Skip to content
2000
Volume 2, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2772-316X
  • E-ISSN: 2772-3178

Abstract

Background

Two interests come together in this article, both from the perspectives of teachers and students from the Department of English Studies at Mohamed First University, Morocco. One is the extent to which Task-Based Learning (TBL) can inform educational technology. The other related issue is the need to capitalise on the interactive connectivity of online learning in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic so as to reconsider the teacher-fronted classes that have long dominated higher education. It is noticed that the sudden shift into online learning has been accompanied by a respective perpetuation of the lecturing style; in-class lecture notes were transferred into PDF documents to be downloaded and memorized by students.

Methods

After reviewing the relevant literature, we carried out a curriculum observation of the university’s e-learning platform, where professors and students of the English department undertook all their instructional and learning activities. In parallel, two questionnaires were administered. One questionnaire was addressed to (18) professors, and the other one targeted (155) students. In their totality, the contents of the questionnaires aim to investigate the participants’ perceptions of the unexpected move to e-learning, including questions of affordability, usability and methodology of presentation and application. The resultant quantitative data were used to test the major hypothesis that online instruction in the present context lacks a methodological framework that organizes the process of presenting and practising the assigned contents on the university’s e-learning platform.

Results

While results come as a mixture of the encouraging, the discouraging and, occasionally, the puzzling, teacher-centeredness is certainly the unchanged aspect of this online transitioning. With the absence of a methodological framework that informs online instruction, both students and teachers are found to miss the interactive prospects afforded by the existing e-learning platform. Thus, there is an imperative to reconsider the lecturing style and teacher-centredness in post-pandemic higher education in Morocco.

