Skip to content
2000
Volume 17, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2405-5204
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Introduction

Subsequent commutation failures (SCFs) in high-voltage direct current (HVDC) systems pose a serious threat to the safe operation of hybrid AC/DC grids. Electrochemical energy storage, which is widely distributed at the sending end of ultra-high voltage direct current (UHVDC) transmission systems, has the potential to mitigate SCFs. To fully harness the SCF-mitigating capabilities of energy storage, this article first establishes a CIGRE-HVDC standard test model incorporating electrochemical energy storage at the sending end.

Methods

Based on this model, the factors influencing DC commutation failures are investigated. Furthermore, the impact of rectifier-side electrochemical energy storage (EES) on inverter-side commutation failures is explored from three aspects: energy storage capacity, output magnitude, and fault conditions. It is found that rectifier-side EES absorbing power can effectively suppress inverter-side commutation failures. Finally, based on this finding, a transient active power control strategy for energy storage is designed to inhibit consecutive commutation failures and is studied on the CIGRE-HVDC standard test system. It is concluded that the optimal capacity for suppressing SCFs is between 20% and 30% of the DC capacity, and the best absorption power output is achieved with a per-unit value of 1.

Results

Simulation results confirm the correctness of the proposed energy storage transient active power control strategy and its effectiveness in suppressing SCF under different fault moments, fault severities, and fault types.

