Skip to content
2000
Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2210-3279
  • E-ISSN: 2210-3287

Abstract

Aim

To address the vulnerability of Multi-Hop Wireless Network Systems (MHWNs) to jamming attacks and propose an effective solution to maintain communication integrity and Quality of Service (QoS).

Background

In MHWNs, the open-access nature makes them susceptible to jamming attacks, which disrupt communication by interfering with authenticated nodes in the wireless medium. Existing methods primarily focus on tracking and countering jammers but lack effectiveness in preventing communication disruptions.

Objective

The objective of this study is to introduce a novel algorithm, Optimized Transmission Mechanism (OTM), to mitigate the impact of jamming attacks on MHWNs. OTM aims to optimize node handover and packet routing to bypass jammed areas, ensuring uninterrupted packet transmission and preserving QoS.

Methods

The proposed OTM algorithm determines the optimal transmission route based on radio transmitter location and connection quality. It prioritizes routes with the highest connection quality to maintain QoS even in jammed conditions. Additionally, it incorporates mechanisms for packet redirection away from jammed areas to ensure successful transmission.

Results

Evaluation of the Extended Optimized Transmission Mechanism (EOTM) demonstrates significant improvements in packet delivery performance compared to existing algorithms. The enhanced algorithm effectively mitigates the impact of jamming attacks, ensuring reliable communication and preserving QoS in MHWNs.

Conclusion

The proposed OTM algorithm presents a promising approach to counter-jamming attacks in MHWNs by dynamically routing packets to avoid jammed areas and maintain communication integrity. The results highlight the effectiveness of EOTM in improving packet delivery performance and ensuring uninterrupted communication in the face of jamming threats.

© 2025 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279296253240919060429
2024-12-26
2025-07-25

