Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Micro and Nanosystems
  4. Fast Track Articles
  5. Fast Track Article
image of A Comprehensive Analysis of Traditional and Advanced Approaches of Image Restoration Techniques

Abstract

Introduction

Tremendous developments in multimedia technology have promoted a massive amount of research in image and video processing. As imaging technologies are rapidly increasing, it is becoming essential to use images in almost every application in our day-to-day life.

Materials and Method

This paper presents a comparative analysis of various image restoration approaches, ranging from fundamental methods to advanced techniques. These approaches aim to improve the quality of images that have been degraded during acquisition or transmission. A brief overview of the image restoration approaches is mentioned in the paper, which are as follows:

Wiener Filter: The Wiener filter is a classical approach used for image restoration. It is a linear filter that minimizes the mean square error between the original image and the restored image. Inverse Filter: The inverse filter is another traditional restoration technique. It attempts to invert the degradation process to recover the original image. However, inverse filtering is highly sensitive to noise and tends to amplify noise artifacts. Linear and Nonlinear Filtering: These methods involve applying linear or nonlinear filters to the degraded image to enhance its quality. Linear filters, such as Gaussian filters, can effectively reduce noise but may blur the image. Nonlinear filters, such as median filters, can preserve edges while reducing noise. Compressive Sensing (CS) Restoration Approaches: Compressive sensing is a signal processing technique that exploits the sparsity of signals or images to reconstruct them from fewer measurements. CS-based restoration methods aim to recover high-quality images from compressed or incomplete measurements. Neural Networks Approaches: With the advancements in deep learning, neural networks have been widely used for image restoration tasks. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and generative adversarial networks (GANs) have shown promising results in restoring degraded images by learning from large datasets.

Result

The paper likely provides a detailed analysis and comparison of these approaches, highlighting their strengths, weaknesses, and performance in different scenarios.

Conclusion

This paper aims to improve the quality of restored images. Several image restoration approaches have been compared, and they have exhibited enhanced performance compared to several existing image restoration approaches.

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/mns/10.2174/0118764029317790240923103651
2024-10-11
2024-11-26

