Skip to content
2000
Volume 21, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1875-6921
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Genomic information plays an essential role in personalized medicine, with the main objective of determining risk and predisposition to disease, as well as guiding diagnosis, selection, and prioritization of therapeutic options, and even predicting prognosis. Research in the second half of the 20th century allowed genomics to move from the laboratory to clinical practice. The Human Genome Project showed the structure of the genome, the genes, and several of their regulatory pathways, which allowed obtaining exact knowledge about the molecular origin of a growing number of diseases and the development of next-generation sequencing technologies. In the second decade of the 21st century, the decrease in testing costs has allowed genomic medicine to begin to be applied in hospital institutions and outpatient services with a positive impact on public health. However, it has been evidenced that these potential benefits have not been experienced equitably throughout the world. This commentary explores the main challenges and obstacles to the implementation of genomic medicine services in order to expand their use as part of clinical practice in the Latin American context. Finally, six main barriers have been identified: i) high costs and poor access, ii) lack of trained personnel in the genomic field, iii) negative personal and social beliefs, iv) lack of representation of Latin American populations in genomic databases, v) scarce evidence of impact on clinical practice, and vi) lack of understanding of genomic test results by patients and clinicians.

© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Bentham Science Publisher. This is an open access article published under CC BY 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cppm/10.2174/0118756921304274240819071740
2024-08-01
2024-11-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cppm/21/2/CPPM-21-2-01.html?itemId=/content/journals/cppm/10.2174/0118756921304274240819071740&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. RothS.C. What is genomic medicine?J. Med. Libr. Assoc.2019107344244810.5195/jmla.2019.604 31258451
    [Google Scholar]
  2. PattanV. KashyapR. BansalV. CandulaN. KoritalaT. SuraniS. Genomics in medicine: A new era in medicine.World J. Methodol.202111523124210.5662/wjm.v11.i5.231 34631481
    [Google Scholar]
  3. GuttmacherA.E. McGuireA.L. PonderB. StefánssonK. Personalized genomic information: Preparing for the future of genetic medicine.Nat. Rev. Genet.201011216116510.1038/nrg2735 20065954
    [Google Scholar]
  4. HoodL. RowenL. The human genome project: Big science transforms biology and medicine.Genome Med.2013597910.1186/gm483 24040834
    [Google Scholar]
  5. BergerM.F. MardisE.R. The emerging clinical relevance of genomics in cancer medicine.Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.201815635336510.1038/s41571‑018‑0002‑6 29599476
    [Google Scholar]
  6. JoomaS. HahnM.J. HindorffL.A. BonhamV.L. Defining and achieving health equity in genomic medicine.Ethn. Dis.201929Suppl. 117317810.18865/ed.29.S1.173 30906166
    [Google Scholar]
  7. WiseA.L. ManolioT.A. MensahG.A. Genomic medicine for undiagnosed diseases.Lancet20193941019753354010.1016/S0140‑6736(19)31274‑7 31395441
    [Google Scholar]
  8. MurdockD.R. RosenfeldJ.A. LeeB. What has the undiagnosed diseases network taught us about the clinical applications of genomic testing?Annu. Rev. Med.202273157558510.1146/annurev‑med‑042120‑014904 35084988
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Special Report. Exome Sequencing for Clinical Diagnosis of Patients with Suspected Genetic Disorders.Technol Eval Cent Assess Program Exec Summ20132814
    [Google Scholar]
  10. AnastassopoulouC. GkizariotiZ. PatrinosG.P. TsakrisA. Human genetic factors associated with susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 disease severity.Hum. Genomics20201414010.1186/s40246‑020‑00290‑4 33092637
    [Google Scholar]
  11. SaravananK.A. PanigrahiM. KumarH. Role of genomics in combating COVID-19 pandemic.Gene202282314638710.1016/j.gene.2022.146387 35248659
