Skip to content
2000
Volume 20, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1574-8863
  • E-ISSN: 2212-3911

Abstract

Purpose

The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the patterns of post-surgical site infections, pre-surgical antibiotics prophylaxis, and related clinical outcomes in the recently published literature.

Methods

This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO registration number CRD42023398963. Several databases and individual journal websites were used to collect data from PubMed/Medline, TRIP, SCOPUS, Elsevier, Springer, ProQuest, and EMBASE. The established criteria of inclusion were RCTs, retrospective, prospective, and cross-sectional studies with patients who had a recent surgical procedure. Excluded from the study designs were systematic reviews, prospective studies, data on pediatrics, and data on disabilities. Quality assessment analysis of the results for randomized controlled trials (RCT) used CONSORT guidelines and STROBE guidelines for cross-sectional and cohort studies.

Results

A total of 328 articles were identified from different databases. Among them, 15 studies were included for data extraction and qualitative analysis. A total of 33,193 patients with an average rate of 11.5% (surgical site infections- SSIs) were identified in these studies during 2008-2022. The mean rate of SSIs among the total number of immunocompromised patients/procedures was 10.2%. The SSI on patients undergoing major surgical procedures with visible incisions was 26.0%. The majority of the studies reported the use of pre-surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. Cefazolin was mostly prescribed antibiotics and administered in 90% of patients. Other antibiotics included ceftriaxone (4%), cloxacillin (3%), and vancomycin (4%). The mean reported rate of SSIs with combination antibiotic prophylaxis therapy was 22.8%.

