Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2666-2558
  • E-ISSN: 2666-2566

Abstract

Background

Floods are among the deadliest natural calamities, devastating ecosystems and human lives worldwide. In India, Bihar is a state grappling with economic hardships and faces severe agricultural devastation due to recurring floods, destroying crops and natural resources, which significantly impacts local farmers. This research addresses the critical need to deeply understand the flood dynamics of selected study areas.

Objective

This research presents a case study that focuses on leveraging Remote Sensing tools and Machine Learning techniques for comprehensive flood mapping and damage analysis in Gopalganj District, Bihar, India, using remote sensing data. More specifically, this research presents three major objectives: (i) Flood damage mapping and change analysis before and after the flood using the Sentinel-2 satellite dataset, (ii) Evaluation of the impact of integrating spectral indices on the accuracy of classification, (iii) Identification of most robust predictor spectral indices for the classification.

Methods

The Sentinel-2 satellite dataset encompasses 13 bands with resolutions of 10m, 20m, and 60m. Here, four spectral bands (NIR, Red, Green, and Blue) with the finest resolution of 10m have been selected for this study. These bands are integrated with four spectral indices, namely Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), MNDWI (Modified NDWI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI). Two ML classifiers, namely Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Random Forest (RF) have been employed for pixel-based supervised classification.

Results

Results have shown that RF outperformed and worked well in extracting water bodies and flood-damaged areas effectively. The results demonstrated that RF obtained (Overall Accuracy (OA)= 89.54% and kappa value () = 0.872) and SVM reported (OA= 87.69%, = 0.849) for pre-crisis data, whereas, for post-crisis, RF reported (OA=91.54%, = 0.897), SVM reported (OA= 89.77%, = 0.875).

