Skip to content
2000
image of Study of Physical Mechanical Characteristics, Economic Viability, and Carbon Emission Impacts of Recycled Aggregate

Abstract

Introduction

Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) constitutes a major portion of solid waste and presents a significant environmental challenge. This study aims to evaluate the transformation of CDW into a Recycled Aggregate (RA) as a sustainable strategy to mitigate environmental pollution.

Method

The research assesses the mechanical properties and economic benefits of RA concrete, which is made by substituting natural aggregate with RA.

Result

Results indicate that RA has lower density, higher water absorption, and reduced crushing strength compared to natural aggregates. However, RA concrete achieves optimal strength with a 40% replacement rate, marking a critical threshold for material efficiency. An economic analysis confirms the financial viability of using recycled concrete, indicating a favorable investment return. Advances in the research and application of RA suggest its expanding role in engineering applications.

Conclusion

A lifecycle assessment of carbon emissions from concrete production to site transportation was conducted. It revealed that the primary source of emissions in recycled concrete is the raw materials, accounting for about 85% of total emissions. This finding underscores the need to optimize raw material usage to enhance the sustainability of recycled concrete.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cac/10.2174/0115734110327991240925112522
2024-10-08
2024-11-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Panizza M. Natali M. Garbin E. Ducman V. Tamburini S. Optimization and mechanical-physical characterization of geopolymers with Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW) aggregates for construction products. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020 264 120158 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120158
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang J. Wei J. Liu Z. Huang C. Du X. Life cycle assessment of building demolition waste based on building information modeling. Resour. Conserv. Recycling 2022 178 106095 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106095
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Deng Z. Utilisation of steel fibres to reinforce waste glass concrete: Alkali–silica reaction, engineering properties, and 3D mesoscale modelling. Case Studies in Construction Materials 2022 17 e01686 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01686
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Deng Z. Yang Z. Pan X. Synergetic effects of recycled crumb rubber and glass cullet on the engineering properties of geopolymer mortar. Cement Concr. Compos. 2023 137 104907 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2022.104907
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Deng Z. Utilization of lithium nitrate to mitigate alkali–silica reaction of architectural glass mortar: Characteristics and mechanisms. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022 315 125433 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125433
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Deng Z. Influence of recycled rubber and glass aggregates on magnesium sulfate resistance of geopolymers: Physio-mechanical properties and mechanisms. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024 438 137134 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137134
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Deng Z. Zhang S. Deng Z. PVA fiber-reinforced geopolymer mortar made with hybrid recycled aggregates: Toward thermal insulation, lightweight and improved durability. J. Clean. Prod. 2023 426 139200 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139200
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Deng Z. Yang Z. Bian J. Pan X. Wu G. Guo F. Fu R. Yan H. Deng Z. Chen S. Engineering properties of PVA fibre-reinforced geopolymer mortar containing waste oyster shells. Materials (Basel) 2022 15 19 7013 10.3390/ma15197013 36234356
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang K. Qing Y. Umer Q. Asmi F. How construction and demolition waste management has addressed sustainable development goals: Exploring academic and industrial trends. J. Environ. Manage. 2023 345 118823 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118823 37673005
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis P. Aziz F. Newaz M.T. Sher W. Simon L. The classification of construction waste material using a deep convolutional neural network. Autom. Construct. 2021 122 103481 10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103481
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gao Q. Li X. Jiang S. Lyu X. Gao X. Zhu X. Zhang Y. Review on zero waste strategy for urban construction and demolition waste: Full component resource utilization approach for sustainable and low-carbon. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023 395 132354 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132354
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang L.W. Sojobi A.O. Kodur V.K.R. Liew K.M. Effective utilization and recycling of mixed recycled aggregates for a greener environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 236 117600 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.07.075
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bai G. Zhu C. Liu C. Liu B. An evaluation of the recycled aggregate characteristics and the recycled aggregate concrete mechanical properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020 240 117978 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117978
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Oikonomopoulou K. Ioannou S. Savva P. Spanou M. Nicolaides D. Petrou M.F. Effect of mechanically treated recycled aggregates on the long term mechanical properties and durability of concrete. Materials (Basel) 2022 15 8 2871 10.3390/ma15082871 35454564
    [Google Scholar]
  15. de Andrade Salgado F. de Andrade Silva F. Recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste towards an application on structural concrete: A review. J. Build. Eng. 2022 52 104452 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104452
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Ma W. Wang Y. Huang L. Yan L. Kasal B. Natural and recycled aggregate concrete containing rice husk ash as replacement of cement: Mechanical properties, microstructure, strength model and statistical analysis. J. Build. Eng. 2023 66 105917 10.1016/j.jobe.2023.105917
