Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Recent Patents on Engineering
  4. Volume 19, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 19, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1872-2121
  • E-ISSN: 2212-4047

Abstract

Background

Examining the concrete quality in its original location and optimizing machine learning models for precise forecasting of concrete compressive strength (fc) is crucial. Current research advocates the fine tuning of hyperparameters within machine learning methodologies in tandem with non-destructive testing techniques to forecast the compressive strength of concrete.

Objective

This patent study aims to incorporate age as a crucial factor by utilizing data spanning from 3 days to 365 days. This approach enhances the study’s applicability for real-time forecasting purposes.

Methods

In the methodology of this current research, three machine learning (ML) models—specifically, Multi-Linear Regression (MLR), Decision Tree Regressor (DTR), and Random Forest Regressor (RFR)—are introduced within the context of age as a significant factor influencing measurements obtained from the Rebound Hammer (RN) and Ultra Sonic Pulse Velocity (UPV). These ML models were sequentially applied, followed by a meticulous process of hyperparameter fine-tuning conducted through grid search Cross-Validation (CV). To gain insights into the predictive results, the study also employed SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for interpretation purposes.

Results

The results of this study reveal the development of an empirical relationship using Multi-Linear Regression, which yielded an R2 value of 0.88. Furthermore, the evaluation showed that Random Forest Regression outperformed other models with an R2 value of 0.95 in the training and 0.92 in the testing datasets. These models hold promise for facilitating decisions about qualitative analyses based on UPV and Rebound Hammer measurements relative to the age of the concrete. Rigorous validation of the models was conducted through standard cross-validation techniques.

