Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews
  4. Fast Track Articles
  5. Fast Track Article
image of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure versus High-Flow Nasal Cannula for the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background

There is no consensus regarding the comparison between nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) among premature infants.

Objective

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessed the efficacy of NCPAP compared to HFNC for the treatment of preterm neonates with RDS.

Methods

The study was conducted at Imam Hospital (Ahvaz, Iran) among preterm neonates with RDS and gestational ages ranging from 28 to 34 weeks. One hundred twenty preterm neonates were randomly allocated to the HFNC or NCPAP groups (n = 60). Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected.

Results

This trial was carried out with 51 male and 69 female preterm neonates. There were no substantial differences between the HFNC and NCPAP groups in gender distribution, occurrence rates of premature rupture of membranes (PROM), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), Cesarean delivery, patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), pneumothorax, chronic lung disease (CLD), treatment failure, and mortality ( > 0.05). The mean body weight, gestational age, Apgar and RDS scores, duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), length of oxygen therapy, hospitalization period, duration to reach full feeding, arterial blood pH, or gas levels were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the HFNC group exhibited a lower incidence of nasal trauma, required more surfactant therapy, and had a longer duration of intervention compared to the NCPAP group.

Conclusion

There were no significant differences between NCPAP and HFNC for the treatment of RDS in preterm infants.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/crmr/10.2174/011573398X339994241209170750
2025-01-08
2025-04-07

