Skip to content
2000
Volume 8, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1874-6098
  • E-ISSN: 1874-6128

Abstract

There are two modern evolutionary theories of mammal senescence: Programmed theories contend that mammals purposely limit their lifespans because doing so creates an evolutionary advantage. Non-programmed theories contend that each mammal specie only needs a particular lifespan and therefore only evolved and retained the capability for attaining that lifespan. Arguments over the evolutionary nature of aging have now existed for more than 150 years and for reasons described here may never be definitively resolved. The programmed/ non-programmed question is critical to medical research because the theories have grossly different predictions regarding the biological mechanisms associated with the aging process and therefore, the nature of age-related diseases and conditions. This article describes and compares two approaches for avoiding the need to obtain resolution on the evolutionary basis of senescence in order to identify and characterize the biological mechanisms responsible for aging and therefore the nature of highly age-related diseases.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cas/10.2174/1874609808666150422104524
2015-03-01
2025-07-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cas/10.2174/1874609808666150422104524
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): ageing; Aging; gerontology; medical research policy; senescence
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test