Skip to content
2000
Volume 22, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1573-4110
  • E-ISSN: 1875-6727

Abstract

Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) spectroscopy, as a novel rapid detection technology, offers molecular fingerprinting capabilities that achieve trace-level detection. The key to optimizing SERS sensitivity and reliability lies in the precise control of the nanostructures of SERS substrates. Nature, through billions of years of evolution, has served as a masterful creator, developing organisms with remarkable abilities based on micro/nanostructures, such as the superhydrophobicity of lotus leaves and the strong adhesive forces of gecko feet. This review categorizes the recent developments in SERS substrates inspired by natural materials into three main types: plant-based, animal-based, and virus-based. Each category is explored in detail, describing how their unique nanoarchitectures inspire the development of highly sensitive SERS substrates, along with their fabrication methods and applications in analytical science. Additionally, the review identifies current challenges, such as the uniformity and scalability of naturally inspired SERS substrates and suggests future directions, including the integration of hybrid biomimetic structures and advanced manufacturing techniques. By fostering a deeper understanding of these nature-inspired materials, we aim to enhance the practical application of SERS in analytical science in the future.

© 2026 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cac/10.2174/0115734110331157241003103106
2024-10-09
2026-02-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/cac/10.2174/0115734110331157241003103106
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. RamanC.V. KrishnanK.S. A new type of secondary radiation.Nature1928121304850150210.1038/121501c0
     [Google Scholar]
  2. FleischmannM. HendraP.J. McQuillanA.J. Raman spectra of pyridine adsorbed at a silver electrode.Chem. Phys. Lett.197426216316610.1016/0009‑2614(74)85388‑1
     [Google Scholar]
  3. JeanmaireD.L. Van DuyneR.P. Surface raman spectroelectrochemistry.J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem.197784112010.1016/S0022‑0728(77)80224‑6
     [Google Scholar]
  4. BellS.E.J. CharronG. CortésE. KneippJ. de la ChapelleM.L. LangerJ. ProcházkaM. TranV. SchlückerS. Towards reliable and quantitative surface‐enhanced Raman scattering (SERS): From key parameters to good analytical practice.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.202059145454546210.1002/anie.201908154 31588641
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ColumbusS. HamdiA. RamachandranK. DaoudiK. DoghecheE.H. GaidiM. Rapid and ultralow level SERS detection of ethylparaben using silver nanoprisms functionalized sea urchin-like Zinc oxide nanorod arrays for food safety analysis.Sens. Actuators A Phys.202234711396210.1016/j.sna.2022.113962
     [Google Scholar]
  6. WangW. LuJ. GuJ. XieL. ChangJ. ZouB. WangF. LiuG. TianZ. Rapid qualitative and quantitative analysis of trace aconitum phytotoxin by SERS.Food Chem.202239113323410.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133234 35605540
     [Google Scholar]
  7. LinX.M. CuiY. XuY.H. RenB. TianZ.Q. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy: Substrate-related issues.Anal. Bioanal. Chem.200939471729174510.1007/s00216‑009‑2761‑5 19381618
     [Google Scholar]
  8. De AngelisF. GentileF. MecariniF. DasG. MorettiM. CandeloroP. ColuccioM.L. CojocG. AccardoA. LiberaleC. ZaccariaR.P. PerozzielloG. TirinatoL. TomaA. CudaG. CingolaniR. Di FabrizioE. Breaking the diffusion limit with super-hydrophobic delivery of molecules to plasmonic nanofocusing SERS structures.Nat. Photonics201151168268710.1038/nphoton.2011.222
     [Google Scholar]