Conclusion

This strategy can limit the number of SCFs to three or fewer in the majority of operating conditions, facilitating rapid system recovery after faults.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204332396240819071726
2024-12-01
2024-11-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. LeiL. ShengL. JianL. Mechanism analysis of subsequent commutation failures caused by improper interaction of controllers.Power Syst Technol2019431035623568
    [Google Scholar]
  2. XiaoC. XiongX. OuyangJ. MaG. ZhengD. TangT. A commutation failure suppression control method based on the controllable operation region of hybrid dual-infeed HVDC system.Energies201811357410.3390/en11030574
    [Google Scholar]
  3. NiX. An improved topology to decrease the commutation failure in LCC-HVDC and its control strategy.Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao2015354811820
    [Google Scholar]
  4. NiX. ZhaoC. GuoC. LiuH. LiuY. Enhanced line commutated converter with embedded fully controlled sub‐modules to mitigate commutation failures in high voltage direct current systems.IET Power Electron.20169219820610.1049/iet‑pel.2015.0421
    [Google Scholar]
  5. XueY. ZhangX.P. YangC. Elimination of commutation failures of LCC HVDC system with controllable capacitors.IEEE Trans. Power Syst.20163143289329910.1109/TPWRS.2015.2491784
    [Google Scholar]
  6. XueY. ZhangX.P. YangC. Series capacitor compensated AC filterless flexible LCC HVDC with enhanced power transfer under unbalanced faults.IEEE Trans. Power Syst.20193443069308010.1109/TPWRS.2019.2899065
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AamirA. QiaoL. GuoC. RehmanA.U. YangZ. Impact of synchronous condenser on the dynamic behavior of LCC based UHVDC system hierarchically connected to AC system.CSEE J Power Energy Syst20195219019810.17775/CSEEJPES.2018.00420
    [Google Scholar]
  8. KuanZ. ChenS. FengL. Configuration scheme of STATCOM for mitigating simultaneous commutation failure risk of multi-infeed HVDC links.Power Sys. Technol.2018422564570
    [Google Scholar]
  9. ZengpingW. XiyangL. BowenZ. The research on fast prediction and suppression measures of commutation failure based on voltage waveform fitting.Trans China Electrotech Soc202035714541463
    [Google Scholar]
  10. LiuL. LinS. LiaoK. Extinction angle predictive control strategy for commutation failure mitigation in HVDC systems considering voltage distortion.IET Gener. Transm. Distrib.201913225171517910.1049/iet‑gtd.2019.0619
    [Google Scholar]
  11. TuJ. Analysis of the sending-side system instability caused by multiple HVDC commutation failure.CSEE J Power Energy Syst201514374410.17775/CSEEJPES.2015.00051
    [Google Scholar]
  12. JianlinL. Comments on power quality enhancement research for power grid by energy storage system.Dianli Xitong Zidonghua20194381524
    [Google Scholar]
  13. LiJ. Operation and control analysis of 100 MW class battery energy storage station on grid side in Jiangsu power grid of China.Dianli Xitong Zidonghua202044022835
    [Google Scholar]
  14. LiuL. LiX. JiangQ. A multi-terminal control method for AC grids based on a hybrid high-voltage direct current with cascaded MMC converters.Electronics 20231223479910.3390/electronics12234799
    [Google Scholar]
  15. LiJ. TianL. LaiX. Outlook of electrical energy storage technologies under energy internet background.Dianli Xitong Zidonghua201539231525
    [Google Scholar]
  16. WangS. LaiX. ChengS. An analysis of prospects for application of large-scale energy storage technology in power systems.Dianli Xitong Zidonghua2013371
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ZhouH. YaoW. AiX. LiD. WenJ. LiC. Comprehensive review of commutation failure in HVDC transmission systems.Electr. Power Syst. Res.202220510776810.1016/j.epsr.2021.107768
    [Google Scholar]
  18. ZhouH. YaoW. AiX. ZhangJ. WenJ. LiC. Coordinated power control of electrochemical energy storage for mitigating subsequent commutation failures of HVDC.Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst.202213410745510.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107455
    [Google Scholar]
  19. WuY. HuangX. HuangL. ChenJ. Strategies for rational design of high‐power lithium‐ion batteries.Energy Environ. Mater.202141194510.1002/eem2.12088
    [Google Scholar]
  20. LiY. LiH. MiaoR. QiH. ZhangY. Energy–Environment–Economy (3E) analysis of the performance of introducing photovoltaic and energy storage systems into residential buildings: A case study in Shenzhen, China.Sustainability20231511900710.3390/su15119007
    [Google Scholar]
  21. GeY. HanJ. ZhuX. Power/thermal-to-hydrogen energy storage applied to natural-gas distributed energy system in different climate regions of China.Energy Convers. Manage.202328311692410.1016/j.enconman.2023.116924
    [Google Scholar]
  22. HeM. XiaoW. ZhouJ. ZhangQ. CuiL. Performance characteristics, spatial connection and industry prospects for China’s energy storage industry based on Chinese listed companies.J. Energy Storage20236210690710.1016/j.est.2023.106907
    [Google Scholar]
  23. ZhangN. JiangH. LiY. Aggregating distributed energy storage: Cloud-based flexibility services from China.IEEE Power Energy Mag.2021194637310.1109/MPE.2021.3072820
    [Google Scholar]
  24. ZhaoJ. OhU. LeeY. ParkJ. ChoiJ. A study on reliability and capacity credit evaluation of China power system considering WTG with multi energy storage systems.J. Electr. Eng. Technol.20211652367237810.1007/s42835‑021‑00775‑9
    [Google Scholar]
  25. LiR. LiY. ChenX. A control method for suppressing the continuous commutation failure of HVDC transmission.Zhongguo Dianji Gongcheng Xuebao2018381750295042
    [Google Scholar]
  26. LiuX. Research on influence of battery energy storage system on voltage transient stability.J. Phys. Conf. Ser.2022229001201110.1088/1742‑6596/2290/1/012011
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MohamedA. KamaruzzamanZ.A. Mohamed KamariN.A. Effect of grid-connected photovoltaic generator on dynamic voltage stability in power system.Jurnal Kejuruteraan201830228929610.17576/jkukm‑2018‑30(2)‑20
    [Google Scholar]
  28. LiJ. MuG. ZhangJ. Dynamic economic evaluation of hundred megawatt-scale electrochemical energy storage for auxiliary peak shaving.Prot Control Mod Power Syst2023815010.1186/s41601‑023‑00324‑8
    [Google Scholar]
  29. SunW. Coordinated control method of multi-infeed DC system for commutation failure prevention.2021 IEEE Sustainable Power and Energy Conference (iSPEC)Nanjing, China, 23-25 December20213224322910.1109/iSPEC53008.2021.9736064
    [Google Scholar]
  30. WangC. Procedure analysis of UHVDC commutation failure.J. Eng.201920191631323134
    [Google Scholar]
  31. LiP. Review of commutation failure on HVDC transmission system under background of multi-infeed structure.Power Syst Technol20224603834850
    [Google Scholar]
  32. LinS. A review of commutation failure suppression methods for HVDC systems based on control protection measures. Z red fruit DI Anji gong Chen GX UE package20204019604559
    [Google Scholar]
  33. XiaoH. LiY. ZhuJ. DuanX. Efficient approach to quantify commutation failure immunity levels in multi‐infeed HVDC systems.IET Gener. Transm. Distrib.20161041032103810.1049/iet‑gtd.2015.0800
    [Google Scholar]
  34. PengW. Research on commutation failure of Jinsu DC transmission project caused by a complex AC fault.J. Eng.2019201916775778
    [Google Scholar]
  35. AcostaJ.S. XiaoH. GoleA.M. Sensitivity analysis of commutation failure in multi-infeed HVDC systems: Exploring the impact of ac system representations and fault types.Electr. Power Syst. Res.202423411080210.1016/j.epsr.2024.110802
    [Google Scholar]
  36. WangY. ZhuJ. LiY. HuJ. MaS. WangT. Transient overvoltage suppression of LCC‐HVDC sending‐end system based on DC current control optimisation.IET Energy Syst. Integr.20246218219510.1049/esi2.12150
    [Google Scholar]
  37. WangH. ZhengA. LiuZ. LiuW. PanX. TianC. A suppression method of commutation failure in LCC-UHVDC systems based on the dynamic tracking of the turn-off angle setting value.Electronics 2024137135310.3390/electronics13071353
    [Google Scholar]
  38. AikD.L.H. AnderssonG. Analysis of voltage and power interactions in multi-infeed HVDC systems.IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.201328281682410.1109/TPWRD.2012.2227510
    [Google Scholar]
  39. ZhuY. ZhangS. LiuD. Prevention and mitigation of high‐voltage direct current commutation failures: A review and future directions.IET Gener. Transm. Distrib.201913245449545610.1049/iet‑gtd.2019.0874
    [Google Scholar]
  40. JingL. Review of consecutive commutation failure research for HVDC transmission system.Electr Power Autom Equip201939116123
    [Google Scholar]
  41. YaoW. LiuC. FangJ. AiX. WenJ. ChengS. Probabilistic analysis of commutation failure in LCC-HVDC system considering the CFPREV and the initial fault voltage angle.IEEE Trans. Power Deliv.202035271572410.1109/TPWRD.2019.2925399
    [Google Scholar]
  42. ShairJ. XieX. YanG. Mitigating subsynchronous control interaction in wind power systems: Existing techniques and open challenges.Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.201910833034610.1016/j.rser.2019.04.003
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204332396240819071726
Loading
/content/journals/rice/10.2174/0124055204332396240819071726
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test