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/mns/10.2174/0118764029317790240923103651
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Esakkirajan S. Veerakumar T. Digital Image Processing Tata McGraw Hill pvt 2009
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Jain A.K. Fundamentals of digital image processing. Prentice-Hall, Inc. 1989
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Gonzalez RC. Woods RE. Digital image processing 2002
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gonzalez R.C. Woods R.E. Eddins S.L. Digital image processing using MATLAB. Pearson Prentice Hall 2004
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Lagendijk R.L. Biemond J. Iterative identification and restoration of images Springer 1991 10.1007/978‑1‑4615‑3980‑3.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bovik A. Huang T. Munson D. Edge-sensitive image restoration using order-constrained least squares methods. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing 1985 33 5 1253 1263 10.1109/TASSP.1985.1164690
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Andrews H.C. Digital lmage Restauafion Englewood Cliffs, NJ Prentice-Hall 1977
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Franklin J.W. “Well Posed Stochastic Extensionsof Ill- Posed Linear Problem,” J. of Mach. Anal. and App. SYS 1970 22 278 286
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bhaskar R. Hite J. Pitts D.E. An iterative frequency-domain technique to reduce image degradation caused by lens defocus and linear motion blur. IGARSS'94. Surface and Atmospheric Remote Sensing: Technologies, Data Analysis and Interpretation. 1994 4 2522 2524 10.1109/IGARSS.1994.399786
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Tekalp A.M. Trussell H.J. Comparative study of some statistical and set-theoretic methods for image restoration. CVGIP Graph. Models Image Process. 1991 53 2 108 120 10.1016/1049‑9652(91)90054‑N
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Reichenbach S.E. Koehler D.E. Strelow D.W. Restoration and reconstruction of AVHRR images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 1995 33 4 997 1007 10.1109/36.406685
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Reichenbach S.E. Li Jing Restoration and reconstruction from overlapping images for multi-image fusion. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2001 39 4 769 780 10.1109/36.917891
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Hunt B.R. The application of constrained least squares estimation to image restoration by digital computer. IEEE Transactions on Computers 1973 805 812 10.1109/TC.1973.5009169
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaufman H. Murat Tekalp A. Survey of estimation techniques in image restoration. IEEE Control Syst. 1991 11 1 16 24 10.1109/37.103345
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Jain Anil K. An operator factorization method for restoration of blurred images. IEEE Transactions on Computers 1977 1061 1071 10.1109/TC.1977.1674752
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Chellappa R. Kashyap R. Digital image restoration using spatial interaction models. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1982 30 3 461 472 10.1109/TASSP.1982.1163911
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Ahmed M.S. Tahboub K. Recursive Wiener filtering for image restoration. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, IEEE International Conference on ICASSP'84 1984 9 10.1109/ICASSP.1984.1172788
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hillery A.D. Chin R.T. Iterative Wiener filters for image restoration. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 1991 39 8 1892 1899 10.1109/78.91161
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Guan L. Ward R.K. Restoration of randomly blurred images by the Wiener filter. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 1989 37 4 589 592 10.1109/29.17544
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Lagendijk R.L. Katsaggelos A.K. Biemond J. Iterative identification and restoration of images International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing New York, NY, USA 1988 992 995 10.1109/ICASSP.1988.196759
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Yeh C.L. Chin R. Error analysis of a class of constrained iterative restoration algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing 1985 33 6 1593 1598
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dikshit S. A recursive Kalman window approach to image restoration. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing IEEE Transactions 1982 125 140 10.1109/TASSP.1982.1163862
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Azimi-Sadjadi   Mahmood R. Wong P.W. Two- dimensional block Kalman filtering for image restoration. Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, IEEE Transactions 1987 1736 1749
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Sheng Y. Xia Z.G. 1996 A comprehensive evaluation of filters for radar speckle suppression. Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Lincoln, NE 1996 1559 1561
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Tan H.S. Denoising of noise speckle in radar image. Thesis, The University of Queensland 2001
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Coupé P. Hellier P. Kervrann C. Barillot C. Nonlocal means-based speckle filtering for ultrasound images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2009 18 2221 2229 10.1109/TIP.2009.2024064
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dong Y. Milne A.K. Forster B. A review of SAR speckle filters: Texture restoration and preservation. Conference: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium 2000 2 633 635 10.1109/IGARSS.2000.861654.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Simard M. Extraction of information and speckle noise reduction in SAR images using the wavelet transform. Sensing and Managing the Environment. IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings. Seattle, WA, USA 1998 4 6 10.1109/IGARSS.1998.702761.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Filip Š. Flusser Š. Multichannel blind deconvolution of the short-exposure astronomical images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000 14 7 874 83 10.1109/TIP.2005.849322.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Sroubek F. Flusser J. Multichannel blind iterative image restoration IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2003 12 1094 1106 10.1109/TIP.2003.815260
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kundur D. Hatzinakos D. Blind image deconvolution. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 1996 13 3 43 64 10.1109/79.489268
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Reeves S. Russell M. Regularization parameter estimation for iterative image restoration in a weighted Hilbert space. Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP-90 1990
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fortier N. Demoment G. Goussard Y. Implementation and practical comparison of two estimators of the smoothing parameter in linear image restoration. International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Albuquerque, NM, USA 1990 4 1905 1908 10.1109/ICASSP.1990.115872
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Angelopoulos G. Pitas I. Multichannel Wiener filters in color image restoration based on AR color image modelling. ICASSP 91: International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Toronto, ON, Canada 1991 4 2517 2520 10.1109/ICASSP.1991.150913
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Dempster A.P. Laird N.M. Rubin D.B. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1977 1 38
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lagendijk R.L. Biemond J. Boekee D.E. Identification and restoration of noisy blurred images using the expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process. 1990 38 7 1180 1191 10.1109/29.57545
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Singh A.K. Singh A.K. Vaishy S.K. Yadav R.S. Image restoration in astronomy.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Poggi G. A Bayesian approach for SAR interferometric phase restoration. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium Proceedings. IGARSS 2000 2000 7
