Skip to content
2000
Volume 23, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1389-2037
  • E-ISSN: 1875-5550

Abstract

Background: The importance of aromaticity vs. hydrophobicity of the central hydrophobic core (CHC, residues 17-20) in governing fibril formation in Aβ(1-42) has been the focus of an ongoing debate in the literature. Introduction: Mutations in the CHC (especially at Phe19 and Phe20) have been used to examine the relative impact of hydrophobicity and aromaticity on the degree of aggregation of Aβ(1-42). However, the results have not been conclusive. Methods: Partial least squares (PLS) modeling of aggregation rates, using reduced properties of a series of position 19 mutants, was employed to identify the physicochemical properties that had the greatest impact on the extent of aggregation. Results: The PLS models indicate that hydrophobicity at position 19 of Aβ(1-42) appears to be the primary and dominant factor in controlling Aβ(1-42) aggregation, with aromaticity having little effect. Conclusion: This study illustrates the value of using reduced properties of amino acids in conjunction with PLS modeling to investigate mutational effects in peptides and proteins, as the reduced properties can capture in a quantitative manner the different physicochemical properties of the amino acid side chains. In this particular study, hydrophobicity at position 19 was determined to be the dominant property controlling aggregation, while size, charge, and aromaticity had little impact.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cpps/10.2174/1389203723666220128105334
2022-01-01
2025-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cpps/10.2174/1389203723666220128105334
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test