Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6581

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Hysterectomy is the emergency removal of the uterus after a cesarean section (CS), usually performed after vaginal or cesarean deliveries, as a life-saving measure to control heavy bleeding during childbirth. This surgery has many complications. However, it has been increasing recently. The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of hysterectomy over time and to explore factors associated with hysterectomy.

Methods

All patients with emergency hysterectomies following vaginal or cesarean delivery at the Fatemieh Medical and Educational Center were included in this study. Risk factors and indications for hysterectomy were recorded based on the study purpose.

Results

The data indicated that out of 114175 deliveries, there were 60 hysterectomies over 14 years with the age range of 20-45 years. The incidence of hysterectomy increased from 0.34/1000 during 2009-2015 to 0.71/1000 deliveries in 2015-2022, with an overall incidence of 0.53 per 1000 deliveries during 14 years. The results indicated that the mean rate of hysterectomy (0.95% CI) increased significantly by 0.059 yearly, and by adjusting other variables, the history of CS (0.95% CI) and placenta accreta previa significantly increased the hysterectomy mean rate by 0.291 (0.053-0.529) and 0.284 (0.074-0.494), respectively.

Conclusion

The mean rate of hysterectomy represented an annual increase, especially during the last 7 years. In summary, the main reason can be the history of CS that leads to placental disorders and, thus, hysterectomy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048287230240429171400
2024-05-16
2024-12-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. HalliS.S. SinghD.P. BiradarR.A. Increased hypertension following hysterectomy among reproductive women in India.Am J Prev Cardiol2020410013110.1016/j.ajpc.2020.10013134327482
    [Google Scholar]
  2. SakseA. Weber, Nickelsen C, Secher NJ. Peripartum hysterectomy in Denmark 1995–2004.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.200786121472147510.1080/0001634070169265118027114
    [Google Scholar]
  3. WangC.Y. PanH.H. ChangC.C. LinC.K. Outcomes of hypogastric artery ligation and transcatheter uterine artery embolization in women with postpartum hemorrhage.Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol.2019581727610.1016/j.tjog.2018.11.01430638485
    [Google Scholar]
  4. SoheilaRN HatavGT MovahediM MojdehG MohammadiN Evaluation the risk factors, indications and short term complications in postpartum hysterectomy in selected hospitals in Isfahan.Int j sci dev res2015242059
    [Google Scholar]
  5. de la CruzC.Z. ThompsonE.L. O’RourkeK. NembhardW.N. Cesarean section and the risk of emergency peripartum hysterectomy in high-income countries: A systematic review.Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.201529261201121510.1007/s00404‑015‑3790‑226104125
    [Google Scholar]
  6. TriunfoS. FerrazzaniS. VolpeM. ScambiaG. LanzoneA. Old and novel insights into emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A timetrend analysis.Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.202030151159116510.1007/s00404‑020‑05504‑732221710
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LiuB. DengS. LinM. Prediction of cesarean hysterectomy in placenta previa complicated with prior cesarean: A retrospective study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth20202018110.1186/s12884‑020‑2790‑932033602
    [Google Scholar]
  8. FawcusS. MoodleyJ. Postpartum haemorhage associated with caesarean section and caesarean hysterectomy.Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.201327223324910.1016/j.bpobgyn.2012.08.01823084097
    [Google Scholar]
  9. DesaiS. ShuklaA. NambiarD. VedR. Patterns of hysterectomy in India: A national and state‐level analysis of the Fourth National Family Health Survey (2015–2016).BJOG2019126S4Suppl. 4728010.1111/1471‑0528.1585831309706
    [Google Scholar]
  10. HalliS.S. PrasadJ.B. BiradarR.A. Increased blood glucose level following hysterectomy among reproductive women in India.BMC Womens Health202020121110.1186/s12905‑020‑01075‑632967655
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ÇintesunE ÇintesunFNI Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in the eastern region of Turkey: Incidence and maternal morbidity.Int j anat radiol surg20187115
    [Google Scholar]
  12. MbakwaM.R. TendongforN. NgunyiY.L. NgekE.S.N. AlemkiaF. EgbeT.O. Indications and outcomes of emergency obstetric hysterectomy; A 5-year review at the bafoussam regional hospital, Cameroon.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth202121132310.1186/s12884‑021‑03797‑333892626
    [Google Scholar]
  13. QatawnehA. FramK. ThikerallahF. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy at Jordan University hospital – A teaching hospital experience.Przegl. Menopauz.2020192667110.5114/pm.2020.9784032802016
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ShellhaasC.S. GilbertS. LandonM.B. The frequency and complication rates of hysterectomy accompanying cesarean delivery.Obstet. Gynecol.2009114222422910.1097/AOG.0b013e3181ad944219622981
    [Google Scholar]