Conclusion

This systematic review concluded the limited reported data on surgical site infections (SSIs). The overuse of pre-surgical antibiotic prophylaxis has been reported in several studies. This study recommended developing standardized guidelines on the use of antibiotics related to surgical cases rather than co-morbidities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cds/10.2174/0115748863338553250106111958
2025-02-28
2025-08-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. MagillS.S. EdwardsJ.R. BambergW. Multistate point-prevalence survey of health care-associated infections.N. Engl. J. Med.2014370131198120810.1056/NEJMoa1306801 24670166
    [Google Scholar]
  2. MawallaB. MshanaS.E. ChalyaP.L. ImirzaliogluC. MahaluW. Predictors of surgical site infections among patients undergoing major surgery at Bugando Medical Centre in Northwestern Tanzania.BMC Surg.20111112110.1186/1471‑2482‑11‑21 21880145
    [Google Scholar]
  3. OwensCD StoesselK Surgical site infections: Epidemiology, microbiology and prevention.J Hosp Infect200870Suppl 231010.1016/S0195‑6701(08)60017‑1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. EmoriT.G. GaynesR.P. An overview of nosocomial infections, including the role of the microbiology laboratory.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.19936442844210.1128/CMR.6.4.428 8269394
    [Google Scholar]
  5. CooperR.A. Surgical site infections: Epidemiology and microbiological aspects in trauma and orthopaedic surgery.Int. Wound J.201310s1Suppl. 13810.1111/iwj.12179 24251837
    [Google Scholar]
  6. de LissovoyG. FraemanK. HutchinsV. MurphyD. SongD. VaughnB.B. Surgical site infection: Incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs.Am. J. Infect. Control200937538739710.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010 19398246
    [Google Scholar]
  7. FortunJ. Martin-DavilaP. PascualJ. Immunosuppressive therapy and infection after kidney transplantation.Transpl. Infect. Dis.201012539740510.1111/j.1399‑3062.2010.00526.x 20553437
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Drugs that delay wound healing.Prescrire Int.2013221379498 23662318
    [Google Scholar]
  9. EspositoS. Immune system and surgical site infection.J Chemother 2001 13 Spec No11121610.1179/joc.2001.13.Supplement‑2.12
    [Google Scholar]
  10. CoccoliniF. ImprotaM. CicuttinE. Surgical site infection prevention and management in immunocompromised patients: A systematic review of the literature.World J. Emerg. Surg.20211613310.1186/s13017‑021‑00375‑y 34112231
    [Google Scholar]
  11. BalakirskiG. KotliarK. PaulyK.J. Surgical site infections after dermatologic surgery in immunocompromised patients: A single-center experience.Dermatol. Surg.2018441215251536
    [Google Scholar]
  12. BalakirskiG. LöserC.R. DippelE. Surgical site infections after microscopically controlled skin surgery in immunocompromised patients: A retrospective two-center cohort study.Arch. Dermatol. Res.2020312491499
    [Google Scholar]
  13. ScanlonM.M. GazelkaH.M. MoeschlerS.M. Surgical site infections in cancer patients with intrathecal drug delivery devices: Table 1.Pain Med.2016183pnw20310.1093/pm/pnw203 27550951
    [Google Scholar]
  14. PROSPERO2023Available from: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails
  15. PageM.J. McKenzieJ.E. BossuytP.M. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.BMJ202137271n7110.1136/bmj.n71 33782057
    [Google Scholar]
  16. STROBE2023Available from: https://www.strobe-statement.org/
  17. MittP. LangK. PeriA. MaimetsM. Surgical-site infections following cesarean section in an Estonian university hospital: Postdischarge surveillance and analysis of risk factors.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.200526544945410.1086/502566 15954482
    [Google Scholar]
  18. JainA.K. PatidarH. NayakV. AgrawalR. Prevalence, risk factors and microbial profile of surgical site infection after cesarean section in a tertiary care center in Western India.J. Pure Appl. Microbiol.202216170070710.22207/JPAM.16.1.73
    [Google Scholar]
  19. KoumuM.I. JawhariA. AlghamdiS.A. HejaziM.S. AlturaifA.H. AldaqalS.M. Surgical site infection post-appendectomy in a tertiary hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.Cureus2021137e1618710.7759/cureus.16187 34367794
    [Google Scholar]
  20. García PradoM.E. MatiaE.C. CiuroF.P. Díez-Canedo JS, Sousa Martín JM, Porras López FM, de la Casa AC, Cisneros Herreros JM.Surgical site infection in liver transplant recipients: impact of the type of perioperative prophylaxis.Transplantation2008 Jun 2785121849185410.1097/TP.0b013e3181735407 18580480
    [Google Scholar]
  21. PetrosilloN. DrapeauC.M.J. NicastriE. MartiniL. IppolitoG. MoroM.L. Surgical site infections in Italian hospitals: A prospective multicenter study.BMC Infect. Dis.2008813410.1186/1471‑2334‑8‑34 18328101
    [Google Scholar]
  22. EckmannC. KramerA. AssadianO. Clinical and economic burden of surgical site infections in inpatient care in Germany: A retrospective, cross-sectional analysis from 79 hospitals.PLoS One20221712e027597010.1371/journal.pone.0275970 36576894
    [Google Scholar]
  23. AsensioA. RamosA. Cuervas-MonsV. Effect of antibiotic prophylaxis on the risk of surgical site infection in orthotopic liver transplant.Liver Transpl.200814679980510.1002/lt.21435 18508358
    [Google Scholar]
  24. PongbangliN. OniemN. ChaiwarithR. NantsupawatT. PhrommintikulA. WongcharoenW. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage and surgical site infection rate among patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.Int. J. Infect. Dis.202110640941410.1016/j.ijid.2021.03.024 33737131