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Rajagopalan A.N. Chaudhuri S. A recursive algorithm for maximum likelihood-based identification of blur from multiple observations. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1998 7 7 1075 1079 10.1109/83.701169 18276324
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kundur D. Hatzinakos D. Blind image restoration via recursive filtering using deterministic constraints. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing Conference Proceedings Atlanta, GA, USA 1996 4 10.1109/ICASSP.1996.547737
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Chuvieco E. Huete A. Fundamentals of satellite remote sensing CRC Press Inc. 2009 10.1201/b18954
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Richards J.A. Richards J.A. Remote sensing digital image analysis. 1999 10.1007/978‑3‑662‑03978‑6
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Arora N. Kalra P. Interactive image restoration using inpainting and denoising. Third National Conference on Computer Vision, Pattern Recognition, Image Processing and Graphics Hubli, Karnataka 2011 219 222 10.1109/NCVPRIPG.2011.54
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu H. Xiong R. Zhang J. Gao W. Image denoising via adaptive soft-thresholding based on non-local samples. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) Boston, MA 2015 484 492 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298646
    [Google Scholar]
  45. de Paiva J.L. Toledo C.F.M. Pedrini H. A hybrid genetic algorithm for image denoising. IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) Sendai 2015 2444 2451 10.1109/CEC.2015.7257188
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Osher S. Burger M. Goldfarb D. Xu J. Yin W. An iterative regularization method for total variation-based image restoration. Multiscale Model. Simul. 2005 4 2 460 489 10.1137/040605412
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Hu Jing. Luo Yu-Pin. Non-local means algorithm with adaptive patch size and bandwidth. Optik 2013 124 22 5639 5645 10.1016/j.ijleo.2013.04.009
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Donoho D.L. De-noising by soft-thresholding. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1995 41 3 613 627 10.1109/18.382009
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Muresan D.D. Parks T.W. Adaptive principal components and image denoising. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing 2003 1 101 104
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Buades A. Coll B. Morel J.M. A non-local algorithm for image denoising. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2005
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Dong W. Li X. Zhang D. Shi G. Sparsity-based image denoising via dictionary learning and structural clustering. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2011 457 464 10.1109/CVPR.2011.5995478
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rudin L.I. Osher S. Fatemi E. Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica D 1992 60 1-4 259 268 10.1016/0167‑2789(92)90242‑F
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sendur L. Selesnick I.W. Bivariate shrinkage functions for wavelet-based denoising exploiting interscale dependency. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2002 50 11 2744 2756 10.1109/TSP.2002.804091
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Beck A. Teboulle M. Fast gradient-based algorithms for constrained total variation image denoising and deblurring problems. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2009 18 11 2419 2434 10.1109/TIP.2009.2028250 19635705
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Chatterjee P. Milanfar P. Clustering-based denoising with locally learned dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2009 18 7 1438 1451 10.1109/TIP.2009.2018575 19447711
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wu X. Zhang X. Wang J. Model-guided adaptive recovery of compressive sensing. Proceedings of IEEE Data Compression Conference 2009 123 132
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kim Y. Nadar M.S. Bilgin A. Compressed sensing using a Gaussian scale mixtures model in wavelet domain. IEEE International Conference on Image Processing Hong Kong, China 2010 3365 3368 10.1109/ICIP.2010.5652744
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lihan He Carin L. Exploiting structure in wavelet-based Bayesian compressive sensing. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 2009 57 9 3488 3497 10.1109/TSP.2009.2022003
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Mun S. Fowler J.E. Block compressed sensing of images using directional transforms IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process 2009 3021 3024
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Chang S.G. Bin Yu Vetterli M. Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2000 9 9 1532 1546 10.1109/83.862633 18262991
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Elad M. Aharon M. Image denoising via sparse and redundant representations over learned dictionaries. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 2006 15 12 3736 3745 10.1109/TIP.2006.881969 17153947
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Mairal J. Bach F. Ponce J. Sapiro G. Zisserman A. Non-local sparse models for image restoration. IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) 2272 2279 2009
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Tomasi C. Manduchi R. Bilateral filtering for grey and colour images. Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision Bombay, India 1998 839 846 10.1109/ICCV.1998.710815
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Gu S. Zhang L. Zuo W. Feng X. Weighted nuclear norm minimization with application to image denoising. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2014 2862 2869 10.1109/CVPR.2014.366
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Mayer M.A. Borsdorf A. Wagner M. Hornegger J. Mardin C.Y. Tornow R.P. Wavelet denoising of multiframe optical coherence tomography data. Biomed. Opt. Express 2012 3 3 572 589 10.1364/BOE.3.000572 22435103
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Zaki F. Wang Y. Su H. Yuan X. Liu X. Noise adaptive wavelet thresholding for speckle noise removal in optical coherence tomography. Biomed. Opt. Express 2017 8 5 2720 2731 10.1364/BOE.8.002720 28663901
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Jian Z. Yu Z. Yu L. Rao B. Chen Z. Tromberg B.J. Speckle attenuation in optical coherence tomography by curvelet shrinkage. Opt. Lett. 2009 34 10 1516 1518 10.1364/OL.34.001516 19448806
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Yu H. Gao J. Li A. Probability-based non-local means filter for speckle noise suppression in optical coherence tomography images. Opt. Lett. 2016 41 5 994 997 10.1364/OL.41.000994 26974099
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Huang S. Tang C. Xu M. Qiu Y. Lei Z. BM3D-based total variation algorithm for speckle removal with structure-preserving in OCT images. Appl. Opt. 2019 58 23 6233 6243 10.1364/AO.58.006233 31503765
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Ramesh C. Venkata R. Murthy KSN. Ramesh C. Image restoration using patch based gaussian distribution distance analysis with PCA correlation factor J. Adv. Res. Dyn. Control Syst. 2018 10 6 843 851
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Ramesh C. Restoration of natural images using iterative global and local adaptive learning scheme. Int J Adv Trends Comp Sci Eng 2020 9 1 128 133 10.30534/ijatcse/2020/20912020.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/mns/10.2174/0118764029317790240923103651
Loading
A Comprehensive Analysis of Traditional and Advanced Approaches of Image Restoration Techniques
Bentham Science Publishers ; https://doi.org/10.2174/0118764029317790240923103651
/content/journals/mns/10.2174/0118764029317790240923103651
/content/journals/mns/10.2174/0118764029317790240923103651
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Research Article
Keywords: MSE ; PSNR ; CNN ; SVD ; TV ; Compressive Sensing

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test