  9. KatiyarN.K. GoelG. HawiS. GoelS. Nature-inspired materials: Emerging trends and prospects.NPG Asia Mater.20211315610.1038/s41427‑021‑00322‑y
     [Google Scholar]
  10. WangX. ChenC. WangR. QiaoX. WaterhouseG.I.N. XuZ. Performance evaluation of novel Ag@GO-biomaterial SERS substrates for the ultrasensitive detection of neomycin in foods.Sens. Actuators B Chem.202338013325010.1016/j.snb.2022.133250
     [Google Scholar]
  11. BarshutinaM. DoroshinaN. BaizhumanovA. NikelshpargE. FedotovaA. PopovA. SemyanovA. YakubovskyD. TselikovG. LunevaO. KirilyukI. MaksimovG. VolkovV. ArseninA. BrazheN. NovikovS. SERS substrates based on rose petal replicas for the oxidative stress detection.Appl. Surf. Sci.202362615728110.1016/j.apsusc.2023.157281
     [Google Scholar]
  12. ChengY.W. HsiaoC.W. LinC.H. HuangL.Y. ChenJ.S. YangM.C. LiuT.Y. Bionic 3D periodic nanostructures by Ag nano-islands deposited on cicada wings for rapid SERS detection.Surf. Coat. Tech.202243612832310.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128323
     [Google Scholar]
  13. WangM. ShiG. ZhuJ. ZhuY. SunX. WangP. JiaoT. LiR. Preparation of a novel SERS platform based on mantis wing with high-density and multi-level “Hot Spots”.Nanomaterials (Basel)20199567210.3390/nano9050672 31052374
     [Google Scholar]
  14. FanM. AndradeG.F.S. BroloA.G. A review on recent advances in the applications of surface-enhanced Raman scattering in analytical chemistry.Anal. Chim. Acta2020109712910.1016/j.aca.2019.11.049 31910948
     [Google Scholar]
  15. HuB. PuH. SunD.W. Multifunctional cellulose based substrates for SERS smart sensing: Principles, applications and emerging trends for food safety detection.Trends Food Sci. Technol.202111030432010.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.005
     [Google Scholar]
  16. NilghazA. Mahdi MousaviS. AmiriA. TianJ. CaoR. WangX. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates for food safety and quality analysis.J. Agric. Food Chem.202270185463547610.1021/acs.jafc.2c00089 35471937
     [Google Scholar]
  17. OttC.E. ArroyoL.E. Transitioning surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS) into the forensic drug chemistry and toxicology laboratory: Current and future perspectives.Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Forensic Sci.2023e1483
     [Google Scholar]
  18. WuJ. ZhangL. HuangF. JiX. DaiH. WuW. Surface enhanced Raman scattering substrate for the detection of explosives: Construction strategy and dimensional effect.J. Hazard. Mater.202038712171410.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121714 31818672
     [Google Scholar]
  19. EnsikatH.J. Ditsche-KuruP. NeinhuisC. BarthlottW. Superhydrophobicity in perfection: The outstanding properties of the lotus leaf.Beilstein J. Nanotechnol.20112115216110.3762/bjnano.2.19 21977427
     [Google Scholar]
  20. LewisR.V. Spider silk: Ancient ideas for new biomaterials.Chem. Rev.200610693762377410.1021/cr010194g 16967919
     [Google Scholar]
  21. KongT. LuoG. ZhaoY. LiuZ. Bioinspired superwettability micro/nanoarchitectures: Fabrications and applications.Adv. Funct. Mater.20192911180801210.1002/adfm.201808012
     [Google Scholar]
  22. HuangJ.A. ZhangY.L. ZhaoY. ZhangX.L. SunM.L. ZhangW. Superhydrophobic SERS chip based on a Ag coated natural taro-leaf.Nanoscale2016822114871149310.1039/C6NR03285K 27199255
     [Google Scholar]
  23. WangL. QiangZ. Numerical characterization of surface structures of slippery zone in Nepenthes alata pitchers and its mechanism of reducing locust’s attachment.Adv. Nat. Sci.20103215216010.3968/j.ans.1715787020100302.017
     [Google Scholar]
  24. YaoL. DaiP. OuyangL. ZhuL. A sensitive and reproducible SERS sensor based on natural lotus leaf for paraquat detection.Microchem. J.202116010572810.1016/j.microc.2020.105728
     [Google Scholar]