Conclusion

The research has created and validated hyper tunned machine learning models with the help of grid search cross-validation function, with Random Forest Regression being the most effective. These models can potentially guide decisions regarding qualitative analyses using UPV and Rebound Hammer measurements concerning concrete age. They provide a valuable tool for on-site assessments in construction and structural evaluations. The primary objective of the research is to introduce age as a significant feature. To achieve this, data ranging from 3 days to 365 days was integrated. This inclusion aims to enhance real-time decision-making in construction processes, facilitating actions like the prompt removal of formwork in high-speed construction projects.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121285572240510100826
2024-05-20
2025-01-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121285572240510100826
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ChouJ.S. PhamA.D. Enhanced artificial intelligence for ensemble approach to predicting high performance concrete compressive strength.Constr. Build. Mater.20134955456310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.078
     [Google Scholar]
  2. ChouJ.S. TsaiC.F. PhamA.D. LuY.H. Machine learning in concrete strength simulations: Multi-nation data analytics.Constr. Build. Mater.20147377178010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.054
     [Google Scholar]
  3. DuanJ. AsterisP.G. NguyenH. BuiX.N. MoayediH. A novel artificial intelligence technique to predict compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete using ICA-XGBoost model.Eng. Comput.20213743329334610.1007/s00366‑020‑01003‑0
     [Google Scholar]
  4. GuptaS.M. Support vector machines based modelling of concrete strength.Int. J. Intel. Technol200731218
     [Google Scholar]
  5. KabiruO.A. OwolabiT.O. SsennogaT. OlatunjiS.O. Performance comparison of SVM and ANN in predicting compressive strength of concrete.IOSR J. Comp. Eng.201416588949
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Asadi ShamsabadiE. RoshanN. HadighehS.A. NehdiM.L. KhodabakhshianA. GhalehnoviM. Machine learning-based compressive strength modelling of concrete incorporating waste marble powder.Constr. Build. Mater.202232412659210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126592
     [Google Scholar]
  7. YoungB.A. HallA. PilonL. GuptaP. SantG. Can the compressive strength of concrete be estimated from knowledge of the mixture proportions?: New insights from statistical analysis and machine learning methods.Cement Concr. Res.201911537938810.1016/j.cemconres.2018.09.006
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Ali-BenyahiaK. SbartaïZ.M. BreysseD. KenaiS. GhriciM. Analysis of the single and combined non-destructive test approaches for on-site concrete strength assessment: General statements based on a real case-study.Case Stud. Constr. Mater.2017610911910.1016/j.cscm.2017.01.004
     [Google Scholar]
  9. ErdalH. ErdalM. SimsekO. ErdalH.I. Prediction of concrete compressive strength using non-destructive test results.Comput. Concr.2018214407417
     [Google Scholar]
  10. AminiK. JalalpourM. DelatteN. Advancing concrete strength prediction using non-destructive testing: Development and verification of a generalizable model.Constr. Build. Mater.201610276276810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.131
     [Google Scholar]
  11. HuangQ. GardoniP. HurlebausS. Predicting concrete compressive strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and rebound number.ACI Mater. J.20111084
     [Google Scholar]
  12. RizzoP. NasrollahiA. DengW. VandenbosscheJ. Detecting the presence of high water-to-cement ratio in concrete surfaces using highly nonlinear solitary waves.Appl. Sci.20166410410.3390/app6040104
     [Google Scholar]
  13. SamiaH. NacerM.G. Application of the combined method for evaluating the compressive strength of concrete on site.Open J. Civil Eng.2012211621
     [Google Scholar]
  14. MirettiR. CarrascoM.F. GretherR.O. PasserinoC.R. Combined non-destructive methods applied to normal-weight and lightweight-concrete.Insight-wigston Then Northampton20044612748753
     [Google Scholar]
  15. CarvalhoC.H.D. Severo JúniorJ.B. MacedoM.C.S.S. GrizaS. AndradeC.E.C.D. Dos SantosA.A. BarretoL.S. Application of statistical techniques to evaluate the reliability of ultrasonic and rebound hammer measurements of compressive strength in the concrete of bridges.Scient. Res. Essays201496136144
     [Google Scholar]
  16. ACI Committee 228In-place methods to estimate concrete strength reported.Available from: http://dl.mycivil.ir/dozanani/ACI/ACI%20228.1R-03%20In-Place%20Methods%20to%20Estimate%20Concrete%20Strength_MyCivil.ir.pdf 2003
  17. El-MirA. El-ZahabS. SbartaïZ.M. HomsiF. SalibaJ. El-HassanH. Machine learning prediction of concrete compressive strength using rebound hammer test.J. Build. Eng.20236410553810.1016/j.jobe.2022.105538
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ali-BenyahiaK. KenaiS. GhriciM. SbartaïZ.M. ElachachiS.M. Analysis of the accuracy of in-situ concrete characteristic compressive strength assessment in real structures using destructive and non-destructive testing methods.Constr. Build. Mater.202336613016110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130161
