Skip to content
2000
Volume 15, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 1574-8847
  • E-ISSN: 2212-3938

Abstract

Background: Several drugs are used for treating IgA nephropathy (IgAN). We carried out a network meta-analysis evaluating these drugs. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for appropriate randomized clinical trials carried out in patients with IgAN. The primary outcome was proteinuria remission rates and there were several other secondary outcome measures. The risk of bias was assessed. Mixed treatment comparison estimates were modelled from direct and indirect comparison estimates. Grading of the evidence for key comparisons was carried out. Results: Fifty-seven clinical trials were included in the systematic review and 51 in the metaanalysis. Polyunsaturated fatty acids, corticosteroids/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), ARB, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), ARB/ACEI, corticosteroids/ACEI and hypolipidemics/ ARB were observed with significantly higher rates of proteinuria remission than the standard of care. Several benefits were observed with other drugs on the secondary outcome measures. A very low grade was observed for the interventions. Conclusion: We observed a few interventions to perform better in the management of IgAN. The results of this study will aid in further evaluation of such drugs that may assist in saving the resources and time. However, the readers should interpret the findings with great caution as the results might change with the advent of future head-to-head clinical trials.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/ccp/10.2174/1574884715666191223103914
2020-08-01
2025-07-10
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/ccp/10.2174/1574884715666191223103914
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test