  25. ShiG. WangM. ZhuY. WangY. XuH. A novel natural SERS system for crystal violet detection based on graphene oxide wrapped Ag micro-islands substrate fabricated from Lotus leaf as a template.Appl. Surf. Sci.201845980281110.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.065
     [Google Scholar]
  26. ZhuZ. ShiX. FengY. HeM. YeC. ZhouH. ZhangM. ZhangW. LiJ. JiangC. Lotus leaf mastoid inspired Ag micro/nanoarrays on PDMS film as flexible SERS sensor for in-situ analysis of pesticide residues on nonplanar surfaces.Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.202328812221110.1016/j.saa.2022.122211 36502762
     [Google Scholar]
  27. ZhuangS. ChengJ. ChenS. LiY. DingD. YuZ. XieY. Lotus leaf-inspired biomimetic SERS substrate for detection of thiram on apple.Food Biosci.20245810381810.1016/j.fbio.2024.103818
     [Google Scholar]
  28. XuB.B. ZhangY.L. ZhangW.Y. LiuX.Q. WangJ.N. ZhangX.L. ZhangD.D. JiangH.B. ZhangR. SunH.B. Silver‐coated rose petal: Green, facile, low‐cost and sustainable fabrication of a SERS substrate with unique superhydrophobicity and high efficiency.Adv. Opt. Mater.201311566010.1002/adom.201200019
     [Google Scholar]
  29. ChouS.Y. YuC.C. YenY.T. LinK.T. ChenH.L. SuW.F. Romantic Story or Raman Scattering? Rose petals as ecofriendly, low-cost substrates for ultrasensitive surface-enhanced raman scattering.Anal. Chem.201587126017602410.1021/acs.analchem.5b00551 26043267
     [Google Scholar]
  30. ZhangC. ChenS. WangJ. ShiZ. DuL. Reproducible flexible SERS substrates inspired by bionic micro‐nano hierarchical structures of rose petals.Adv. Mater. Interfaces2022913210246810.1002/admi.202102468
     [Google Scholar]
  31. SammiH. SardanaN. Reusable, flexible, facile, and economical SERS substrates based on rose petal replicas for pesticide detection.Sens. Actuators A Phys.202336211463810.1016/j.sna.2023.114638
     [Google Scholar]
  32. KumarP. KhoslaR. SoniM. DevaD. SharmaS.K. A highly sensitive, flexible SERS sensor for malachite green detection based on Ag decorated microstructured PDMS substrate fabricated from Taro leaf as template.Sens. Actuators B Chem.201724647748610.1016/j.snb.2017.01.202
     [Google Scholar]
  33. YangF. ZhangH. FengH. DongJ. WangC. LiuQ. Bionic SERS chip with super-hydrophobic and plasmonic micro/nano dual structure.Photon. Res.201862778310.1364/PRJ.6.000077
     [Google Scholar]
  34. YangS. DaiX. StoginB.B. WongT.S. Ultrasensitive surface-enhanced Raman scattering detection in common fluids.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA2016113226827310.1073/pnas.1518980113 26719413
     [Google Scholar]
  35. LinY.T. WuC.H. SyuW.L. HoP.C. TsengZ.L. YangM.C. LinC.C. ChenC.C. ChenC.C. LiuT.Y. Replica of bionic nepenthes peristome-like and anti-fouling structures for self-driving water and raman-enhancing detection.Polymers (Basel)20221412246510.3390/polym14122465 35746042
     [Google Scholar]
  36. HuangJ. ChenF. ZhangQ. ZhanY. MaD. XuK. ZhaoY. 3D silver nanoparticles decorated zinc oxide/silicon heterostructured nanomace arrays as high-performance surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces20157105725573510.1021/am507857x 25731067
     [Google Scholar]
  37. HuangJ. MaD. ChenF. BaiM. XuK. ZhaoY. Ag nanoparticles decorated cactus-Like Ag Dendrites/Si nanoneedles as highly efficient 3D surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates toward sensitive sensing.Anal. Chem.20158720105271053410.1021/acs.analchem.5b02788 26406111
     [Google Scholar]
  38. LiH. YangQ. HouJ. LiY. LiM. SongY. Bioinspired Micropatterned Superhydrophilic Au‐Areoles for Surface‐Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Trace Detection.Adv. Funct. Mater.20182821180044810.1002/adfm.201800448
     [Google Scholar]