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/crmr/10.2174/011573398X339994241209170750
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Guo B.B. Pang L. Yang B. Zhang C. Chen X.Y. OuYang J.B. Wu C.J. Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis and management of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: A minireview. Front Pediatr. 2022 10 864911 10.3389/fped.2022.864911 35498779
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Pholanun N. Srisatidnarakul B. Longo J. The incidence and factors predicting survival among Preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome admitted to neonatal intensive care unit. Sepsis 2022 17 2 4 51 10.20473/jn.v17i2.36860
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Berger D.S. Garg B. Penfield C.A. Caughey A.B. Respiratory distress syndrome is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in late preterm births. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2024 6 6 101374 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101374 38583712
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Liu L. Deng Q. Profound effect of pulmonary surfactant on the treatment of preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Cont. Med. Mol. Imag. 2022 2022 4166994 10.1155/2022/4166994
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Weerasekera M. Wimalasiri A.Y. Savithri K.D.S.K. Respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn. Sri Lanka J. Child Health 2018 47 4 295 10.4038/sljch.v47i4.8588
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Luo K. Huang Y. Xiong T. Tang J. High-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure in primary respiratory support for preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2022 10 980024 10.3389/fped.2022.980024 36479290
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Demirel G. Vatansever B. Tastekin A. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants: A prospective randomized study. Am. J. Perinatol. 2021 38 3 237 241 10.1055/s‑0039‑1696673 31563133
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang S.T. Chung H.W. Chen H.L. Comparison of two methods for weaning from nasal continuous positive airway pressure via the cyclic use of high-flow nasal cannula or room air in preterm infants. Children 2024 11 3 351 10.3390/children11030351 38539386
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mukerji A. Rempel E. Thabane L. Johnson H. Schmolzer G. Law B.H.Y. Jani P. Tracy M. Rottkamp C. Keszler M. Kirpalani H. Shah P.S. NOVEL Trial Group High continuous positive airway pressures versus non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in preterm neonates: Protocol for a multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023 13 2 e069024 10.1136/bmjopen‑2022‑069024 36787974
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Rehman A. Quddusi A.I. Nadeem A. Fatima N. Iqbal I. Early nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Prof. Med. J. 2021 28 7 957 962 10.29309/TPMJ/2021.28.07.5707
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Lemyre B. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023 7 7 CD005384 10.1002/14651858.CD005384.pub3 37466143
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Gautam G. Gupta N. Sasidharan R. Thanigainathan S. Yadav B. Singh K. Singh A. Systematic rotation versus continuous application of ‘nasal prongs’ or ‘nasal mask’ in preterm infants on NCPAP: A randomized controlled trial. Eur. J. Pediatr. 2023 182 6 2645 2654 10.1007/s00431‑023‑04933‑1 36967420
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Gupta N. Saini S.S. Murki S. Kumar P. Deorari A. Continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates: An update of current evidence and implications for developing countries. Indian Pediatr. 2015 52 4 319 328 10.1007/s13312‑015‑0632‑z 25929631
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kandraju H. Murki S. Subramanian S. Gaddam P. Deorari A. Kumar P. Early routine versus late selective surfactant in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome on nasal continuous positive airway pressure: A randomized controlled trial. Neonatology 2013 103 2 148 154 10.1159/000345198 23235135
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Rojas M.A. Lozano J.M. Rojas M.X. Laughon M. Bose C.L. Rondon M.A. Charry L. Bastidas J.A. Perez L.A. Rojas C. Ovalle O. Celis L.A. Garcia-Harker J. Jaramillo M.L. Very early surfactant without mandatory ventilation in premature infants treated with early continuous positive airway pressure: A randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2009 123 1 137 142 10.1542/peds.2007‑3501 19117872
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Shin J. Park K. Lee E.H. Choi B.M. Humidified high flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as an initial respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: A randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2017 32 4 650 655 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.4.650 28244292
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Roberts C.T. Manley B.J. Dawson J.A. Davis P.G. Nursing perceptions of high-flow nasal cannulae treatment for very preterm infants. J. Paediatr. Child Health 2014 50 10 806 810 10.1111/jpc.12636 24943729
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Alanazi M.M. Algarni S.S. Use of a high flow nasal cannula in extremely premature infants: Benefits and drawbacks. Global Pediatrics Elsevier 2023 7 100092 10.1016/j.gpeds.2023.100092
