Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Women's Health Reviews
  4. Volume 21, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 21, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4048
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Background

Cesarean section imposes a huge social and economic cost on the individual and health care system. Iran is one of the countries that have experienced a significant increase in cesarean section in recent decades. There are few studies on the causes of women's reluctance to give natural birth. This study was conducted to determine the women’s unwillingness to have vaginal delivery through qualitative methods.

Methods

The present qualitative study was conducted between March to July 2023 at private and three public centers in Qom City. Purposeful sampling was used and based on inclusion criteria; 17 women were recruited in the study. MAXQDA software was used to analyze and manage the qualitative data.

Results

Three main categories appeared from the data analysis, which included individual factors, professional factors, and social factors. The findings of this study showed that beliefs, fear, lack of knowledge, previous experiences, and psychological factors are the most important individual factors that cause unwillingness to give birth vaginally. Factors related to midwives and physicians, birth environment, social modeling, and legal protection affected women’s decision to choose cesarean delivery.

Conclusion

The findings of this study showed that unwillingness to have vaginal delivery by women is an issue that has various reasons. These reasons remind us that education, awareness, and support in prenatal care should be considered more than ever. In addition, treatment systems play a role in increasing cesarean section, so it is the responsibility of midwifery and obstetric experts to make improvements in the treatment systems.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048278070231212094115
2024-01-24
2024-11-22