  39. ChenW. LiC. YuZ. SongY. ZhangX. NiD. ZhangD. LiangP. Optimum synthesis of cactus-inspired SERS substrate with high roughness for paraquat detection.Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.202226812070310.1016/j.saa.2021.120703 34896679
     [Google Scholar]
  40. LuY. BiZ. ShangG. Facile Method to Fabricate Cactus-like Ag NPs/CuO/Cu 2 O Nanocomposites for Recyclable SERS Detection of Trace Carbendazim Residues.ACS Appl. Nano Mater.2022512178061781810.1021/acsanm.2c03769
     [Google Scholar]
  41. SharmaV. KrishnanV. Fabrication of highly sensitive biomimetic SERS substrates for detection of herbicides in trace concentration.Sens. Actuators B Chem.201826271071910.1016/j.snb.2018.01.230
     [Google Scholar]
  42. SharmaV. KumarS. JaiswalA. KrishnanV. Gold deposited plant leaves for SERS: Role of surface morphology, wettability and deposition technique in determining the enhancement factor and sensitivity of detection.ChemistrySelect20172116517410.1002/slct.201601451
     [Google Scholar]
  43. LiJ. YanH. TanX. LuZ. HanH. Cauliflower-Inspired 3D SERS Substrate for Multiple Mycotoxins Detection.Anal. Chem.20199163885389210.1021/acs.analchem.8b04622 30793591
     [Google Scholar]
  44. GuoL. CaoH. CaoL. YangY. WangM. SERS study of wheat leaves substrates with two different structures.Opt. Commun.202251012792110.1016/j.optcom.2022.127921
     [Google Scholar]
  45. JinB. HeJ. LiJ. ZhangY. Lotus Seedpod Inspired SERS Substrates: A Novel Platform Consisting of 3D Sub‐10 nm Annular Hot Spots for Ultrasensitive SERS Detection.Adv. Opt. Mater.2018613180005610.1002/adom.201800056
     [Google Scholar]
  46. WangY. ZhangM. FengL. DongB. XuT. LiD. JiangL. ChiL. Tape‐Imprinted Hierarchical Lotus Seedpod‐Like Arrays for Extraordinary Surface‐Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy.Small20191519180452710.1002/smll.201804527 30957406
     [Google Scholar]
  47. OomenP.E. MulderJ.P.S.H. VerpoorteE. OleschukR.D. Controlled, synchronized actuation of microdroplets by gravity in a superhydrophobic, 3D-printed device.Anal. Chim. Acta2017988505710.1016/j.aca.2017.08.010 28916103
     [Google Scholar]
  48. ZhangQ.X. ChenY.X. GuoZ. LiuH.L. WangD.P. HuangX.J. Bioinspired multifunctional hetero-hierarchical micro/nanostructure tetragonal array with self-cleaning, anticorrosion, and concentrators for the SERS detection.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces2013521106331064210.1021/am403534z 24080041
     [Google Scholar]
  49. LawJ.B.K. NgA.M.H. HeA.Y. LowH.Y. Bioinspired ultrahigh water pinning nanostructures.Langmuir201430132533110.1021/la4034996 24358957
     [Google Scholar]
  50. LiL. ChinW.S. Rapid Fabrication of a Flexible and Transparent Ag Nanocubes@PDMS Film as a SERS Substrate with High Performance.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces20201233375383754810.1021/acsami.0c07178 32701289
     [Google Scholar]
  51. MaX. XieJ. WangZ. ZhangY. Transparent and flexible AuNSs/PDMS-based SERS substrates for in-situ detection of pesticide residues.Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.2022267Pt 212054210.1016/j.saa.2021.120542 34749261
     [Google Scholar]
  52. WangY. ChenC. LuJ. LiuJ. ZhaiJ. ZhaoH. LuN. Fabrication of rose-petal-like flexible substrate for rapid sampling and in-situ Raman detection.Sens. Actuators B Chem.202440213508710.1016/j.snb.2023.135087
     [Google Scholar]
  53. KumarM. BhardwajR. Wetting characteristics of Colocasia esculenta (Taro) leaf and a bioinspired surface thereof.Sci. Rep.202010193510.1038/s41598‑020‑57410‑2 31969578
     [Google Scholar]
  54. ChenH. ZhangP. ZhangL. LiuH. JiangY. ZhangD. HanZ. JiangL. Continuous directional water transport on the peristome surface of Nepenthes alata.Nature20165327597858910.1038/nature17189 27078568
     [Google Scholar]