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Iranpour R. Armanian A-M. Parvaneh M. Salehimehr N. Feizi A. Hajirezaei M. Heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is not an effective method for initial treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) versus nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). J. Res. Med. Sci. 2019 24 1 73 10.4103/jrms.JRMS_2_19 31523259
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Alrzoq R.A. Alateeq O.M. Almslam M.S. Alanzi F.A. Alhuthil R.T. Cardiopulmonary outcomes following high flow nasal cannula in pediatric population: A systematic review. Heart Lung 2023 61 46 50 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2023.04.009 37148814
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hong H. Li X. Li J. Zhang Z. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory support in preterm infants: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 34 2 259 266 10.1080/14767058.2019.1606193 30966839
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Alhomaid Y.M. Alramli J.A. Beneficial of high flow nasal cannula with infants. J. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 2023 6 02 1576 1578
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hodgson K.A. Nasal high flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2023 5 5 CD006405 10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub4 37144837
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Mir N.Y. Malik M.I. Incidence of nasal trauma in nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus heated humidified high flow nasal cannula in neonates, our experience in government medical college srinagar. Int. J. Contemp. Pediatrics 2023 10 3 353 356 10.18203/2349‑3291.ijcp20230434
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Martins C. Pissarra R. Costa S. Soares H. Guimarães H. Comparison between continuous positive airway pressure and high-flow nasal cannula as postextubation respiratory support in neonates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Turk. Pediatri Ars. 2022 57 6 581 590 10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2022.22161 36314953
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Volakli E. High flow nasal cannula therapy in children: Working principles and treatment failure predictors. Signa Vitae 2022 18 6
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Colleti Junior J. Azevedo R. Araujo O. Carvalho W.B. High-flow nasal cannula as a post-extubation respiratory support strategy in preterm infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Pediatr. 2020 96 4 422 431 10.1016/j.jped.2019.11.004 31951817
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Murki S. Singh J. Khant C. Kumar Dash S. Oleti T.P. Joy P. Kabra N.S. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: A randomized controlled trial. Neonatology 2018 113 3 235 241 10.1159/000484400 29393237
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhao X. Qin Q. Zhang X. Outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure in young children with respiratory distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr. 2021 9 759297 10.3389/fped.2021.759297 34805049
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Milési C. Essouri S. Pouyau R. Liet J.M. Afanetti M. Portefaix A. Baleine J. Durand S. Combes C. Douillard A. Cambonie G. High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: A multicenter randomized controlled trial (tramontane study). Intensive Care Med. 2017 43 2 209 216 10.1007/s00134‑016‑4617‑8 28124736
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Nishimura M. High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in adults: Physiological benefits, indication, clinical benefits, and adverse effects. Respir. Care 2016 61 4 529 541 10.4187/respcare.04577 27016353
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoffman S.B. Terrell N. Driscoll C.H. Davis N.L. Impact of high-flow nasal cannula use on neonatal respiratory support patterns and length of stay. Respir. Care 2016 61 10 1299 1304 10.4187/respcare.04668 27460101
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Anne R.P. Murki S. Noninvasive respiratory support in neonates: A review of current evidence and practices. Indian J. Pediatr. 2021 88 7 670 678 10.1007/s12098‑021‑03755‑z 34075532
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Badiee Z. Naseri F. Sadeghnia A. Early versus delayed initiation of nasal continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in premature newborns: A randomized clinical trial. Adv. Biomed. Res. 2013 2 1 4 10.4103/2277‑9175.107965 23930249
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Farhat A.S. Comparison of nasal non-invasive ventilation methods in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Iran. J. Neonatol. 2018 9 4
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Shoemaker M.T. Pierce M.R. Yoder B.A. DiGeronimo R.J. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory disease: A retrospective study. J. Perinatol. 2007 27 2 85 91 10.1038/sj.jp.7211647 17262040
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Hillman N. Jobe A.H. Noninvasive strategies for management of respiratory problems in neonates. Neorev. 2013 14 5 e227 e236 10.1542/neo.14‑5‑e227
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Schmölzer G.M. Kumar M. Pichler G. Aziz K. O’Reilly M. Cheung P.Y. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2013 347 oct17 3 f5980 10.1136/bmj.f5980 24136633
