Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 34
  • ISSN: 1381-6128
  • E-ISSN: 1873-4286

Abstract

There is initial evidence, at least in cardiac surgery, that total intra-venous anesthesia (usually a propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia) is associated with an increased mortality when compared to an anesthetic plan including a halogenated anesthetics. The cardiac protective properties of halogenated agents (desflurane, isoflurane and sevoflurane) have not been confirmed in non-cardiac surgery and mixed results exist for patients admitted in postoperative intensive care units. This article summarizes the papers with the most impressive findings in favor of halogenated anesthetics, but it recognizes that, at the same time, there is no evidence based medicine against the use of propofol, highlighting the need for large randomized trials that should focus on survival.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cpd/10.2174/1570161112666140123105536
2014-10-01
2025-05-06
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cpd/10.2174/1570161112666140123105536
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test