  55. BaiF. DongJ. QuJ. ZhangZ. Construction of flexible, transparent and mechanically robust SERS-active substrate with an efficient spin coating method for rapid in-situ target molecules detection.Nanotechnology2021323838550110.1088/1361‑6528/ac09ab 34107456
     [Google Scholar]
  56. WangK. SunD.W. PuH. WeiQ. Polymer multilayers enabled stable and flexible Au@Ag nanoparticle array for nondestructive SERS detection of pesticide residues.Talanta2021223Pt 212178210.1016/j.talanta.2020.121782 33298287
     [Google Scholar]
  57. WangY. WangZ. ChenC. LiuJ. LuJ. LuN. Fabrication of flexible pyramid array as SERS substrate for direct sampling and reproducible detection.Anal. Chem.20239538141841419110.1021/acs.analchem.3c01455 37721016
     [Google Scholar]
  58. XuQ. WanY. HuT.S. LiuT.X. TaoD. NiewiarowskiP.H. TianY. LiuY. DaiL. YangY. XiaZ. Robust self-cleaning and micromanipulation capabilities of gecko spatulae and their bio-mimics.Nat. Commun.201561894910.1038/ncomms9949 26584513
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Available from https://www.nisenet.org/catalog/scientific-image-sem-image-blue-morpho-butterfly-wing
  60. SongZ. TongJ. PflegingW. SunJ. A review: Learning from the flight of beetles.Comput. Biol. Med.202113310439710.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104397 33895456
     [Google Scholar]
  61. XieG. ZhangG. LinF. ZhangJ. LiuZ. MuS. The fabrication of subwavelength anti-reflective nanostructures using a bio-template.Nanotechnology200819909560510.1088/0957‑4484/19/9/095605 21817680
     [Google Scholar]
  62. LoveraP. CreedonN. AlatawiH. O’RiordanA. Metal capped polystyrene nanotubes arrays as super-hydrophobic substrates for SERS applications.Nanotechnology20142517175502
     [Google Scholar]
  63. WangP. WuL. LuZ. LiQ. YinW. DingF. HanH. Gecko-inspired nanotentacle surface-enhanced raman spectroscopy substrate for sampling and reliable detection of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables.Anal. Chem.20178942424243110.1021/acs.analchem.6b04324 28194954
     [Google Scholar]
  64. MuZ. ZhaoX. XieZ. ZhaoY. ZhongQ. BoL. GuZ. In situ synthesis of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in butterfly wings for surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS).J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med.20131111607161310.1039/c3tb00500c 32260723
     [Google Scholar]
  65. TanY. GuJ. ZangX. XuW. ShiK. XuL. ZhangD. Versatile fabrication of intact three-dimensional metallic butterfly wing scales with hierarchical sub-micrometer structures.Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.201150368307831110.1002/anie.201103505 21780267
     [Google Scholar]
  66. ZhangM. MengJ. WangD. TangQ. ChenT. RongS. LiuJ. WuY. Biomimetic synthesis of hierarchical 3D Ag butterfly wing scale arrays/graphene composites as ultrasensitive SERS substrates for efficient trace chemical detection.J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. Opt. Electron. Devices2018681933194310.1039/C7TC03922K
     [Google Scholar]
  67. GarrettN.L. SekineR. DixonM.W.A. TilleyL. BamberyK.R. WoodB.R. Bio-sensing with butterfly wings: Naturally occurring nano-structures for SERS-based malaria parasite detection.Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.20151733211642116810.1039/C4CP04930F 25491490
     [Google Scholar]
  68. TanY. GuJ. XuW. ChenZ. LiuD. LiuQ. ZhangD. Reduction of CuO butterfly wing scales generates Cu SERS substrates for DNA base detection.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces20135209878988210.1021/am402699c 24080166
     [Google Scholar]
  69. SongG. ZhouH. GuJ. LiuQ. ZhangW. SuH. SuY. YaoQ. ZhangD. Tumor marker detection using surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy on 3D Au butterfly wings.J. Mater. Chem. B Mater. Biol. Med.2017581594160010.1039/C6TB03026B 32263931