  15. CollinsS.L. AddleyS. WeeksE. ChakravartiS. HalderS. AlazzamM. The modified radical peripartum cesarean hysterectomy (Soleymani-Alazzam-Collins technique): A systematic, safe procedure for the management of severe placenta accreta spectrum.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.20212252175
    [Google Scholar]
  16. YildirimG.Y. KorogluN. AkcaA. What is new in peripartum hysterectomy? A seventeen year experience in a tertiary hospital.Taiwan. J. Obstet. Gynecol.2021601959810.1016/j.tjog.2020.11.01433495017
    [Google Scholar]
  17. AslamL. SohailN. AyyubN. SarwarA. ShahA.A. AfzalA. Risk factors, indications and outcome of emergency obstetric hysterectomy: A study performed at tertiary care hospital.Pak. J. Med. Health Sci.20221607169
    [Google Scholar]
  18. DaskalakisG. AnastasakisE. PapantoniouN. MesogitisS. TheodoraM. AntsaklisA. Emergency obstetric hysterectomy.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.200786222322710.1080/0001634060108844817364287
    [Google Scholar]
  19. WongT.Y. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A 10-year review in a tertiary obstetric hospital.N. Z. Med. J.20111241345343922072164
    [Google Scholar]
  20. KallianidisA.F. MaraschiniA. DanisJ. Epidemiological analysis of peripartum hysterectomy across nine European countries.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.202099101364137310.1111/aogs.1389232358968
    [Google Scholar]
  21. HashimN.A.H.A. 11-year review of emergency obstetric hysterectomy in hospital universiti sains malaysia, kubang kerian, kelantan (january 2007-december 2017).Malays. J. Med. Sci.2022295192193
    [Google Scholar]
  22. BurkeC. AllenR. Complications of cesarean birth: Clinical recommendations for prevention and management.MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs.2020452929910.1097/NMC.000000000000059831804227
    [Google Scholar]
  23. CurtinS.C. GregoryK.D. KorstL.M. UddinS.F. Maternal morbidity for vaginal and cesarean deliveries, according to previous cesarean history: New data from the birth certificate, 2013. National vital statistics reports: From the centers for disease control and prevention, national center for health statistics.National Vital Statistics System2015644113
    [Google Scholar]
  24. CallaghanW.M. GrobmanW.A. KilpatrickS.J. MainE.K. D’AltonM. Facility-based identification of women with severe maternal morbidity: It is time to start.Obstet. Gynecol.2014123597898110.1097/AOG.000000000000021824785849
    [Google Scholar]
  25. FingarK. HambrickM. HeslinK. MooreJ. Trends and disparities in delivery hospitalizations involving severe maternal morbidity.In: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Statistical Briefs. Rockville (MD).Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US)2018
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KweeA. BotsM.L. VisserG.H.A. BruinseH.W. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy: A prospective study in The Netherlands.Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.2006124218719210.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.06.01216026917
    [Google Scholar]
  27. KhursheedF. AbbasS. MadhudasC. ZaheenZ. BanoN. AkbarR. Emergency obstetrics hysterectomy: Current situation in a tertiary care hospital of sindh.Pak. J. Med. Health Sci.202216021224
    [Google Scholar]
  28. RadniaN. ManouchehrianN. ShayanA. ShirmohamadiN. EskandarlooT. OtogaraM. Frequency and causes of emergency hysterectomy along with vaginal delivery and caesarean section in Hamadan, Iran.Electron. Physician2017964643464710.19082/464328848642
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SentilhesL. SecoA. AzriaE. BeucherG. BonnetM-P. BrangerB. Conservative management or cesarean hysterectomy for placenta accreta spectrum: The PACCRETA prospective study.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.2022226683910.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.013
    [Google Scholar]
  30. KhanA. DoQ.N. XiY. Inter-reader agreement of multivariable MR evaluation of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and association with cesarean hysterectomy.Placenta202212619620110.1016/j.placenta.2022.07.00535868245
    [Google Scholar]
  31. BartelsH.C. PostleJ.D. DowneyP. BrennanD.J. Placenta accreta spectrum: A review of pathology, molecular biology, and biomarkers.Dis. Markers20182018150767410.1155/2018/1507674
    [Google Scholar]
  32. HuqueS. RobertsI. FawoleB. ChaudhriR. ArulkumaranS. Shakur-StillH. Risk factors for peripartum hysterectomy among women with postpartum haemorrhage: Analysis of data from the WOMAN trial.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth201818118610.1186/s12884‑018‑1829‑729843627
    [Google Scholar]
  33. OrvietoR. KirshenbaumM. GleicherN. Is embryo cryopreservation causing macrosomia—and what else?Front. Endocrinol.2020111910.3389/fendo.2020.0001932047479
    [Google Scholar]
  34. ArulpragasamK. HyanesG. Epee-BekimaM. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a Western Australian population: Ten‐year retrospective case‐note analysis.Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.201959453353710.1111/ajo.1292230411318
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048287230240429171400
Loading
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048287230240429171400
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test