Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications
  4. Volume 18, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 18, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2666-2558
  • E-ISSN: 2666-2566

Abstract

Background

Computer science significantly influences modern culture, especially with the rapid breakthroughs and technology in social media networking. Social media platforms have become significant channels for sharing and exchanging daily news and information on many issues in the current digital environment, which is known for its massive data collection and transmission capabilities. While there are many benefits to this environment, there are also many false reports and information that deceive readers and users into believing they are receiving correct information.

Objective

Nowadays, all users use social media to obtain news content, but sometimes some malicious users tamper with real news and then spread fake news, which may reduce the reputation of social media. Therefore, many existing models have been introduced to detect fake news, but these models are based on traditional machine learning algorithms, such as decision tree (DT), multilayer perceptron (MLP), random forest (RF), . These models Lack of performance, security, and authorization. Our proposed model can solve existing model problems using reinforcement learning and blockchain technology.

Methods

In this research paper, we explain a new way to identify fake news. This new approach, combined with policy-based heuristic reinforcement learning (PHRL), where the model dynamically adjusts through iterative learning, is the key innovation and gradually improves classification accuracy. The same as our smart contract authorization method, which enhances the authenticity of content posted safely by authorized users and improves the transparency and accountability of information.

Results

Our model was tested on real-time information collected from various sources with 70% accuracy and valid authentication.

Conclusion

Our proposed model produced better results with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 0.0811 and Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 0.2847, both significantly lower values. Our proposed model performs better than multilayer perceptron (MLP), and random forest (RF).

