Skip to content
2000
Volume 18, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 1573-4110
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6727

Abstract

Background: Mexiletine belongs to the β-amino-aryl-ether group of pharmaceutical and applied in the diagnosis of antiarrhythmics, allodynia, and myotonic disorders. In its chemical structure, it possesses a chiral center and practiced in the form of the racemic mixture. The production and accessibility of mexiletine have accompanied with a meaningful development in awareness of its pharmacologic actions. But in clinical arrhythmias and binding experiments on cardiac sodium channels, the (R)-enantiomer of mexiletine is more potent than the (S)-enantiomer. Also, (S)-enantiomer is further active in the diagnosis of allodynia than the (R)-enantiomer Methods: During the last two decades, chromatographic techniques such as HPLC, and GC coupled with mass spectrometry or field ionization detector have been used for the stereoselective analysis of MEX enantiomers Results: The direct enantioresolution deals with the use of chiral stationary phases (CSPs) with or no pre-derivatization which depend on a chromophoric entity in the racemates whereas the indirect HPLC process involves the use of chiral derivatization reagents (CDR) for the synthesis of diastereomeric derivatives of racemates. Different techniques have their strengths and weaknesses. Conclusion: Regulation of enantiomeric purity and estimation of particular enantiomers of drug molecules stay an essential topic for therapeutic, diagnostic, and regulatory uses and to promote a precise assessment of the hazards to human health by false enantiomers. This review aims to offer a systematic survey of the analytical methods (chromatography based) used in the enantioselective analysis of MEX developed in the last two decades (the year 2000 onwards).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cac/10.2174/1573411016999201008125143
2022-05-01
2025-04-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cac/10.2174/1573411016999201008125143
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Review Article
Keyword(s): direct separation; enantioselective analysis; GC; HPLC; indirect separation; Mexiletine; TLC
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test