Skip to content
2000
Volume 8, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1574-888X
  • E-ISSN: 2212-3946

Abstract

Background: In the absence of a gold standard for hematopoietic progenitor counting, the intra-laboratory variation between commonly used strategies for progenitor assessment was compared. Methods and Materials: We used a pool of FITC-conjugated monoclonal antibodies (CD14, CD11b) and PE-CD34 to facilitate CD34 counting, excluding CD14+/CD11b+ bright cells. We compared this protocol with other common methodologies, such as the single-staining approach, known as the Milan method, and the ISHAGE multiparameter method. Results: We show that the CD14/CD11b protocol is a valid approach to progenitor cell counting. Though different methods give different results for progenitor cell counting, Lin's coefficient shows high concordance among flow cytometry counts but a substantial difference with colony- forming unit counts. Both the ISHAGE and CD14/CD11b protocol give higher counts than the Milan method. Moreover, on revising the ISHAGE analysis, we described a rare population of cells with the CD34+CD45neg phenotype, which could have an impact in CD34 counting. Conclusions: We have designed a valid alternative approach for hematopoietic progenitor cell counting, and we show that different methods give different results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cscr/10.2174/157488813805219785
2013-03-01
2025-01-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cscr/10.2174/157488813805219785
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test