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048278070231212094115
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. AlthabeF. SosaC. BelizánJ.M. GibbonsL. JacqueriozF. BergelE. Cesarean section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality in low-, medium-, and high-income countries: an ecological study.Birth200633427027710.1111/j.1523‑536X.2006.00118.x17150064
     [Google Scholar]
  2. OrganizationW.H. Appropriate technology for birth.Lancet1985284524364372863457
     [Google Scholar]
  3. GrivellR.M. DoddJ.M. Short- and long-term outcomes after cesarean section.Expert Rev. Obstet. Gynecol.20116220521510.1586/eog.11.5
     [Google Scholar]
  4. MascarelloK.C. HortaB.L. SilveiraM.F. Maternal complications and cesarean section without indication: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Rev. Saude Publica20175110510.11606/S1518‑8787.201705100038929166440
     [Google Scholar]
  5. JafarzadehA. HadaviM. HasanshahiG. RezaeianM. VazirinejadR. AminzadehF. SarkoohiA. Cesarean or cesarean epidemic?Arch. Iran Med.2019221166367031823633
     [Google Scholar]
  6. PourshiraziM. HeidarzadehM. TaheriM. EsmailyH. BabaeyF. TalkhiN. GholizadehL. Cesarean delivery in Iran: A population-based analysis using the Robson classification system.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth202222118510.1186/s12884‑022‑04517‑135260106
     [Google Scholar]
  7. BadakhshM.H. SeifoddinM. KhodakaramiN. GholamiR. MoghimiS. Rise in cesarean section rate over a 30-year period in a public hospital in Tehran, Iran.Arch Iran Med.201215147
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Azami-AghdashS. GhojazadehM. DehdilaniN. MohammadiM. Asl Amin AbadR. Prevalence and causes of cesarean section in Iran: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Iran. J. Public Health201443554555526060756
     [Google Scholar]
  9. HainesH. PallantJ.F. KarlströmA. HildingssonI. Cross-cultural comparison of levels of childbirth-related fear in an Australian and Swedish sample.Midwifery201127456056710.1016/j.midw.2010.05.00420598787
     [Google Scholar]
  10. GibbonsL BelizanJM LauerJA BetranAP MerialdiM AlthabeF Inequities in the use of cesarean section deliveries in the world.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.20122064331e1-. e1910.1016/j.ajog.2012.02.026
     [Google Scholar]
  11. SoltaniF. EskandariZ. KhodakaramiB. ParsaP. RoshanaeiG. Factors contributing to fear of childbirth among pregnant women in Hamadan (Iran) in 2016.Electron. Physician2017974725473110.19082/472528894527
     [Google Scholar]
  12. MatinniaN. FaisalI. Hanafiah JuniM. HerjarA.R. MoeiniB. OsmanZ.J. Fears related to pregnancy and childbirth among primigravidae who requested caesarean versus vaginal delivery in Iran.Matern. Child Health J.20151951121113010.1007/s10995‑014‑1610‑025269852
     [Google Scholar]
  13. SuriH. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis.Qual. Res. J.2011112637510.3316/QRJ1102063
     [Google Scholar]
  14. GraneheimU.H. LundmanB. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness.Nurse Educ. Today200424210511210.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.00114769454
     [Google Scholar]
  15. WiklundI. EdmanG. AndolfE. Cesarean section on maternal request: Reasons for the request, self-estimated health, expectations, experience of birth and signs of depression among first-time mothers.Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.200786445145610.1080/0001634070121791317486467
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Garthus-NiegelS. KnophC. von SoestT. NielsenC.S. Eberhard- GranM. The role of labor pain and overall birth experience in the development of posttraumatic stress symptoms: A longitudinal cohort study.Birth201441110811510.1111/birt.1209324654643
     [Google Scholar]
  17. ErikssonC. JanssonL. HambergK. Women’s experiences of intense fear related to childbirth investigated in a Swedish qualitative study.Midwifery200622324024810.1016/j.midw.2005.10.00216603282
     [Google Scholar]
  18. RäisänenS. LehtoS.M. NielsenH.S. GisslerM. KramerM.R. HeinonenS. Fear of childbirth in nulliparous and multiparous women: A population-based analysis of all singleton births in F inland in 1997–2010.BJOG2014121896597010.1111/1471‑0528.1259924494605
     [Google Scholar]
  19. NilssonC. LundgrenI. KarlströmA. HildingssonI. Self reported fear of childbirth and its association with women’s birth experience and mode of delivery: A longitudinal population-based study.Women Birth201225311412110.1016/j.wombi.2011.06.00121764400
     [Google Scholar]
  20. ZakerihamidiM. Latifnejad RoudsariR. Merghati KhoeiE. Vaginal Delivery vs. Cesarean Section: A focused ethnographic study of women’s perceptions in the north of Iran.Int. J. Community Based Nurs. Midwifery201531395025553333
     [Google Scholar]
  21. RydingE.L. LukasseM. ParysA.S.V. WangelA.M. KarroH. KristjansdottirH. SchrollA.M. ScheiB. Fear of childbirth and risk of cesarean delivery: A cohort study in six European countries.Birth2015421485510.1111/birt.1214725676793
     [Google Scholar]
  22. NilssonC. BondasT. LundgrenI. Previous birth experience in women with intense fear of childbirth.J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs.201039329830910.1111/j.1552‑6909.2010.01139.x20576072
     [Google Scholar]
  23. RooseveltL. LowL.K. Exploring fear of childbirth in the United States through a qualitative assessment of the Wijma delivery expectancy questionnaire.J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs.2016451283810.1016/j.jogn.2015.10.00526815796
     [Google Scholar]
  24. WulcanA.C. NilssonC. Midwives’ counselling of women at specialised fear of childbirth clinics: A qualitative study.Sex. Reprod. Healthc.201919243010.1016/j.srhc.2018.12.00130928131
     [Google Scholar]
  25. MoloneyS. GairS. Empathy and spiritual care in midwifery practice: Contributing to women’s enhanced birth experiences.Women Birth201528432332810.1016/j.wombi.2015.04.00925997730
     [Google Scholar]
  26. WigertH. NilssonC. DenckerA. BegleyC. JangstenE. Sparud-LundinC. MollbergM. PatelH. Women’s experiences of fear of childbirth: A metasynthesis of qualitative studies.Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being2020151170448410.1080/17482631.2019.170448431858891
     [Google Scholar]
  27. FaisalI. MatinniaN. HejarA.R. KhodakaramiZ. Why do primigravidae request caesarean section in a normal pregnancy? A qualitative study in Iran.Midwifery201430222723310.1016/j.midw.2013.08.01124055288
     [Google Scholar]
  28. RondungE. ThomténJ. SundinÖ. Psychological perspectives on fear of childbirth.J. Anxiety Disord.201644809110.1016/j.janxdis.2016.10.00727788373
     [Google Scholar]
  29. GennaroS. MelnykB.M. O’ConnorC. GibeauA.M. NadelE. Improving prenatal care for minority women.MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs.201641314715310.1097/NMC.000000000000022726854915
     [Google Scholar]
  30. YazdizadehB. NedjatS. MohammadK. RashidianA. ChangiziN. MajdzadehR. Cesarean section rate in Iran, multidimensional approaches for behavioral change of providers: A qualitative study.BMC Health Serv. Res.201111115910.1186/1472‑6963‑11‑15921729279
     [Google Scholar]
  31. ShirzadM. ShakibazadehE. HajimiriK. BetranA.P. JahanfarS. BohrenM.A. OpiyoN. LongQ. KingdonC. ColomarM. AbediniM. Prevalence of and reasons for women’s, family members’, and health professionals’ preferences for cesarean section in Iran: A mixed-methods systematic review.Reprod. Health2021181310.1186/s12978‑020‑01047‑x33388072
     [Google Scholar]
  32. LuceA. CashM. HundleyV. CheyneH. van TeijlingenE. AngellC. “Is it realistic?” the portrayal of pregnancy and childbirth in the media.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth20161614010.1186/s12884‑016‑0827‑x26928660
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048278070231212094115
Loading
Unwillingness to have Vaginal Delivery among Iranian Women: A Qualitative Study
Current Women's Health Reviews 21, E240124226088 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734048278070231212094115
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048278070231212094115
/content/journals/cwhr/10.2174/0115734048278070231212094115
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Cesarean section; natural birth; obstetric experts; prenatal care; vaginal delivery; women’s unwillingness

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test