Skip to content
2000
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Current Social Sciences
  4. Fast Track Articles
  5. Fast Track Article
image of Making Sense of STEM Education: An Integration into Higher Education

Abstract

The goal of STEM education is to increase students' capacity to use their knowledge to make the world a better place by encouraging creativity and innovation. STEM education in higher education institutions (HEIs) in India is shaped by the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, the demand for STEM graduates worldwide, and a number of other factors. This article provides practical recommendations for development while examining the state, prospects, trends, and difficulties of STEM education in India's Higher Education Institutions. This study evaluates data from secondary sources, such as articles, reports, and websites, using a mixed-methods methodology. The results show a noteworthy rise in diversity, STEM enrollment, curriculum development, creative pedagogy, research, and innovation. But issues like the demanding nature of STEM programs, prejudices, exorbitant expenses, and the divide between secondary and tertiary education continue to exist. Important suggestions consist of: Increasing Integration: Organize STEM courses according to academic levels and fields. Increasing Exposure: Give students more opportunities to learn about STEM professions and prepare for the workforce. Supporting Resources: Give instructors and students access to sufficient facilities and services. Encouraging Inclusion: Promote gender parity and diversity in STEM disciplines. Building Industry Links: For practical relevance, strengthen industry-academia ties. In conclusion, STEM education in India's higher education institutions has the ability to establish India as a global leader in STEM. It equips students with the opportunities and challenges of the twenty-first century by providing an all-encompassing, interdisciplinary, and creative learning experience.

© 2024 Bentham Science Publishers
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X334286241104051444
2024-11-11
2025-05-05

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X334286241104051444
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Garet M.S. Porter A.C. Desimone L. Birman B.F. Yoon K.S. What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. Am. Educ. Res. J. 2001 38 4 915 945 10.3102/00028312038004915
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Gibbs G. Coffey M. The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learn. High. Educ. 2004 5 1 87 100 10.1177/1469787404040463
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Henderson C. Beach A. Finkelstein N. Facilitating change in undergraduate STEM instructional practices: An analytic review of the literature. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2011 48 8 952 984 10.1002/tea.20439
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Henderson C. Dancy M. Niewiadomska-Bugaj M. Use of research-based instructional strategies in introductory physics: Where do faculty leave the innovation-decision process? Phys. Rev. Spec. Top. Phys. Educ. Res. 2012 8 2 020104 10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.8.020104
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Chesky N.Z. Wolfmeyer M.R. Introduction to STEM education. 2015 Philosophy of STEM Education: A Critical Investigation New York Palgrave Pivot 1 16 10.1057/9781137535467_1
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Amundsen C. Wilson M. Are we asking the right questions? A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education. Rev. Educ. Res. 2012 82 1 90 126 10.3102/0034654312438409
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Lalitha P. Lal M. S. 2022 Employability and modern education. J. Emerg. Technol. Innov. Res. 9 6 g631 g638
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Shukla B. Joshi M. Sujatha R. Beena T. Kumar H. Demystifying Approaches of Holistic and Multidisciplinary Education for Diverse Career Opportunities: NEP 2020. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2022 15 14 603 607 10.17485/IJST/v15i14.2296
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Yenugu S. The new National Education Policy (NEP) of India: Will it be a paradigm shift in Indian higher education? Perspect.: Policy Pract. High. Educ. 2022 26 4 121 129 10.1080/13603108.2022.2078901
    [Google Scholar]
  10. De Meester J. Boeve-de Pauw J. Buyse M.P. Ceuppens S. De Cock M. De Loof H. Goovaerts L. Hellinckx L. Knipprath H. Struyf A. Thibaut L. Van de Velde D. Van Petegem P. Dehaene W. Bridging the Gap between Secondary and Higher STEM Education – the Case of STEM@school. Eur. Rev. 2020 28 S1 S135 S157 10.1017/S1062798720000964
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Yelon S.L. Kevin Ford J. Bhatia S. How trainees transfer what they have learned: Toward a taxonomy of use. Perform. Improv. Q. 2014 27 3 27 52 10.1002/piq.21172
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Desimone L.M. Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educ. Res. 2009 38 3 181 199 10.3102/0013189X08331140
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Seymour E. DeWelde K. Fry C. The Reformers’ Tale: Determining progress in improving undergraduate STEM education. Transforming Institutions Purdue University Press Weaver G.C. Burgess W.D. Childress A.L. Slakey L.S. 441 461 2011 10.2307/j.ctv2x00vcx.37
