Skip to content
2000
  • ISSN: 1568-010X
  • E-ISSN: 1568-010X

Abstract

In the last decades several preclinical models for sepsis have been used to study the pathophysiologic processes during sepsis. Although these studies revealed promising immunomodulating agents for the treatment of sepsis, clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of these new agents in septic patients were disappointing. It should be realized that most of the preclinical models for sepsis lack a localized infectious source from which the infection disseminates. Studies on the effects of several immunomodulating strategies have demonstrated strikingly opposite results when using models for sepsis with a more natural route of infection, such as pneumonia, and when using models for sepsis lacking an infectious focus. In this review we will compare models for sepsis and models for pneumonia. We advise to use a combination of models, including models for sepsis and models for localized infections, to test new immunomodulating strategies before starting any clinical trial evaluating a new immunomodulating therapy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cdtia/10.2174/1568010043483962
2004-03-01
2025-07-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cdtia/10.2174/1568010043483962
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Review Article
Keyword(s): cytokines; immunomodulation; innate immunity; pneumonia; sepsis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test