness.J. Pediatr.202122811712510.1016/j.jpeds.2020.08.041
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ChateS. MetgudC. Pregnancy outcome among high-risk pregnant women in the rural area of Belagavi.J. Family Med. Prim. Care20221184440444610.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_10_22 36353024
    [Google Scholar]
  19. NaghizadehS. Comparison of pregnancy self-care, perceived social support and perceived stress in low-risk and high-risk groups.J Health Care2019211162510.29252/jhc.21.1.16
    [Google Scholar]
  20. ChanCh.K.L. SoW.K.W. FongD.Y.T. Hong Kong baccalaureate nursing students’ stress and their coping strategies in clinical practice.J. Prof. Nurs.20201646164810.1016/j.profnurs.2009.01.018 19751936
    [Google Scholar]
  21. AslaniA. KhosraviA. FarjamfarM. PoorheidariM. The effect of group training of solution-focused stress management on pregnant women’s stress.J Fundam Ment Health.201719454458
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ertekin PinarS. DaglarG. Duran AksoyO. The effect of stress management training on perceived stress, anxiety and hopelessness levels of women with high-risk pregnancy.J. Obstet. Gynaecol.2022421172210.1080/01443615.2020.1867970 33892613
    [Google Scholar]
  23. AbediM. SaboryE. RabiepourS. RasouliJ. The relationship between stress in pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes: A longitudinal study.J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac.201714969981
    [Google Scholar]
  24. KhazaeianS. Fathnezhad-KazemiA. Perceived stress and its predictors in pregnant women with gestational hypertension: A cross-sectional study.J. Prev. Med.2022916818110.32598/JPM.9.2.6
    [Google Scholar]
  25. ValsamakisG. ChrousosG. MastorakosG. Stress, female reproduction and pregnancy.Psychoneuroendocrinology2019100485710.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.09.031 30291988
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cole-LewisH.J. KershawT.S. EarnshawV.A. YonkersK.A. LinH. IckovicsJ.R. Pregnancy-specific stress, preterm birth, and gestational age among high-risk young women.Health Psychol.20143391033104510.1037/a0034586 24447189
    [Google Scholar]
  27. ShenQ. ZhangQ. ZhaoJ. HuangZ. WangX. NiM. TangZ. LiuZ. Association between maternal perceived stress in all trimesters of pregnancy and infant atopic dermatitis: A prospective birth cohort study.Front Pediatr.2020852699410.3389/fped.2020.526994 33313022
    [Google Scholar]
  28. GhassabianA. JacobsonM.H. KahnL.G. BrubakerS.G. Mehta-LeeS.S. TrasandeL. Maternal perceived stress during the COVID-19 pandemic: Pre-existing risk factors and concurrent correlates in new york city women.Int. J. Public Health202267160449710.3389/ijph.2022.1604497 35479764
    [Google Scholar]
  29. GulloG. ScaglioneM. CucinellaG. RivaA. ColdebellaD. CavaliereA.F. SignoreF. BuzzaccariniG. SpagnolG. LaganàA.S. NoventaM. ZaamiS. Congenital zika syndrome: Genetic avenues for diagnosis and therapy, possible management and long-term outcomes.J. Clin. Med.2022115135110.3390/jcm11051351 35268441
    [Google Scholar]
  30. IncognitoG.G. DistefanoR.E.C. CampoG. GulinoF.A. GulisanoC. GullottaC. GulloG. CucinellaG. TuscanoA. BrunoM.T. PalumboM. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between SARS-CoV-2 variants: A retrospective, monocentric study.J. Clin. Med.20231219632910.3390/jcm12196329 37834972
    [Google Scholar]
  31. MarantoM. ZaamiS. RestivoV. TerminiD. GangemiA. TumminelloM. CulmoneS. BilloneV. CucinellaG. GulloG. Symptomatic COVID-19 in pregnancy: Hospital cohort data between may 2020 and april 2021, risk factors and medicolegal implications.Diagnostics2023136100910.3390/diagnostics13061009 36980317
    [Google Scholar]
  32. SinaciS. Ozden TokaliogluE. OcalD. AtalayA. YilmazG. KeskinH.L. ErdincS.O. SahinD. Moraloglu TekinO. Does having a high-risk pregnancy influence anxiety level during the COVID-19 pandemic?Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.202025519019610.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.10.055 33147531
    [Google Scholar]
  33. MunfordL.A. FicheraE. SuttonM. Is owning your home good for your health? Evidence from exogenous variations in subsidies in England.Econ. Hum. Biol.20203910090310.1016/j.ehb.2020.100903 32659622
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Howden-ChapmanPh. FyfeC. NathanK. KeallM. RiggsL. PierseN. The effects of housing on health and well-being in Aotearoa New Zealand.N. Z. Popul. Rev.2021471632
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SinghA. DanielL. BakerE. BentleyR. Housing disadvantage and poor mental health: A systematic review.Am. J. Prev. Med.201957226227210.1016/j.amepre.2019.03.018 31326010
    [Google Scholar]
  36. LeifheitK.M. SchwartzG.L. PollackC.E. EdinK.J. BlackM.M. JenningsJ.M. AlthoffK.N. Severe housing insecurity during pregnancy: Association with adverse birth and infant outcomes.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health20201722865910.3390/ijerph17228659 33233450
    [Google Scholar]
  37. ShresthaB. DunnL. The declaration of helsinki on medical research involving human subjects: A review of seventh revision.J. Nepal Health Res. Counc.202017454855210.33314/jnhrc.v17i4.1042 32001865
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048302870240523053503
Loading
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048302870240523053503
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test