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Araujo-FilhoJ.A.B. MayoralM. HorvatN. SantiniF.C. GibbsP. GinsbergM.S. Radiogenomics in personalized management of lung cancer patients: Where are we?Clin. Imaging202284546010.1016/j.clinimag.2022.01.012 35144039
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ShuiL. RenH. YangX. The era of radiogenomics in precision medicine: an emerging approach to support diagnosis, treatment decisions, and prognostication in oncology.Front. Oncol.20211057046510.3389/fonc.2020.570465 33575207
    [Google Scholar]
  14. MontiS. Precision Medicine in Radiomics and Radiogenomics.J. Pers. Med.20221211180610.3390/jpm12111806 36579529
    [Google Scholar]
  15. JohnsonK.B. WeiW.Q. WeeraratneD. Precision medicine, AI, and the future of personalized health care.Clin. Transl. Sci.2021141869310.1111/cts.12884 32961010
    [Google Scholar]
  16. LiS. ZhouB. A review of radiomics and genomics applications in cancers: The way towards precision medicine.Radiat. Oncol.202217121710.1186/s13014‑022‑02192‑2 36585716
    [Google Scholar]
  17. StarkZ. DolmanL. ManolioT.A. Integrating genomics into healthcare: A global responsibility.Am. J. Hum. Genet.20191041132010.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.014 30609404
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Alvarez-GómezR.M. De la Fuente-HernandezM.A. Herrera-MontalvoL. Hidalgo-MirandaA. Challenges of diagnostic genomics in Latin America.Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.20216610110910.1016/j.gde.2020.12.010 33517184
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Calderón-AparicioA. OrueA. Precision oncology in Latin America: Current situation, challenges and perspectives.Ecancermedicalscience20191392010.3332/ecancer.2019.920 31281417
    [Google Scholar]
  20. MaddenE.B. HindorffL.A. BonhamV.L. Advancing genomics to improve health equity.Nat. Genet.202456575275710.1038/s41588‑024‑01711‑z 38684898
    [Google Scholar]
  21. AcevedoF. WalbaumB. CamusM. Access disparities and underutilization of germline genetic testing in Chilean breast cancer patients.Breast Cancer Res. Treat.2023199236337010.1007/s10549‑023‑06909‑z 36988750
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hendricks-SturrupR.M. LinskyA. LuC.Y. VassyJ.L. Genomic testing is best integrated into clinical practice when it is actionable.Per. Med.20201715810.2217/pme‑2019‑0106 31795838
    [Google Scholar]
  23. HayeemsR.Z. DimmockD. BickD. Clinical utility of genomic sequencing: A measurement toolkit.NPJ Genom. Med.2020515610.1038/s41525‑020‑00164‑7 33319814
    [Google Scholar]
  24. HortonR. CrawfordG. FreemanL. FenwickA. WrightC.F. LucassenA. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing.BMJ2019367l568810.1136/bmj.l5688 31619392
    [Google Scholar]
  25. HudsonK. JavittG. BurkeW. ByersP. ASHG Statement* on direct-to-consumer genetic testing in the United States.Obstet. Gynecol.200711061392139510.1097/01.AOG.0000292086.98514.8b 18055737
    [Google Scholar]
  26. RichardsS. AzizN. BaleS. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American college of medical genetics and genomics and the association for molecular pathology.Genet. Med.201517540542410.1038/gim.2015.30 25741868
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Sigman M. Introduction.Fertil. Steril.2018109694494510.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.027 29935651
    [Google Scholar]
  28. ManolioT.A. RowleyR. WilliamsM.S. Opportunities, resources, and techniques for implementing genomics in clinical care.Lancet20193941019751152010.1016/S0140‑6736(19)31140‑7 31395439
    [Google Scholar]
  29. VellekoopH. VersteeghM. HuygensS. The net benefit of personalized medicine: a systematic literature review and regression analysis.Value Health20222581428143810.1016/j.jval.2022.01.006 35248467
    [Google Scholar]
  30. PanduroA. RomanS. Personalized medicine in latin america.Per. Med.202017533934310.2217/pme‑2020‑0049 32804053
    [Google Scholar]