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Cresi F. Maggiora E. Lista G. Dani C. Borgione S.M. Spada E. Ferroglio M. Bertino E. Coscia A. Fiora M. Colombo S. Peila C. Luciano M. Meneghin F. Gatto S. Lupo E. Elia S. Ciarcià M. Mosca F. Orsi A. Mercadante D. Amatruda M. Tomasini B. Cecchi S. Liuzzo Lasagna P. Martinelli S. Ilardi L. Proto A. Vento G. Costa S. Fusco F.P. Farina D. Campagnoli M.F. Boetti T. Boano E. Sannia A. De Maio C. Murizasco E. Raimondi F. Capasso L. Salomè S. Agosti M. Morlacchi L. Perniciaro S. Laforgia N. Baldassarre M. Capozza M. Stronati M. Civardi E. Garofoli F. Maggio L. Corvaglia L. Effect of nasal continuous positive airway pressure vs heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula on feeding intolerance in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: The entares randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2023 6 7 e2323052 e2323052 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.23052 37436750
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mahmoud R.A. Schmalisch G. Oswal A. Christoph Roehr C. Non-invasive ventilatory support in neonates: An evidence-based update. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2022 44 11 18 36428196
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Dassios T. Ambulkar H. Greenough A. Treatment and respiratory support modes for neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Expert Opin. Orphan Drugs 2020 8 5 145 156 10.1080/21678707.2020.1769598
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sammour I. Karnati S. Non-invasive respiratory support of the premature neonate: From physics to bench to practice. Front Pediatr. 2020 8 214 10.3389/fped.2020.00214 32457860
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Dumpa V. Avulakunta I. Bhandari V. Respiratory management in the premature neonate. Expert Rev. Respir. Med. 2023 17 2 155 170 10.1080/17476348.2023.2183843 36803028
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Downes J.J. Vidyasagar D. Morrow G.M. Boggs T.R. Respiratory distress syndrome of newborn infants. I. new clinical scoring system (RDS score) with acid-base and blood-gas correlations. Clin. Pediatr. 1970 9 6 325 331 10.1177/000992287000900607 5419441
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Zadkarami M. Sadat-Mirdamadi N. Hardani A. Mirkarimi M. Alisamir M. Heidari S. Barouti S. Mohammadi S. Evaluation of oxygenation index compared with oxygen saturation index among neonates admitted to the NICU. Acta Med. Iran. 2021 376 382 10.18502/acta.v59i6.6896
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Esmaeilnia Shirvani T. Continuous positive airway pressure or humidified high flow nasal cannula for respiratory distress syndrome: A randomized control trial among premature neonates. Iran. J. Neonatol. 2020 11 4 50 56
    [Google Scholar]
  47. de Jesus Brito S. Tsopanoglou S.P. Galvão E.L. de Deus F.A. de Lima V.P. Can high-flow nasal cannula reduce the risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia compared with CPAP in preterm infants? a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2021 21 1 407 10.1186/s12887‑021‑02881‑z 34530788
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Choi B.M. Lee E.H. Park K.H. Chung B.H. Park H.J. Choi Y.O. Hong Y.S. Comparing usefulness of humidified high-flow nasal cannula (hHFNC) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for neonatal respiratory diseases in preterm infants. Pediatr. Res. 2011 70 5 504 504 10.1038/pr.2011.729
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kadivar M. Mosayebi Z. Razi N. Nariman S. Sangsari R. High flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome managed with insure method: A randomized clinical trial. Iran. J. Med. Sci. 2016 41 6 494 500 27853329
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lin X. Jia P. Li X.Q. Liu Q. Efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates: A meta analysis. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 2020 22 11 1164 1171 33172549
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Piaggio G. Elbourne D.R. Pocock S.J. Evans S.J.W. Altman D.G. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: Extension of the consort 2010 statement. JAMA 2012 308 24 2594 2604 10.1001/jama.2012.87802 23268518
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kotecha S.J. Adappa R. Gupta N. Watkins W.J. Kotecha S. Chakraborty M. Safety and efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula therapy in preterm infants: A meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2015 136 3 542 553 10.1542/peds.2015‑0738 26283781
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Wilkinson D. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016 2 2 CD006405 10.1002/14651858.CD006405.pub3 26899543
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Roberts C.T. Owen L.S. Manley B.J. Frøisland D.H. Donath S.M. Dalziel K.M. Pritchard M.A. Cartwright D.W. Collins C.L. Malhotra A. Davis P.G. Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. N. Engl. J. Med. 2016 375 12 1142 1151 10.1056/NEJMoa1603694 27653564
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Collins C.L. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants. J. Pediatr. 2013 162 5 949 954.e1 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.016 23260098
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Yoder B.A. Stoddard R.A. Li M. King J. Dirnberger D.R. Abbasi S. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics 2013 131 5 e1482 e1490 10.1542/peds.2012‑2742 23610207
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Manley B.J. Owen L.S. Doyle L.W. Andersen C.C. Cartwright D.W. Pritchard M.A. Donath S.M. Davis P.G. High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013 369 15 1425 1433 10.1056/NEJMoa1300071 24106935
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Iranpour R. Sadeghnia A. Abari S. High flow nasal cannula in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in one day-old neonate. Br. J. Med. Med. Res. 2016 15 4 1 7 10.9734/BJMMR/2016/25316