    [Google Scholar]
  14. National Research Council STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press 2014
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Shaha S.H. Glassett K.F. Ellsworth H. Long-term impact of on-demand professional development on student performance: A longitudinal multi-state study. Journal of International Education Research (JIER) 2015 11 1 29 34 [JIER]. 10.19030/jier.v11i1.9096
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Carlson K. Turvold Celotta D. Curran E. Marcus M. Loe M. Assessing the impact of a multi-disciplinary peer-led-team learning program on undergraduate STEM education. j. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 2016 13 1 10.53761/1.13.1.5
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Denton M. Borrego M. Funds of knowledge in STEM education: A scoping review. Stud. Eng. Educ. 2021 1 2 71 92
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Freeman B. Marginson S. Tytler R. An international view of STEM education. STEM Education 2.0. Brill 2019 350 363 10.1163/9789004405400_019
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Anders Ericsson K. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview. Acad. Emerg. Med. 2008 15 11 988 994 10.1111/j.1553‑2712.2008.00227.x 18778378
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Ebert-May D. Derting T.L. Hodder J. Momsen J.L. Long T.M. Jardeleza S.E. What we say is not what we do: Effective evaluation of faculty professional development programs. Bioscience 2011 61 7 550 558 10.1525/bio.2011.61.7.9
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Fung L. Chow L.P.Y. Congruence of student teachers’ pedagogical images and actual classroom practices. Educ. Res. 2002 44 3 313 321 10.1080/0013188022000031605
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kane R. Sandretto S. Heath C. Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Rev. Educ. Res. 2002 72 2 177 228 10.3102/00346543072002177
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Murray K. Macdonald R. The disjunction between lecturers’ conceptions of teaching and their claimed educational practice. High. Educ. 1997 33 3 331 349 10.1023/A:1002931104852
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stes A. Min-Leliveld M. Gijbels D. Van Petegem P. The impact of instructional development in higher education: The state-of-the-art of the research. Educ. Res. Rev. 2010 5 1 25 49 10.1016/j.edurev.2009.07.001
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Miller S. Pfund C. Pribbenow C.M. Handelsman J. The pipeline. Scientific teaching in practice. Science 2008 322 5906 1329 1330 10.1126/science.1166032 19039122
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Ebert-May D. Derting T.L. Henkel T.P. Middlemis Maher J. Momsen J.L. Arnold B. Passmore H.A. Breaking the cycle: future faculty begin teaching with learner-centered strategies after professional development. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2015 14 2 ar22 , ar22 10.1187/cbe.14‑12‑0222 26033870
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Maher J.M. Markey J.C. Ebert-May D. The other half of the story: effect size analysis in quantitative research. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2013 12 3 345 351 10.1187/cbe.13‑04‑0082 24006382
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Montgomery C. Fernández-Cárdenas J.M. Teaching STEM education through dialogue and transformative learning: global significance and local interactions in Mexico and the UK. J. Educ. Teach. 2018 44 1 2 13 10.1080/02607476.2018.1422606
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Buturlina O. Dovhal S. Hryhorov H. Lysokolenko T. Palahuta V. STEM Education in Ukraine in the Context of Sustainable Development. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2021 10 1 323 323 10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n1p323
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Postareff L. Lindblom-Ylänne S. Nevgi A. The effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2007 23 5 557 571 10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.013
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Fletcher S.S. Luft J.A. Early career secondary science teachers: A longitudinal study of beliefs in relation to field experiences. Sci. Educ. 2011 95 6 1124 1146
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Addy T.M. Blanchard M.R. The Problem with Reform from the Bottom up: Instructional practises and teacher beliefs of graduate teaching assistants following a reform‐minded university teacher certificate programme. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2010 32 8 1045 1071 10.1080/09500690902948060
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lizzio A. Wilson K. Simons R. University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Stud. High. Educ. 2002 27 1 27 52 10.1080/03075070120099359
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Sarukkai S. Challenges for STEM education in India. International Science and Technology Education 1st ed Routledge Renn O. Karafyllis N. Hohlt A. Taube D. 2015