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558290878240522070346
2024-05-27
2025-07-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558290878240522070346
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. PulidoC.M. Villarejo-CarballidoB. Redondo-SamaG. GómezA. COVID-19 infodemic: More retractions than fake news?J. Med. Internet Res.2020228e19722
     [Google Scholar]
  2. HabibiM. LiuY. ChenH. Combating fake news: A review of recent trends and advances in information quality assessment.ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst.2020113133
     [Google Scholar]
  3. PengZ. YanG. SunJ. ZhangJ. Quality of trust: A framework for assessing the credibility of information sources on social media.J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.2019705471481
     [Google Scholar]
  4. ShuK. MahudeswaranD. WangS. LiuH. Beyond binary: Detecting and visualizing the dynamics of fake news spread on social media.ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol.2019102122
     [Google Scholar]
  5. GhasemiM. AzadiS. PournamdariM. Automatic detection of propaganda techniques in news articles using convolutional neural networks.Int. J. Soc. Robot.20211313144
     [Google Scholar]
  6. LewandowskyS. EckerU.K.H. SeifertC.M. SchwarzN. CookJ. Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing.Psychol. Sci. Public Interest201213310613110.1177/152910061245101826173286
     [Google Scholar]
  7. PennycookG. RandD.G. Who falls for fake news? The roles of bullshit receptivity, overclaiming, familiarity, and analytic thinking.J. Pers.202088218520010.1111/jopy.1247630929263
     [Google Scholar]
  8. SchmidhuberJ. Deep learning in neural networks: An overview.Neural Netw.2015618511710.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.00325462637
     [Google Scholar]
  9. GoodfellowI. BengioY. CourvilleA. Deep learning.MIT Press2016
     [Google Scholar]
  10. HintonG. DengL. YuD. DahlG. MohamedA. JaitlyN. SeniorA. VanhouckeV. NguyenP. SainathT. KingsburyB. Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: The shared views of four research groups.IEEE Signal Process. Mag.2012296829710.1109/MSP.2012.2205597
     [Google Scholar]
  11. CrosbyM. PattanayakP. VermaS. KalyanaramanV. Blockchain technology: Beyond bitcoin.Applied Innovation201626-107181
     [Google Scholar]
  12. LiuZ. YangH. A blockchain-based authentication scheme for news in the era of deepfake.J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.202112658015812
     [Google Scholar]
  13. SwanM. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy.O’Reilly Media2015
     [Google Scholar]
  14. MahmoodT. Fake news detection: A deep learning approach.J. Inf. Sci. Theory Pract.2019742534
     [Google Scholar]
  15. SunS. ChenH. ChanS-K. An automatic approach to detecting false information in social media.IEEE Intell. Syst.20183327080
     [Google Scholar]
  16. PotthastM. GollubT. HagenM. A stylometric inquiry into hyperpartisan and fake news.In Acm sigir forum 201852637210.18653/v1/P18‑1022
     [Google Scholar]
  17. KangJ. ChoiK-S. A blockchain-based authorship verification system for digital content.Future Gener. Comput. Syst.20201106979
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ChadwickA. The hybrid media system: Politics and power.Oxford University Press201710.1093/oso/9780190696726.001.0001
     [Google Scholar]
  19. KimH. HanS. KimY. How do we understand “fake news?”: Perspectives from the united states, south korea, and china.Telemat. Inform.201937101113
     [Google Scholar]
  20. ZhangZ. ZhangY. ChenY. A review of machine learning methods for fake news detection.Comput. Intell. Neurosci.20202020114
     [Google Scholar]
  21. LazerD.M.J. BaumM.A. BenklerY. BerinskyA.J. GreenhillK.M. MenczerF. MetzgerM.J. NyhanB. PennycookG. RothschildD. SchudsonM. SlomanS.A. SunsteinC.R. ThorsonE.A. WattsD.J. ZittrainJ.L. The science of fake news.Science201835963801094109610.1126/science.aao299829590025
     [Google Scholar]
  22. WangW-Y. ChenC-C. LiY-C. Fake news identification on twitter with hybrid cnn and rnn models.Proceedings of the 32nd aaai conference on artificial intelligence2018
     [Google Scholar]
  23. MoorthyK.M. KowsalyaS. ChandrasekaranP. ChandrasekaranV.M. Fake news detection using multi-source deep learning approach.IEEE Access202084053440543
     [Google Scholar]
  24. AslamM. RizviS.A. AhmadR.B. Fake news detection using machine learning techniques: A review.J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.20201146254643
     [Google Scholar]
  25. KumarA. JhaA. GuptaN.K. Detecting misleading and fake news using natural language processing techniques: A review.Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl.2021132230
     [Google Scholar]
  26. AhmedN. IqbalA. KhanS. Fake news detection using graph-based techniques: A survey.J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.20221343594379
     [Google Scholar]
  27. ShahbaziZ. ByunY.C. Fake media detection based on natural language processing and blockchain approaches.IEEE Access2021912844212845310.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112607
     [Google Scholar]
  28. PaulS. JoyJ.I. SarkerS. AhmedS. DasA.K. Fake news detection in social media using blockchain.2019 7th International Conference on Smart Computing & Communications (ICSCC), Sarawak, Malaysia, 28-30 June 2019, pp. 1-5.10.1109/ICSCC.2019.8843597
     [Google Scholar]
  29. WaghmareA.D. PatnaikD.G.K. Fake news detection of social media news in blockchain framework.Indian J. Comput. Sci. Eng.202112497298010.21817/indjcse/2021/v12i4/211204151
     [Google Scholar]
  30. DwivediA.D. SinghR. DhallS. SrivastavaG. PalS.K. Tracing the source of fake news using a scalable blockchain distributed network.2020 IEEE 17th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Delhi, India, 10-13 December 2020, pp. 38-43.202010.1109/MASS50613.2020.00015
     [Google Scholar]
  31. TorkyM. NabilE. SaidW. Proof of credibility: A blockchain approach for detecting and blocking fake news in social networks.Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl.2019101210.14569/IJACSA.2019.0101243
     [Google Scholar]
  32. MosallanezhadA. KaramiM. ShuK. MancenidoM.V. LiuH. Domain adaptive fake news detection via reinforcement learning.Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 202225 April 2022, pp. 3632–3640.10.1145/3485447.3512258
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Share of adults who believe fake news has become more prevalent in the last year in the united states as of june 2021, by political affiliation.2021Available from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/1094597/fake-news-prevalence-last-year-us-political-affiliation/
  34. BiauG. ScornetE. A random forest guided tour.Test201625219722710.1007/s11749‑016‑0481‑7
     [Google Scholar]
  35. OrrùP.F. ZocchedduA. SassuL. MattiaC. CozzaR. ArenaS. Machine learning approach using MLP and SVM algorithms for the fault prediction of a centrifugal pump in the oil and gas industry.Sustainability20201211477610.3390/su12114776
     [Google Scholar]
  36. RoomC. Confusion matrix.Mach. Learn.2019627
     [Google Scholar]
  37. ManolacheM.A. ManolacheS. TapusN. Decision making using the blockchain proof of authority consensus.Procedia Comput. Sci.202219958058810.1016/j.procs.2022.01.071
     [Google Scholar]
  38. ZhangW.J. LinY. On the principle of design of resilient systems – Application to enterprise information systems.Enterprise Inf. Syst.2010429911010.1080/17517571003763380
     [Google Scholar]
  39. LinW. BabynP. ZhangW. Context-based ontology modelling for database: Enabling chatgpt for semantic database management.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.073512023
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558290878240522070346
Loading
A Multimodal Fusion and Ensemble Approach for Robust Fake News Detection through Deep Learning, Reinforcement Learning, and Using Blockchain to Enhance Security and Authorization
Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications 18, E270524230374 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0126662558290878240522070346
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558290878240522070346
/content/journals/rascs/10.2174/0126662558290878240522070346
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): authorization; blockchain; fake media; machine learning; natural language processing; Reinforcement learning; security

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test