Skip to content
2000
Volume 5, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 1574-8936
  • E-ISSN: 2212-392X

Abstract

Copy number alterations (CNA) in genomic DNA are linked to a variety of human diseases. Although many methods have been developed to analyze data from a single subject, disease-critical genes are more likely to be found in regions that are common or recurrent among diseased subjects. Unfortunately, finding recurrent CNA regions remains a challenge. We review existing methods for the identification of recurrent CNA regions. Methods differ in their working definition of “recurrent region”, the type of input data, the statistical and computational methods used to identify recurrence, and the biological considerations they incorporate (which play a role in the identification of “interesting” regions and in the details of null models used to assess statistical significance). Very few approaches use and/or return probabilities, and code is not easily available for several methods. We emphasize that, when analyzing data from complex diseases with significant among-subject heterogeneity, methods should be able to identify CNAs that affect only a subset of subjects. We suggest that finding recurrent CNAs would benefit from clearly specifying the types of pattern to be detected and the intended usage of the regions found (CNA association with disease, CNA effects on gene expression, clustering of subjects). We finish with suggestions for further methodological research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/cbio/10.2174/157489310790596402
2010-03-01
2025-05-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/cbio/10.2174/157489310790596402
Loading

  • Article Type:
    Research Article
Keyword(s): aCGH; common regions; copy number alterations; recurrent
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test