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279296253240919060429
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. WangT. WeiX. HuF. FanJ. Mobile jammer localization and tracking in multi-hop wireless network.J. Ambient Intell. Humaniz. Comput.20181521239125010.1007/s12652‑018‑0708‑4
     [Google Scholar]
  2. HeS. LiQ. KhisheM. Salih MohammedA. MohammadiH. MohammadiM. The optimization of nodes clustering and multi-hop routing protocol using hierarchical chimp optimization for sustainable energy efficient underwater wireless sensor networks.Wirel. Netw.202430123325210.1007/s11276‑023‑03464‑9
     [Google Scholar]
  3. WongA.W.L. GohS.L. HasanM.K. FattahS. Multi-hop and mesh for LoRa networks: Recent advancements, issues, and recommended applications.ACM Comput. Surv.202456614310.1145/3638241
     [Google Scholar]
  4. LiuH. YangZ. ZhaoN. GuY. YuenC. Interference-Aware Multi-Hop Routing in UAV Networks: A Harmonic Function-Based Potential Field Approach.IEEE Inter. Things J.202499110.3390/books978‑3‑03928‑606‑5
     [Google Scholar]
  5. ZungeruA.M. AngL.M. SengK.P. Classical and swarm intelligence based routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A survey and comparison.J. Netw. Comput. Appl.20123551508153610.1016/j.jnca.2012.03.004
     [Google Scholar]
  6. LiuH. YangZ. ZhaoN. GuY. YuenC. Interference-Aware Multi-Hop Routing in UAV Networks: A Harmonic Function-Based Potential Field Approach.IEEE Internet Things J.2024
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Chee-Yee Chong KumarS.P. Sensor networks: Evolution, opportunities, and challenges.Proc. IEEE20039181247125610.1109/JPROC.2003.814918
     [Google Scholar]
  8. RaultT. BouabdallahA. ChallalY. Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: A top-down survey.Comput. Netw.20146710412210.1016/j.comnet.2014.03.027
     [Google Scholar]
  9. FaheemM. AbbasM.Z. TunaG. GungorV.C. EDHRP: Energy efficient event driven hybrid routing protocol for densely deployed wireless sensor networks.J. Netw. Comput. Appl.20155830932610.1016/j.jnca.2015.08.002
     [Google Scholar]
  10. FaheemM. GungorV.C. Energy efficient and QoS-aware routing protocol for wireless sensor network-based smart grid applications in the context of industry 4.0.Appl. Soft Comput.20186891092210.1016/j.asoc.2017.07.045
     [Google Scholar]
  11. ShahS.B. ZheC. YinF. KhanI.U. BegumS. FaheemM. KhanF.A. 3D weighted centroid algorithm & RSSI ranging model strategy for node localization in WSN based on smart devices.Sustain Cities Soc.20183929830810.1016/j.scs.2018.02.022
     [Google Scholar]
  12. FadelE. FaheemM. GungorV.C. NassefL. AkkariN. MalikM.G.A. AlmasriS. AkyildizI.F. Spectrum-aware bio-inspired routing in cognitive radio sensor networks for smart grid applications.Comput. Commun.201710110612010.1016/j.comcom.2016.12.020
     [Google Scholar]
  13. FaheemM. Cagri GungorV. Capacity and spectrum-aware communication framework for wireless sensor network-based smart grid applications.Comput. Stand. Interfaces201753485810.1016/j.csi.2017.03.003
     [Google Scholar]
  14. FaheemM. ShahS.B.H. ButtR.A. RazaB. AnwarM. AshrafM.W. NgadiM.A. GungorV.C. Smart grid communication and information technologies in the perspective of Industry 4.0: Opportunities and challenges.Comput. Sci. Rev.20183013010.1016/j.cosrev.2018.08.001
     [Google Scholar]
  15. SaleemM. Di CaroG.A. FarooqM. Swarm intelligence based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks: Survey and future directions.Inf. Sci.2011181204597462410.1016/j.ins.2010.07.005
     [Google Scholar]
  16. ButtyanL. HubauxJ.P. Enforcing service availability in mobile ad-hoc WANs.2000 First Annual Workshop on Mobile and Ad Hoc Networking and Computing.11-11 August 2000, Boston, MA, USA, 2000, pp. 87-96.10.1109/MOBHOC.2000.869216
     [Google Scholar]
  17. MacKenzieA.B. WickerS.B. Game theory in communications: motivation, explanation, and application to power control.GLOBECOM'01. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference (Cat. No.01CH37270)25-29 November 2001, San Antonio, TX, USA, 2001, pp. 821-826.10.1109/GLOCOM.2001.965533
     [Google Scholar]
  18. ZiaM.T. QureshiF.F. ShahS.S. Energy Efficient Cognitive Radio MAC Protocols for Adhoc Network: A Survey.2013 UKSim 15th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation10-12 April 2013, Cambridge, UK, 2013, pp. 140-143.10.1109/UKSim.2013.96
     [Google Scholar]
  19. JoshiG.P. AcharyaS. KimS.W. A MAC protocol for CR-WSN without a dedicated common control channel.Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw.201511398240810.1155/2015/982408
     [Google Scholar]
  20. BonnetP. GehrkeJ. SeshadriP. “Querying the physical world,” IEEE personal.Communications2000751015
     [Google Scholar]
  21. GulO.M. ErkmenA.M. KantarciB. UAV-driven sustainable and quality-aware data collection in robotic wireless sensor networks.Intern.Things J.2022924251502516410.1109/JIOT.2022.3195677
     [Google Scholar]
  22. GulO.M. ErkmenA.M. Energy-Efficient Cluster-Based Data Collection by a UAV with a Limited-Capacity Battery in Robotic Wireless Sensor Networks.Sensors (Basel)20202020586510.3390/s2020586533081344
     [Google Scholar]
  23. JayalakshmiR. BaranidharanB. SanthiB. Attribute based spanning tree construction for data aggregation in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks.Indian J. Sci. Technol.20147is5767910.17485/ijst/2014/v7sp5.18