     [Google Scholar]
  19. EN 13791:2019Assessment of in-situ compressive strength in structures and precast concrete components. Brussels, Belgium: CEN-CENELEC Management CentreAvailable from: https://standards.iteh.ai/catalog/standards/cen/3209bcc7-df9a-4eb2-904d-e690e79b7452/en-13791-2019
  20. EN 13791:2007-01Assessment of in-situ compressive strength in structures and precast concrete componentAvailable from: https://brmca.org.uk/documents/Assessment_of_in-situ_concrete_strength-revised_BS_EN_13791_and_BS_EN_12504-1_Concrete_April2020.pdf
  21. AsterisP.G. MokosV.G. Concrete compressive strength using artificial neural networks.Neural Comput. Appl.20203215118071182610.1007/s00521‑019‑04663‑2
     [Google Scholar]
  22. KnazeP. BenoP. The use of combined non-destructive testing methods to determine the compressive strength of concrete.Mater. Constr.198417320721010.1007/BF02475246
     [Google Scholar]
  23. TanigawaY. BabaK. MoriH. Estimation of concrete strength by combined nondestructive testing method.Spec. Publ.1984825776
     [Google Scholar]
  24. HenaoR.L. GómezF.J. AgüíL.J.C. Rebound hammer, pulse velocity, and core tests in self-consolidating concrete.ACI Mater. J.20121092
     [Google Scholar]
  25. SamarinA. MeyninkP. Use of combined ultrasonic and rebound hammer method for determining strength of concrete structural members.Concr. Int.1981332529
     [Google Scholar]
  26. ShuX. HuangB. WuH. DongQ. BurdetteE.G. Performance comparison of laboratory and field produced pervious concrete mixtures.Constr. Build. Mater.20112583187319210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.03.002
     [Google Scholar]
  27. CianfroneF. FacaoaruI. Study on the introduction into Italy on the combined non-destructive method, for the determination of in situ concrete strength.Mater. Struct.197912541342410.1007/BF02478819
     [Google Scholar]
  28. FintelM. Handbook of concrete engineering.2nd ed.Lakehead University Library1974
     [Google Scholar]
  29. IS 13311-2, 1992. Method of non-destructive testing of concrete-methods of test, part 2: rebound hammer.Available from: https://law.resource.org/pub/in/bis/S03/is.13311.2.1992.pdf 1992
  30. IS 13311–1 (1992): Method of non-destructive testing of concret, part 1: Ultrasonic pulse velocity.IS19921331117
     [Google Scholar]
  31. PoorarbabiA. GhasemiM. MoghaddamA.M. Concrete compressive strength prediction using non-destructive tests through response surface methodology.Ain Shams Eng. J.202011493994910.1016/j.asej.2020.02.009
     [Google Scholar]
  32. JainA. KathuriaA. KumarA. VermaY. MurariK. Combined use of non-destructive tests for assessment of strength of concrete in structure.Procedia Eng.20135424125110.1016/j.proeng.2013.03.022
     [Google Scholar]
  33. NaU.J. ParkT.W. FengM.Q. ChungL. Neuro-fuzzy application for concrete strength prediction using combined non-destructive tests.Mag. Concr. Res.200961424525610.1680/macr.2007.00127
     [Google Scholar]
  34. SheatherS. A modern approach to regression with RSpringer Science & Business Media200910.1007/978‑0‑387‑09608‑7
     [Google Scholar]
  35. DraperN.R. SmithH. Applied regression analysisJohn Wiley & Sons199832610.1002/9781118625590
     [Google Scholar]
  36. HjorthJ.U. Computer intensive statistical methods: Validation, model selection, and bootstrapChapman and Hall/CRC201710.1201/9781315140056
     [Google Scholar]
  37. MorganJ.N. SonquistJ.A. Problems in the analysis of survey data, and a proposal.J. Am. Stat. Assoc.19635830241543410.1080/01621459.1963.10500855
     [Google Scholar]
  38. SonquistJ.A. MorganJ.N. The Detection of Interaction Effects: A Report on a Computer Program for the Selection of Optimal Combinations of Explanatory Variables6th ed.Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan1964
     [Google Scholar]
  39. SonquistJ.A. Multivariate model buildingAnn ArborSurvey Research Center, University of Michigan1970
     [Google Scholar]
  40. AndrewsF.M. Multiple classification analysis.A Report on a Computer Program for Multiple Regression using Categorial Predictor's Servey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, The university of Michigan1975
     [Google Scholar]
  41. FieldingA.H. BellJ.F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models.Environ. Conserv.1997241384910.1017/S0376892997000088
     [Google Scholar]
  42. LandwehrN. HallM. FrankE. Logistic model trees.Mach. Learn.2005591-216120510.1007/s10994‑005‑0466‑3
     [Google Scholar]
  43. ChanK.Y. LohW.Y. LOTUS: An algorithm for building accurate and comprehensible logistic regression trees.J. Comput. Graph. Stat.200413482685210.1198/106186004X13064
     [Google Scholar]
  44. BreimanL. Random forests.Mach. Learn.200145153210.1023/A:1010933404324
     [Google Scholar]
  45. LiawA. WienerM. Classification and regression by randomForest.R News2002231822
     [Google Scholar]
  46. JanitzaS. TutzG. BoulesteixA.L. Random forest for ordinal responses: Prediction and variable selection.Comput. Stat. Data Anal.201696577310.1016/j.csda.2015.10.005