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ravi R.V. STEM in higher education: Applications, objectives and challenges. Best Practices Of Research And Innovation In Steam Higher Education A Step Forward To glorify Sustainable Development Goals Through Indian Knowledge System Chennai, India, 9-10 March 2023, pp. 1-160.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Freeman S. Eddy S.L. McDonough M. Smith M.K. Okoroafor N. Jordt H. Wenderoth M.P. Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014 111 23 8410 8415 10.1073/pnas.1319030111 24821756
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Deák C. Kumar B. Szabó I. Nagy G. Szentesi S. Evolution of new approaches in pedagogy and STEM with inquiry-based learning and post-pandemic scenarios. Educ. Sci. (Basel) 2021 11 7 319 10.3390/educsci11070319
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Donna J.D. A Model for Professional Development to Promote Engineering Design as an Integrative Pedagogy within STEM Education J. Pre-Coll. Eng. Educ. Res. 2 2 2012 10.5703/1288284314866
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Kyere J. 2017 The effectiveness of hands-on pedagogy in STEM education Doctor of Philosophy, Walden University
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Worldwide: Savery J.R. Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdiscip. J. Probl. Based Learn. 2006 1 1 9 10.7771/1541‑5015.1002
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Sharma A. Verma R. Problem-based learning (PBL) as an effective teaching strategy in engineering education: A review Int. J. Eng. Pedagog. 9 3 51 59 2019
    [Google Scholar]
  42. A review of research on project-based learning. 200- Available from: https://tecfa.unige.ch/proj/eteach-net/Thomas_researchreview_PBL.pdf
  43. Mohanty C.R. Acharya P. 2019 Project-based learning: An innovative approach to teaching. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res. Technol. 4 1 249 254
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Worldwide: Bishop J.L. Verleger M.A. Worldwide: Bishop J. L. Verleger M. A. The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. 120th ASEE National Conference Proceedings Atlanta, GA, 23-26 June, 2013, pp. 1-18. 10.18260/1‑2‑‑22585
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Varshneya G. 2016 Flipped classroom teaching model: A study in India. J. Educ. Pract. 7 3 64 69
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Inquiry-based learning: A review of the research literature. 2013 Available from: https://galileo.org/focus-on-inquiry-lit-review.pdf
  47. Khan M.S. Hariprasad R. 2019 Inquiry-based learning (IBL): An Indian perspective. Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol. 12 2 175 183
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Worldwide: Chittaro L. Computer-supported simulation in engineering education: Trends and issues. IEEE Trans. Educ. 2008 51 4 457 464
    [Google Scholar]
  49. 2016 Virtual laboratories: Current trends, advantages, and challenges. Int. J. Res. Anal. Rev. 1 3 51 55
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Deterding S. Dixon D. Khaled R. Nacke L. From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments Tampere, Finland, Sep. 28 - 30, 2011, pp. 9-15.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Dicheva D. Dichev C. Agre G. Angelova G. 2019 Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educ. Technol.Soc. 18 3 75 88
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Thomas B. Watters J.J. Perspectives on Australian, Indian and Malaysian approaches to STEM education. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2015 45 42 53 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.08.002
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Momsen J.L. Long T.M. Wyse S.A. Ebert-May D. Just the facts? Introductory undergraduate biology courses focus on low-level cognitive skills. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2010 9 4 435 440 10.1187/cbe.10‑01‑0001 21123690
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Wiltsey Stirman S. Kimberly J. Cook N. Calloway A. Castro F. Charns M. The sustainability of new programs and innovations: a review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implement. Sci. 2012 7 1 17 10.1186/1748‑5908‑7‑17 22417162
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Walczyk J.J. Ramsey L.L. Zha P. Obstacles to instructional innovation according to college science and mathematics faculty. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2007 44 1 85 106 10.1002/tea.20119
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Austin A.E. 2011 Promoting evidence-based change in undergraduate science education. American Association for the Advancement of Science 2013 Annual Meeting Michigan, March 1, 2011, pp. 1-25.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Brownell S.E. Tanner K.D. Barriers to faculty pedagogical change: lack of training, time, incentives, and...tensions with professional identity? CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2012 11 4 339 346 10.1187/cbe.12‑09‑0163 23222828
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Alsmadi M.A. Requirements for Application of the STEM Approach as Perceived by Science, Math and Computer Teachers and their Attitudes towards it. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2020 16 9 em1879 10.29333/ejmste/8391
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Sheth M.M. Pathak R. Stem education: An interdisciplinary and integrated approach of teaching. Interdisciplinary Approaches and Strategies for Sustainable Development S. M. Joshi College Hadapsar Pune Mundhe E. Santha R.S. 80 86