     [Google Scholar]
  70. YangW. LiZ. LuZ. YuJ. HuoY. ManB. PanJ. SiH. JiangS. ZhangC. Graphene-Ag nanoparticles-cicada wings hybrid system for obvious SERS performance and DNA molecular detection.Opt. Express20192733000301310.1364/OE.27.003000 30732328
     [Google Scholar]
  71. ShiG. WangM. ZhuY. WangY. MaW. Synthesis of flexible and stable SERS substrate based on Au nanofilms/cicada wing array for rapid detection of pesticide residues.Opt. Commun.2018425495710.1016/j.optcom.2018.04.065
     [Google Scholar]
  72. LiX. LiH. ZhaoK. WangH. ZhangZ. HuangL. NiuH. YangZ. WangC. Biomimetic flexible SERS substrates replicated from cicada wings for portable in situ detection.Opt. Mater.202414911480110.1016/j.optmat.2023.114801
     [Google Scholar]
  73. JiweiQ. YudongL. MingY. QiangW. ZongqiangC. WudengW. WenqiangL. XuanyiY. JingjunX. QianS. Large-area high-performance SERS substrates with deep controllable sub-10-nm gap structure fabricated by depositing Au film on the cicada wing.Nanoscale Res. Lett.20138143710.1186/1556‑276X‑8‑437 24148212
     [Google Scholar]
  74. NairS. Gomez-CruzJ. AscanioG. DocoslisA. SabatR.G. EscobedoC. Cicada wing inspired template-stripped SERS active 3D metallic nanostructures for the detection of toxic substances.Sensors (Basel)2021215169910.3390/s21051699 33801222
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Thanh NguyenD. Phuong NguyenL. Duc LuuP. Quoc VuT. Quynh NguyenH. Phat DaoT. Nhut PhamT. Quoc TranT. Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) from low-cost silver nanoparticle-decorated cicada wing substrates for rapid detection of difenoconazole in potato.Spectrochim. Acta A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc.202227512111710.1016/j.saa.2022.121117 35364411
     [Google Scholar]
  76. YanX. WangY. ShiG. WangM. ZhangJ. SunX. XuH. Flower-like Cu nanoislands decorated onto the cicada wing as SERS substrates for the rapid detection of crystal violet.Optik (Stuttg.)201817281282110.1016/j.ijleo.2018.07.088
     [Google Scholar]
  77. KumariN. SoodN. KrishnanV. Beetle wing inspired fabrication of nanojunction based biomimetic SERS substrates for sensitive detection of analytes.Mater. Technol.202237211212310.1080/10667857.2020.1816382
     [Google Scholar]
  78. LuC.H. ChengM.R. ChenS. SyuW.L. ChienM.Y. WangK.S. ChenJ.S. LeeP.H. LiuT.Y. Flexible PDMS-Based SERS substrates replicated from beetle wings for water pollutant detection.Polymers (Basel)202215119110.3390/polym15010191 36616540
     [Google Scholar]
  79. WangM. ShiG. ZhuY. WangY. MaW. Au-decorated dragonfly wing bioscaffold arrays as flexible surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrate for simultaneous determination of pesticide residues.Nanomaterials (Basel)20188528910.3390/nano8050289 29710795
     [Google Scholar]
  80. ShiG.C. WangM.L. ZhuY.Y. ShenL. MaW.L. WangY.H. LiR.F. Dragonfly wing decorated by gold nanoislands as flexible and stable substrates for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS).Sci. Rep.201881691610.1038/s41598‑018‑25228‑8 29720685
     [Google Scholar]
  81. WeiY. ZhuY. WangM. A facile surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy detection of pesticide residues with Au nanoparticles/dragonfly wing arrays.Optik (Stuttg.)201612722107351073910.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.118
     [Google Scholar]
  82. WangY. WangM. ShenL. SunX. ShiG. MaW. YanX. High-performance flexible surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates fabricated by depositing Ag nanoislands on the dragonfly wing.Appl. Surf. Sci.201843639139710.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.212
     [Google Scholar]
  83. YangJ. PetrescuF.I.T. LiY. SongD. ShiG. A novel bio-inspired Ag/3D-TiO2/Si SERS substrate with ordered moth-like structure.Nanomaterials (Basel)20221218312710.3390/nano12183127 36144914
