Skip to content
2000
Volume 17, Issue 16
  • ISSN: 1385-2728
  • E-ISSN: 1875-5348

Abstract

Contemporary theories of the origin of life divide along the same conceptual lines as contemporary accounts of the nature of life, with small molecule theories (e.g., Wachtershauser’s iron pyrite world) corresponding to metabolic theories/definitions of life and genes-first theories (currently dominated by the RNA world) corresponding to evolutionary (e.g., chemical Darwinian) theories/ definitions of life. I discuss some difficulties faced by this general approach: First, it isn’t at all obvious that a successful theory of the origin of life will divide along the same lines as a theory of the nature of life. Second, in both cases there is the worry that signs of life are being mistakenly treated as essential to life. Third, most theories of the origin of life tend to minimize or even side step the transition from nonliving ensembles of molecules to the first proto-organisms. I close with a suggestion for dealing with some of these difficult problems.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/coc/10.2174/13852728113179990077
2013-08-01
2025-05-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/coc/10.2174/13852728113179990077
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test