Skip to content
2000
Volume 19, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1872-2121
  • E-ISSN: 2212-4047

Abstract

Introduction

Vehicular Ad-hoc Network (VANET) is wireless communication between Roadside vehicles and vehicle infrastructure. Vehicle Ad Hoc Network (VANET) is a promising technology that effectively manages traffic and ensures road safety. However, communication in an open-access environment presents real challenges to security and privacy issues, which may affect large-scale deployments of VANETs. Vehicle identification, classification, distribution rates, and communication are the most challenging areas in previous methods. Vehicular communications face challenges due to vehicle interference and severe delays.

Methods

To overcome the drawbacks, this patent work proposed a new method based on the Artificial Neural Network Trust Authentication Secure Sugeno Fuzzy System (AN2-TAS2FS). Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANET) are required to transmit data between vehicles and use traffic safety indicators. Improved Cluster-Based Secure Routing Protocol (ICSRP). Artificial Neural Network Based Trust Authentication Secure Sugeno Fuzzy System (AN2-TAS2FS) used the symmetric key to increase the security performance of VANET. Use ANFIS-based Secure Sugeno Fuzzy System for calculating the node weights for data transferring; reduced the attacks accuracy of network malicious attacks.

Results

In the improved cluster-based VANET routing protocol, each node obtains an address using a new addressing scheme between the wireless vehicle-2-vehicle (V2V) exchanges and the Roadside Units (RSUs). It will explore the effectiveness of the Secure Sugeno Fuzzy System-based adaptation term Enhanced Cluster-based routing protocol in finding the vehicle's shortest-path for transmission.