    [Google Scholar]
  25. AisuN. TanimuraS. YamashitaY. Impact of perioperative probiotic treatment for surgical site infections in patients with colorectal cancer.Exp. Ther. Med.201510396697210.3892/etm.2015.2640 26622423
    [Google Scholar]
  26. KasatpibalN. JamulitratS. ChongsuvivatwongV. Standardized incidence rates of surgical site infection: A multicenter study in Thailand.Am. J. Infect. Control2005331058759410.1016/j.ajic.2004.11.012 16330307
    [Google Scholar]
  27. MaksimovićJ. Marković-DenićL. BumbaširevićM. MarinkovićJ. VlajinacH. Surgical site infections in orthopedic patients: Prospective cohort study.Croat. Med. J.2008491586510.3325/cmj.2008.1.58 18293458
    [Google Scholar]
  28. HarringtonG. RussoP. SpelmanD. Surgical-site infection rates and risk factor analysis in coronary artery bypass graft surgery.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.200425647247610.1086/502424 15242194
    [Google Scholar]
  29. EhrenkranzN.J. MeakinsJL. Surgical infections.In: Bennett JV, editor; Brachman PS, editor. Hospital Infections.3rdBoston: Little, Brown1992685710
    [Google Scholar]
  30. NguyenT.A. RoweG. HarrisK. KoS. KoM. GharaviN.M. Antibiotic use and surgical site infections in immunocompromised patients after mohs micrographic surgery: A single-center retrospective study.Dermatol. Surg.202248121283128810.1097/DSS.0000000000003620 36449868
    [Google Scholar]
  31. RoninE. DerancourtC. CabiéA. Marion-SanchezK. Achromobacter spp. Surgical site infections: A systematic review of case reports and case series.Microorganisms2021912247110.3390/microorganisms9122471 34946073
    [Google Scholar]
  32. AwadhH. MansourM. AqtashO. ShweihatY. Pneumonia due to a Rare Pathogen: Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Subspecies denitrificans.Case Rep. Infect. Dis.201720171410.1155/2017/3969682 28894613
    [Google Scholar]
  33. MoroM.L. MorsilloF. TangentiM. MongardiM. PirazziniM.C. RagniP. Rates of surgical-site infection: An international comparison.Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol.200526544244810.1086/502565 15954481
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Marion-SanchezK. PaillaK. OliveC. Le CoutourX. DerancourtC. Achromobacter spp. healthcare associated infections in the French West Indies: A longitudinal study from 2006 to 2016.BMC Infect. Dis.201919179510.1186/s12879‑019‑4431‑3 31500579
    [Google Scholar]
  35. HarropJ.S. StyliarasJ.C. OoiY.C. RadcliffK.E. VaccaroA.R. WuC. Contributing factors to surgical site infections.J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.20122029410110.5435/00124635‑201202000‑00005 22302447
    [Google Scholar]
  36. YoungB. NgT.M. TengC. AngB. TaiH.Y. LyeD.C. Nonconcordance with surgical site infection prevention guidelines and rates of surgical site infections for general surgical, neurological, and orthopedic procedures.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.201155104659466310.1128/AAC.00562‑11 21825293
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McDonaldM. GrabschE. MarshallC. ForbesA. Single- versus multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis for major surgery: A systematic review.Aust. N. Z. J. Surg.199868638839510.1111/j.1445‑2197.1998.tb04785.x 9623456
    [Google Scholar]
  38. HarbarthS. SamoreM.H. LichtenbergD. CarmeliY. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis after cardiovascular surgery and its effect on surgical site infections and antimicrobial resistance.Circulation2000101252916292110.1161/01.CIR.101.25.2916 10869263
    [Google Scholar]
  39. De ChiaraS. ChiumelloD. NicoliniR. Prolongation of antibiotic prophylaxis after clean and clean-contaminated surgery and surgical site infection.Minerva Anestesiol.2010766413419 20473254
    [Google Scholar]
  40. MishaG. ChelkebaL. MelakuT. Incidence, risk factors and outcomes of surgical site infections among patients admitted to Jimma medical center, South West Ethiopia: Prospective cohort study.Ann. Med. Surg.20216510224710.1016/j.amsu.2021.102247 33898031
    [Google Scholar]
  41. BanashankariG.S. RudreshH.K. HarshaS.S. An overview of surgical site infections: An insight into the prevalence, etiology and predisposing factors.Int. J. Med. Sci. Clin. Invent.201419
    [Google Scholar]
  42. LilaniS.P. JangaleN. ChowdharyA. DaverG.B. Surgical site infection in clean and clean-contaminated cases.Indian J. Med. Microbiol.200523424925210.1016/S0255‑0857(21)02530‑5 16327121
    [Google Scholar]
  43. AfifiI.K. LabahE.A. AyadK.M. Surgical site infections after elective general surgery in Tanta University Hospital: Rate, risk factors and microbiological profile.Egypt. J. Med. Microbiol.20091826172
    [Google Scholar]
  44. LeboN.L. QuimbyA.E. CaulleyL. Surgical site infection affects length of stay after complex head and neck procedures.Laryngoscope202013012E837E84210.1002/lary.28512 31977071
    [Google Scholar]
  45. MujagicE. MartiW.R. CoslovskyM. Associations of hospital length of stay with surgical site infections.World J. Surg.201842123888389610.1007/s00268‑018‑4733‑4 29978247
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cds/10.2174/0115748863338553250106111958
Loading
/content/journals/cds/10.2174/0115748863338553250106111958
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

PRISMA checklist is available on the publisher's website along with the published article.

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test