Conclusion

It was reported that the integration of spectral indices improved the OA by +3.41% and +2.86% using RF and SVM, respectively. The results of this study demonstrated that the waterbody area increased from 12.72 to 88.23 km2, as shown by the RF classifier. The variable importance computation results indicated that MNDWI is the most important predictor variable, followed by NDWI. This study recommends the use of these two predictor variables for flood mapping.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558309143240529104953
2024-07-15
2025-06-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. SanyalJ. LuX.X. Application of remote sensing in flood management with special reference to monsoon Asia: a review.Nat. Hazards200433228330110.1023/B:NHAZ.0000037035.65105.95
    [Google Scholar]
  2. RahmanM.R. ThakurP.K. Detecting, mapping and analysing of flood water propagation using synthetic aperture radar (SAR) satellite data and GIS: A case study from the Kendrapara District of Orissa State of India.Egypt. J. Remote Sens. Space Sci.2018211S37S4110.1016/j.ejrs.2017.10.002
    [Google Scholar]
  3. BhattC.M. RaoG.S. Ganga floods of 2010 in Uttar Pradesh, north India: a perspective analysis using satellite remote sensing data.Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk20167274776310.1080/19475705.2014.949877
    [Google Scholar]
  4. JensenR.J. Remote Sensing of the Environment: An Earth Resource Perspective.2nd edPrentice-Hall, Inc.2013110
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BrakenridgeR. nderson MODIS-based flood detection, mapping and measurement: the potential for operational hydrological applications TransboundaryFloods.20067211210.1007/1‑4020‑4902‑1_1
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ManjusreeP. BhattC.M. BegumA. RaoG.S. BhanumurthyV. A decadal historical satellite data analysis for flood hazard evaluation: A case study of B ihar ( N orth I ndia).Singap. J. Trop. Geogr.201536330832310.1111/sjtg.12126
    [Google Scholar]
  7. SinghaC. SwainK.C. MelihoM. AbdoH.G. AlmohamadH. Al-MutiryM. Spatial analysis of flood hazard zoning map using novel hybrid machine learning technique in Assam, India.Remote Sens.20221424622910.3390/rs14246229
    [Google Scholar]
  8. RawatS. 2022Analysis of post-flood impacts on Sentinel-2 data using non-parametric machine learning classifiers: a case study from Bihar floods, Saharsa, India.International Conference on Computing in Engineering TechnologySpringerSingapor15216010.1007/978‑981‑19‑2719‑5_14
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PrakashG. Flood Inundation Mapping and Depth Modelling using Machine Learning algorithms and Microwave data.J Genomics2021152
    [Google Scholar]
  10. YaseenZ. M. Flood hazards and susceptibility detection for Ganga river, Bihar state, India: Employment of remote sensing and statistical approaches.Resul. Engineer.202321101665
    [Google Scholar]
  11. KumarH. Utilizing machine learning algorithm, cloud computing platform and remote sensing satellite data for impact assessment of flood on agriculture land.Curr. Sci.20231258886
    [Google Scholar]
  12. RanaV.K. LinhN.T.T. DitthakitP. ElkhrachyI. NguyenT.T. NguyenN-M. Mapping and analysing framework for extreme precipitation-induced flooding.Earth Sci. Inform.20231644213423410.1007/s12145‑023‑01137‑x
    [Google Scholar]
  13. AvandM. KuriqiA. KhazaeiM. GhorbanzadehO. DEM resolution effects on machine learning performance for flood probability mapping.J. Hydro-environment Res.20224011610.1016/j.jher.2021.10.002
    [Google Scholar]
  14. PawarU. SuppawimutW. MuttilN. RathnayakeU. A GIS-based comparative analysis of frequency ratio and statistical index models for flood susceptibility mapping in the Upper Krishna Basin, India.Water20221422377110.3390/w14223771
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GunathilakeM.B. AmaratungaY.V. PereraA. ChathuranikaI.M. GunathilakeA.S. RathnayakeU. Evaluation of future climate and potential impact on streamflow in the Upper Nan River Basin of Northern Thailand.Adv. Meteorol.2020202011510.1155/2020/8881118
    [Google Scholar]
  16. KarunanayakeC. GunathilakeM.B. RathnayakeU. Inflow forecast of iranamadu reservoir, Sri Lanka, under projected climate scenarios using artificial neural networks.Appl. Comput. Intell. Soft Comput.2020202011110.1155/2020/8821627
    [Google Scholar]
  17. KhaniyaB. GunathilakeM.B. RathnayakeU. Ecosystem-based adaptation for the impact of climate change and variation in the water management sector of Sri Lanka.Math. Probl. Eng.2021202111010.1155/2021/8821329
    [Google Scholar]
  18. SainiR. SinghS. Land use land cover mapping and snow cover detection in Himalayan region using machine learning and multispectral Sentinel-2 satellite imagery.Int. J. Inform. Technol.202416267568610.1007/s41870‑023‑01673‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  19. BhattC.M. GuptaA. RoyA. DalalP. ChauhanP. Geospatial analysis of September, 2019 floods in the lower gangetic plains of Bihar using multi-temporal satellites and river gauge data.Geomatics Nat. Hazards Risk20211218410210.1080/19475705.2020.1861113
    [Google Scholar]
  20. TripathiG. PandeyA.C. ParidaB.R. Flood hazard and risk zonation in north Bihar using satellite-derived historical flood events and socio-economic data.Sustainability2022143147210.3390/su14031472
    [Google Scholar]
  21. McFEETERSS.K. The use of the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features.Int. J. Remote Sens.19961771425143210.1080/01431169608948714
    [Google Scholar]
  22. XuH. Modification of normalised difference water index (NDWI) to enhance open water features in remotely sensed imagery.Int. J. Remote Sens.200627143025303310.1080/01431160600589179
    [Google Scholar]
  23. SarkarD. SahaS. MondalP. GIS-based frequency ratio and Shannon’s entropy techniques for flood vulnerability assessment in Patna district, Central Bihar, India.Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol.20221998911893210.1007/s13762‑021‑03627‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SoloveyT. Flooded wetlands mapping from Sentinel-2 imagery with spectral water index: a case study of Kampinos National Park in central Poland.Geol. Q.202064210.7306/gq.1509
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SainiR. GhoshS.K. Exploring Capabilities of Sentinel-2 for Vegetation Mapping Using Random Forest.Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci2018XLII-31499150210.5194/isprs‑archives‑XLII‑3‑1499‑2018
    [Google Scholar]
  26. BreimanL. Random forests.Mach. Learn.200145153210.1023/A:1010933404324
    [Google Scholar]
  27. CortesC. VapnikV. Support-vector networks.Mach. Learn.199520327329710.1007/BF00994018
    [Google Scholar]
  28. SainiR. SinghS. VermaS.K. HattureS.M. 2022Automatic mapping of deciduous and evergreen forest by using machine learning and satellite imagery.International Conference on Soft Computing and its Engineering ApplicationsSpringercham197209
    [Google Scholar]
  29. RouseJ.W. HaasR.H. SchellJ.A. DeeringD.W. Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS.NASA Spec. Publ.19743511309
    [Google Scholar]
  30. TehranyM.S. JonesS. ShabaniF. Identifying the essential flood conditioning factors for flood prone area mapping using machine learning techniques.Catena201917517419210.1016/j.catena.2018.12.011
    [Google Scholar]
  31. ShahabiH. ShirzadiA. GhaderiK. OmidvarE. Al-AnsariN. ClagueJ.J. GeertsemaM. KhosraviK. AminiA. BahramiS. RahmatiO. HabibiK. MohammadiA. NguyenH. MelesseA.M. AhmadB.B. AhmadA. Flood detection and susceptibility mapping using sentinel-1 remote sensing data and a machine learning approach: Hybrid intelligence of bagging ensemble based on k-nearest neighbor classifier.Remote Sens.202012226610.3390/rs12020266
    [Google Scholar]
  32. PrasadP. LovesonV.J. DasB. KothaM. Novel ensemble machine learning models in flood susceptibility mapping.Geocarto Int.202237164571459310.1080/10106049.2021.1892209
    [Google Scholar]
  33. SaravananS. AbijithD. Flood susceptibility mapping of Northeast coastal districts of Tamil Nadu India using Multi-source Geospatial data and Machine Learning techniques.Geocarto Int.20243727152521528110.1080/10106049.2022.2096702
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Gudiyangada NachappaT. Tavakkoli PiralilouS. GholamniaK. GhorbanzadehO. RahmatiO. BlaschkeT. Flood susceptibility mapping with machine learning, multi-criteria decision analysis and ensemble using Dempster Shafer Theory.J. Hydrol.202059012527510.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125275
    [Google Scholar]
  35. FengQ. LiuJ. GongJ. Urban flood mapping based on unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing and random forest classifier—A case of Yuyao, China.Water20157121437145510.3390/w7041437
    [Google Scholar]
  36. NeymanJ. On the two different aspects of the representative method: the method of stratified sampling and the method of purposive selection.Breakthroughs in statistics: Methodology and distribution.New York, NYSpringer New York199212315010.1007/978‑1‑4612‑4380‑9_12
    [Google Scholar]
  37. LaonamsaiJ. JulphunthongP. SaprathetT. KimmanyB. GanchanasuragitT. ChomcheawchanP. TomunN. Utilizing NDWI, MNDWI, SAVI, WRI, and AWEI for estimating erosion and deposition in Ping River in Thailand.Hydrology20231037010.3390/hydrology10030070
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558309143240529104953
Loading
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558309143240529104953
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): Flood mapping; machine learning; MNDWI; NDWI; remote sensing; RF; sentinel-2; SVM
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test