Conclusion

Simulation results show that in the proposed ANN-based Trust Authentication Secure Sugeno Fuzzy System (AN2-TAS2FS) analysis, the packet delivery ratio is 93%, delay performance is 0.55 sec, throughput performance is 94%, bandwidth is 55 bits/sec, Network security is 92%, and the transmission ratio is 89%, attack detection is 90%.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121269253240214075231
2024-02-23
2025-02-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. YangF. HanJ. DingX. WeiZ. BiX. Spectral efficiency optimization and interference management for multi-hop D2D communications in VANETs.IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol.20206966422643610.1109/TVT.2020.2987526
    [Google Scholar]
  2. LinN. FuL. ZhaoL. MinG. Al-DubaiA. GacaninH. A novel multimodal collaborative drone-assisted VANET networking model.IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.20201974919493310.1109/TWC.2020.2988363
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-HeetyO.S. ZakariaZ. IsmailM. ShakirM.M. AlaniS. AlsarieraH. A comprehensive survey: Benefits, services, recent works, challenges, security, and use cases for SDN-VANET.IEEE Access20208910289104710.1109/ACCESS.2020.2992580
    [Google Scholar]
  4. WangP. ChenC.M. KumariS. ShojafarM. TafazolliR. LiuY.N. HDMA: Hybrid D2D message authentication scheme for 5G-enabled VANETs.IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.20212285071508010.1109/TITS.2020.3013928
    [Google Scholar]
  5. LiuB. FangZ. WangW. ShaoX. WeiW. JiaD. WangE. XiongS. A region-based collaborative management scheme for dynamic clustering in green VANET.IEEE Trans. Green Commun. Netw.2022631276128710.1109/TGCN.2022.3158525
    [Google Scholar]
  6. ChenJ. WangZ. Topology control in hybrid VLC/RF vehicular Ad-Hoc network.IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun.20201931965197610.1109/TWC.2019.2960229
    [Google Scholar]
  7. AbdelfatahR.I. Abdal-GhafourN.M. NasrM.E. Secure VANET authentication protocol (SVAP) using chebyshev chaotic maps for emergency conditions.IEEE Access2022101096111510.1109/ACCESS.2021.3137877
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ChenJ. WangZ. Coordination game theory-based adaptive topology control for hybrid VLC/RF VANET.IEEE Trans. Commun.20216985312532410.1109/TCOMM.2021.3077950
    [Google Scholar]
  9. PanQ. WuJ. NebhenJ. BashirA.K. SuY. LiJ. Artificial intelligence-based energy efficient communication system for intelligent reflecting surface-driven VANETs.IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.20222310197141972610.1109/TITS.2022.3152677
    [Google Scholar]
  10. FinkelbergI. PetrovT. Gal-TzurA. ZarkhinN. PoctaP. KovacikovaT. BuznaL. DadoM. ToledoT. The effects of vehicle-to-infrastructure communication reliability on performance of signalized intersection traffic control.IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.2022239154501546110.1109/TITS.2022.3140767
    [Google Scholar]
  11. HusseinN.H. YawC.T. KohS.P. TiongS.K. ChongK.H. A comprehensive survey on vehicular networking: Communications, applications, challenges, and upcoming research directions.IEEE Access202210861278618010.1109/ACCESS.2022.3198656
    [Google Scholar]
  12. WeiZ. ChenQ. YangH. WuH. FengZ. NingF. “Neighbor discovery for VANET with gossip mechanism and multipacket reception”, in IEEE.Int. J.2022913105021051510.1109/JIOT.2021.3122023
    [Google Scholar]
  13. TanH. ChungI. Secure authentication and key management with blockchain in VANETs.IEEE Access202082482249810.1109/ACCESS.2019.2962387
    [Google Scholar]
  14. KhanA.A. AbolhasanM. NiW. LipmanJ. JamalipourA. A hybrid-fuzzy logic guided genetic algorithm (H-FLGA) approach for resource optimization in 5G VANETs.IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technol.20196876964697410.1109/TVT.2019.2915194
    [Google Scholar]
  15. GhalebF.A. Al-RimyB.A.S. AlmalawiA. AliA.M. ZainalA. RassamM.A. ShaidS.Z.M. MaarofM.A. Deep kalman neuro fuzzy-based adaptive broadcasting scheme for vehicular Ad hoc network: A context-aware approach.IEEE Access2020821774421776110.1109/ACCESS.2020.3040903
    [Google Scholar]
  16. AnJ. YuY. TangJ. ZhanJ. Fuzzy-based hybrid location algorithm for vehicle position in VANETs via fuzzy kalman filtering approach.Advances in. Fuzzy Systems.201920191110.1155/2019/5142937
    [Google Scholar]
  17. AnJ. LiuX. WenG. Stability analysis of delayed Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy systems: A new integral inequality approach.J. Non. Sci. App.20171041941195910.22436/jnsa.010.04.53
    [Google Scholar]
  18. MendelJ.M. ChimatapuR. HagrasH. Comparing the performance potentials of singleton and non-singleton type-1 and interval type-2 fuzzy systems in terms of sculpting the state space.IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.202028478379410.1109/TFUZZ.2019.2916103
    [Google Scholar]
  19. AlolaiyanH. ShuaibU. LatifL. RazaqA. t-Intuitionistic fuzzification of lagrange’s theorem of t-intuitionistic fuzzy subgroup.IEEE Access2019715841915842610.1109/ACCESS.2019.2950167
    [Google Scholar]
  20. AjayiO. BabahajiM. AghdamA. A multi-spectral approach to fuzzy quantum modelling of nonlinear systems.IEEE J. Radio Freq. Identif.20215325426010.1109/JRFID.2021.3066884
    [Google Scholar]
  21. ChatterjeeT. KarmakarR. KaddoumG. ChattopadhyayS. ChakrabortyS. A survey of VANET/V2X routing from the perspective of non-learning- and learning-based approaches.IEEE Access202210230222305010.1109/ACCESS.2022.3152767
    [Google Scholar]
  22. FatemidokhtH. RafsanjaniM.K. GuptaB.B. HsuC.H. Efficient and secure routing protocol based on artificial intelligence algorithms with UAV-assisted for vehicular Ad Hoc networks in intelligent transportation systems.IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst.20212274757476910.1109/TITS.2020.3041746
    [Google Scholar]
  23. CárdenasL.L. MezherA.M. Barbecho BautistaP.A. Astudillo LeónJ.P. IgartuaM.A. A multimetric predictive ANN-based routing protocol for vehicular Ad Hoc networks.IEEE Access20219860378605310.1109/ACCESS.2021.3088474
    [Google Scholar]
  24. SepasgozarS.S. PierreS. Network traffic prediction model considering road traffic parameters using artificial intelligence methods in VANET.IEEE Access2022108227824210.1109/ACCESS.2022.3144112
    [Google Scholar]
  25. SaleemM.A. ZhouS. SharifA. SabaT. ZiaM.A. JavedA. RoyS. MittalM. Expansion of cluster head stability using fuzzy in cognitive radio CR-VANET.IEEE Access2019717318517319510.1109/ACCESS.2019.2956478
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Al-ShareedaM.A. ManickamS. COVID-19 vehicle based on an efficient mutual authentication scheme for 5G-enabled vehicular fog computing.Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health202219231561810.3390/ijerph192315618 36497709
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Al-ShareedaM.A. AnbarM. ManickamS. HasbullahI.H. SE-CPPA: A secure and efficient conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme in vehicular Ad-Hoc networks.Sensors 20212124820610.3390/s21248206 34960311
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Al-ShareedaM.A. AnbarM. ManickamS. HasbullahI.H. Towards identity-based conditional privacy-preserving authentication scheme for vehicular Ad Hoc networks.IEEE Access2021911322611323810.1109/ACCESS.2021.3104148
    [Google Scholar]
  29. MohammedB.A. Al-ShareedaM.A. ManickamS. Al-MekhlafiZ.G. AlreshidiA. AlazmiM. AlshudukhiJ.S. AlsaffarM. FC-PA: Fog computing-based pseudonym authentication scheme in 5G-enabled vehicular networks.IEEE Access202311185711858110.1109/ACCESS.2023.3247222
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Al-ShareedaM.A. ManickamS. MSR-DoS: Modular square root-based scheme to resist Denial of Service (DoS) attacks in 5G-enabled vehicular networks.IEEE Access20221012060612061510.1109/ACCESS.2022.3222488
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121269253240214075231
Loading
/content/journals/eng/10.2174/0118722121269253240214075231
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test