     [Google Scholar]
  47. TurgutP. Research into the correlation between concrete strength and UPV values.eJNDT2004121219
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Nash’tI.H. A’bourS.H. SadoonA.A. Finding an unified relationship between crushing strength of concrete and non-destructive tests.Middle East Nondestructive Testing Conference & Exhibition20052730
     [Google Scholar]
  49. TrtnikG. KavčičF. TurkG. Prediction of concrete strength using ultrasonic pulse velocity and artificial neural networks.Ultrasonics2009491536010.1016/j.ultras.2008.05.00118589471
     [Google Scholar]
  50. QasrawiH.Y. Concrete strength by combined nondestructive methods simply and reliably predicted.Cement Concr. Res.200030573974610.1016/S0008‑8846(00)00226‑X
     [Google Scholar]
  51. AriogluE. ManzakO. Application of ‘sonreb’ method to concrete samples produced in yedpa construction site.Prefabr. Union19911991512
     [Google Scholar]
  52. ErdalM. Prediction of the compressive strength of vacuum processed concretes using artificial neural network and regression techniques.Sci. Res. Essays200941010571065
     [Google Scholar]
  53. KhederG.F. A two stage procedure for assessment of in situ concrete strength using combined non-destructive testing.Mater. Struct.199932641041710.1007/BF02482712
     [Google Scholar]
  54. MaiH-V.T. NguyenM.H. TrinhS.H. LyH-B. Toward improved prediction of recycled brick aggregate concrete compressive strength by designing ensemble machine learning models.Constr. Build. Mater.202336913061310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130613
     [Google Scholar]
  55. ShishegaranA. VaraeeH. RabczukT. ShishegaranG. High correlated variables creator machine: Prediction of the compressive strength of concrete.Comput. Struc.202124710647910.1016/j.compstruc.2021.106479
     [Google Scholar]
  56. AsterisP.G. SkentouA.D. BardhanA. SamuiP. LourençoP.B. Soft computing techniques for the prediction of concrete compressive strength using Non-Destructive tests.Constr. Build. Mater.202130312445010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124450
     [Google Scholar]
  57. PoorarbabiA. GhasemiM. Azhdary MoghaddamM. Concrete compressive strength prediction using neural networks based on non-destructive tests and a self-calibrated response surface methodology.J. Nondestr. Eval.20203947810.1007/s10921‑020‑00718‑w
     [Google Scholar]
  58. AlwashM. BreysseD. SbartaïZ.M. Non-destructive strength evaluation of concrete: Analysis of some key factors using synthetic simulations.Constr. Build. Mater.20159923524510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.023
     [Google Scholar]
  59. SamsonD. MosesO.T. Correlation between non-destructive testing (NDT) and destructive testing (DT) of compressive strength of concrete.Int. J. Eng. Sci. Invent.2014391217
     [Google Scholar]
  60. HobbsB. KebirM.T. Non-destructive testing techniques for the forensic engineering investigation of reinforced concrete buildings.Forens. Sci. Int.1672-3167172
     [Google Scholar]
  61. LawsonI. DansoK.A. OdoiH.C. AdjeiC.A. QuashieF.K. MumuniI.I. IbrahimI.S. Non-destructive evaluation of concrete using ultrasonic pulse velocity.Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol.201136499504
     [Google Scholar]
  62. BenyahiaK.A. GhriciM. KenaiS. BreysseD. SbartaiZ.M. Analysis of the relationship between non-destructive and destructive testing of low concrete strength in new structures.Asian J. Civ. Eng.2017182191205
     [Google Scholar]
  63. ACI Committee 228ACI PRC-228.2-13 Report on Nondestructive Test Methods for Evaluation of Concrete in StructuresAmerican Concrete Institute201382
     [Google Scholar]
  64. SathiparanN. JeyananthanP. Predicting compressive strength of cement-stabilized earth blocks using machine learning models incorporating cement content, ultrasonic pulse velocity, and electrical resistivity.Nondestruct. Test. Eval.2023202312510.1080/10589759.2023.2240940
     [Google Scholar]
  65. SathiparanN. JeyananthanP. Predicting compressive strength of quarry waste-based geopolymer mortar using machine learning algorithms incorporating mix design and ultrasonic pulse velocity.Nondestruct. Test. Eval.2024202412410.1080/10589759.2024.2304257
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121285572240510100826
Loading
Utilizing Optimized Machine Learning Techniques to Predict the Compressive Strength of Concrete through Non-Destructive Testing Methodologies
Recent Pat Eng 19, E200524230103 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0118722121285572240510100826
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121285572240510100826
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121285572240510100826
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): Compressive strength (fc); Cross validation (CV); Decision tree regression (DTR); Machine learning (ML); Multi linear regression (MLR); Random forest regressor; Rebound hammer (RN); SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP); Ultra sonic pulse velocity (UPV)

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test