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Baron J.B.E. Sternberg R.J. Teaching Thinking Skills: Theory and Practice. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co. 1987
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Bybee R.W. The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities NSTA Press Verginia 2013
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Çarkıt C. Özenç M. Assessment of 4th Grade Students’ Problem-Solving Skills in Terms of Various Variables. Educational Policy Analysis and Strategic Research 2021 16 2 313 329 10.29329/epasr.2020.345.14
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Chivapruk A. Narkpongphun A. Efficacy of structured home program to improve motor coordination in elementary school children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J. Psychiatr. Assoc. Thailand 2021 66 2 123 140
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Bansode S.P. A STUDY OF INDIAN AGRICULTURE AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. DR. EKNATH MUNDHE Professor, Rayat Shikshan Sanstha’s. SM Joshi College Hadapsar, Pune 2023 411028 72
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Mundhe E. INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH PATHWAY OF NATIONAL EDUCATION POLICY 2023 2020 [NEP]. 10.5281/zenodo.7676230
    [Google Scholar]
  66. LaForce M. Noble E. King H. Century J. Blackwell C. Holt S. Ibrahim A. Loo S. The eight essential elements of inclusive STEM high schools. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2016 3 1 21 10.1186/s40594‑016‑0054‑z
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Papadakis S. IoT, AI, and ICT for Educational Applications: Technologies to Enable Education for All. Springer Cham 2024 10.1007/978‑3‑031‑50139‑5
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Kelley T.R. Knowles J.G. A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. Int. J. STEM Educ. 2016 3 1 11 10.1186/s40594‑016‑0046‑z
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Srivastava R. Probing into the Rise of Fintechs in India. Jus Corpus LJ 2022 3 856
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Liu Z.Y. Chubarkova E. Kharakhordina M. Online technologies in STEM education. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. 2020 15 15 20 32 [iJET]. 10.3991/ijet.v15i15.14677
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Mateos-Núñez M. Martínez-Borreguero G. Naranjo-Correa F.L. Learning science in primary education with STEM workshops: analysis of teaching effectiveness from a cognitive and emotional perspective. Sustainability (Basel) 2020 12 8 3095 10.3390/su12083095
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Mishra D.P. Scientific Literacy: To days Necessity. J. Humanist. Educ. Dev. 2022 4 1 39- 42 [IJHED]. 10.22161/jhed.4.1.5
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Salic-Hairulla M.A. Utilization of ICT-integrated STEM lessons on biodiversity for grade 8 learners. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021 1835 1 012074 [). IOP Publishing.]. 10.1088/1742‑6596/1835/1/012074
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Application of problem-based learning in higher education in soil and climate change studies in Sub-Saharan Africa. 2022 Available from: https://unlimited.hamk.fi/ammatillinen-osaaminen-ja-opetus/application-of-problem-based-learning-in-higher-education-in-soil-and-climate-change-studies-in-sub-sahara-africa/
  75. Nguyen T. Phung V. Nguyen Q. Hoang P. Designing and organizing STEM education topics for middle and high school students. Ho Chi Minh City University of Education Publishing House 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  76. National Science Board (US) A National Action Plan for Addressing the Critical Needs of the U.S. Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education System National Science Foundation Arlington, VA 2007
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Webb D. STEM Lesson Essentials, Grades 3-8: integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Teach. Educ. Pract. 2013 26 2 358 364
    [Google Scholar]
  78. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine 2018 Graduate STEM Education for the 21st Century Washington The National Academies Press 10.17226/25038
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Kalogiannakis M. Papadakis S. The use of developmentally mobile applications for preparing pre-service teachers to promote STEM activities in preschool classrooms. Research anthology on early childhood development and school transition in the Digital Era. IGI Global 2023 1095 1113
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X334286241104051444
Loading
Making Sense of STEM Education: An Integration into Higher Education
Bentham Science Publishers ; https://doi.org/10.2174/012772316X334286241104051444
/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X334286241104051444
/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X334286241104051444
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:     Review Article
Keywords: higher education institutions ; interdisciplinary ; STEM education ; multidisciplinary ; Global market ; pedagogy
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test