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Ciuffini F. Pietrasanta C. Lavizzari A. Musumeci S. Gualdi C. Sortino S. Colnaghi M. Mosca F. Comparison between two different modes of non-invasive ventilatory support in preterm newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome mild to moderate: Preliminary data. Pediatr. Med. Chir. 2014 36 4 88 10.4081/pmc.2014.88 25573704
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Lavizzari A. Colnaghi M. Ciuffini F. Veneroni C. Musumeci S. Cortinovis I. Mosca F. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: A randomized clinical noninferiority trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016 8 1243 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1243 27532363
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Zheng G. The effect of the treatment with heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula on neonatal respiratory distress syndrome in China: A single-center experience. Can. Respir. J. 2017 2017 3782401 10.1155/2017/3782401 28167860
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Poonia A.K. Sharma P.K. Bansal R. Comparison of efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants. J. Clin. Neonatol. 2019 8 2 102 105 10.4103/jcn.JCN_116_18
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Manley B.J. Cripps E. Dargaville P.A. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants. Seminars in Perinatology. Elsevier 2024 48 2 151885 10.1016/j.semperi.2024.151885
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Ho J.J. Subramaniam P. Davis P.G. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for respiratory distress in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2020 10 10 CD002271 10.1002/14651858.CD002271.pub3 33058208
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Ezeh N.I. Eyo T.J. Gurusamy K. Ebneo commentary: Weaning from CPAP using high-flow is non-inferior to using CPAP alone in very preterm infants. Pediatrics 2015 82 9 775 776
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Ishigami A.C. Meneses J. Alves J.G. Carvalho J. Cavalcanti E. Bhandari V. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation as a rescue therapy after nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in infants with respiratory distress syndrome. J. Perinatol. 2023 43 3 311 316 10.1038/s41372‑023‑01600‑z 36631566
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Guay J.M. Carvi D. Raines D.A. Luce W.A. Care of the neonate on nasal continuous positive airway pressure: A bedside guide. Neonatal Netw. 2018 37 1 24 32 10.1891/0730‑0832.37.1.24 29436355
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Lemyre B. Deguise M-O. Benson P. Haresh K. Ekhaguere O.A. Davis P.G. 17 early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants. Paediatr. Child Health 2022 27 Suppl. 3 e7 10.1093/pch/pxac100.016
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Abdelbaky A.M. Elmasry W.G. Awad A.H. Khan S. Jarrahi M. The impact of high-flow nasal cannula therapy on acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A systematic review. Cureus 2023 15 6 e41219 10.7759/cureus.41219 37397646
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ramaswamy V.V. More K. Roehr C.C. Bandiya P. Nangia S. Efficacy of noninvasive respiratory support modes for primary respiratory support in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 2020 55 11 2940 2963 10.1002/ppul.25011 32762014
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Mokhtary-Hassanabad A. Mirjalili S.R. Lookzadeh M.H. Noorishadkam M. Comparison of treatment outcomes of high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome in the NICU of shahid sadoughi hospital in yazd. Wor. J. Peri. & Neonatol. 2024 6 2 75 82 10.18502/wjpn.v6i2.15488
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Alexander E.C. Wadia T.H. Ramnarayan P. Effectiveness of high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy compared to standard oxygen therapy (sot) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in bronchiolitis. Paediatr. Respir. Rev. 2024 11 S1526-0542(24)00048-4 10.1016/j.prrv.2024.05.004 38937210
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Shi Y. Muniraman H. Biniwale M. Ramanathan R. A review on non-invasive respiratory support for management of respiratory distress in extremely preterm infants. Front Pediatr. 2020 8 270 10.3389/fped.2020.00270 32548084
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Narayanan K.R. Ashwath Ram R.N. Sundaram M. How to choose between high-flow nasal cannula, continuous positive airway pressure, and bilevel positive airway pressure in children with acute respiratory illness. Journal of Pediatric Critical Care 2023 10 3 101 106 10.4103/jpcc.jpcc_33_23
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Bruet S. Butin M. Dutheil F. Systematic review of high-flow nasal cannula versus continuous positive airway pressure for primary support in preterm infants. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2022 107 1 56 59 10.1136/archdischild‑2020‑321094 34016651
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/crmr/10.2174/011573398X339994241209170750
Loading
Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure versus High-Flow Nasal Cannula for the Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Bentham Science Publishers ; https://doi.org/10.2174/011573398X339994241209170750
/content/journals/crmr/10.2174/011573398X339994241209170750
/content/journals/crmr/10.2174/011573398X339994241209170750
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keywords: Preterm neonates ; premature infants ; respiratory distress syndrome ; NCPAP ; HFNC ; RDS

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test