Conclusion

Technology-mediated TBL methodology is proposed as a working alternative to the lecturing style dominant in the e-learning platform in the case under research and in similar universities elsewhere.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X264099231227114647
2024-01-25
2024-11-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. WillisJ. Task-based learning: What kind of adventure?Lang. Teach.1998722
    [Google Scholar]
  2. EllisR. Task-based Language Learning and Teaching.Oxford, New YorkOxford Applied Linguistics2003
    [Google Scholar]
  3. EllisR. Introducing task-based language teaching.Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press201910.1017/9781108643689
    [Google Scholar]
  4. UrP. 100 Teaching tips.CambridgeCambridge University Press2016
    [Google Scholar]
  5. EllisR. Introducing task-based language teaching.Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press201910.1017/9781108643689
    [Google Scholar]
  6. LewisM. ReindersH. New ways in teaching adults.Alexandria, VirginiaTESOL Press2015
    [Google Scholar]
  7. LiuJ. BergerC.M. TESOL: A guide.London, New YorkBloomsbury201510.5040/9781474217675
    [Google Scholar]
  8. ReindersH. Technology and second language teacher education.The Cambridge Guide to second language teacher education. BurnsA. RichardsJ.C. CambridgeCambridge University Press200923023710.1017/9781139042710.030
    [Google Scholar]
  9. TESOL English Language BulletinHere’s what Gen Z teachers around the world want in their jobs.A2020Available from https://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/teaching_now/2020/01/heres_what_gen_z_teachers_around_the_world_want.html
    [Google Scholar]
  10. PapadakisS. KiвA.Ю. KravtsovH.M. Revolutionizing education: Using computer simulation and cloud-based smart technology to facilitate successful open learning.CEUR Workshop Proc.2023335811810.31812/123456789/7375
    [Google Scholar]
  11. ZyngierD. (Re)conceptualising student engagement: Doing education not doing time.Teach. Teach. Educ.20082471765177610.1016/j.tate.2007.09.004
    [Google Scholar]
  12. ThomasM. ReindersH. Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching with Technology.LondonContinuum2010
    [Google Scholar]
  13. WahlL. DuffieldJ. Using flexible technology to meet the needs of diverse learners: What teachers can do. Wested.2005Available from: https://www.wested.org/online_pubs/kn-05-01.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  14. ChapelleC. Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition.CambridgeCUP200110.1017/CBO9781139524681
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cambridge papers in ELT. Using mobile devices in the language classroom.2018Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/elt/blog/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Whitepaper-mobiles-in-class.pdf
  16. EvansM. Foreign Language Learning with Digital Technology.LondonContinuum2009
    [Google Scholar]
  17. ArnoldN. Reducing foreign language communication apprehension with computer-mediated communication: A preliminary study.System200735446948610.1016/j.system.2007.07.002
    [Google Scholar]
  18. KungW.T. EslamiZ. Learners of different language proficiency levels and incidentals focus on form in synchronous text-based discussion.In; Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications.ED. Information Resources Management Association201910.4018/978‑1‑5225‑7663‑1.ch072
    [Google Scholar]
  19. NorrisJ.M. Task‐Based Teaching and Testing.In: Long MH, Doughty CJ, Eds. The Handbook of Language Teaching. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 200910.1002/9781444315783.ch30
    [Google Scholar]
  20. SamudaV. BygateM. Tasks in Second Language Learning.Palgrave Macmillan200810.1057/9780230596429
    [Google Scholar]
  21. BrandenV. Task-Based Language Education; From Theory to Practice.Cambridge University Press200610.1017/CBO9780511667282
    [Google Scholar]
  22. González-LloretM. OrtegaL. Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks.Amsterdam, PhiladelphiaJohn Benjamins Publishing Company2014
    [Google Scholar]
  23. LantolfJ.P. Sociocultural theory and second and foreign language learning: an overview of sociocultural theory.New insights into foreign language learning and teaching.Frankfurt am MainPeter Lang20041384
    [Google Scholar]
  24. LantolfJ.P. ThorneS.L. Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development.Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press2013
    [Google Scholar]
  25. QinT. Introduction to Sociocultural Theory in Second Language Acquisition.BeijingPeking University Press2017
    [Google Scholar]
  26. ThorneK. Blended Learning How to Integrate Online & Traditional Learning.LondonKogan Page2003
    [Google Scholar]
  27. HowardS.K. MozejkoA. Teachers: technology, change and resistance.Teaching and Digital Technologies: Big Issues and Critical Questions.Port Melbourne, AustraliaCambridge University Press201530731710.1017/CBO9781316091968.030
    [Google Scholar]
  28. HowardS.K. Risk-aversion: understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration.Technol. Pedagogy Educ.2013223357372http://:blogs.edweek.org/teachers/teaching_now/2020/01/heres_what_gen_z_teachers_around_the_world_want.html10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995
    [Google Scholar]
  29. GläselA. 2018https://medium.com/the-edtech-world/resistance-tech-classrooms-981b86d862fc
  30. HealeyD. Technology Enhanced Learning Environments.Teaching and Technology201810.1002/9781118784235.eelt0437
    [Google Scholar]
  31. IsnawatiI. Students’ Views On The Use Of Book And Web-Based Materials For Their Elt Classes: A Study On Ict-Based Education.Indonesian Context. KnE Social Sciences201710.18502/kss.v1i3.730
    [Google Scholar]
  32. LaiC. LiG. Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review.CALICO J.201128249852110.11139/cj.28.2.498‑521
    [Google Scholar]
  33. ChenX. A literature review of task-based language teaching in college reading comprehension - exploration of tasks design to foster reading strategies.International Journal of English Language Teaching20185390106
    [Google Scholar]
  34. HickmanL.A. NeubertS. ReichK. John Dewey: Between Pragmatism and Constructivism.New YorkFordham University Press200910.5422/fso/9780823230181.001.0001
    [Google Scholar]
  35. SinghE. Learning theory and online technologies.Open Learn.2014291899210.1080/02680513.2013.864550
    [Google Scholar]
  36. BervellB. UmarI.N. KamilinM.F. Towards a model for online learning satisfaction (MOLS): re-considering non-linear relationships among personal innovativeness and modes of online interaction.Open Learn.201910.1080/02680513.2019.1662776
    [Google Scholar]
  37. RodriguezB.C.P. ArmelliniA. NietoM.C.R. Learner engagement, retention and success: why size matters in massive open online courses (MOOCs).Open Learn.201910.1080/02680513.2019.1665503
    [Google Scholar]
  38. BlackmoreC. TantamD. DeurzenE. Evaluation of e‐learning outcomes: experience from an online psychotherapy education programme.Open Learn.200823318520110.1080/02680510802420027
    [Google Scholar]
  39. BarberàE. Gómez-ReyP. Fernández-NavarroF. A cross-national study of teacher’s perceptions of online learning success.Open Learn.2016311254110.1080/02680513.2016.1151350
    [Google Scholar]
  40. UllahO. KhanW. KhanA. Students’ attitude towards online learning at tertiary level.UTAJ-Humanities and Social Sciences20172512
    [Google Scholar]
  41. MehraV. OmidianF. Examining Students’ Attitudes towards Online learning: A Case from India.Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology20111121318
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Adewole-OdeshiE. 2014http://digitalcommons. unl.edu/libphilprac/1035
  43. GriffinL. RoyJ. A great resource that should be utilised more, but also a place of anxiety: student perspectives on using an online discussion forum.Open Learn.201910.1080/02680513.2019.1644159
    [Google Scholar]
  44. MoreillonJ. Increasing Interactivity in the Online Learning Environment: Using Digital Tools to Support Students in Socially Constructed Meaning-Making.TechTrends2015593414710.1007/s11528‑015‑0851‑0
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Yamagata-LynchL.C. DoJ. SkutnikA.L. ThompsonD.J. StephensA.F. TaysC.A. Design lessons about participatory self-directed online learning in a graduate-level instructional technology course.Open Learn.201530217818910.1080/02680513.2015.1071244
    [Google Scholar]
  46. KimJ. 2020https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/blogs/learning-innovation/teaching-and-learning-after-covid-19
  47. AllenJ. How Technological Innovation In Education Is Taking On COVID-192020https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeanneallen/2020/03/13/how-technological-innovation-in-education-is-taking-on-covid-19/#6bf0f5147bc7
    [Google Scholar]
  48. KandriS. 2020https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/05/how-covid-19-is-sparking-a-revolution-in-higher-education/
  49. DennisM. How will higher education have changed after COVID-19?2020https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20200324065639773
    [Google Scholar]
  50. MackenzieS LuthraP 2020https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/4-ways-covid-19-education-future-generations/
  51. JahnkeA. 2020http://www.bu.edu/articles/2020/covid-19-recovery-plan/
/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X264099231227114647
Loading
/content/journals/css/10.2174/012772316X264099231227114647
Loading

Data & Media loading...


  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): COVID-19; e-learning; online learning; TBL; teachers-centredness; technology-mediated
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test