  31. BordaV. LoeschD.P. GuoB. Genetics of Latin American Diversity (GLAD) Project: Insights into Population Genetics and Association Studies in Recently Admixed Groups in the Americas.bioRxiv2023
    [Google Scholar]
  32. MitropoulouC. LitinskiV. KabakchievB. RogersS. P Patrinos G. PARC report: Health outcomes and value of personalized medicine interventions: Impact on patient care.Pharmacogenomics2020211179780710.2217/pgs‑2019‑0194 32635813
    [Google Scholar]
  33. RunheimH. PetterssonM. HammarsjöA. The cost-effectiveness of whole genome sequencing in neurodevelopmental disorders.Sci. Rep.2023131690410.1038/s41598‑023‑33787‑8 37106068
    [Google Scholar]
  34. NurchisM.C. RiccardiM.T. RadioF.C. Incremental net benefit of whole genome sequencing for newborns and children with suspected genetic disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis of cost-effectiveness evidence.Health Policy2022126433734510.1016/j.healthpol.2022.03.001 35317923
    [Google Scholar]
  35. NurchisM.C. AltamuraG. RiccardiM.T. Whole genome sequencing diagnostic yield for paediatric patients with suspected genetic disorders: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and GRADE assessment.Arch. Public Health20238119310.1186/s13690‑023‑01112‑4 37231492
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Sanford KobayashiE. WaldmanB. EngornB.M. Cost Efficacy of Rapid Whole Genome Sequencing in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.Front Pediatr.2022980953610.3389/fped.2021.809536 35141181
    [Google Scholar]
  37. JainN. NagaichU. PandeyM. ChellappanD.K. DuaK. Predictive genomic tools in disease stratification and targeted prevention: A recent update in personalized therapy advancements.EPMA J.202213456158010.1007/s13167‑022‑00304‑2 36505888
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Ruíz-PatiñoA. RojasL. ZuluagaJ. Genomic ancestry and cancer among Latin Americans.Clin. Transl. Oncol.20242681856187110.1007/s12094‑024‑03415‑6 38581481
    [Google Scholar]
  39. OlloquequiJ. Castro-SantosP. Díaz-PeñaR. Pharmacogenetic variation and its clinical relevance in a latin american rural population.Int. J. Mol. Sci.202223191175810.3390/ijms231911758 36233078
    [Google Scholar]
  40. GailleM. HornR. The ethics of genomic medicine: Redefining values and norms in the UK and France.Eur. J. Hum. Genet.202129578078810.1038/s41431‑020‑00798‑2 33456054
    [Google Scholar]
  41. ManolioT.A. ChisholmR.L. OzenbergerB. Implementing genomic medicine in the clinic: The future is here.Genet. Med.201315425826710.1038/gim.2012.157 23306799
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Echeverry-QuicenoL.M. CandeloE. GómezE. Population-specific facial traits and diagnosis accuracy of genetic and rare diseases in an admixed Colombian population.Sci. Rep.2023131686910.1038/s41598‑023‑33374‑x 37106005
    [Google Scholar]
  43. NaveO.P. Modification of semi-analytical method applied system of ODE.Mod. Appl. Sci.20201467510.5539/mas.v14n6p75
    [Google Scholar]
  44. MayeuxR. Biomarkers: Potential uses and limitations.NeuroRx20041218218810.1602/neurorx.1.2.182 15717018
    [Google Scholar]
  45. FDA-NIH Biomarker Working Group BEST. BEST (Biomarkers, EndpointS, and other Tools) Resource. Bethesda (MD).National Institutes of Health (US)2016
    [Google Scholar]
  46. RamosE. DoumateyA. ElkahlounA.G. Pharmacogenomics, ancestry and clinical decision making for global populations.Pharmacogenomics J.201414321722210.1038/tpj.2013.24 23835662
    [Google Scholar]
  47. ShatalovP.A. FalaleevaN.A. BykovaE.A. Genetic and therapeutic landscapes in cohort of pancreatic adenocarcinomas: Next-generation sequencing and machine learning for full tumor exome analysis.Oncotarget20241519110310.18632/oncotarget.28512 38329726
    [Google Scholar]
  48. LandryL.G. AliN. WilliamsD.R. RehmH.L. BonhamV.L. Lack of diversity in genomic databases is a barrier to translating precision medicine research into practice.Health Aff (Millwood).2018May; 37578078510.1377/hlthaff.2017.1595 29733732
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cppm/10.2174/0118756921304274240819071740
Loading
/content/journals/cppm/10.2174/0118756921304274240819071740
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test