     [Google Scholar]
  84. ZhangZ. YuW. WangJ. LuoD. QiaoX. QinX. WangT. Ultrasensitive Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Sensor of Gaseous Aldehydes as Biomarkers of Lung Cancer on Dendritic Ag Nanocrystals.Anal. Chem.20178931416142010.1021/acs.analchem.6b05117 28208308
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Evidence for van der Waals adhesion in gecko setae.Nature2002
     [Google Scholar]
  86. LoveraP. CreedonN. AlatawiH. MitchellM. BurkeM. QuinnA.J. O’RiordanA. Low-cost silver capped polystyrene nanotube arrays as super-hydrophobic substrates for SERS applications.Nanotechnology2014251717550210.1088/0957‑4484/25/17/175502 24717806
     [Google Scholar]
  87. GhiradellaH. RadiganW. Development of butterfly scales. II. Struts, lattices and surface tension.J. Morphol.1976150227929710.1002/jmor.1051500202 30257531
     [Google Scholar]
  88. NguyenS. WebbH. MahonP. CrawfordR. IvanovaE. Natural insect and plant micro-/nanostructsured surfaces: An excellent selection of valuable templates with superhydrophobic and self-cleaning properties.Molecules2014199136141363010.3390/molecules190913614 25185068
     [Google Scholar]
  89. DellieuL. SarrazinM. SimonisP. DeparisO. VigneronJ.P. A two-in-one superhydrophobic and anti-reflective nanodevice in the grey cicada Cicada orni (Hemiptera).J. Appl. Phys.2014116202470110.1063/1.4889849
     [Google Scholar]
  90. StoddartP.R. CaduschP.J. BoyceT.M. ErasmusR.M. CominsJ.D. Optical properties of chitin: Surface-enhanced Raman scattering substrates based on antireflection structures on cicada wings.Nanotechnology200617368068610.1088/0957‑4484/17/3/011
     [Google Scholar]
  91. ClaphamP.B. HutleyM.C. Reduction of Lens Reflexion by the “Moth Eye” Principle.Nature1973244541428128210.1038/244281a0
     [Google Scholar]
  92. LiF. WangQ. Fabrication of nanoarchitectures templated by virus-based nanoparticles: Strategies and applications.Small201410223024510.1002/smll.201301393 23996911
     [Google Scholar]
  93. KohE.H. MunC. KimC. ParkS.G. ChoiE.J. KimS.H. DangJ. ChooJ. OhJ.W. KimD.H. JungH.S. M13 bacteriophage/silver nanowire surface-enhanced Raman scattering sensor for sensitive and selective pesticide detection.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces20181012103881039710.1021/acsami.8b01470 29505228
     [Google Scholar]
  94. BiL. ZhangH. HuW. ChenJ. WuY. ChenH. LiB. ZhangZ. ChooJ. ChenL. Self-assembly of Au@AgNR along M13 framework: A SERS nanocarrier for bacterial detection and killing.Biosens. Bioelectron.202323711551910.1016/j.bios.2023.115519 37437455
     [Google Scholar]
  95. NguyenA.H. ShinY. SimS.J. Development of SERS substrate using phage-based magnetic template for triplex assay in sepsis diagnosis.Biosens. Bioelectron.20168552252810.1016/j.bios.2016.05.043 27209579
     [Google Scholar]
  96. MoonJ.I. ChoiE.J. JoungY. OhJ.W. JooS.W. ChooJ. Development of highly sensitive plasmonic biosensors encoded with gold nanoparticles on M13 bacteriophage networks.Sens. Actuators B Chem.202440013491610.1016/j.snb.2023.134916
     [Google Scholar]
  97. WangX.Y. YangJ.Y. WangY.T. ZhangH.C. ChenM.L. YangT. WangJ.H. M13 phage-based nanoprobe for SERS detection and inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus.Talanta202122112166810.1016/j.talanta.2020.121668 33076174
     [Google Scholar]
  98. NguyenH.A. JupinI. DecorseP. Lau-TruongS. AmmarS. Ha-DuongN.T. Assembly of gold nanoparticles using turnip yellow mosaic virus as an in-solution SERS sensor.RSC Advances2019955322963230710.1039/C9RA08015E 35530810
     [Google Scholar]
  99. LiK. ChenY. LiS. NguyenH.G. NiuZ. YouS. MelloC.M. LuX. WangQ. Chemical modification of M13 bacteriophage and its application in cancer cell imaging.Bioconjug. Chem.20102171369137710.1021/bc900405q 20499838