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bocken N. Strupeit L. Whalen K. Nußholz J. A review and evaluation of circular business model innovation tools. Sustainability (Basel) 2019 11 8 2210 10.3390/su11082210
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhu J. Fan C. Shi H. Shi L. Efforts for a circular economy in China: A comprehensive review of policies. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019 23 1 110 118 10.1111/jiec.12754
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Visintin P. Xie T. Bennett B. A large-scale life-cycle assessment of recycled aggregate concrete: The influence of functional unit, emissions allocation and carbon dioxide uptake. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 248 119243 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119243
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Orsini F. Marrone P. Approaches for a low-carbon production of building materials: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 241 118380 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118380
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang B. Yan L. Fu Q. Kasal B. A comprehensive review on recycled aggregate and recycled aggregate concrete. Resour. Conserv. Recycling 2021 171 105565 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105565
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhang J. Ding L. Li F. Peng J. Recycled aggregates from construction and demolition wastes as alternative filling materials for highway subgrades in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 255 120223 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120223
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Yang W. Liu L. Wu W. Zhang K. Xiong X. Li C. Huang Y. Zhang X. Zhou H. A review of the mechanical properties and durability of basalt fiber recycled concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2024 412 134882 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.134882
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Ouyang X. Wang L. Xu S. Ma Y. Ye G. Surface characterization of carbonated recycled concrete fines and its effect on the rheology, hydration and strength development of cement paste. Cement Concr. Compos. 2020 114 103809 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2020.103809
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Qu F. Li W. Dong W. Tam V.W.Y. Yu T. Durability deterioration of concrete under marine environment from material to structure: A critical review. J. Build. Eng. 2021 35 102074 10.1016/j.jobe.2020.102074
    [Google Scholar]
  26. GB 175-2007 Common Portland Cement Standards Press of China Beijing, China 2007
    [Google Scholar]
  27. GB/T50081-2019; Standard for Test Methods of Concrete Physical and Mechanical Properties Quality Supervision Inspection and Quarantine of the People’s Republic of China and Standardization Administration of the People’s Republic China Beijing, China 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Prakash S. Wijayasundara M. Pathirana P.N. Law K. De-risking resource recovery value chains for a circular economy – Accounting for supply and demand variations in recycled aggregate concrete. Resour. Conserv. Recycling 2021 168 105312 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105312
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Mickovski S.B. Buss K. McKenzie B.M. Sökmener B. Laboratory study on the potential use of recycled inert construction waste material in the substrate mix for extensive green roofs. Ecol. Eng. 2013 61 706 714 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.02.015
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen X. Capiau L. Reynaert I. Zheng K. Gruyaert E. Li J. Comparative study on modelling concrete properties using physical and mechanical properties of recycled coarse aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022 345 128249 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128249
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Elansary A.A. Ashmawy M.M. Abdalla H.A. Effect of recycled coarse aggregate on physical and mechanical properties of concrete. Adv. Struct. Eng. 2021 24 3 583 595 10.1177/1369433220963792
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang W. Liu Y. Jiang L. Zhao L. Li Z. Effect of physical properties of recycled coarse aggregate on the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate thermal insulation concrete (RATIC). Constr. Build. Mater. 2018 180 229 238 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.232
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Omary S. Ghorbel E. Wardeh G. Relationships between recycled concrete aggregates characteristics and recycled aggregates concretes properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016 108 163 174 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.042
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Zerbst U. Ainsworth R.A. Beier H.T. Pisarski H. Zhang Z.L. Nikbin K. Nitschke-Pagel T. Münstermann S. Kucharczyk P. Klingbeil D. Review on fracture and crack propagation in weldments – A fracture mechanics perspective. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2014 132 200 276 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.05.012
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhu X.K. Joyce J.A. Review of fracture toughness (G, K, J, CTOD, CTOA) testing and standardization. Eng. Fract. Mech. 2012 85 1 46 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.02.001
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Itani L. Liu Y. Zhang W. Bozhilov K.N. Delmotte L. Valtchev V. Investigation of the physicochemical changes preceding zeolite nucleation in a sodium-rich aluminosilicate gel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009 131 29 10127 10139 10.1021/ja902088f 19572709
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhou C. Sun T. Gao Q. Alshameri A. Zhu P. Wang H. Qiu X. Ma Y. Yan C. Synthesis and characterization of ordered mesoporous aluminosilicate molecular sieve from natural halloysite. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2014 45 3 1073 1079 10.1016/j.jtice.2013.09.030
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Gholampour A. Ho V.D. Ozbakkaloglu T. Ambient-cured geopolymer mortars prepared with waste-based sands: Mechanical and durability-related properties and microstructure. Compos., Part B Eng. 2019 160 519 534 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.057
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/cac/10.2174/0115734110327991240925112522
Loading
/content/journals/cac/10.2174/0115734110327991240925112522
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test