     [Google Scholar]
  24. ChandrakasanA. AmirtharajahR. Design considerations for distributed microsensor systems.Proceedings of the IEEE 1999 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (Cat. No.99CH36327)19-19 May 1999, San Diego, CA, USA, 1999, pp. 279-286.10.1109/CICC.1999.777291
     [Google Scholar]
  25. YuS. ZhangB. LiC. MouftahH. Routing protocols for wireless sensor networks with mobile sinks: a survey.IEEE Commun. Mag.201452715015710.1109/MCOM.2014.6852097
     [Google Scholar]
  26. YanJ. ZhouM. DingZ. Recent advances in energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A review.IEEE Access201645673568610.1109/ACCESS.2016.2598719
     [Google Scholar]
  27. YetginH. CheungK.T.K. El-HajjarM. HanzoL. A survey of network lifetime maximization techniques in wireless sensor networks.IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor.201719282885410.1109/COMST.2017.2650979
     [Google Scholar]
  28. ZungeruA.M. AngL.M. SengK.P. A formal mathematical framework for modeling and simulation of wireless sensor network environments utilizing the hill-building behavior of termites.Simulation201389558961510.1177/0037549712466706
     [Google Scholar]
  29. MoreA. RaisinghaniV. A survey on energy efficient coverage protocols in wireless sensor networks.Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences201729442844810.1016/j.jksuci.2016.08.001
     [Google Scholar]
  30. EmansB. Additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN).Available from: wikipedia.org/wiki/Additive_white_Gaussian_noise (accessed on 20-8-2024)2012
  31. MorenoR. Robles-GómezA. BermúdezA. CasadoR. SensGrid: modeling and simulation for wireless sensor grids.Simulation201288897298710.1177/0037549711434180
     [Google Scholar]
  32. RawatD.B. ZhaoY. YanG. SongM. CRAVE: Cognitive radio enabled vehicular communications in heterogeneous networks2013 IEEE Radio and Wireless Symposium20-23 January 2013, Austin, TX, USA, 2013, pp. 190-192.10.1109/RWS.2013.6486684
     [Google Scholar]
  33. MitolaJ. MaguireG.Q. Cognitive radio: making software radios more personal.IEEE Personal Commun.1999641318
     [Google Scholar]
  34. YangY. LambertF. DivanD. A survey on technologies for implementing sensor networks for power delivery systems 2007 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting24-28 June 2007, Tampa, FL, USA, 2007, pp. 1-8.10.1109/PES.2007.386289
     [Google Scholar]
  35. MaitraT. RoyS. A comparative study on popular MAC protocols for mixed Wireless Sensor Networks: From implementation viewpoint.Comput. Sci. Rev.20162210713410.1016/j.cosrev.2016.09.004
     [Google Scholar]
  36. AnastasiG. ContiM. Di FrancescoM. PassarellaA. Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: A survey.Ad Hoc Netw.20097353756810.1016/j.adhoc.2008.06.003
     [Google Scholar]
  37. AkyildizI.F. Weilian Su SankarasubramaniamY. CayirciE. A survey on sensor networks.IEEE Commun. Mag.200240810211410.1109/MCOM.2002.1024422
     [Google Scholar]
  38. YeW. HeidemannJ. EstrinD. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks, Proceedings.Twenty-First Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications SocietiesNew York, NY, USA, 2002, pp. 1567-157610.1109/INFCOM.2002.1019408
     [Google Scholar]
  39. PolastreJ. HillJ. CullerD. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networksProceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systemsNovember 3-5, 2004, Baltimore, USA, pp. 95-107.10.1145/1031495.1031508
     [Google Scholar]
  40. LiuZ. LiuH. XuW. ChenY. Wireless jamming localization by exploiting nodes’ hearing rangesInternational Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor SystemsBerlin, Heidelberg, pp. 348-361.10.1007/978‑3‑642‑13651‑1_25
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Friis(accessed on 20-8-2024)2019
  42. JohnsonD.B. MaltzD.A. BrochJ. DSR: The dynamic source routing protocol for multi-hop wireless ad hoc networks.Ad Hoc Netw.200151139172
     [Google Scholar]
  43. RoyerE.M. PerkinsC.E. Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing.Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications25-26 February 1999, New Orleans, LA, USA, 1999, pp. 90-100.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. LeungR. LiuJ. MP-DSR: a QoS-aware multi-path dynamic source routing protocol for wireless ad-hoc networks26th Annual IEEE Conference on Local Computer Networks14-16 November 2001, Tampa, FL, USA, 2001, pp. 132-141.10.1109/LCN.2001.990778
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279296253240919060429
Loading
An Optimized Transmission Mechanism for Mitigating Jamming Attacks in Multi-Hop Wireless Networks
Int J Sensors Wirel Commun Control 15, 117 (2025); https://doi.org/10.2174/0122103279296253240919060429
/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279296253240919060429
/content/journals/swcc/10.2174/0122103279296253240919060429
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keyword(s): communication integrity; denial-of-service (DoS) attacks; HHacket reouting; jamming attacks; Multi-Hop Wireless Networks (MHWNs); node handover; Optimized Transmission Mechanism (OTM); Quality of Service (QoS)

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test