     [Google Scholar]
  100. HanX.X. JiW. ZhaoB. OzakiY. Semiconductor-enhanced Raman scattering: Active nanomaterials and applications.Nanoscale20179154847486110.1039/C6NR08693D 28150834
     [Google Scholar]
  101. TanL. CaoY. YanJ. MaoK. LiuL. WangX. YeW. HarrisR.A. ZhangH. TiO2 nanorod arrays@PDA/Ag with biomimetic polydopamine as binary mediators for duplex SERS detection of illegal food dyes.Anal. Chim. Acta2024128734204710.1016/j.aca.2023.342047 38182363
     [Google Scholar]
  102. BodenS.A. BagnallD.M. Moth-eye antireflective structures. In: Encyclopedia of Nanotechnology. BhushanB. DordrechtSpringer Netherlands201214671477
     [Google Scholar]
  103. ZangS. LiuH. WangQ. YangJ. PangZ. LiuK. CaiS. RenX. Facile fabrication of Au nanoworms covered polyethylene terephthalate (PET) film: Towards flexible SERS substrates.Mater. Lett.202129412964310.1016/j.matlet.2021.129643
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Riswana BarveenN. WangT.J. ChangY.H. Photochemical synthesis of Au nanostars on PMMA films by ethanol action as flexible SERS substrates for in-situ detection of antibiotics on curved surfaces.Chem. Eng. J.202243113424010.1016/j.cej.2021.134240
     [Google Scholar]
  105. LiP. LiP. TanX. WangJ. ZhangY. HanH. YangL. Assembling PVP-Au NPs as portable chip for sensitive detection of cyanide with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy.Anal. Bioanal. Chem.2020412122863287110.1007/s00216‑020‑02517‑8 32112131
     [Google Scholar]
  106. LiY. ZhuJ. MaY. LiY. ShaoJ. LiH. High transparent Ag NPs/PVC SERS membrane combined with molecular imprinting technology for selective detection of norfloxacin.J. Environ. Chem. Eng.202210610891610.1016/j.jece.2022.108916
     [Google Scholar]
  107. SunJ. ZhangZ. LiuC. DaiX. ZhouW. JiangK. ZhangT. YinJ. GaoJ. YinH. LiH. Continuous in situ portable SERS analysis of pollutants in water and air by a highly sensitive gold nanoparticle-decorated PVDF substrate.Anal. Bioanal. Chem.2021413215469548210.1007/s00216‑021‑03531‑0 34312691
     [Google Scholar]
  108. GaoR. SongX. ZhanC. WengC. ChengS. GuoK. MaN. ChangH. GuoZ. LuoL.B. YuL. Light trapping induced flexible wrinkled nanocone SERS substrate for highly sensitive explosive detection.Sens. Actuators B Chem.202031412808110.1016/j.snb.2020.128081
     [Google Scholar]
  109. KalachyovaY. ErzinaM. PostnikovP. SvorcikV. LyutakovO. Flexible SERS substrate for portable Raman analysis of biosamples.Appl. Surf. Sci.2018458959910.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.073
     [Google Scholar]
  110. JiaoL. FanB. XianX. WuZ. ZhangJ. LiuZ. Creation of nanostructures with poly(methyl methacrylate)-mediated nanotransfer printing.J. Am. Chem. Soc.200813038126121261310.1021/ja805070b 18763767
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Abu HatabN.A. OranJ.M. SepaniakM.J. Surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy substrates created via electron beam lithography and nanotransfer printing.ACS Nano20082237738510.1021/nn7003487 19206640
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cac/10.2174/0115734110331157241003103106
Loading
Fabrication of Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering (SERS) Substrates in Analytical Science by Natural-inspired Materials: A Review
Current Analytical Chemistry 22, 13 (2026); https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734110331157241003103106
/content/journals/cac/10.2174/0115734110331157241003103106
/content/journals/cac/10.2174/0115734110331157241003103106
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keyword(s): analytical science; micro/nanostructures; natural-inspired materials; spectroscopy; substrates; Surface-enhanced raman scattering (SERS)

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test